September 07, 2015

WATCH: Are you smarter than a 5th grader (when it comes to Ontario's new sex-ed lessons)?

Jason & MattRebel Commentators

As students get ready to head back to school, the Ontario government has launched a series of public service announcements to promote the controversial new sex-ed curriculum.

As part of the curriculum, 5th graders will be taught to identify parts of the reproductive system.

This inspired me to head out to the streets of Toronto, diagrams in hand, to quiz random adults to see how many of them were able to do so.

Watch as random (uncomfortable) adults play "Are you smarter than a 5th grader . . . who has been educated by the new Ontario sexual education curriculum?" and you'll see that no matter how old you are, when the topic is sex, there will always be giggling.


Ontario’s sex-ed curriculum sexualizes young children, undermines parental authority and imposes the government's morality on every Ontario family.

JOIN for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.

VISIT our NEW group blog The Megaphone!
It’s your one-stop shop for rebellious commentary from independent and fearless readers and writers.


You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2015-09-29 10:39:16 -0400
Joan Abernathy, parental objection has never been about teaching basic anatomy or the biology of reproduction. Schools have been doing that for years. This new curriculum is promoting the ideology of deviant sexual practices that are contrary to the moral and religious values of many parents.
commented 2015-09-08 20:20:16 -0400
Cathy Rochford and Yvette Mozol. Very well said, both of you. It can’t be said loud enough or often enough how inappropriate and unnecessary the pornographic s/ed curriculum is for underage students. I say, in my opinion, Kathleen Wynne should be incarcerated along with Ben Levin. Wynne is the one imposing it against parents’ wishes which to me is an abuse of power. This has to be the most amoral government in Canadian history.
commented 2015-09-07 23:43:11 -0400
I sent the following to some big shots at the CBC. On the cc, I asked them to fact check what I wrote. The addresses may be handy for you guys in the future.
Fin Donnelly was on Power and Politics today. So was the story on the two Conservative candidates who were kicked out. I have been calling the CBC a left wing propaganda machine for a long time now. Let me point out some facts that occurred today that justifies my wanting of our, yes OUR, 1.1 BILLION dollars to stop going to the CBC.

- Fin Donnelley was interviewed alone with nobody to argue against what he said. I am so upset that from now on I will be referring to Fin Donnelly as “Lying Prick”. With no counter comments, the lying prick had it easy.
- The first question asked to him by the lady was “OK tell us your story”. How convenient for the lying prick.
- To the CBC’s lady’s credit. She played a video from a few days ago which completely contradict what the lying prick was saying today, Only the lying prick commented. Even a two cent lawyer like Mulcair would have been able to expose the lying prick’s lies.
- The lying pricks interview was the shortest of the day. The report on the two Conservatives was much longer.
- Later on that show, they have the Power Panel. it is where experts comment on the days events ( the one with helium head Rob Silver and flaming Ian Dipstick). Not one mention of the lying prick. IS THE CBC LEFT WING. God no
- Guess which topic was discussed the most. Yes, the two conservative candidates who did something three years ago. WHEN THEY WERE NOT CANDIDATES.
Why is a French citizen running to be Canada’s Prime Minister. Not newsworthy.
In Disgust
Alex Armutlu
Someone who is going to try very hard to KILL THE CBC!! KILL THE CBC!!
commented 2015-09-07 22:27:38 -0400
Cathy Rochford……You’re spot on with your assessment of this sex ed curriculum. There is nothing wrong with learning about the anatomy, but sure as hell there is absolutely no reason for elementary & junior high students to learn about anal sex & masturbation, etc if that is indeed what they intend to teach. When it comes to high school students most today are pretty sophisticated & are quite knowledgeable about those topics already (innocence has gone all to hell today….sad to say) & having said that, they certainly don’t need to be listening & looking at this smut either. Kids today don’t know how to write (other than maybe sign their name), can’t do math without a gadget of some kind, know mostly nothing about the history of their country or current events,, but boy it sure is important they learn about anal sex.
commented 2015-09-07 14:54:53 -0400
This report only showed one part of this sex ed regarding the human reproductive system which has always been part of the school’s curriculum. This report is shoddy and a total lie. This is not what people are upset about. Talking to kids about anal sex, gay lifestyles, transgender, bisexual, etc, masturbation and all the other sexually explicit material is what people are upset about. Most gay people are confused regarding their lifestyles and transgender crap and the gestapo lesbian Wynne is loading this garbage onto small children expecting them to learn something. Learn what? How screwed up the world around them is, confuse their small impressionable minds, which is grooming them to be something they aren’t. This agenda would be fine in a gay school for gay children. Open a gay school, put this agenda there and leave the other 95% of children out of this.
commented 2015-09-07 13:12:08 -0400
Jason – This is a nice tasteful skit that makes the point that most adults do not have the knowledge required to adequately teach 10- and 11-year old students sexual anatomy as required by the Ontario curriculum. And as is now the law. Thanks for that.
commented 2015-09-07 10:52:48 -0400
I have question the logic of attempting to prove adults in the TO core are more intelligent than a child – the answer is so obvious the effort is redundant. Oh I see this is done for entertainment value, well sorry I do not find humor in confusing the mentally challenged.