July 25, 2016

Bernie Sanders proven right: The system IS rigged but so is the media

Brian LilleyRebel Co-Founder
 

How many times throughout the primary race between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton did you hear him say the system is rigged to make it almost impossible for an insurgency candidate like himself to win?

In the wake of a leaked email scandal showing correspondence between the DNC and the Clinton campaign that provides ample evidence of collusion, we have proof that Bernie was right.

Former Democratic National Committee Chair, and now Clinton campaign staffer, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, was stacking the deck against Bernie.

That’s big news right?

Not for CNN (Clinton News Network) because they keep changing the subject from a scandal about the corrupt Democrat Party and crooked Hillary, to one about Donald Trump!

Watch as I explain how the Clinton loving media are making this story about Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-07-28 17:48:50 -0400
It’s a sad day when we have to get our information form the KGB because our own people can’t or won’t do the job.
commented 2016-07-26 19:05:44 -0400
Some of the American conservative websites and blogs have coined a new word to describe the willingness of the media to accept the Democratic Party’s narrative unquestioningly and, indeed, to help further it: “presstitutes”. I suggest we start using it here in Canada too. It seems appropriate.

Another one I’ve seen is a bit longer but also seems accurate: “activists with bylines”. I genuinely believe that a large percentage of journalists today see their job as being primarily to advance whatever ideology they happen to favour, not to report on the truth with as little bias as possible. Given that the vast majority of journalists have been Left or Far Left – and I heard this back in the 70s when I was in university from Political Science professors – it won’t surprise anyone that their bias is overwhelmingly to the Left side of the political spectrum.

I actually went to school with a guy who has long been an editor at a national newspaper. A bunch of us happened to be in Ottawa the night Brian Mulroney became the leader of the old Progressive Conservative Party and my editor friend – he was still just a co-op student at the time – who was pretty drunk at the time, shouted “F*ck Mulroney!” very loudly, right out on the street, not far from where Mulroney had just been chosen party leader. He never revealed a party preference to us but I remember him admitting to be on the Left.
commented 2016-07-26 16:51:35 -0400
What I would like to see is someone from CNN ask Bernie Sanders since he during his campaign said Hillary Clinton was not qualified to be President and then railed against her taking money form wall street and the fossil fuel industry. In light of these accusations and his disapproval how is he now endorsing her in record time?
commented 2016-07-26 15:49:12 -0400
It is really little wonder to me that Hillary destroyed 30,000 emails. She’s been busy moonlighting on the job for the Hillary Foundation.
commented 2016-07-26 15:47:36 -0400
Jan G: It says something to me that Hillary Clinton offered a position to Debbie Wasserman Schulz (the former chair). So you get caught cheating and lying about impartiality and you get offered a job by Hillary? I have to wonder if other favors or cash has been moving around and if this is a “shut up” maneuver. It certainly doesn’t look good to be openly rewarding dishonesty or as th Clintons would frame it “loyalty”.
commented 2016-07-26 14:01:34 -0400
What job has Bernie Sanders been offered IF she thinks she will win?
commented 2016-07-26 13:08:29 -0400
I want to thank Ken Joyce for his comments here. While it is more of a sideline, to the Sanders item by Brian, his observations (using facts, by the way) about president Bush vs the Clintons is quite true. Others here should read his four points on Bush. My favorite quote from Bush is: “I was a war president when the nation needed a war president.” How true. Yet the lamestream media puts it the other way. We all know how they twist the truth into lies. Thanks, Ken. Right on. And my favorite reply to “Can Trump fix America?” is “No, it’s already too late. But good on him for trying.”
commented 2016-07-26 08:54:49 -0400
Leave it to the media party to hatch a conspiracy theory that will deflect attention from the Clinton’s. Lefties are experts on doing that. I cannot fathom how the media can be so stupid in parroting what their puppets want them to parrot! Oh, well, just another typical day in the western world!
commented 2016-07-26 05:28:51 -0400
Poor Hillary, she blamed her first email scandal on an evil Republican plot until Comey finally outed her. Now this current scandal is the result of an evil Russian plot? Hee hee, it is to laugh.
commented 2016-07-26 02:06:47 -0400
Bernie was right as we all knew, but too damn bad for him, the communism and heavy socialism he pushes for works that way, if you are not part of the favored elite circle you are not getting into power and the press is controlled. That is the ideology you prefer Bernie, too bad it bit you in the a&&.
commented 2016-07-26 01:44:42 -0400
It never stops, the Clinton scandals, wait until Hillary “The Horrible” is president. The scandals will be the likes of which no one could imagine, utter destruction. What they did here was violate the democratic process and I would also consider this to be election fraud. I think anyone associated with these emails and that means Teflon Hillary should be charged. As well, her not so democratic convention should be shut down. I have been watching and listening to those CNN commentators, they make me sick and angry, they are just vile Hillary lap dogs. I know all this nasty stuff about the Clinton Gang. Why doesn’t all those supporters at the convention know ? If they did I would have to assume some would go elsewhere. I’m pretty sure Bernie knows the dirt on Hillary and yet he is going to support her, he thinks that she is going to implement some of his policies, he’s in for a real let down. Hillary will make mega millions on the backs of the tax payers, and ruin the country. My opinion has been that Hillary is also on a revenge mission, she plans on making America pay for what was done to Bill and her over the Lewinsky scandal. She only cares about taking power, because with it comes payoffs from enemy nations.
commented 2016-07-25 23:49:48 -0400
Debbie Wasserman Schultz truly is a repulsive human being. She is a perfect match for Hillary. They are both compulsive liars and psychopaths.
commented 2016-07-25 22:58:23 -0400
Wasserman is NOT out of the picture!
LIFENEWS:
“Hillary Clinton has hired soon-to-be-former DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz. DWS will resign from her position effective at the conclusion of the Democratic National Convention.
….Clinton emailed supporters and said that Schultz would join the campaign as “honorary chair” of the 50-state program to ensure Democrats win elections nationwide. Wasserman Schultz will continue to serve as a Clinton surrogate.” http://www.lifenews.com/2016/07/25/hillary-clinton-hires-debbie-wasserman-schultz-after-shes-forced-to-resign-as-democrat-chair/

I haven’t heard this on MSM yet today.
commented 2016-07-25 20:29:05 -0400
Why has the press not made the connection of hacked Wasserman emails to Clinton’s improper use of an unsecured private server?

If Russia supposedly hacked the anti-Bernie emails, Clinton’s confidential government emails would just as easily be hacked by Russia, China, Germany, France, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Italy, the kid down the street and so on.

Wasserman lost her job. Clinton is still walking around free.

Not fair… to Wasserman. Clinton should be in an orange pantsuit/jumpsuit speaking with her extensive expensive legal team. (Or is she still “broke” and in need of a public defender?)
commented 2016-07-25 20:24:46 -0400
Does anyone doubt the same sort of rigging is being undertaken by the Liebranos knowing the socialist MSM will cover for them………………..!
commented 2016-07-25 19:59:20 -0400
Paul Maurice commented 4 hours ago
Justin Trudeau got in with a majority because too many Canadians were duped by the mendacious manipulation of the mainstream media.

Too vague.

Here’s how it happens: CBC gets $1.1 per year, now $1.4B per year granted decades ago by liberals.

CBC pays of the media party and Canada gets on narrative – and liberal policies called Canadian values.

The Demarais family (and Dussault) are working the other end ensuring that their puppets run the liberal parties.

And since Canadians here the same thing over and over, the truth is irrelevant.
commented 2016-07-25 19:56:51 -0400
Here’s a great documentary about how the Clinton’s have been fucking the system for many years and getting away with it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LYRUOd_QoM

Bernie is just a stupid old man – he has no presence and no strength to end something like the above vid.
commented 2016-07-25 19:44:18 -0400
Strange how all the Media have labelled the Trump campaign as DARK.
I guess being a Nationalist and a Patriot is verboten and Dark.
So , what does Hillary want ? All of us to head towards the LIGHT
commented 2016-07-25 19:17:04 -0400
I’m convinced that if the deeply corrupt Dem party and the anti-constitutional, anti-nationalist special interests who they patronize keep going down this dark path, there will be blood on American soil soon.
commented 2016-07-25 18:45:14 -0400
Fraser Mcburney Asks: "Who was the first to say " I’M COOKED ON THAT SIDE; TURN ME OVER, AND EAT ME. "

Uhhh , Who is Bill Clinton Alex

Ding, next I’ll take famous buttholes for $50 Alex
commented 2016-07-25 18:37:32 -0400
Not only CNN Brian but here in Calgary over at good ole QR77. Both Daniel Smith and Rob Breckenridge (both admitted Never Trumpers) opened their shows with the Russian/Putin/Trump conspiracy theory and barely discussed the actual email hack and the carnage that followed. Am I the only one to find it odd that BOTH talk shows OPENED their shows with this yet to be proven theory and barely discussed the factual story?
commented 2016-07-25 18:37:01 -0400
How many are aware of the super delegates. Clinton needed to majority of the 4000 or so delegates. Of those about 1200 are called super delegates which are delegates the people don’t get to vote for. And most of those were pledged to Clinton.
commented 2016-07-25 18:30:08 -0400
Hi REBELS

From time to time I will post some questions just for the fun of it

INTERESTING QUOTES
Who was the first to say " I’M COOKED ON THAT SIDE; TURN ME OVER, AND EAT ME. "

I’ll post the answers at the end of Ezra’s show on Monday.
Just another reason to watch THE REBEL only $8 bucks a month or $80 bucks a year.
The only voice that shines a light on the news and brings you the news the other media won’t. Just think of all the comments you leave FREEDOM OF SPEECH….use it or loose it.
commented 2016-07-25 18:18:27 -0400
David Ross

Clinton-Bush?

Let me remind people of some facts about Bush…

1. The World Trade Center was bombed only ONE MONTH after Bill Clinton became President in 1993. US Embassies were bombed in Africa by Bin Landen in 1998. The first attacks on Bin Laden occurred under Clinton that same year. Also that year Clinton attacked Iraq and butted heads with the UN about WMD inspections. Apparently HE pulled out WMD inspectors operating under the UN. However I suspect it was both Clinton and the UN. It was Democratic incompetency and their inept OR deliberate botching of intel on Bin Laden that led to 9/11 and what was to transpire afterwards. Clinton had TWO TERMS to stop Bin Laden. The 9/11 attack occurred only 8 months after Bush was sworn in. It was intel under BUSH’s rearrangement of the US intel system that led Obama to Bin Laden, NOT anything smart arse Obama OR Clinton II did.

2. The United Nations PULLED OUT OF IRAQ under Clinton. As stated ALL foreign powers left IRAQ under Clinton leaving open the door of suspicion regarding WMD. WMD which was confirmed to EXIST and covered up by the media when ISIS closed in on one of Saddams former weapons storage facilities. The head up the arse institution that most lefties clamber to in order to avoid actually doing anything had set up a list of RESOLUTIONS under the former Bush and CLINTON. When Bush Junior became president Saddam violated EVERY SINGLE F-IN RESOLUTION. Bush simply did what the UN was terrified and did NOT have the BALLS to do.

3. Bush went to war in Iraq and Afghanistan ( went to war is not correct ) the PC idiots in the US and around the world prevent actual wars from being fought leaving the military scratching its head and losing thousands of soldiers in order not to upset leftists and their media followers with civilian casualties by using the FULL force of the military. So while a real military operation in both Iraq and Afghanistan could have been over in about a month, limited war policy created by idiots during the Korean War continues to kill western soldiers by the thousands. Bush was completely HEAR THIS LEFTIST PIGS, he was COMPLETELY within his LEGAL rights as President to attack Iraq AND Afghanistan. If the UN will not uphold its resolutions FK em. Bin Laden was in Afghanistan, nuff said. It was not the intervention that was the issue, it was the way it was handled under the pressure of the LEFT and the likes of the homos at CNN.

4. Bush may have destabilized Iraq but read the above. Bush still gets piss about this. YET Obama and Clinton, within a span of a couple of months, destabilized Libya, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Turkey, France, Yemen, Germany. They are not done yet, the possibility of others to follow like Jordan, Tunisia and other nations in Europe infected by the migrant stream THEY created are yet to be seen. But still, its all about BUSH. To compare Bush to the absolute Penultimate DISASTER now facing the earth is delusional and proof of the lefts INSANITY.
commented 2016-07-25 17:57:54 -0400
Oooops sorry Bill, i did’nt realize you had already posted the video