October 09, 2016

Bulgaria stands up to rising Islamism by doing THIS — Should Canada do it, too?

David MenziesMission Specialist
 

Bravo for Bulgaria! Following in the footsteps of France, the Netherlands and Belgium, they’ll be banning the burqa. Those who break the law will face fines and have their social security benefits cut off. Not all are rejoicing though.

The usual suspects are screaming that this legislation is Islamophobic, xenophobic, anti-Muslim and perversely, anti-woman.

But banning misogynistic costumes like the burqa and the niqab isn’t about being unfair but rather, levelling the playing field.

Plus, we in western democracies live in free societies without checkpoints on every corner with guards asking for our I.D. papers mostly because we can actually see one another!

And the law doesn’t prevent anyone from wearing a burqa at home or in a mosque, just not in a public place yet progressive lefties decry the ban. People like John Dalhuisen, spokesman for the U.K. chapter of Amnesty International who said:

“Women in Bulgaria should be free to dress as they please and to wear the burqa or the niqab as an expression of their identity or beliefs. This ban violates their rights to freedom of expression and religion.”

There’s so much wrong with this it’s hard to know where to begin but watch as I take a stab at it.

In the meantime, again, bravo for Bulgaria in taking a stand against the rise of Islamism.

Wouldn’t it be great if Canada followed suit?

But, given the politically-correct, Islamist-friendly cowards in charge right now, don’t hold your breath waiting for that to happen.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-10-11 11:32:18 -0400
I would have no problem with the Islamic faith if they renounced all the political and legal rhetoric contained in their holy books and scriptures. However, 99% of their so called religion is devoted to politics so we know that just ain’t gonna happen. With well over a billion followers of their prophet , there should be lots of willing Muslim homes in Muslim countries. They all have free health care and social assistance , DON’T THEY?? They should move to where they can profess their faith in a despotic theocracy instead of enjoying the fruits of our Judeo Christian capitalist system which is anathema to them.
commented 2016-10-11 06:05:11 -0400
John Dalhuisen is a blowhard who cannot see the problems England is faced with. England will be the next Muslim country. Then the left wing will cry “Someone should have done something”. Some one did do something, they elected a left wing government which gave the Islams the power to take over.
commented 2016-10-11 01:35:37 -0400
I find these types of garb. Totally offensive. And they should in no way be excepted in a civilized society.
commented 2016-10-10 16:59:13 -0400
Contaminate with swine everything they use in their daily life including toothbrushes any kind of leather that’s been tanned right down to concrete that they walk on because pig blood has been used in the wet cement…
Make it so they can’t touch anything.
commented 2016-10-10 16:56:59 -0400
Swine is ridiculously cheap and ultimately it could be their kryptonite..!!
commented 2016-10-10 16:55:57 -0400
Real estate is expensive and swine is cheap… One pig can contaminate 5 acres and a mosque worth over $1 million for about 250 bucks Canadian.. So I say bring it on..!!
commented 2016-10-10 16:54:05 -0400
Glen Craig responded to my statement with..
GLENN CRAIG commented 20 hours ago
“@<a class=“tweet-url username” href=“http://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=leviticus”>leviticus 2013…problem with that plan is that there is a lot more available acreage of real estate than there is pig awful and blood to cover with deterent. And thanks to our dependency on on sharia oil they can easily afford their pick of real estate."
commented 2016-10-10 16:52:53 -0400
“Contaminate every mosque everywhere with massive amounts of liquefied swine sprayed liberally over the ground that they must walk on and the building they must enter”
commented 2016-10-10 13:25:26 -0400
Just a random thought… Amusingly, in “racist, fascist, criminal, zionist” Israel, niqab-type garnments, while certainly not the norm, can be seen, and aren’t illegal.
commented 2016-10-10 12:30:07 -0400
“The niqab is outlawed in Azerbaijan, where the overwhelming majority of the population is Muslim. Niqabi women, just like women wearing hijab, cannot work as public servants, neither can they continue studies at schools, including the private schools. Although there is no single law banning niqab at private companies, it would be nearly impossible for a niqabi woman to find work[citation needed] .
In February 2010, an Arab country’s unnamed ambassador to Dubai had his marriage annulled after discovering that his bride was cross-eyed and had facial hair. The woman had worn a niqab on the occasions that the couple had met prior to the wedding. The ambassador informed the Sharia court that he had been deliberately deceived by the bride’s mother, who had shown him photographs of the bride’s sister. He only discovered this when he lifted the niqab to kiss his bride. The court annulled the marriage, but refused a claim for compensation”

……………from same link as below.
commented 2016-10-10 12:28:32 -0400
In Iran, "Between 1941 and 1979 wearing the niqab was no longer against the law, but it was considered by the government to be a “badge of backwardness.” During these years, wearing the niqab and chador became much less common and instead most religious women wore headscarves only. Fashionable hotels and restaurants refused to admit women wearing niqabs. High schools and universities actively discouraged or even banned the niqab, though the headscarf was tolerated."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niq%C4%81b
commented 2016-10-10 11:45:28 -0400
Glen Craig ..
I read your link and found it amusing, how base we as humans can get when we live in the material world.
That is exactly why politicians lower the interest rate to enslave people into mortgages they can’t afford and other financial situations they can’t afford and then comes the “knocking.”
What happens next when the money runs out for a nation is an act of Financial cannibalism where “beggar than my neighbor.” becomes the applied principal.
As civilized people we cannot let that happen, so contrary to your believe of "pimps and hoes in your link "I believe that we set up parties to act as administrations and then have the responsibility to hold them to their convictions or their feet to the fire. That neither makes me a pimp nor a hoe but a responsible member of society not looking to take advantage of anybody for personal gain.
Not everybody can be a thief and a robber as suggested by your link because some people actually have to produce wealth for the benefit of intellectual, scientific, and sociological expansion of our communities and nations.
Some of us have a greater ability to think further then be on the tip of our proboscis..
If you really believe in that link that you provided for all to see where your mind is coming from here’s what I think.
I think you have been a beta male all your life and jealous of the alpha males around you, you weren’t born with alpha male qualities so you had to go learn them from another beta male (who promoted book for his pimp to sell you) who suffers from the same insecurities as you do and have never understood why women control them in their relationships.
So basically what you’re saying is you learned how to be a man from a book. From this point forward after reading that link I can no longer take any comment that you say with any credibility as you are obviously an individual that is only capable of loving themselves while pushing everyone else beneath them.
Another words you’re a narcissistic asshole.
commented 2016-10-10 11:15:34 -0400
Drew: You said it: Equal rights should trump religious “rights” to discriminate—within reason, meaning you should have the right to refuse to bake a cake for religious reasons, but you don’t have the right to beat your wife or FGM your daughter for religious reasons.
Leftist catering to anti-Canadian values is shameful.
commented 2016-10-10 02:28:32 -0400
Glen Craig said..
“I stopped thinking with the little head some time ago.
But for as long as we are ruled by women and by sexual syncophants there is no hope. "

However I am inclined to agree with the latter part of your statement.
commented 2016-10-10 01:59:40 -0400
Glenn, you’re absolutely right. Jesus didn’t call us to be nice. The Tater Pop did.
commented 2016-10-10 00:11:51 -0400
Great effort on the spin…!!! Straight A+ .. If I didn’t know any better I would say you may have worked a mid-level public relations department… A.k.a. spin doctor..

And as far as my name goes… When someone deserves to know my name and earns that privilege they will know who I am..
With your kind of thinking I suppose I should introduce myself to every pizza delivery guy… Every taxi driver or maybe the girl at the grocery or hardware store… maybe random people on the street and while I’m at it I should also tell them other personal details of my life.
My name isn’t important and I’m not hiding behind
my pseudonym to bully anybody we’re only here for opinions and not to badmouth anybody anyway and I believe I held up my end of the rebel contract..
commented 2016-10-09 22:35:33 -0400
Leviticus 2013….I turned off spell check when it refused to recognize “misandry” as a word and I will not turn it back on until it does.

The problem is “nice guy”…that is why the MGTOW forum is called that. Sweden is dying of terminal nice guy and is in paliative care.

Just this evening I did holiday phone and FACEBOOK calls to my best friends and siblings…all of them fended me off and wanted to change the subject if I brought up this reality.

I am aware of the reference of your alias. I was a scripture scholar….so consider this piece of scripture…

Hosea 1:2

and then read this…..

http://revolutionarylifestyledesign.com/pimp-game-women-life/

how about …

Isaia 3:12

need I say more

or here is the humdinger that I call out all who scold with scripture …..

THOU SHALT NOT SUFFER A WITCH TO LIVE!!!

I stopped thinking with the little head some time ago. But for as long as we are ruled by women and by sexual syncophants there is no hope.

What say you to that and have the courage to declare your real Christian name when you say it.
commented 2016-10-09 22:18:16 -0400
Billy Howard why should any rights trump others? How about equal rights. And it is the secular left who is letting this crap happen.
commented 2016-10-09 21:45:21 -0400
And Glenn… Clean up your grammar and spelling.!
commented 2016-10-09 21:42:55 -0400
You sound like the federal government Glenn Craig… That we should just roll over and make no attempt to do anything. Now I was only half kidding about the swine thing but I simply abhor a defeatist attitude such as the one you were presenting..
To quote an old boss of mine as he used to say… “Don’t tell me how you can’t do it tell me how it can be done.”
commented 2016-10-09 21:39:48 -0400
And let’s not forget that the ground can be contaminated at any point during construction
commented 2016-10-09 21:38:44 -0400
Real estate is expensive and swine is cheap… One pig can contaminate 5 acres and a mosque worth over $1 million for about 250 bucks Canadian.. So I say bring it on..!!
commented 2016-10-09 20:54:25 -0400
@leviticus 2013…problem with that plan is that there is a lot more available acreage of real estate than there is pig awful and blood to cover with deterent. And thanks to our dependency on on sharia oil they can easily afford their pick of real estate.
commented 2016-10-09 18:21:36 -0400
Contaminate every mosque in Canada with massive amounts of liquefied swine sprayed liberally over the ground that they must walk on and the building they must enter… That would render their mosques useless allowing them no place to gather en masse to plot and scheme crimes against us.
Keep in mind that swine is like kryptonite to them and there is no defense against it.
commented 2016-10-09 16:54:58 -0400
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b66gLKLU8yU

ZEN KOAN

Two people went walking…it started to rain….one did not get wet…explain

ANSWER

One did not get wet because there were two…….:-)

The symbolism of this epoch scene from Stephen Kings novel is that the Chinese character for TAO (theway) is a man raising his arms to receive the blessings of Heaven….the rain.

When David Milgard saw this movie in the theater release it was pouring rain when he left the theatre…he stripped to the waist …raised his arms and danced in the rain…..:-)

It is Thanksgiving…..the sky is grey where I am…I await the rain….I am ready to dance.

To all of the women who have arrived in Canada seeking refuge from a world gone mad with poisonous bullshit ideologies….who wear the niquab or the hijab out of fear and mistrust of the men of this land…..do not be fooled by those who pretend to be the brokerage between you and the freedom under Heaven which is your birthright….take off these cloth prisons ….raise your arms to receive Heaven’s blessings….dance in the rain and know the joy of the Sufis.
commented 2016-10-09 15:47:20 -0400
Good to see more countries banning the burka and nicab. I would like to see a Conservative leadership candidate take the bold step and promote that same law. They’d have my vote.
I don’t care which religion you follow, but in this country secular rights should trump religious, cultural, and misogynistic practices. Trudeau is quickly destroying our secular society.
commented 2016-10-09 15:24:45 -0400
I have a question for the lefties-If Donald Trumps locker talk offended you so, then why do you defend barbaric practices by a culture admitting far worse than what Trump said will occur at their hands if a woman is not forced to be covered?
commented 2016-10-09 15:04:59 -0400
Coerced or brainwashed, take your choice.
commented 2016-10-09 14:33:45 -0400
Since 9/11 – IN THE NAME OF ISLAM (SATAN): 31,924 Attacks, 202,924 Killed, 284,209 Injured…. that we know of.
commented 2016-10-09 13:52:00 -0400
John Dalhuisen, spokesman for the U.K. chapter of Amnesty International said:

“Women in Bulgaria should be free to dress as they please and to wear the burqa or the niqab as an expression of their identity or beliefs. This ban violates their rights to freedom of expression and religion.”

Then why isn’t Amnesty International pushing for this in Muslim countries? Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Eritrea , lands controlled by ISIS for example desperately need AI leadership and instruction. I would like to see him and his fellow AI members show up with their soap boxes to stand on, pick a corner of a large populated area and begin exhorting the freedom of women to dress as they wish. As the saying goes, “Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand.”

Lets not be naive. Suggesting that women can dress as they want while in those lands would probably mean a return home in a body bag once all their body parts are found.