July 21, 2016

VIDEO: Attempted CHEMICAL WEAPONS attack at US Walmart

Victor LaszloRebel Commentator
 

It is interesting that the news focused on mental health and crime as opposed to what it most likely is: Islamic jihad.

What is the potential gain for a criminal to make a bomb in a store and detonate it? 

Why go from clean shaven — as in the prison photos — to a mustache-less beard similar to that worn in the orthodox, Wahhabi or Salafist sect of Islam?

How can a person, thought to be legally insane, research how to make a deadly weapon and then go to a store and correctly assemble it all in a manner that would have caused great harm to all present had he been able to complete it?

This was jihad.

 

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-07-22 08:22:38 -0400
Stephen, Muslims are automatically mentally disturbed. Anyone who claims to be a follower of Islam is crazy and thus would never be prosecuted in a court of law simply because they can claim insanity.
It would be a great waste of taxpayers’ money and besides the powers that be, our politicians, would never want to offend Islam.

DJBT and STPC
commented 2016-07-21 19:09:51 -0400
Why is it that any time anyone tries to do a terrorist attack, or succeeds at doing a terrorist attack the person is considered as having a mental problem, disturbed, or unstable. Maybe its just the way they are and it has to do with what they believe.

He has a criminal past and served time. Could be that he converted while incarcerated and that this is his attempt at jihad.

No, no! What could I possibly be thinking? It was “a mental problem, disturbed, or unstable”. Yea. That is the only possible reason for him to do something like this. Right. Just as I have ocean front land for sale in Saskatchewan.
commented 2016-07-21 15:23:49 -0400
Charles Moulton wrote «Plus Rebel you shouldn’t be taken down posts.»

They should remove commercial spam, which that message clearly was.
commented 2016-07-21 13:31:04 -0400
The Walmart lunatic is never going to change, he is a life time criminal and terrorist, (yet to be absolutely proven), Islamic terrorist. We all know where this comes from. Should this guy go back to prison to mix amongst the others? Shouldn’t it be considered, that all who attempt to convert other inmates to Islam should be put into solitary confinement, separate at all times from the prison’s general public.
commented 2016-07-21 12:57:58 -0400
Very frightening!! Just don’t understand this politically correct paralysis in Canada and the U.S., refusing to see what is happening, so afraid of offending someone. Getting dangerous. A lot of people are saying Trump will be dangerous…..not nearly as dangerous as the U.S. with Obama in the white house. Get him OUT!!!
commented 2016-07-21 12:46:04 -0400
If spam is not dealt with and deleted quickly what do you think will happen to our comment section? I appreciate Victor’s quick intervention.
If you don’t want your comment to look out of place, don’t respond to spam.

Regarding the Walmart incident, as we see more of this kind of thing I wonder how on earth we can protect ourselves. How do we stop Muslims from converting convicts or anyone else to this evil agenda. Separate prisons for Muslims? They should be sent to Guantanamo.
commented 2016-07-21 12:01:32 -0400
That should read “Since 9/11 – IN THE NAME OF ISLAM: 31,370 Attacks, 199,219 Killed, 279,650 Injured.”
commented 2016-07-21 11:56:57 -0400
Charles Moulton commented 33 mins ago
I see the Rebel took off Helen Marks post.

Thanks for making look like I am talking to myself.

Plus Rebel you shouldn’t be taken down posts. That kinda looks like you are scanning the posts and are starting to remove posts you don’t agree with. Or your site has been hacked.

Your comment reads like you are supporting an internet troll. Your closing comment is fucking stupid.
commented 2016-07-21 11:56:44 -0400
Since 9/11 – IN THE NAME OF ISLAM: 31,370 Attacks, 199,219 Killed, 267,650 Injured.
commented 2016-07-21 11:35:11 -0400
@charles Moulton:

This was not the Rebel, this was I who took down her comment. It was an insulting off topic advert to sell voodoo. I do not take down posts which I don’t agree with, insult me or otherwise rub the other way. But as this was spam, I felt it best to remove it as it isn’t a freedom of speech issue so much as a cleaning of bot made spam.
Sorry that it made your post look out of place. I didn’t realize it was here when I removed the former. This was me, NOT the Rebel. I have no idea what they would have done if anything. But again, this wasn’t censorship it was removing automated spam that was abusing this forum for commercial purposes.
commented 2016-07-21 11:23:20 -0400
I see the Rebel took off Helen Marks post.

Thanks for making look like I am talking to myself.

Plus Rebel you shouldn’t be taken down posts. That kinda looks like you are scanning the posts and are starting to remove posts you don’t agree with. Or your site has been hacked.
commented 2016-07-21 11:16:03 -0400
@helen Marks, Thank you for your inspired life story, and I am glad everything worked out for you.

But please don’t sell this type of crap on the Rebel. We are not a bunch of lefties that are easily brainwashed. Here at the Rebel we are Conserative minded and we believe in hard work and doing pretty much everything for ourselves.

Now if you want to think like we do, please join the conversation and add some input, but don’t sell your fortune telling crap here.

Thank you and take care.