May 09, 2016

Dear Anti-vaxxers: Retracted papers and blogging conspiracy theorists are NOT a scientific argument

Holly NicholasRebel Commentator

Last week, I covered the anti-vaxxer movement and how scientific evidence backs the efficiency of vaccinations and their direct link to decreasing the occurrence of several diseases.

I learned a lot about anti-vaxxers when my story aired – including that not one of those in opposition could provide any scientific evidence accepted by the community to counter my points. Now, I’m doubling down to shred the counter-claims of the anti-vaxxer crowd.

The first comes from those who say vaccines are a Big Pharma plot to get rich. But vaccines are cheap, one dose shots that keep people healthy - if vaccinations were just another way for companies to get rich, wouldn’t they want to keep us all sick?

The vaccines I’m talking about have saved lives. The World Health Organization notes 3 million lives are saved yearly and another 1.5 million could be saved with more effective programmes in place.

Anti-vaxxers also claimed that the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention reported that autism does result from vaccines which is completely false. The proof can be found on their website. As for the suggestion that the Mumps, Measles and Rubella (MMR) shot contains mercury which some say is what’s causing autism, also false. Thimersal, the mercury containing substance used in some vaccines to prevent the growth of bacteria, was never a component of the MMR vaccine and was removed from all childhood vaccines in the United States in 2001.

My favourite rebuttal was that I MUST watch the movie “Vaxxed” directed by Andrew Wakefield. He’s the kooky doctor that published a paper (later retracted) claiming autism and irritable bowel syndrome were caused by vaccinations. He had his medical license revoked and was barred from practicing medicine in the UK. Of the 12 researchers that contributed to the paper, ten retracted, one wasn’t found guilty and the other, John Walker-Smith, had his license revoked too. He appealed his case and won, which some anti-vaxxers mistake for validation of his research. It isn’t – legal rulings aren’t science. The only thing his case shows is that Walker-Smith wasn’t guilty of using interventions on kids for research purposes because he was actually treating kids.

The documentary also details “whistleblowing” by some employees at the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. One allegation is that African-American boys are more likely to have autism when vaccinated between 24 and 36 months. But, one whistleblower turned data over to a scientist named Dr. Brian S Hooker who then published his findings in the journal Translational Degeneration – which was, you guessed it, later retracted.

Sorry anti-vaxxers, two retracted papers and some blogs written by conspiracy theorists just don’t stack up against hundreds of peer reviewed scientific studies using different methodologies that all conclude that vaccines result in a decrease in the occurrence of diseases.

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-05-25 00:51:10 -0400
Found a few more articles supporting my position that it isn’t unvaccinated generational Canadians that are spreading disease but refugees and 3rd world immigrants.

From reading the articles it looks like in the US they are screening refugees for disease finding them positive and letting them in anyway. Wonder if Canada does the same?
commented 2016-05-12 12:30:58 -0400
Thanks to all the contributors for the information to be gleaned. Unfortunately you are most likely wasting your time. If you have been accused of being a “Conspiracy Theorist”, wearing a tinfoil hat or what ever, you have to realize you are dealing with someone who is closed minded, probably not by choice but by a coordinated social engineering program that they are not even aware of. It is good to provide all this evidence, but it will just be ignored, they are not listening, because the hardest thing to do is to admit you have been conned and you swallowed the bait, hook line and sinker. You might get your information dealt with by a very tiny minority of the herd, but usually only if they have suddenly been struck by something profound that happens to them personally (awakened).
So take the advice of a “wise One” – if they refuse to listen to your message, walk away, shake the dust off your feet, and don’t look back, you can’t help them.
commented 2016-05-11 22:06:59 -0400
Part 3

So found this one by accident now I habe been forced to do a part 3:

" In rare cases, children can contract polio from the weakened virus in the oral vaccine itself, Hossaini said. That’s why it’s so important to co-ordinate the switch to remove the vaccine with Type 2 polio across 126 countries, including those with the largest populations, such as China, India, Brazil and Nigeria. Teams on the ground will monitor how the old vaccines are destroyed by heat and light."

Did I just read that right? So they are switching to a different vaccine because it can give polio to children? Sort of defeats the purpose doesn’t it. Don’t worry though it only happens in “rare cases” but not rare enough to continue with the same vaccine. Nothing like a little doublespeak.

Meanwhile in Pakistan……. Over 500 parents arrested for failure to give the polio vaccine to their children. Oh and this article was published before the previous one and Pakistan is mentioned several times in the CBC article.

So these parents were concerned that their children might contract the polio from the vaccine (now proven right) and were thrown in jail. What a nice loving system.

This isn’t the first time this polio vaccine has had problems either. According to this article they knew back in 1999 that this oral vaccine could not only cause polio but even spread it to other people. In 2000 it was removed from the US but still apparently good enough for the developing world….

" In the year 2000, Kew was investigating an apparent polio outbreak in the Dominican Republic and Haiti. Twenty-one kids had been paralyzed and two had died from an unidentified disease. It seemed unlikely that the cluster of paralysis cases on the island of Hispaniola was actually polio because polio had been eliminated from the Americas in 1991.

Kew got hold of samples from the outbreak. When he sequenced the genetic code of the virus he found what researchers had hoped not to see. The virus paralyzing kids in Haiti and the Dominican Republic came from the polio vaccine."

Another mention of the oral polio vaccine.

Holly I thought it was only the unvaccinated that put people at risk? Any thoughts? They continued from 2000 to last month administering this vaccine all over the world knowing it could spread and cause disease. In fact it seems even more reckless in the third world where sanitation isn’t up to first world standards and transmission to others much more likely.

Of course there is more.

Yes a conspiracy website but original sources are qouted at top of article:

Seems like polio vaccines have a long history of problems.

So I forgot, we still need to look at some vaccine inserts to see what the companies that make them have to say.

Large data base here:

Most of the links are good some are broken or behind a log in page. I would recommend downloading the PDF’s to your personal files im case one day they get memory holed.

Lets do just one, MMR2 manufactured by Merk. (Watch me get banned for naming the specific name and brand lol. Interested to see how owned the Rebel is or isn’t.) I chose this from the list because it is very common and well known not because I went through them all looking for the worst of the bunch. Trust me i don’t have time to do that much dry readimg.

Honestly I dont know where to start, the insert is a treasure trove of damnation.

Page 5 Precautions

" Adequate treatment provisions, including epinephrine injection (1:1000), should be available for
immediate use should an anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reaction occur.
Special care should be taken to ensure that the injection does not enter a blood vessel."

So first of all anaphylaxis is common enough that those administratering the vaccine are warned to be ready for it.

Special care not to inject into a blood vessel (instructions say it is to be administered subcutaneously) This would actually make sense since the toxic ingredients would hit the brain, heart and organs all in one shot rather then seeping out slowly. Many of the extremely severe reactions may actually be due to sloppy administration which would be rare during trials; remember they are being paid for a certain result. I bet it would be more likely to occur in the real world with nurses and docters are rushing to get through patients and they get complacent.

“Excretion of small amounts of the live attenuated rubella virus from the nose or throat has occurred in
the majority of susceptible individuals 7 to 28 days after vaccination. There is no confirmed evidence to
indicate that such virus is transmitted to susceptible persons who are in contact with the vaccinated
individuals. Consequently, transmission through close personal contact, while accepted as a theoretical
possibility, is not regarded as a significant risk.{33} However, transmission of the rubella vaccine virus to
infants via breast milk has been documented (see Nursing Mothers).
There are no reports of transmission of live attenuated measles or mumps viruses from vaccinees to
susceptible contacts.”

So here they are admitting that live virus can be shed by recipients. They play it down saying there are no documented cases of transmission; however as we saw with the polio vaccine it is absolutely possible it could be happing, just not documented. That’s lawyer speak for you.

I was going to qoute the entire adverse reactions but there are so many it is impractical in a comments section. Over 1.5 full 8×11 pages. Just a small sampling:

Atypical measels: (basically measels that they dont want to call normal measels)


Diabetes mellitus (In other words a lot of the people that were “born” with diabetes may have been vaccine damaged, their parents just didn’t suspect a vaccine as the cause so it went unreported.)

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (

" Guillain-Barre (gee-YAH-buh-RAY) syndrome is a rare disorder in which your body’s immune system attacks your nerves. Weakness and tingling in your extremities are usually the first symptoms.

These sensations can quickly spread, eventually paralyzing your whole body. In its most severe form Guillain-Barre syndrome is a medical emergency. Most people with the condition must be hospitalized to receive treatment.

The exact cause of Guillain-Barre syndrome is unknown."

Well we know one of the causes anyway…..)

Nerve deafness (Someone close to me is almost deaf in one ear. I am not saying I am sure it is because of vaccines but it is possible. Vaccines are administered starting at 2 months old in Alberta. If the parents are not aware of vaccine side affects they would never suspect anything. This may actually be one of the reasons for such a rush to vaccinate. Adverse reactions in infants can be played off as congenital.)

Ok well I think I have had enough. Didn’t plan on writing a fricken novel. Anyone who read all three of my posts, the links and the link sources and still thinks anti-vaxxers opinions are baseless has a severe case of cognitive dissonance.
commented 2016-05-11 07:47:31 -0400

I too “have been the grateful recipient of some amazing trauma repair at times”…unfortunately the day conventional medicine became a church that aligned itself with government in order to compel the public to adhere to its vaccine and certain drug rituals is the day it transgressed beyond the bounds of moral principles. Of course the priests of the “church of modern medicine” including its worshippers will argue that moral principles are on their side, as many church denominations have in the past and still do. Indeed, moral principles that are based on a socialistic, utilitarian rational that is designed to enslave mankind and that is ultimately, “ethically and morally corrupt”.

Benjamin Franklin’s words certainly ring true for those who are obsessed with safety and control; “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety”.
commented 2016-05-11 01:48:00 -0400
I guess this problem boils down to information sources and authority figures. Some say tomato and some say tomahto…
Based on all the stuff I’ve read, personally I mistrust the M.I.C. (Medical Industrial Complex) – even though I have been the grateful recipient of some amazing trauma repair at times, the MIC is the BIG Business of big business, in a corporate world.
No cure for cancer or the common cold, natural supplements and diet bad – poison chemical pharmaceuticals good, needles, vaccinations, booster shots!?
One needs to start at the beginning to first understand the real problem and then find and act on a real solution. Inform yourselves of some of our little known/repressed history. The Pasteur/Bernard debate!
Here’s link to a brief outline:
“The Causes of Disease: The Great Debate”
Then take another look at vaccinations.
These are some good questions from PETER SHOSTAK to have answered: “…Why are vaccine manufacturers exempted from being sued if their products injure or kill? Why are there secret vaccine courts paying out $billions in damages? Why are going numbers of mothers with children injured or killed after being vaccinated? Why do so many people get ill with the very same illness they have been vaccinated from? Why do you care if I don’t get a vaccine, if you’re protected by getting your? Why does Robert DiNero recommend everyone see Vaxxed? What happened to personal rights and freedoms?…”
I have never heard of “Vaxxed”, will check it out, and I don’t do ‘celebrity’ endorsements…
One last thought: If one chooses to have chemical poisons put into their bodies – and I suppose the bodies of their children too – then I suppose that is their choice. But don’t think for one second that anyone has any kind of a right or reason to even suggest MANDATORY vaccinations!
Because anyone comes near me with a mandatory vaccination will be getting a bad case of lead poisoning…
commented 2016-05-10 21:12:52 -0400
Holly, please don’t ever take up Gambling. Doubling down on a losing position just means you lose double plus the original wager. I find most of the College crowd can’t see their own mistakes, they are not aware of the “Social Engineering” that has been perpetrated on them (believe me, I been there). They don’t see it, don’t know how or when it happened, so they can’t see through the fog of their own delusions. But that is how it is meant to be, so don’t be too hard on yourself, just open your mind, dig a little deeper, and surprise, one day there will be a tiny little spark of enlightenment and everything clears up, and everything changes. Unfortunately you might find yourself pissed off at how you were manipulated. Good luck…
BTW, don’t be surprised if you get called a “CONSPIRACY THEORIST
commented 2016-05-10 20:42:37 -0400
Wow, thanks Rebels, it does my heart good to hear that the “CONSPIRACY THEORIST” crowd of “KOOKS” actually ares well informed. How can all you commenters have access to all this information? Information that is totally (willfully) ignored by the so called well informed readers (Parrots) of the scripted narrative, put out by the bought and paid for shills. Good for all of you (should I say most of you) keep up the good work, keep pounding out the questions and demanding the answers. And wear that badge of Honor “CONSPIRACY THEORIST” with dignity, because it means you are getting under their skin. And rightfully so !!!
commented 2016-05-10 15:22:52 -0400
Part 2

Report discussing outbreak od measels caused by twice vaccinated individual:

Report of the Disneyland measles outbreak. Interestingly over half of those infected were vaccinated:

Article discussing how statistical manipulation was used to prove effectiveness of polio vaccines(sources provided again in article ):

Interesting article showing that whooping cough and measles were almost completely eradicated before their vaccinations were even introduced. Of course vaccine companies decided not to show the data for the 50 years before the vaccines and then take credit when most of the work to eliminate the deseases had already been done. Article was written by a doctor who exonerated herself in court using the data in the article:

Harvard trained immunologist’s letter to legislators complete with legit government sources:

Medical errors kill up to 98 thousand a year in the United States. (1999, I doubt it has improved):

PDF excerpt from Journal of the American medical association. Properly prescribed medication kills over 100,000 per year in the United States: (Holly conveniently ignored this in her article instead bashing bloggers as sources of information even though they referenced this report)

To expand on the importance of last two links. Holly, in her first article was engaging in what I believe to be a variation of the Utopia or Nirvana fallacy.

She held up the recent death of an infant to meningitis and the poor decisions of the parents as “proof” that natural alternatives are dangerous and ineffective. However this same standard of perfection is not applied to the medical establishment who by their own omissions kill approximately 150-200,000 people each year in the US due to medical errors and properly prescribed medications.

Funny how the main stream media can spend weeks discussing the tragic death of one baby while ignoring thousands of deaths due to the entrenched medical system . You know what this sort of behaviour is called Holly? HYPOCRISY and you are also engaging in it.

Another thing conviently omitted in these discussions where the unvaccinated take all the blame for the resurgence of certain communicable deases over the last couple of decades; is that there is one other major factor during this time period. Massive emigration from the third world and increases in overseas travel. Apparently it isn’t politically correct to talk about this but if certain diseases were eliminated, how is it possible for the unvaccinated to be spreading them and remember (provided two links above) it isn’t just the unvaccinated that are catching these diseases. Before we go off on a witch hunt for anti-vaxxers maybe we should deal with the huge influx from the third world where many of these diseases are still common.

I can go and and on and I might, we’ll see. There is no shortage of information in support of my position; just time to dig it up. Unlike all the pharma paid shills running around the internet telling everyone how dangerous and crazy those that don’t take vaccines are I don’t get paid for my time spent.
commented 2016-05-10 14:00:06 -0400
Richard Neufeld commented 1 day ago
Science has been corrupted in several areas. That being said, I would rather have my child get vaccinated with a small chance of getting autism (my son does have autism) than not vaccinate and have a much larger chance of death due to any number of diseases and viruses.

As for things like the mercury argument. I read once where you would have to eat almost a truckload of apples to equal the amount of mercury in a single vaccination. Mercury is a naturally occurring substance so it would be very difficult to go completely mercury free.

My daughter just went through her first round of vaccination and got quite sick for three days or so, so there is a chance of an adverse reaction. We are debating delaying the second round for a couple months, but not doing the vaccination is just plain crazy.

This guy is a bumbling idiot… I wonder if he has ANY clue how dumb this above post sounds..
commented 2016-05-10 09:52:56 -0400
Rebel commentators will often poke fun at leftists that use words like ‘racist’ and ‘sexist’ in lieu of an actual argument. Endearing terms such as ‘anti-vaxxer’ and ‘conspiracy theorist’ are reminiscent of ‘racist’ and ‘sexist’ … it looks like the poker has become the poked.

It also looks like you’ve alienated half your audience, if comments and thumbs down are to be believed. Well done!

I’ve closed my premium membership account.
commented 2016-05-10 09:50:04 -0400
In an attempt to promote its “Solvent/Detergent”(S/D) technology for the inactivation of viruses the New York Blood Center (NYBC), has this to say, “Cell lines used in the manufacture of monoclonal antibody preparations and reagents used in tissue culture may be contaminated by viruses especially retroviruses, which can cross species barriers. Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVD), whose small virion size does not allow 100% assurance of its filtration, may potentially contaminate every lot of commercially produced fetal bovine serum”.

The S/D treatment referred to above according to NYBC utilizes a solvent known as tri-n-butyl phosphate, in conjunction with one of two detergents (non-ionic surfactants), polysorbate 80 (Tween 80) or Triton X-100. These toxic ingredients are commonly used in the production of vaccines in an attempt to deactivate the above and numerous other biological (retroviral) contaminants found in the various serums (bovine, monkey, chicken egg yolk, aborted fetal cells etc.) that are used to culture these viral vaccine preparations.

Retroviruses such as BVD, Avian Leukosis (a leukemic disease of animals), and SV40 (simian Virus 40) by their very nature have the ability to insert a DNA copy of their genome into the host cell in order to replicate, e.g., HIV. Indeed, the authoritative Fields Virology text (2001 edition) states, “At the present time, vaccines produced by some of the world’s 12 manufacturing institutes are contaminated with avian leukosis virus”

Holly, do you consider it acceptable to inject the above ingredients into an infant? Perhaps we should ask ourselves why there is such a high incidence of leukemia in children? Is it unreasonable to conclude that the injection of vaccines which bypass natural censoring mechanisms are responsible?

What about the introduction of genetically engineered vaccines known as “subunit” and “naked DNA” types? If you are not concerned about these latter vaccine preparations, you should be!

Tptb are living in a state of denial and will continue to defend their sacred cow despite the concerns of parents who see a dramatic change in their child following vaccinations.
commented 2016-05-10 06:07:14 -0400
CORRECTION…“or mandates” is my emphasis and should have been in brackets.
commented 2016-05-10 05:58:20 -0400
The next time someone tries to tell you that vaccines are scientifically proven to be safe and effective at preventing illness, remember this little boy who had been vaccinated against the very microbe that ravaged his body. It would be inconceivable for health officials to think that their invasive toxic methodologies are in fact responsible for prompting or stimulating such illnesses.

It’s time to stop peddling vaccines as benign immune stimulants whose benefits outweigh the risks. It’s time to name vaccines for what they are, complex biochemical compounds, which by definition are drugs, that have the ability of crossing the infant’s still undeveloped blood brain barrier. They are comprised of elaborate “proprietary” formulas for which full disclosure of ingredients or manufacturing processes is not given. Vaccine formulas may include genetically engineered organisms, animal and human cell DNA, foreign protein particles, novel growth mediums, neurotoxic adjuvants, and other undisclosed ingredients protected by the drug companies that make them and the governments that license these products. Once injected, vaccines cannot be deactivated or removed should something go wrong.

As explained by neuroscientist Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD in a discussion about the effects of vaccine adjuvants on the brain, “There is a huge body of research that shows, if you overstimulate the immune system at the periphery, especially in the critical stage of early development, you are going to influence the brain in a negative way, and by doing so, you can create irreversible damage. This is research that is rarely discussed, because it really shows that there is reason to question the safety of the burden of vaccines given to infants. The backbone of this research was done 30 years ago. We already knew that there is a significant connection between the immune system and the central nervous system. They communicate. You cannot influence the immune system at the periphery without changing something in the brain……[and]… if you increase an immune response artificially at the periphery, you are going to mess up the brain.”

As the following article suggests, “the proper response to bad science is good science, not censorship or mandaters. No area of research should be out of bounds for free minds, and received wisdom, whether positive or negative, about vaccine safety should never substitute for real research.”

Parents are the ones that should have the final say as to whether or not their child is administered an invasive drug…not the Canadian Medical Association
commented 2016-05-10 03:57:47 -0400
Hi Holly. Your videos never disappoint. Keep up the great work, which includes using scientific methods to generate provable results.
commented 2016-05-10 01:17:40 -0400
Dear Holly Nicholas,

LOL, so because you feel the comments section didn’t prove you wrong you are going to let that out of control ego of yours make you double down? You know, some of us write these replies in a few minutes on coffee or lunch breaks. We don’t have time to find every source of evidence we have come across over the years and link to it.

That being said my main objection to vaccination is that there are things in them (like mercury, aluminium, polysorbate 80, fetal tissue etc) that I don’t want in my body or my childrens bodies. In a FREE COUNTRY that should be my choice even if (that’s a big if…)the information I am basing my conclusions on is wrong. However the pro vaccination camp always ends up coming to the conclusion that anti-vaxxers are somehow putting other people at risk and we should be forced to give our children vaccines to protect their vaccinated children. Which of course is completely illogical since if vaccination was actually as effective as claimed there would be no need for heard immunity.

Another notable quality of pro-vaxxers of which you have just demonstrated again; is their complete inability to ever concede that those against vaccination make some valid points. As a reasonable person I concede that pro-vaxxers do make some valid and logical arguments. However I am not convinced enough by these arguments to play Russian roulette with my or my childrens health. My theory about this inability by the pro vaccine camp to ever admit they could be wrong on ANY POINT stems from most of them either being parents of vaccinated children or medical professionals. Being personally invested in their position they become fanatical in the defence of it.

My observation of people I know that have this viewpoint is that the same people that scoff at the mere thought that vaccines could be harmful are feeding their children copious amounts of processed food and sugar and taking them to the hospital on almost a monthly basis, never questioning why their vaccinated children are always sick because it is “normal” for kids to always have colds, flush, allergies, ear aches, upset stomach, tonsillitis etc. That’s just part of growing up right?…. Right?…..

Of course the other thing the pro-vaxxers always end up resting their case on as you illustrated in this latest article is “science.” If you have “scientific peer reviewed” studies backing your case you must be correct. Don’t bother taking into account that those that finance the studies usually have a certain outcome they are looking for. Any and all anecdotal evidence is thrown out the window. Even though anecdotal evidence leads to many important scientific breakthroughs.

It doesn’t matter that science told us that margarine was healthier then butter (now proven wrong). It doesn’t matter that science told us that dietary cholesterol was unhealthy (now proven wrong). It doesn’t matter that science told us that even small amounts of sun exposure was was bad for us (now proven wrong, we need vitamin D duh!)

It doesn’t matter that the medical community here in Canada approved the use of thalidomide even after the evidence from the UK was showing it was causing horrible birth defects. They approved it anyway. (Where could us anti-vaxxers possibly get the idea that big pharma is big business and most of the vaccinations are unnecessary and are being pushed on us simply for profit?!)

It doesn’t matter if your baby received another round of vaccinations and just hours later goes into a seizure. It doesn’t matter if a girl my brother dated (yes my brother) received an HPV vaccine and hours later went into a three day coma, waking up with a rare nervous system disorder.

None of this stuff matters because it is just observation and not “Science.” You know what else I observed today? That the sky was blue! Do you want me to find a study to prove it to you?

Btw the World Health Organisation pulling numbers out of their ass about how many people theoretically could be saved by vaccines isn’t science either…..

Anyway since you want sources I am going to dig some up.

Sources at end of article:

Sources at end again:

Don’t worry I’ll find a whole bunch more for ya.

To be continued…..
commented 2016-05-10 01:13:27 -0400
Peter you are kooks, and your links are pure BS.
commented 2016-05-09 23:29:19 -0400
What next, are you going to come out in support of GMO’s, glyphosate, common core schooling, bank bailouts, AB prov sales tax.

There is so much, readily available information on the dangers of vaccines, the ineffectiveness of vaccines and the fact that it is being made mandatory on everyone.

When it was discovered that the polio vaccine contained the SV40 cancer virus, no one went to jail even though millions contracted cancer. The vaccine did not stop polio, plumbing and sanitation did. The numbers went down the same in countries that were never vaccinated. The remaining cases just had the illness re-branded as meningitis.

Listen to whistle blower, Gwen Olsen (Confessions of an Rx Drug Pusher), explain big pharma’s vaccine business plan:

Hey Ezra, if you guys keep attacking anti 9/11, anti vax people, then we’re going to have to start another Canadian alternative news website, without agendas.
commented 2016-05-09 23:01:26 -0400
Holly Nicolas provides a compelling argument in favour of vaccines.

Courage, Holly Nicolas, you will face some opposition.
commented 2016-05-09 21:29:03 -0400
Dr. Eric Delwart is the researcher who, along with colleagues, made the discovery of contamination in Rotarix. Their intent was reportedly to “show that live attenuated vaccine only contained the expected viral genomes and no other,” but what they found told a different story.

Using new technology to test eight infectious attenuated viral vaccines, the results showed three of the vaccines contained “unexpected viral sequences”:

A measles vaccine was found to contain low levels of the retrovirus avian leukosis virus

Rotateq, Merck’s rotavirus vaccine, was found to contain a virus similar to simian (monkey) retrovirus

Rotarix (GlaxoSmithKine’s rotavirus vaccine) was found to contain “significant levels” of porcine cirovirus 1

So in their tests, nearly 40 percent of the vaccines they tested contained viral contaminants. The implications of these findings on the alleged safety of the vaccine supply remains to be seen, but clearly there is contamination occurring that was a complete surprise to researchers, health officials and vaccine manufacturers alike.
commented 2016-05-09 21:26:27 -0400
An entire issue of Lupus [11,table of contents at ] was recently devoted to ‘ASIA’ – autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (put in vaccines to increase effectiveness) with at least 9 papers each presenting data indicating numerous autoimmune problems are caused by vaccine adjuvants. Injections of aluminum into infant rats and mice in amounts comparable to what human infants receive resulted in brain inflammation and damage [13, 2 sec 4.5], and in an experiment where an analog of the aluminum content of the US vaccine series, and of the Swedish vaccine series, were injected into infant mice, the US series resulted in huge behavioral deficits (and 50% heavier adult mice) and the Swedish series resulted in lesser problems 14.
commented 2016-05-09 21:19:51 -0400
16 Confirmed Mumps Cases in Harvard Community

March 24, 2016

Sixteen mumps cases have been confirmed among Harvard University students in Cambridge since Feb. 29. All students were fully immunized against the mumps prior to contracting the disease.

A measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine prevents most, but not all, cases of mumps. Even in a highly vaccinated population it is possible that some people will get the illness. At Harvard, 99% of undergraduate students and 98% of graduate students meet all state immunization requirements.
commented 2016-05-09 21:15:44 -0400
Holly – Wouldn’t big pharma want us to all get sick you ask? Well Holly pharmaceutical companies get far more money from the illnesses that vaccines create in the form of auto-immune diseases, autism and chronic sickness than they would ever get from the vaccines themselves. The vaccine court has paid out over 3 billion in damages.
The FDA doesn’t conduct its own studies or tests to determine the safety of vaccines. The drug companies conduct their own studies. Those that produce the desired result are submitted to the FDA; those that don’t can be avoided by asking the right questions during study design, or by doing such things as using a “placebo” that isn’t a placebo at all, but another experimental injection; e.g., sometimes another vaccine is used.
Clinical trials consider only short-term adverse events, i.e., reactions that might occur within weeks of having received a vaccine; long-term health outcomes aren’t a consideration, e.g., to determine whether vaccines might increase the risk of children developing asthma, allergies, or autoimmune disease.
Since the 1992 Prescription Drug User Fee Act was passed, pharmaceutical companies can pay the FDA to get their products fast-tracked for approval (a process that a BMJ study found was associated with a higher rate of subsequent safety withdrawals).
The claim that vaccine-induced immunity is “just as good” as natural immunity is an outright lie.
Influenza vaccines, for example, favor a humoral response, i.e., the production of antibodies, while inhibiting the cell-mediated response that would otherwise occur through natural infection; hence while flu shots can protect against the specific strains of the flu contained in the vaccine, there are hundreds of known strains of virus that can produce influenza or influenza-like symptoms, and natural infection confers immunity against not only the specific strain of infection, but against other strains as well (leading to possibility that getting the flu shot could actually increase your chances of getting the flu).
Vaccine-induced immunity for measles is less robust than natural immunity, leading to waning immunity over time, whereas birth before 1957 is considered “evidence of immunity” to measles by the CDC since natural infection generally confers permanent, lifelong immunity.
Mothers who were naturally infected in their youth are able to pass on their antibodies to their infants through their breastmilk. Infants born to vaccinated mothers, on the other hand, are at a higher risk in the event of an outbreak since their mothers are less able to protect them due to waning vaccine-induced immunity.
Immunity from natural infection with pertussis may last from 4-20 years, whereas protection from the vaccine lasts only 2-4 years.
Furthermore, pertussis vaccine doesn’t prevent infection and transmission. Vaccinated individuals can carry and spread pertussis, falsifying the claim that vaccination is necessary for “herd immunity”.
Despite reassuring claims from the government, media, and medical establishment that studies have conclusively shown that there is no association between vaccines and autism, they admit they don’t have any other answer for what does cause autism, and there has never been a study comparing rates of autism in children who’ve received the CDC’s scheduled vaccinations and children who remained unvaccinated.
Aluminum is a common vaccine ingredient despite being a known neurotoxin that can pass the blood-brain and placental barriers.
While some individuals may be able to tolerate the accumulated amount of aluminum from doses of vaccines, others might have an impaired ability to eliminate it from their body or genetic susceptibility to greater harm.
Studies have linked vaccinations with development of autoimmune diseases, with the use of adjuvants like aluminum being of particular concern in this regard.
commented 2016-05-09 19:11:35 -0400
Need More Holly again you need to be removed from Rebel as you cant be trusted as a Truther