January 04, 2016

Don't let Justin's Liberals define "the real Canada"

Rebel Staff
 

With slogans like "Canada is back", the Liberals have had one message since they were elected: Nothing that happened under Stephen Harper was legitimate; that wasn’t the "real" Canada.

That’s what new Roman Emperors would do to the old ones: Every law they ever passed would be immediately nulled; any statues made of them destroyed. Stalin did that too, of course.

Melanie Joly, the new Minister of Heritage, says she plans to uproot any cultural symbols made in the last nine years. For example, that memorial for victims of Communism? Gone. And remember what happened to that portrait of the Queen...

If Stephen Harper had this approach, he would have stuffed the 22 vacant Senate seats with his friends in the days after the election, before Trudeau was sworn in.

That’s how the Liberals play. It wasn’t how Harper played. Though he was the one called the dictator.

I’m just as much a Canadian as the Liberals are. And so are you.

We have to push back against these bullies in every way we can. If you haven't done so yet, sign our petition to demand that we have a right to vote on their scheme to change elections. Go to LetUsVote.ca and add your name.


NEXT: Refugee and immigration lawyer Guidy Mamann talks about Trudeau's refugee plan. He says the PM's refusal to prioritize minority victims of Muslim violence "doesn't make sense."

Seven out of ten would-be "refugees" are now declining to come to Canada. "If you're truly running for your life," says Mamann, "you'll go anywhere."

This proves, he says, that the Liberals aren't focused on trying to help true refugees, and that their plan was a election stunt rather than a true humanitarian effort all along.

It's a fascinating conversation with a true expert, and exactly the kind of information you'll only hear on The Rebel.


Then Wildrose MLA Rick Strankman talks about the ongoing fight against the Alberta NDP's Bill 6. We review that revealing video of Premier Rachel Notley laughing about the new law, which will destroy farmers' traditional way of life.

Strankman talks about what he thinks Notley's NDP have in store for Alberta in 2016, noting that the government's tone has become increasingly belligerent.


Don't forget to stay tuned for viewer feedback (and leave yours in the comments!)

PS: One viewer mentions my interview with England's anti-Islamist crusader Tommy Robinson. If you missed it, be sure to watch it HERE.

 

JOIN TheRebel.media FREE for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-01-11 19:37:05 -0500
“Canada” was never what was told in the romantic narratives told to Truedough in the opulent drawing rooms of the Laurentian elite community in which he has lived most his life.

I have no doubt that an insulated, narcissistic, academic washout second generation trust fund “selfie” has any empathy whatsoever with those on main street Canada outside of Mont Royal or Sussex Drive.
commented 2016-01-07 00:13:03 -0500
Hey Richard… Very accurate comment on your posting.. Yes… What you say is the truth
commented 2016-01-07 00:04:01 -0500
The Liberal parties new name for our nation
CAN-ADASTAN..)
But I must say that Putin has been very patient with the west…
In spite of all the posturings… In spite of a democratically elected government (the Ukraine) that was friendly with Russia overthrown by the USA to create instability all over a warmwater port. Moronic attempts to sanction Russia.. (Nice try but failed miserably) and all the other attempts to draw Russia from a cold war to a hot one… Putin is no fool. I might even think that Putin may have cracked a rib laughing while watching Obama publicly cry on nationwide TV over some pathetic attempt at gun control propaganda.
Putin is a man’s man with commitment to his people. The proof in that statement is that he’s not in a hurry to take his country to war which considering their technological advancements in the military they may very likely win. But the reality of it is in a nuclear hot war there would be no winners so why is Obama trying to provoke the Russians.Throughout history Russia has never been occupied nor do they spend a lot of time clanking swords in offshore wars as do the United States… Many have tried all have failed. The difference between Russians and us is they have genuine national pride and love their culture. Russians are proud to the death to be Russians in spite of their circumstances or surroundings.
commented 2016-01-06 16:46:08 -0500
Abortion has never been debated – that’s just a lefty lie. Are you saying that to avoid the chance that a child might grow up in an impoverished and/or abusive situation, it is morally justifiable to end his/her life? Or that it is morally justifiable to end an unborn life because it will be an inconvenience?
commented 2016-01-06 14:53:30 -0500
Elton,

Why do you ask questions that you already know the answer to. You make it sound like abortion is some new thing and that it hasn’t been debated endlessly for decades when it comes to law, science and morality.

The problem with people like you is that ignore the fact that morality is actually subjective. Morality is NOT definitive. Everyone has their own perception of morality and there is no one set of terms that makes someone moral or not. In many ways, abortion is actually viewed as being very moral – but of course you ignore that for some fetus that you don’t really give a shit about.
commented 2016-01-06 02:09:30 -0500
Richard go hand missiles to Iran , that is so much better LMAO!
commented 2016-01-06 02:08:40 -0500
Richard Harper did not transfer anything a private company made those vehicles and they were not armed in any way, just protective. and russia sells crap to dictators and fanatics. So spare me your pathetic useless arguments.
commented 2016-01-06 02:07:00 -0500
If Russia is so great then move there.
commented 2016-01-06 02:06:38 -0500
Richard that was for offenses committed and after due process. Our judges were handing out joke sentences and oyu damn well know it. And Putin controls the press and kills those who run against him. Neither are perfect , but get a grip.
commented 2016-01-06 02:05:03 -0500
Richard when did Harper say go to jail? And putin asks for licenses which we have and has just let it happen, we have had guns and licenses for a long time now. And he did not create Isis Richard. Now let me know when Putin answers for the Ukrainians he has murdered.
commented 2016-01-06 01:05:23 -0500
Don’t forget that your former PM, and your current PM… Helped CREATE ISIS. Yes Sir. Both voted to assist “moderate rebels” who were known Al-Qaeda operatives. Your faggot sweatervest goof has the blood of hundreds of thousands of dead Syrian Christians all over his goddamn stupid smiling face and Trudeau is no different.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G63wYfqLuZM
commented 2016-01-06 00:59:10 -0500
Maybe if Soros loosened Harper’s strings a bit it would’ve been a go.
commented 2016-01-06 00:54:55 -0500
Even better Drew, tell me why Putin lets Russians carry, and Harper says go to jail… Looks to me that your preferred leader has quite a bit more in common with Trudeau than he could ever have with Putin.
commented 2016-01-06 00:47:55 -0500
This’ll be another one where we’ll have to agree to disagree, Drew.

Harper gave a very ripe and vindictive tool to “liberal” activist judges and “crown” prosecutors in the form of firearms “mandatory minimums”.

You can play stupid about this, but I’ve seen it with my own eyes, first hand. When you serve such a treat to tyrants and fail to remove racial sentencing guidelines, you either knew or ought to have known the outcome.

Please comment on Harper’s armored vehicle transfers to Saudi Towel-head-ia (ISIS). Please comment on the billion spent on “Arab Spring” by Harper and your new “progressive” tool, Trudeau.

At the end of the day, the guy may be squeeky clean, but the people he surrounded himself with, the things he was involved in, there is such a thing as guilt by association. When your savior promotes pieces of trash like Julian Fantino, don’t tell me that being a white male gets you fair treatment.
commented 2016-01-06 00:35:36 -0500
Left wing trolls, Harper let his party vote freely, Justin is forcing his views on his party, that is a dictator. LMAO! Sorry if the truth hurts little left wing babies like you.
commented 2016-01-06 00:33:59 -0500
Sean Penson and michael Mann how come you guys are not on the refugee rape spree in Germany story? Oh yeah , you are cowards and hypocrites who hide from reality LMAO!
commented 2016-01-06 00:31:28 -0500
Richard when did Harper make it a crime to do anything while being white?
commented 2016-01-06 00:30:35 -0500
Michael the law says different, she has until birth to change her mind, you cannot have it both ways and you don’t. Look it up.
commented 2016-01-06 00:20:57 -0500
Intent is HUGE. Especially when it comes to law.

And that is why the “liberal” judges love Harper’s tyranical “mandatory minimums” on carrying a gun (if you’re white)… Because no matter whether your intent was to rob someone, or to protect yourself from robbers… You’re guilty to them just the same… In fact, they go easier on you if you wanted to rob someone (especially if you’re not white).

I am a TRUE liberal, don’t believe in state-sponsored murder of babies, but at the same time, I know abortion will go underground. Its a lot like guns, pot, whatever. Deregulate is the only answer. The government has no business helping abort fetuses or encroaching on others to prevent abortions. No business selling pot, or banning it either… No business banning guns, or handing them out to “moderate rebels”.

Your “liberals” are tyrants, your “refugees” are mercenaries… War is not peace, freedom is not slavery, ignorance is not strength.
commented 2016-01-06 00:12:35 -0500
Michael Mann. Sheldon was talking about abortion “on a purely moral basis” so never mind what the law is cause we all know what the law is. Everyone can make the same reasonable assumption that a pregnant human being will give birth to another human being. For awhile it develops in the womb and then continues to develop outside of the womb. From the moment of conception it receives a soul and becomes a human being. It’s all about a woman’s right to do what she wants with her own body but what about the right to life of the other soon to be born human body? Why is an expectant mother the only one allowed to put a value on another human being especially for the soul reason that it’s an inconvenience?
commented 2016-01-05 23:41:00 -0500
Sheldon,

Intent is HUGE. Especially when it comes to law.

If a woman chooses to have a baby, then it’s assumed that fetus will be born and officially be a human/person. If someone kicks her in the stomach and it makes the woman have a miscarriage – then it’s deemed that the potential human/person to be born was killed.

If a woman decides to have an abortion, then the fetus never was going to be born and become a human/person and thus no killing was done.

While I know you will never accept it, I hope you at least understand the difference per the law. You can’t equate kicking a pregnant woman in the stomach with a woman choosing to have an abortion.
commented 2016-01-05 22:47:29 -0500
Me aged 69, raised in Tommy Douglas (a true responsible fiscally-conscious socialist..read his biography if you doubt me and compare to Rachael Notley!) country, travelled as an exploration geologist in remote Canada looking for potential mines, have a black step-daughter, my Chinese neighbours like me, have worked and socialized with aboriginals, have voted Liberal in the past when I was not so politically-informed and I am now a Conservative with responsible and fiscally-conscious socialists tendencies now and then. I felt safe under the Harper government, as safe as I would feel under any government. However, with the new Liberal government I am very worried about our great country of Canada being compromised by parliamentarians who appear to lack common sense in regard to managing the important issues in this country (not necessarily in order of importance): democracy and FREE speech, jobs, health and senior care, education, foreign policy and security, immigration and infrastructure. Oh yes, the Liberals have promised lots in these areas but I still have considerable concern for myself as a senior and my daughter for her future.
commented 2016-01-05 21:44:02 -0500
Roll Banana, Harper did no leftie pandering. He was so far to the right, that he shamed this great country. I just can’t believe how many “borderline” fascists think he wasn’t right wing enough! Would Benito Mussolini or Francisco Franco have far right enough for you?
commented 2016-01-05 21:22:32 -0500
Kenneth Lawrence this certainly does nothave anything to do with democracy and everything to do with preventing conservatives from ever holding power again. The lefts’ new hateful traitorous agenda.
commented 2016-01-05 20:26:03 -0500
Michael Mann;
I guess I will pick on you since you are clearly defining yourself as a Liberal/Progressive and amongst the majority. I probably disagree with you on many core issues that are established on more fundamental philosophical grounds. I do want to be respectful towards you because I am in a genuine exchange on what I think are important questions. I get the feeling you are of a similar attitude. I want to take up the abortion question on a purely moral basis. I assume that you believe in an objective moral standard when it comes to the right to live. If not please feel free to correct me. The usual argument that pro choice people offer is that no one should tell a woman what to do with her body. But it seems that there is a very clear distinction between a woman’s body and the body of the baby/fetus (the name does not matter much) that lives inside the mothers body. I feel justified in saying this because the law and science both bear this out. In the case of the law, if someone was to punch the mother in the abdamon and kill the baby that would be considered murder given sufficient motive or 2nd degree murder or maybe manslaughter without the requisite motive. However, if another mother decided she did not want the baby and aborted it that would be okay. This is both a logical contradiction and a moral contradiction. What makes it murder in one case is the mothers desire to have a person born into the world and in the other case it is accepted as morally and therefore legally neutral when the mother does not want to bring a person into the world. If that is true murder only depends on the killers desire and if you desire me dead you may kill me with no legal repercussions. I have to say that I just don’t see why we can’t just start killing human beings willy nilly if we accept such a ridiculous line of thinking. Anyone who recognizes an unborn baby as a being to be protected in one instance cannot on pains of logical absurdity see that unborn baby as an object that can be justifiably killed in another instance. The meaning and the recognition of human life and the right to life is the foundation of all human rights. This idea of pro-choice is the biggest lie ever told. What is frightening is that people believe it without any rigorous thought or reflection. Can you honestly say you have wrestled with this question? Apparently pro-choice is a progressive position. This is what I am told. It is a fact that only a mother and not a woman can abort an unborn baby. This is an important distinction. It is not any woman who is in a position to abort a baby but an expectant mother. What women do with their bodies is their own business but a mother is not just a woman and that is why we made the distinction by inventing a new word and even a holiday around it. A pregnant woman is a mother that has a living human being growing inside her. If the unborn was a part of her body like her breasts or belly fat this would not be a contentious issue. If it is okay to abort a baby prior to birth then why not after it is born? If the argument is that the baby is dependant for its existence while in the womb it is also true that the baby is dependant after birth. If it is okay to abort a baby that was just born then why not at one month? And if a one month old baby why not at one year, or two years, or pre kindergarten … how old are you again Michael? There is something to human beings much greater than our biology and the atoms and cells that make up our corpreal self. Our physical selves are intertwined in some great complexity with our transcendent being that we can experience immediately yet barely define. This is a deep and profound reality that the poets, prophets, sages, philosophers, scientists, great thinkers, and common person alike known since we first walked the earth. You know this tacitly if in no other way. It is our transcendent self that gives our bodies the unique status as humans. If we did not have this transcendent quality the killing could commence on an industrial scale without any moral implications. That is not the case with unborn human life. There will come a day when we will look back on abortion the same way we do the hollacaust (the Nazis, I am told, were quite progressive in the 30’s and early 40’s) or slavery or the many other senseless practices in human history. It is unfortunate that ‘progressivism’ has not gotten to that place yet. Social conservatives will be waiting there for you when you arrive. Please try to get their soon, future generations are depending on it!
commented 2016-01-05 19:07:04 -0500
Elton Braun, you’re right, but the question is, will the Liberals have rigged the electoral system so that the Conservatives can never get back into power, because the preferential ballot system will bring most NDP votes to the Liberals in every election. I suspect this is what Butts and his front man Justin have in mind. Democracy in Canada on the federal level died when they took power, and it’s only a matter of them working out the details of how Justin’s love of dictatorship, especially for himself, would be made reality in Canada. If only Harper had at least filled up the 22 vacant Senate seats to slow them down, but in the end, he must have thought respectability took precedence over saving democratic Canada. As if the MSM would ever accord that to him in any case. Well, Canada is now a Liberal dictatorship.
commented 2016-01-05 18:55:56 -0500
The kind of demonic glee that Notley displayed for her NDP Bolshevik fans could only have come from her understanding the extent to which she has screwed over the Wildrose base, which is to say, conservative Christian family farmers and their families, by means of her “favorite bill”, Bill 6, which will do exactly that. Many of those farmers and their families will probably be forced to sell their farms and leave Alberta to get work elsewhere, which is what Notley wants, i.e. to shrink the Wildrose base and depopulate Alberta of conservative Christians at the same time.
commented 2016-01-05 18:50:27 -0500
The Liberals refugee plan is DIS GUSTING. It’s pretty sad that the they are using the refugee issue for political gain and instead of helping the most vulnerable people in Syria they are taking in refugees of convenience. I don’t know how these hypocrites can sleep at night knowing that there are people who are being killed just because of their religeous beliefs and they are not doing a thing about it.
commented 2016-01-05 18:40:29 -0500
A rogue Government in the making. Sean Penson is practically having an orgasm! Be careful what you wish for. You might get it! Tyranny once having established itself on the backs of others does not discriminate on oppression. There is plenty of history to show this. It is also worth remembering the “useful idiots” that enable tyranny become yesterday’s trash when tyranny achieves full rein!
commented 2016-01-05 18:05:27 -0500
Whatever percentage of voters voted for whoever is irrelevant. The fact is the left is once against running the show with all their usual pomp and arrogance and we are once again living in the land of nonsense and once again they will take us right to the edge of total stupidity and annihilation before enough of the simple, thick and dull voters come back to their senses and allow the conservatives to come back in to fix all the damage they’ve done. We can only hope there will still be enough pieces left over big enough to work with.