April 22, 2016

Earth Day SPECIAL: Our experts reveal the TRUTH about “Paris Agreement” lies, hypocrisy

Brian LilleyRebel Co-Founder

Ezra is celebrating Passover with his family, so you get me, Brian Lilley, for a few days. Today, believers in the religion of environmentalism are marking Earth Day.

It's laughable, because even the United Nations says there’s been no warming since 1998. Leading climate change scientists signed a new paper admitting their predictions haven't panned out.

You won’t hear much about that from other media. Instead, they’re beaming images of world leaders, including Justin Trudeau, signing the Paris Climate agreement. 

My guest Tom Harris of the International Climate Science Coalition explains why the Paris treaty is laughable.

Then Rebel fan favourite Dr. Tim Ball comes on to say that climate change fear mongering isn't just annoying -- it could be dangerous.

Finally, your messages to me about some of my stories this week:

Trudeau's refusal to use the word "genocide," my analysis of the Mike Duffy verdict, and the Liberals' latest use of the race and gender cards.

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-04-24 15:53:47 -0400
It’s “Earth Day” every day around my place. Just too expensive to be wasteful! Only the rich like Suzuki can afford to leave their lights on all the time!
commented 2016-04-24 07:55:40 -0400
John Siciliano commented 10 hours ago

Why would we want to get off oil, and no, there is nothing else.
commented 2016-04-24 01:54:49 -0400
Really simplified. - The Saudis will not let ISIS win. IRAN will not let ISIS win. It is a Muslims thing .
commented 2016-04-24 01:41:52 -0400
Western Democracies must like the Saudis because of their MONEY. Sure isn’t because of their Culture , their Religion or their Human Rights. So—- I have no problem selling them guns—- I have no problems selling their enemies guns— Far as I am concerned - THEY can ALL kill each other.
commented 2016-04-24 01:18:43 -0400
I have a really simple question . Why should Canada kiss Saudi ass ? They have Nothing that we need and

Absolutely nothing that we want. Unless—-
commented 2016-04-24 00:22:58 -0400
Thank you Peter Netterville…I needed your insight!
commented 2016-04-23 23:00:51 -0400
David trembling—-do you know where our Incdooge pm imam got his trust fund inheritance majority from? His grandfathers sale of his oily company , and you can bet he himself owns oil in his portfolio!!!!
MARY ANN KENNY I like the way you get to the real point of the matter
commented 2016-04-23 22:24:13 -0400
That’s true David Tremblay I may not agree with a carbon tax or cap and trade since they seem like schemes to get more money but I do agree from college that there are newer supplies to get off oil and gas and coal but the right wing does not want to let it go. It is like the third wheel of their donor funding and ideology. If they lose that base and the big corporate funding, their ideology will not be supported in Canada and it will go down the tubes. Canada needs to have oil and gas for transport but I do not agree with it as the only source. I think having such a policy is too last century and not smart to build a 21st century energy grid and to move into the future. These Conservatives are too rigid in their ideology and are told how to think. Just like how they cling to their god and their guns and they claim to be religious. Canada definitely needs more open-mindedness because just like Europe and the US Canada will hopefully have more parties, new ideas and more unity unlike the echo chamber in the US. I say enough with Churchill, Reagan, FDR and how to structure societies. By October, it is suggested that a new recession could happen, and hopefully civic nationalist and anti-racist and protectionist movements will spring from it in Canada. Protecting our water and valuable resources are worth defending, but the right and neoliberals want to sell out Canada. Canadians clearly deserve better and newer politics with a fresh and bold change. It must all start with the most positive and the true leaders and the brave minor parties standing up to the cowardly elites in the mainstream three big parties federally and provincially with the labels (PC/CON, LIB and NDP).
commented 2016-04-23 19:26:28 -0400
The website I cited below should be GLOBALCLIMATESCAM.COM (SCAM, not SCAN) – KL
commented 2016-04-23 19:20:10 -0400
The article by Richard Foot that I cited below is still to be found in GLOBALCLIMATESCAN.COM

Search it by the title, Scientists Using Selective Temperature Data, Skeptics Say

This is the definitive proof that global temperature data, upon which pronouncements of global warming are based, is based on a shrinking set of thermometer readings worldwide that increasingly eliminates cooler locations, thus making it appear the globe is warming when it in fact is not warming, and may even be cooling. I would love to see an interview on THEREBEL.MEDIA with Joseph D’Aleo, one of the founders of The Weather Network, or E. Michael Smith, co-authors of a report cited in this article, who are quoted in the article as saying: “NOAA… systematically eliminated 75% of the world’s stations with a clear bias toward removing higher latitude, high altitude and rural locations, all of which had a tendency to be cooler”, and “The thermometers, in a sense, marched toward the tropics, the sea and to airport tarmacs.” The article by Foot states, " D’Aleo and Smith say NOAA and GISS also ignore data from numerous weather stations in other parts of the world, including Russia, the U.S. and China" and “The result, they say, is a warmer-than-truthful global temperature record.”
commented 2016-04-23 18:49:18 -0400
As Richard Foot reported in his January 2010 article (carried in the Globe and Mail and newspapers worldwide, although most have removed it from their websites by now), more and more temperature data stations in cooler locations around the world have been eliminated progressively (i.e. a few more each year) for decades, which has the effect of making a stable climate look as if it is warming, or which makes a cooling climate look as if it is stable. That means that when the MSM tell you the global climate is warming, it is stable, and when they tell you it is stable, it is actually cooling. Google ‘Call it the Mystery of the Missing Thermometers’ and search for the full article, which is getting harder to find as time goes on. It’s gone from the Globe and Mail now.
commented 2016-04-23 13:10:11 -0400
Justin “Dear Leader” prefers the Chinese Model . . . where government can Turn on a Dime ! ! !
Having watched his marxist father for decades . . . I know exactly where he is coming from !
You have really Stepped In It this time Canada . . .
commented 2016-04-23 11:59:05 -0400
I cant even describe how much dipshit Justin trudeau make me sick. hearing his voice makes me cringe
commented 2016-04-23 11:55:02 -0400
David Tremblay . . . you are an Earth Day Zellot . . . a “Believer” in AGW nonsense . . . and living in one of the cleanest countries on the planet . . . where Emissions have dropped in the last Decade.
Must be ALL Harper’s fault . . . lol
You are no smarted than clueless Justin . . . do you have a puppet master too ?
commented 2016-04-23 11:21:36 -0400
Jay Kelly asked, “Daryl Herman, do I take it you are a subscriber?”

We do not know what you do or do not take, Jay. I think that most people here do not care what you do or do not take.

To get inside your mind to discover what you do or do not take would be an extremely frightening experience for the intelligent common sense people support this website.

People, can you imagine the swirling chaos of contradicting idiotic thoughts that smash and collide with each other in that minuscule mind that is Jay Kelly? [shiver] What a frightening thought!
commented 2016-04-23 11:14:29 -0400
Nathan W lied, “warming since 1998: this is statistical fraud to call it a lie.”

Actually it is not a fraud. The data that the IPCC uses comes from four separate sensing station. Now, Nathan you have to understand that the data that comes from the sensing stations is pure raw data without any political agenda at all.

It is this data that indicates that there has been no global increase in the mean temperature of the plant in over 18 years.

The four websites are listed below. You can find the raw data sets from there.

University of Alamaba Huntsville

Goddard Institute of Space Studies

Hadley Centre of the UK Met Office

Remote Sensing Solutions

Now Nathan, I know you do not have the maturity to actually seek out the truth, you just love listening to the lies, but I have posted these links for those people that are actually interested in the truth, and we all know that is not Nathan W.
commented 2016-04-23 11:01:15 -0400
commented 2016-04-23 10:27:34 -0400
Tom Harris is not a climate scientist, he is a PR man, similar to the people that tobacco companies used to hire to tell people that smoking was good for you. The only climate scientists that believe people aren’t causing global warming are those paid to believe that by big oil. Finally we have a PM that isn’t owned by the oil companies and maybe just maybe he can start to fix the damage done by Harper.
commented 2016-04-23 10:18:52 -0400
Simple, Paul Mccullough has a functioning brain and Nathan W does not. Dr. Ball would give us more pertinent information from his sleep than Mann and all his bonehead ilk could do combined. Why do these expert LIARS always refuse to debate Ball or like minded people. Because they cant win, and their lies would be exposed. Last night I had to watch John Kerry sign the UN document and then crow about the impending doom if we dont conform to this unenforceable document immediatment!!! WE should strap him, Obama and Selfy to the blades of a giant windmill and let the doomed birds smash the hell out of them. Of course there is climate change, it will evolve over time as it always has. To ruin economies and send us on a backward spiral just to allow a money shuffle and fuzzy feel good moments is so absurd it stinks. China and India are sure to comply. NOT!!! Nathan, you seem like you might be a big enough fool, tool, tool, fool to bathe yourself in the LEAP manifesto. All supporters of that piece of shit should imagine their first hospital trip after adopting LEAP. Wouldnt have much for supplies, and by the way, the hospital would be a cave. And when the sun spots decide to become less active, which they will, we can watch Nathan out there rubbing sticks to start a fire so he can burn up that carbon based tree so he doesnt FREEZE TO DEATH!!!!!!
commented 2016-04-23 10:09:15 -0400
So they are worried about global warming, and want a new world tax on energy use, but they never mentioned the whale in the room in Davos, Fukishima, the gift that keeps giving. The Pacific Ocean is dying and these meltdown will continue to churn out radiation for the rest of time. Global warming is a farce, Radiation levels are growing by the minute.

Please sign and share on social media if you are against Trudeau.

commented 2016-04-23 09:37:45 -0400
The lengths that they’ve gone too to falsify temperature data is astounding. In what were the best kept historical temperature records in the world. Hansen falsified the US temperature records going back as far as the 1930’s. They do by lowering the older records and increasing the newest ones, thus tipping the scale from both ends to show warming.

Global Temperature Record Is A Smoking Gun Of Collusion And Fraud

commented 2016-04-23 09:30:04 -0400
Global warming sheep are idiots who don’t even understand that scientists do NOT DO CONSENSUS.

A scientists conducts experiments, to establish facts to form a “Proof.”

From a “Proof” the scientist forms an Hypothesis, which is then presented, with all the relevant data, for review and it is the job of the scientific community to SHRED THE WORK.

If say, the experiments involved chemistry, physics, and mechanical engineering, and just one, single solitary person in the evaluation process, the chemist, or the physicist or the mechanical engineer says, “Wait a sec. Your data is flawed here.” then the Hypothesis is declared invalid, and the original scientist must start from square one, with the corrections in the experimentation process.

The new “Proof” can then be resubmitted, and if nobody can find flaw, (And only another environmental scientist is qualified to understand how the combined data from the separate fields affects the environment) then the Hypothesis becomes a “Theory.”

And even then, a “Theory” is not the end of the matter.

A Theory only stands as long new data, and new knowledge continue to uphold it.

If just one, single, solitary provable example disproves the theory, said “Theory” is toast again.

Scientist are NOT supposed EVER be in consensus. The best they can say is, “I have found no flaws in the data.”
commented 2016-04-23 08:23:35 -0400
JAY KELLY , get your mom to park the car in a nice sunny spot, roll up the windows, and then sit in it. you will soon discover that co2 does not cause warming, solar radiation does.
commented 2016-04-23 03:16:09 -0400
Global warming is a lie. It was a lie when it was global cooling & it’s a lie now.
commented 2016-04-23 03:05:09 -0400
Daryl Herman, do I take it you are a subscriber?
commented 2016-04-23 02:46:52 -0400
@ Jay Kelly – you have all the info that we have, you Lazy Phuck! go and find it & hear! Get out of your trance of ignorance and listen & learn. Google is not entirely corrupt – other than entries like you and Nathan put up. Listen to FACTS. There is probably more righteous info than you Zombies can absorb.
commented 2016-04-23 02:39:59 -0400
@ Paul McCullough -That was well said, and you are absolutely right. Any human being who thinks he or she or “trans” (think that’s Nathans problem) can control the climate is so insane it is unbelievable that these people would even allow themselves to bring it up or mention it to another human!
It’s like me claiming I have control over the volcanoes or the solar powers.
commented 2016-04-23 02:34:50 -0400
When I clicked on the video icon it said “are you a subscriber?”

How can I subscribe to a theory of global warming when I do not know what it is? All I know is that the overwhelming majority of scientists in fields related to climate and atmospheric changes say that human activity has created the conditions for an increase in mean temperatures.

Do I subscribe to this theory? Yes, if I had more information.
commented 2016-04-23 02:30:00 -0400
Kenneth Lawrence : Yea, funny how all the “solutions” to the “problem” result in the taxpayers being parted of their money & citizens being parted of their rights, isn’t it? Funny how the oil from the oilsands is dirty & oil from the middle east or south American dictatorships is somehow exempt in their view. I’ll look into the works of Richard Foot. I don’t know that much about him.
commented 2016-04-23 02:29:07 -0400
Thanks guys – Nathen is one of those idiots that just doesn’t think much or who allows himself no NEW info on his most revered campaign of aligning himself withe the IMPORTANT people who he thinks will save his sorry ass in any given event. He is like that wounded coyote who comes up to you growling hoping he will avenge his condition with you. THEN as any sane man would do you need to put the animal down. He just is suffering the Libtard cramps of being a useless idiot.
Eh – Nathan there is a weather storm coming – better find a SAFE place for your sorry ass.
As for hate – Nathan I don’t hate you – I despise you – because you are such an undeveloped human being as to imagine you and your sick heroes can actually control weather.