September 20, 2016

Because “abortion”: Trudeau’s latest defense of gender segregated mosque visit

Brian LilleyRebel Co-Founder

It was strange enough to see self-proclaimed feminist Justin Trudeau attend a gender-segregated mosque and justify it on the basis of “diversity” and now pressed again by Bloc Quebecois MP’s, the Liberals have taken it to absurdity.

Watch as Liberal Minister for the Status of Women, Patricia Hajdu, tries to justify their willingness to ignore the blatant unequal treatment of women Trudeau witnessed in that mosque.

It’s bizarre to say the least for the Liberals to say “because abortion”, therefore we can ignore brazen lack of regard for the fundamental Canadian value of equality between men and women.

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-09-22 16:08:46 -0400
two faced , lame and fake and……………………………………. trustworthy ????
commented 2016-09-21 19:21:23 -0400
Can we get a true definition of what a Feminist is? Turdeau’s definition confuses me, he definition seems to be whatever the flavour of the day is and who is audience is. I am weary of Turdeaus drama he takes with him every place he shows up in public and his mouth and brain should go through some electroshock treatment, you think that might help?
commented 2016-09-21 15:18:37 -0400
Oh, and great job Brian. Thks for bringing this to our attention. I think I’ll go post it on The Agenda, along with Ezra’s 300k milestone LOL!!
commented 2016-09-21 15:02:41 -0400
Brian. I’m not so sure she meant abortion when she used the phrase “right to choose”. Though I do think she’s piggy-backing on the connotation. I think she means the women have a right to choose subservience! Note that she goes on to say; " . . . where these other communities have determined the ‘rules of engagement’ ". In other words, they in the Muslim community have decided to be sexist pigs, and it’s all ok because they all agreed to it as a community.

Trudeau uses the phrase “full diversity” (emphasis on “full”). In other words, similar to the minister, if it’s what they want to do then hey, who are we to disagree?

Minister Hajdu uses the phrase “respecting diversity”.

We have enough to draw conclusions and start hurling accusations. Clearly they’re abusing the term “diversity” to mean Muslims can do as they wish, and one has to assume he’s planning – like Britain – to legalize Sharia Law in Canada.

So now Brian, you want to start drawing him out further with the right questions. . . . . Prime Minister, it’s become clear when you use the term “diversity” or “full diversity” (emphasis on “full”), you actually mean permitting Sharia Law in Canada. Can we assume therefor you’re agreeable to FGM and honour killings as well? (use a different Sharia law each time you ask).
commented 2016-09-21 14:26:46 -0400
This really illustrates the immaturity, thoughtlessness of our fake PM and his handlers.
Number one, he attends a well known mosque, obviously by invitation, one day after 9/11 15th anniversary memorial services. None of which he did not attend. The purpose or reaso; to acknowledge the muslim’s “celebration of the sacrifice”.
Two. Neither he or his handlers ever dreamt the fact the women in attendance would be segregated to another area. (Duhhh, never thought of that!)
Three. His MP’s in question period, now trying to come up with answers to the why who what and where, provide the most lame brained answers anyone could invent.

Of all the years following politics I have to say, I have never witnessed a PM with so much fluff and arrogance. Indecision plus only staged photo ops to show, is going to catch up to this guy. It’s like watching an average movie ten times through. First you know what’s coming, and second, you become uninterested and just turn it off.
commented 2016-09-21 14:22:54 -0400
Notice how evil trudoop says it in every garbage speech, Diversity is our strength, not our weakness, this idiot muslim pm says this every time he spews his crap, everytime. He has certainly learnt those lines well. Even at the evil UN, he said it again, but I noticed there was an awful lot of empty seats.
commented 2016-09-21 14:16:10 -0400
Actually, the Catholic Church has always been defending women.
Natural birth control, respect.
When it comes to ‘rights’, it depends on who is defining these ‘rights’ and what kind of ‘rights’ are they.
Are the rights to kill babies, to fill women’s bodies with hormones and end up with breast, ovarian and uterine cancer and have deformed babies (thalidomide, DES, maybe homosexual)?

Buddhists support abortion, but they do not support killing a worm, because that worm may have been someone reincarnated.

Fr. Stephen Imbarrato of Priests for Life (US), gave two powerful homilies on his personal experience with abortion when he was younger and, now as a Priest his experience with women and abortion.
Go to EWTN website, library, audio and click on Sept. 13 and 15. POWERFUL.
If every man heard what he had to say, there would be fewer abortions.
And that will tell you what the Catholic Church thinks of women.
commented 2016-09-21 14:07:58 -0400
What do you call a constipated separatist?
“Le Bloc”.
commented 2016-09-21 14:07:01 -0400
Drew: Unfortunately in Canada, a woman can go to the hospital and have an abortion, and you and I pay for it.
Catholics, Protestants and Muslims pay for these abortions with their taxes.
Catholics have fought this, do Canadian Muslims even know this?
They need to start asking Turdeau why they must pay for abortions they do not condone.
commented 2016-09-21 14:04:46 -0400
If abortion was retroactive, we could have JT aborted and save.the country!
commented 2016-09-21 11:37:44 -0400
So what is the game plan? Screw English Canada over then move back to Quebec and separate? Nothing he is doing makes any sense in the light of wanting to protect Canadians.
commented 2016-09-21 11:07:12 -0400
I have no use for the Bloc Quebecois, I have no idea why they are even allowed in federal politics…but good questions and at least someone is asking them in parliament.
commented 2016-09-21 09:26:30 -0400
“Let’s not be too hard on Justin. He’s entitled to his opinion, and if gender segregation is fine with him, then he has the freedom to believe what he wants.”

Billy, yes everyone is entitled to have their own opinion. However, it is an entirely different matter when that person has the power to impose “his opinion” on every Canadian – that is called a dictatorship.
commented 2016-09-21 04:39:33 -0400
If the women had half an ounce of brains to share between the whole lot of them—- There would be no PM Justin.
commented 2016-09-21 04:07:01 -0400
Judy there are not MANY gender segregated churches and the left has a cow over those.
commented 2016-09-21 04:04:01 -0400
By the way you progressive twits, sharia doe snot allow abortion, so what are you gonna say when they start closing the clinics? Oh yeah , you will say nothing like good sheep.
commented 2016-09-21 04:03:13 -0400
LMAO! Yeah they chose that, you f*cking moron.
commented 2016-09-21 01:35:30 -0400
Once again we see The Windsock blowing this way and that. The problem with trying to be all things to all people is that you end up looking like the uncritical, unthinking doofus that you are.
commented 2016-09-21 01:16:32 -0400
So how does this gender thing work with muslim schools? In Alberta? As far as LBGTQ washrooms are concerned.
commented 2016-09-21 00:33:38 -0400
Let’s not be too hard on Justin. He’s entitled to his opinion, and if gender segregation is fine with him, then he has the freedom to believe what he wants.
If this really was an issue about gender equality, women and women’s groups would speak out. They don’t so they’re fine with it.
Even his female cabinet ministers had to come in through a side door, but that’s okay too. If they want to be demeaned and treated as second class, that’s their choice. I have no qualms with women that truly are okay with being treated like shit. It’s a free country.
I personally believe in gender equality, but if the PM of Canada doesn’t, that’s fine too, because enough Canadians keep voting for him, so I guess most Canadians are just as misogynistic as he is. I guess I’m in the minority, because no one seems to be defending women’s rights.
commented 2016-09-21 00:31:36 -0400
Since 9/11 – IN THE NAME OF ISLAM: 31,774 Attacks, 202,086 Killed, 283,222 Injured…. that we know of.
commented 2016-09-20 23:23:58 -0400
Looks like women and gays are dropping behind the white privileged folk. Muzzies first, BLMen second, sheep and goats next (except during Eid and sexual emergency), natives next I guess but they won’t be around once muzzies control the country…..sorry Jay but gay Liberals will also be shoved off buildings. I will time you and Penson for who hits the ground first.
commented 2016-09-20 22:48:21 -0400
“The Sisters upstairs.” Would those be members of the Sisters of the Muslim Brotherhood?

Our highly uneducated PM is really not fit to be our PM, but due to the support of the MSM he was elected. He proves himself at all instances to be nothing more than an airhead. All flash, no flame.

How much longer will the MSM honeymoon with him last? Will Canada become the next Sweden run by another Merkel? It looks like it will, and soon.

But until then, he continues to give away our money as though it isn’t his. Oh wait, it isn’t his.
commented 2016-09-20 21:21:56 -0400
Justin just makes things up as he goes along and the msm blindly follows along like so many sheep. He can’t keep 2 different thoughts in his mind at one time so he blathers out the 1 that sounds the most progressive, in this case diversity. He’s a mental midget who is excused by the selfie seekers posing as our media.
commented 2016-09-20 21:04:49 -0400
Sean Penson you are right the Liberals have made Canada what it is today: a place where you cannot have freedom of thought, where people believe they are entitled to things without working for them, where the interest owed on our accumulated debt would have bought much better medical services, schools and help for our aging population AND people have become snowflakes that melt when others disagree with them. Well done!
commented 2016-09-20 20:52:15 -0400
The six vacations he’s had should indicate that he has no concern for equality
commented 2016-09-20 20:06:01 -0400
Libs lie.

Anything else you need to know?

Segregated churches?


But do those churches require mothers and grandmothers to hold their daughters down and cut off their clitoris with side cutters or exacto knives?

FGM is on the rise in Canada. Do your due diligence if you chose to not believe me.

Women in islam – property – nothing more.

To be bought and sold at will. Female child forced marriage and rape is rampant. Again do your due diligence.

No Canadian feminist would ever speak up against the above.

They only speak out against the white Christian male. They support all criminal cultures – especially evil islam.
commented 2016-09-20 20:03:33 -0400
As archaic as gender segregation is, I think the greater emphasis … and spotlight … needs to be shined on what the mosques teach that is contrary to Canadian law, such as wife beating, female genital mutilation, honour killings, calls to terrorist activity, etc.
commented 2016-09-20 19:54:44 -0400
Brent, the liberals are not responsible for everything wrong with Canada – voters are. The last I heard, junior is still planning to lower the voting age before the next election. What can we do to prevent this from becoming a reality? Things are bad enough already.