March 22, 2016

LIVE UPDATES: Explosions at Brussels airport, subway station; 34 dead

Victor LaszloRebel Commentator
 

Brussels under attack. 

This timeline moves downwards. For newer items please scroll to the bottom.

Daily Mail:

At least eleven people have died and several people injured after two explosions rocked Brussels Airport in a suspected terror attack.

Witnesses said they 'felt the shockwaves' of the blasts which are believed to have centred on the American Airlines check-in desk at 8am (7am GMT).

Photographs from inside the arrivals hall showed the floor was covered in fallen roof tiles and dust as bloodied people hobbled out of the airport. Others injured were photographed lying on the floor. 

Express UK

Unconfirmed reports have said 11 people are dead and at least 20 people are injured. 

Multiple injuries have been reported and medics are racing to the scene.

The large explosions have taken out glass windows at the entrance and much of the airport's ceiling has collapsed.

The cause of the two blasts, which occurred at around 8am this morning at an American airline check-in desk, are unknown at this stage.

There are unconformed reports that a bomb had been placed next to a check-in desk.

The blasts occurred four days after the arrest in Brussels of a suspected participant in November militant attacks in Paris that killed 130 people. Belgian police had been on alert for any reprisal action.

Target seems to have been American Airlines desk

UPDATE: 

Train station seems to have been attacked as well.

Photos, video and story (in French) here

Molenbeek train station

Sky News Update:

Shots were reportedly fired and Arabic shouted before the apparent airport suicide bombing, as a third blast hits a metro station.

 

UPDATE: Second suicide-bomber said to be behind blast at Brussels Metro station

The above video is immediately after the blast at the Brussels Airport. A revised estimate has 35 people killed in this Islamic terror attack at this time.

More from the airport:

Eye witness account: First an explosion, then a bigger explosion

This Belgian news site claims that the featured picture is the three bombing suspects. 

Eye witness describes hearing "Allahu Akbar".

BBC: Islamic State claims responsibility for Brussels attacks

According to the BBC, the Islamic State has officially claimed responsibility for the attacks. The fanatical terror group also published its claims in French and Arabic.

Corroborating these statements, Amaq Agency, a news organization that is reportedly affiliated with the Islamic State, posted the following article to its website:

 Islamic State press release

UPDATE from Breitbart:

(Third suicide vest found, suspects arrested)

Geert Wilders statement on the Brussels attack:

“I am extremely shocked by today’s events in Brussels. Travelers were murdered in cold blood at Brussels airport, commuters were killed in the metro. Once again, Islamic jihadists hit the free world very hard and slaughtered dozens of innocent people. After Paris, Boston, London, Madrid, New York, this time terror struck in Brussels. Next time it might be Amsterdam.

It is time to act. First of all, we must close our national borders and detain all the jihadists whom we have foolishly allowed to return from Syria. We must also tell people the truth. The cause of all this bloodshed is Islam. We need to de-Islamize the West. That is the only way to safeguard our lives and protect our freedom.”

 UPDATE: Starbucks closes all Belgian outlets after it was discovered that one of the explosions at Zaventem airport happened outside one of the company's stores. 

Belgian Health Minister gives official numbers on dead and wounded at the moment along with other updates on The Guardian.

Update: 31 dead and 250 wounded

 What are the Republican presidential frontrunners saying? 

From the BBC:

Ted Cruz: "Police must 'secure' US Muslim neighbourhoods".

From TheHill.com: 

Donald Trump: "Brussels used to be one of the great places of the world, it was amazing and safe and now its a horror show".

Flashing back to January 2016, the attack on a Jakarta Starbucks in Indonesia. Once is a data point. Two is a coincidence. Frankly it is not unreasonable to ask if this is policy. 

Now lets have a look at a Brussels Belgium tourist advert from not too long ago

UPDATE March 23 AM:

Two of the suicide bombers are brothers.

Authorities said Khalid El Bakraoui, 27, blew himself up in the Belgian capital's subway system while his 30-year-old sibling Ibrahim detonated a bomb at the city's airport. Both had been convicted of violent crimes in the past and had links to one of the Paris attackers. 

It would be interesting to know what crimes they had committed in the past, as contemporary authorities seem to be unable to distinguish crime from an action which is clearly political and military in nature.

 

 

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-03-23 01:34:36 -0400
And let’s never forget the one and only verse the apologists use to ‘prove’ that Isis has nothing to do with Islam. The one they always take out of context to sound like if a Muslim kills someone it’s like he would kill the whole world. Except it’s being said to the Jews and then goes on to say that since Jews didn’t stick to the no killing rule then the Jews should all be killed.
commented 2016-03-22 22:49:19 -0400
A big thank you to Victor Laszlo for keeping us posted throughout the day.
commented 2016-03-22 21:37:50 -0400
Karan Singh
Thank you for posting historical fact on the long and bloody history of the “Religion of Peace”. What is so amply illustrated by the recitation of events in your post is that the “radical” Islamic attacks of today are no different in character and cause than they have been over the past 1300+ years, long before there were “radical” groups such as ISIS or Al Qaeda upon which we could conveniently pin the blame. Wherever Islam has become rooted and taken hold, existing religions are supplanted and intolerance and misery follow. Even where supposedly “non-radical” Islam is practised, such as in Saudi Arabia, citizens cannot worship any other God but the Islamic one.
For those who maintain the false narrative that you can’t despise Islam because not all Muslims participate in such atrocities, it should be obvious that not all Muslims stormed the walls of Constantinople, nor rode with the Barbary Coast pirates to sell non-Muslims into slavery, nor flew aircraft into the side of high-rise towers and kill thousands of people who had done nothing to deserve such a fate except to live in a Western society. Yet all these things did happen, they are historical fact, and they happened under the banner of Islam; and such incidents have been repeating themselves in the same manner albeit in different forms for over a thousand years. It is true that not all Muslims have taken part in such despicable endeavours; but that is the absolute best that can be said for the supposed overwhelming majority of Islamic adherents. At worst, the silence of the alleged majority has to be taken as indifference or, worse, tacit complicity.
Islam is far more than a religion, it is also a judiciary and a theocracy, all rolled into one, all having the Koran as the basis. It always amuses me, then, to see the apologists and usefully idiotic (who themselves would be subject to sanction or death by being non-believers) fly to the defence of Islam as a religion, conveniently overlooking the other aspects of the Religion of Peace which are inextricably woven up with the prayer mats and the mosques.
Unless secularized, as some branches of the Muslim faith are, the tenets of Islam as a whole have never risen or advanced beyond the 7th century dunes where they originated, and they have no place in any society founded on tolerance. Islam itself is intolerant; any religion that threatens its adherents with death for freely choosing another religion cannot be said to be anything but intolerant. In that vein, we as a secular, free Western society have every right to be intolerant of it; because the intolerance of intolerance is, by definition, tolerance.
commented 2016-03-22 18:38:56 -0400
Karan Singh commented 33 mins ago

Thank You! for posting those verses – and those inclined to be truthful to themselves, including all apologists, should do some studies into whom this character Mohammad really was. Just a lunatic Barbarian … pedophile, rapist, mass murderer – all round “nice” guy, eh??!!
commented 2016-03-22 18:14:56 -0400
Ron Christensen commented 6 hours ago:
ACUUNA commented 1 hour ago: ask yourself, " who started all of this"?
the americans. a long time ago.
“That is correct.”

Ron; The brutal subjugation & murder of rival arab tribes in Ridda Wars waged by caliph Abu Bakr in early 7th century, the conquest of Persia in the mid 7th century by caliph Umar of Medina (Arab) and subsequent murder of hundreds of thousands of Zoroastrians & destruction of their culture, during the early 8th century conquest of Bactria which followed by the indiscriminate killing of thousands of Buddhists and enslavement of many more women & children, conquest of Sindh & murder of hundred of thousands of Hindus & Buddhists and enslavement of their women & children in 7th century by Muhammed bin Qassim, invasion of modern day Afghanistan & India by Mahmud of Ghaznavid during 11th century followed by the murder & enslavement of thousands of Buddhist & Hindus and destruction of their culture, invasion of India in the late 12th century by Muhammad the sultan of Ghurid empire surpassed all in savagery; millions were killed & many more of their women & children were taken slaves later to be sold in the markets of Arab -just like the modern day Islamic State, the invasion & conquest of Constantinople & Spain during the early part of the 8th century resulted in the murder of thousands of native Christians & enslavement of many more, the invasion of Sicily & Malta in 9th century by Arab Mujahideens on the orders of caliph Muawiyah culminated with killing of thousands of native Christians, Anatolia met the same fate in 11th century, Byzantine Empire met it’s end in the 15th century at the hands of Ottoman turks establishing their own caliphate, which carried regular raids in Balkans, Hungary, Romania & enslaved millions of European women which were later sold in the slave markets of Constantinople, Medina & Damascus, the raids of Italy, France, England, Spain, Netherland & Iceland done by Barbary Pirates (of North Africa & Arabs) for capturing white Christian slaves to be sold in the Arab markets.
Well, I am sure all these raids, invasions, conquests and subsequent murder or enslavement of the native populace & destruction of their cultures by mohammedan arabs from 7th century onwards were not because of the Crusades or British or French or Americans or any other Western country meddling in their affairs, although it had everything to do with the dominance of islam.
commented 2016-03-22 18:09:32 -0400
“Ron Christensen commented 6 hours ago:SARAH TEAMEDWARDJACE commented “Prepare to be attacked in here by radical Christians Sarah.”

Ron, I am not a radical Christian, I am not even a Christian.
If bringing about the facts and presenting empirical evidence of the violent nature of islam & it’s followers is ‘radical’ then we are not living in a free society, we’ve been subjugated by this cult.
commented 2016-03-22 18:04:30 -0400
Ron C you do realize they had help and were sheltered by other Muslims and the community eh? It was not only these 3 who are complicit.
commented 2016-03-22 18:01:08 -0400
Sarah TeamEdwardJace commented 5 hours ago: “What happened was so awful and I hope appropriate and swift justice is taken against all invovled in orchestrating the attacks. However, we must not allow maltreatment of true non-militants who happen to identify as Muslim just because this happened.”

Sarah, I guess you’ve absolutely no understanding of islam and it’s adherents, I guess you think there’s a violent form of islam & a non-violent one. Well read here what their quran has to say about infidels (non-mohammedans):
- Fight and kill unbelievers until “religion is Allah’s,” i.e. Islamic law rules all societies. (Quran 2:191-193)
- No other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam. (Quran 2:256)
- Don’t take unbelievers as friends and allies, unless it is for “fear of them,” i.e. deceptively for protection of oneself or of Islam. (Quran 3:28)
- Terror. “We will cast into the hearts of the unbelievers terror, for that they have associated with Allah that for which He sent down never authority; their lodging shall be the Fire; evil is the lodging of the evildoers.” (Quran 3:151)
- Crucify or amputate the hands and feet of those who make war against Allah and Muhammad. (Quran 5:33)
- Don’t take Jews and Christians as friends and allies. (Quran 5:51)
- Allah will terrorize unbelievers; Muslims should behead them. “When thy Lord was revealing to the angels, “˜I am with you; so confirm the believers. I shall cast into the unbelievers” hearts terror; so smite above the necks, and smite every finger of them! (Quran 8:12)
- Fight unbelievers until Islam reigns supreme. “Fight them, till there is no persecution and the religion is Allah’s entirely; then if they give over, surely Allah sees the things they do.” (Quran 8:39)
- Make war against enemies of Allah. “Make ready for them whatever force and strings of horses you can, to terrify thereby the enemy of Allah and your enemy, and others besides them that you know not; Allah knows them. And whatsoever you expend in the way of Allah shall be repaid you in full; you will not be wronged.” (Quran 8.60)
- Slay the idolaters. "Then, when the sacred months are drawn away, slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them, and confine them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they repent, and perform the prayer, and pay the alms, then let them go their way; Allah is All-forgiving, All-compassionate.” (Quran 9:5)
- Behead and slaughter the unbelievers; take others captive. “When you meet the unbelievers, smite their necks, then, when you have made wide slaughter among them, tie fast the bonds; then set them free, either by grace or ransom, till the war lays down its loads. So it shall be; and if Allah had willed, He would have avenged Himself upon them; but that He may try some of you by means of others. And those who are slain in the way of Allah, He will not send their works astray.”(Quran 47:4)

There are more then 170 such verses in quran commanding it’s followers to kill, convert and subjugate all non-mohammedans. The peaceful muslim or ‘innocent’ as you may call them are still the followers of the same ideology, they still believe in the same islam, and for all muslims ‘mohammed’ is their role model to be followed in every aspect of life. All mohammedans follow the quran. The quran is unequivocal in its instructions on killing non-believers. That leads one to believe that all mohammedans will be more than willing to kill non-mohammedans at some point in time. The difference between an innocent/peaceful mohammedan and a terrorist is largely opportunity.
You can close your ears & eyes to reality but that will not dispel the threat we are facing.
commented 2016-03-22 17:55:08 -0400
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/23/world/europe/brussels-attacks-what-we-know-and-dont-know.html?_r=0

• Why Brussels?

In addition to being the seat of European Union government and the capital of Belgium, Brussels has become a focus of counterterrorism investigations, notably since the Paris attacks.

Officials have also been concentrating on a particular Brussels neighborhood in an investigation of an Islamic State recruitment network.

Brussels has a high proportion of citizens who travel to Iraq, insular Muslim communities believed to have helped shield jihadists, and security services that have had problems with their counterterrorism operations.
commented 2016-03-22 17:50:55 -0400
Team Jace please spare us the phony backlash garbage, try some concern for actual events and victims , your outrage for imagined slights is pathetic.
commented 2016-03-22 17:46:40 -0400
Ron C liberals do not support anyone but their cronies, having someone else pay for support and doing the work required is not something you can take credit for you halfwit. LIBERALS ONLY CARE FOR THEMSELVES!
commented 2016-03-22 17:15:32 -0400
You aren’t fooling anyone Ronnie and you know it. Do everyone a favor and take a very long walk on a very short pier or go play in the middle of a busy highway, we are sick of you and your continual leftard lies.
commented 2016-03-22 16:34:40 -0400
The leftards like to claim they won’t allow these terrorist attacks to create a climate of fear in them. They say those who question and criticize the culture and religion of Islam are the fear mongers. Why then are they so afraid to open a Quran and read it for themselves? Why are they so eager to appease Muslims and tolerate their intolerant culture and religion? Why are they apologists for the violence itself? Why don’t they see what’s happening in Europe? What are they afraid of? Why don’t they explain these things to the rest of us so we can all understand? Is it because it’s incomprehensible? Harper continued the tradition of bringing in 250,000-300,000 migrants a year which Canada had been doing for some time. With refugees he wanted to put a priority on the most persecuted which are the Christians and other minorities but the lefties threw a tantrum and screamed racism. Now they are being ‘racist’ by only allowing Muslims.
commented 2016-03-22 16:15:21 -0400
HYACINTH commented 3 hours ago
I see The Rebel’s resident Liberal troll has switched to his other favorite alias
Ron Christensen since his other alias Sean got piled on.

There you go with your usual conspiricy theory. You aren’t as smart as you think you are.
commented 2016-03-22 15:20:01 -0400
Mr Christensen…do you lock your door at night?….if so….is that because you hate the people outside or because you love the people inside?
commented 2016-03-22 14:36:28 -0400
@daryl Herman – You fail to acknowledge that war is a business and it is true since all the weapons contractors tend to the close to government. That has to change otherwise war is made to occur too easily and that has to change. Perhaps politicians should sign up for war if they are so gung-ho about it.

And yes peace is a hard thing to come by nowadays.
commented 2016-03-22 14:31:40 -0400
Daryl Herman well said
commented 2016-03-22 14:30:30 -0400
Well thank you for the questions as most partisans tend to not be too open-minded enough to even want to bring up any questions. Now, regarding the subject as to why people tend to not hear about minor parties in general, it is because networks will not bring on small parties until they have representation or at least a seat in a legislature or parliament. That means since the system is the way it is things will not change until new laws are brought in to allow for more voices and another reason is that the political class does not want to acknowledge these entities even exist. Therefore, either by direct decree by the political class or by defense of the political class these smaller parties cannot voice their opinions. They are only allowed to do so during elections, by-elections but only on extremely small and local networks or in the rate occurrence on CPAC. This all proves that the system cannot have more voices unless money is taken out the system and so that everyone is made to be on an equal wavelength. I actually hope Canada can have a multi-party democracy where anyone can win, and that way Canadians can be truly informed.

As for what I know about the Canadian Action party which has existed since 1997, this party wants protectionism and a mixed economy and a return to using the Bank of Canada for money creation. This party states that our economy is globalist and that we sold our soul back in 1988 with FTA and again in 1994 with the NAFTA agreement and that selling our nation out will occur with the EU FTA and all the ones since 1988. The party concludes that we have lost hundreds of jobs each month since 1988 and that does make sense because we opened our economy to the world based on manufacturing and other sectors. Canada also used to have 2 food banks back in 1981 and now we have thousands in operation. That is because we use a fiat currency.

The party also believes that since we sold our soul we have to have a foreign policy which is beholden to the USA, and that means we cannot have an independent foreign policy and even a domestic one. We need to be controlled by globalist forces. Therefore, the party is anti-globalist, pro-fair trade, anti-TPP, anti-FIPA, anti-TTIP, anti-NAFTA and pro-mixed economy. This is what I know about the party and why Canada definitely needs a new direction, and it also shows that Canada is the 51st state.
commented 2016-03-22 14:17:15 -0400
@john

That is a good statement…
But you also stated that the PC’s were the ones that started the high immigration? Now if that was true it would have been all over the REbel and the MSM in this country. That is so untrue… I see your cental party, as something that can be thrown into any political debate. As it really doesn’t stand for anything. You can weigh in and state the this government or that government is wrong. If this party is so good, Why Haven’t I Ever Heard Of It Until Now? Please explain to me all your wisdom and stance on this party.
commented 2016-03-22 13:56:44 -0400
Americans have gotten involved in 50+ wars since WW2 – that is the fact. They cannot get themselves away from it and they believe they are the world’s superpower. They know nothing about human rights, democracy or national sovereignty. They despise third world people by that notion and they want all nations to be under their thumbs. Also, the point of democracy is to pick from a group of parties with similar ideologies with small ounces of differences. Also, Liberals are centrists and supported all the wars so I do not know where you’ve been because it is either you ignore those votes or you do not pay attention. Civic nationalists like me realize that these wars are for oil and selling the resources under the US dollar for passing through the US nation or else.

And nationalists do not support liberalism. That is just lumping people in groups of convenience for your side to attack. You are an interventionist much like the Liberals and NDP and nationalists differ from all three major parties. That is the issue and nationalists feel the UN is a US tool because it is based in the US and the US is a warmongering and a nation based in war. The Liberals have to go after different segments of the electorate which is the way politics is.

I cannot control who goes after what, but liberals, conservatives and ndpers all supported Libya and Afghanistan and it resulted in chaos. Conservatives use freedom as a tool to win votes when they want war the most, even though the Libertarian party is non-interventionist much like all the minor parties in Canada, so I think you have it wrong on that front because nations should determine their own path.
commented 2016-03-22 13:44:47 -0400
John Siciliano – one thing that Libtards fail to see or admit – is that the American peoples have incredible amounts of money & blood invested (much of which is our tax $$) over there – in attempting to give these nations positive relief from poverty and oppression and war – YET – the godless Jihadists think they have a right to steel this from the people over there and nullify major investments by Americans – that includes Canadians! Don’t tell me you wouldn’t intervene if your neighbors start steeling your property??!! This is what’s behind a lot of these WARS – and the Libtards keep going on & on about how we are meddling over there? Get a grip on some REAL REALITY! Do some real study – dig up the real truth – and yes – some really stupid shit gets done in the name of good – however anyone attempting to apologize for the barbaric behavior we are seeing on a continuing basis, is just not ACCEPTABLE as so with the attacks.
These Barbarians have been on this Islamic mission for hundreds of years and began long before America was America – so get off your Libtard high-horses and do some thoughtful reasoning. Begin by disallowing Canada to become involved with the United Nations – look for yourself – what a line-up of despots! … and TruDope wants to send more of OUR taxes over there – what the hell for – who really are the “interventionists”? Answer that one for me and all of us Conservative “right-wingers”!
Libtards are the interventionist – in every way – in intervening in the freedom of those everywhere.
Us “right-wingers” are doing exactly what you would be doing should your property become violated.
commented 2016-03-22 13:41:44 -0400
Peter Netterville: Exactly. Th very ones who say we should not criticize Islam have no difficulty disecting and criticizing Christians and are full of their own stereotypes. I have zero problem with criticism. I welcome it as should any responsible religion or political organization. It is cults and politicians with self serving tyrannical purposes who discourage scrutiny. These guys love to scour the messages for the few who are truly making bigoted comments to justify dismissing any legitimate message that is being conveyed and using it to camouflage the fact they are the ones who are truly afraid to make any criticisms of Islam lest we upset them or because they fear the people might over react if thy really see what is going on. I suggest it is that attitude that is what causes the real bigotry to grow. When we see the government and media trying to play down and hide the kind of crimes we have witnessed that is the root of the anger towards Muslims. Canada has been very open to immigrants from every country and with a few bumps along the way we have been very successful because of one important reason. We have all been treated like we are equal. Yes you will always have some bigots who are against any new wave of foreign immigrant but the outrage in this case is being generated by the government who are treating on group of immigrant better than thy have others. When you allow Muslim only buildings paid for by the tax payer, when you rush phony refugees to the front of the immigration line. When you are secretive and rushed about how you are vetting these “refugees”. It is the government and the MSM who because of their desire to tout their photo-op Kumbaya moment, that is the real reason for concern.
commented 2016-03-22 13:35:18 -0400
I see The Rebel’s resident Liberal troll has switched to his other favorite alias
Ron Christensen since his other alias Sean got piled on.
commented 2016-03-22 13:21:42 -0400
Ron Christensen said, "… or religion—just look at the Christian radicals in here and you’ll get my drift. "

Ron, there is no one on this forum doing any sort of radical terrorist activity.

To compare the Christians here who are posting their opinion to radical Islamic terrorists is the biggest bloody lie ever.

Can you prove that the Christians on this website are the same as the Islamic terrorists? If so prove it, or be a man for a change and apologize for making that comparison.

I suspect you are not man enough to apologize. Ditz.
commented 2016-03-22 13:18:14 -0400
@ron Christensen – What people on the interventionist left, right and centre fail to realize is that we are told things that the government wants us to know, but behind the scenes they are probably all best buddies and they are using each other for employment.

That is why I call politics acting for ugly people. What we need to have in politics is real accountability and transparency and a media that is completely independent and against the mainstream class, and yes the Conservative party is mainstream. That is the case because they have representation and 9 out the 13 networks/papers endorsed the neocon party. What Canada also needs is a fact-finding media which truly asks questions which no one ever discusses.

Rebel plays on emotions, populism and is used to riling people up.

We have tried war for 14+ years since 9/11 and you’d think Rebel and the interventionists in all three main parties would want something new and a non-interventionist agenda. I guess they do not.

The Liberals to me are too warlike, just like the NDP.

The Rebel and all mainstream media never talk about Saudi Arabia or trying to ensure that money does not reach these groups. They engage in simplistic talk either due to incompetence or because they are playing the game for future elections.

Rebel wants a fearful electorate since they believe it is the Conservative party’s path to victory, and Rebel does not mince words about who they support. My response to that is wouldn’t having a multi-party democracy be a true definition of supporting democracy. Another response to that is why doesn’t Rebel want money out of politics and a true meritocracy. I can understand why they wouldn’t want these terms. They want to have oligarchy and few options, much like the Liberals and NDP. These parties talk a good game about human rights, democracy and the rule of law, but to me it seems like none of these parties supports any of these policies.

Canada needs new parties and new ways of thinking. Freedom and using it as well is subjective because an independent media would be better since people would get all their facts and knowledge from these sources. Partisan media does not nothing except lock people in the party system which is simply not a good thing, and it is why people have to be open-minded. Big parties only result in oligarchy and nothing more. These facts I am bringing up show that the system simply does not work.

I think the civic nationalist Canadian Action party is the best choice, which I am a member of. They are non-interventionist, for a mixed economy and they want a smart and independent foreign policy. This PC nonsense is one-sided as well, since it is used a tool to attack those to gain political points as well. This talking point must also change.
commented 2016-03-22 13:08:55 -0400
ron, you are running out of steam there, mate.
better have a nap….
and that is just ‘advice’, not a threat.
commented 2016-03-22 13:07:26 -0400
George Carlin used to say that there is a club and we are not in it.

I agree with you Ron in that the media and Rebel want us to believe a certain narrative to control us and so that we will be fearful rather than be against the warmongering class, which they are part of.

Do they take ownership for wanting war on Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria with Harper?! This all proves that whether it is liberal, ndp or conservative you get war and interventionism.

These people talk about Political Correctness but that is only to attack the nationalists like I am or the left, centre-right or centre. The people using it as a tool are far-right or right wing and they are using it for a clash of civilizations. They seem to forget that with the oil for food program and Iraq that 2 million people died. In Afghanistan, around 500,000 to 1 million people died based on figures, and you cannot dispute figures.

These people use phony outrage and they expect us to cave into their fears. We have our own minds and I personally want a non-interventionist foreign policy, defense of Canada and less immigration which is much better than the Conservatives that increased immigration, and yet no calls or complaints from Rebel.

Nationalism is something Canada needs due to our massive debt, youth unemployment and increased taxation and racing to the bottom when it comes to tax cuts. Canada needs more protectionism and more national sovereignty but less war and less BS from Rebel and the interventionists.

Nationalists love the military but we would never want rampant war. That is why Canada must have an independent foreign policy and an independent media which does not cater to the political class. I am glad to be a Canadian Action party member and with one seat it would educate Canadians on civic nationalism, which is anti-racist nationalism and the best kind of nationalism to win over Canadians.
commented 2016-03-22 13:01:59 -0400
So where are these groups of evil going to hit next is a question on my mind this tragic day. ?
commented 2016-03-22 12:57:40 -0400
god bless old george… RIP.
I loved that guy!
commented 2016-03-22 12:56:36 -0400
DARYL HERMAN

Idiot