October 26, 2016

In Germany, a migrant with four wives, 23 kids collects $520K a year — Is this happening in Canada?

Rebel Staff
 

The Daily Express picked up this German news story: "Syrian refugee with FOUR WIVES and 23 CHILDREN ‘claims £320,000 a year in benefits’”

Now, polygamy is illegal. But only a racist talks about enforcing the law in Germany these days. And if you’re a journalist or politician or policeman who will cover up a mass rape of German women, you’re not going to be fussed when some Syrian sends a half million dollar bill to taxpayers.

Is this happening in Canada, too? The government won’t tell us.

The Liberals have been stonewalling on any access to information requests relating to the Syrian migrants they’ve shipped in by the tens of thousands. They’re either embarrassed by the facts or don’t even know what the facts are.

Back in 2008, Toronto media left and right reported on hundreds of polygamous Muslim families in Toronto, many on welfare. Has anything changed?

Need I remind you about Mohamed Shafia? He came to Canada with two wives. Hey, no problem! And you know the rest — Shafia, one of his wives and his son, murdered another wife and his three daughters, because they didn’t want to live like medieval Afghan peasants.

Again, has anything changed?

Does Canada’s government screen for polygamous marriages? Do our welfare agencies? No.

And our media won’t breathe a word about it...

NEXT: Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore joined me to talk about his own experiences dealing with the United Nations, in light of the UN's blacklist of our journalists from the Morocco climate conference. 

THEN: Marc Morano of Climate Depot reacts to Democratic Vice Presidential candidate Tim Kaine's weird statement comparing believing in global warming to joining AA's 12-step program.

 

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-10-29 22:59:10 -0400
The Koran sates that you may have 4 wives if you can take care of four wives. When the state provides for all then you’re not able to take care of all those people. Then you clearly contravening the very word of the religion you’re following and abusing our monogamous built system.

These abuses should be banned all together from receiving any kind of tax payer’s contribution.
commented 2016-10-27 19:37:32 -0400
Bringing in 450 000 of these a year is some how going to “stimulate” our economy according to the oxymoron-ical left wing(math is hard) economic “experts”…
commented 2016-10-27 13:57:51 -0400
Well Germany is the birthplace of the welfare state, so no surprise there. But yes, they will all end up in the GTA living off their relatives and/or the government teat. Is anyone really that naive to think otherwise?
commented 2016-10-27 13:42:59 -0400
What a great idea Ezra to try to change “climate denier” to “climate realist” using real statistics, not the cherry-picked opinions that the MSM touts.
commented 2016-10-27 11:03:00 -0400
Glen C, Mongrel – these came from an address given by a scientist from the Global Warming Policy Foundation given at the Royal Society on October of this year – addressing delegates going to COP22.

The gist of the address is warning scientists not to be party to supporting any proposition which has political implications – primarily that “the science is settled” – that is a political statement not a scientific one.

The list of past predictions which turned out to be a farce were proven by political agendas and media sensationalism – those scientists who lent their name to to these lost credibility but far worse, made the public distrustful of of science.

Recall the peak oil crisis??? Now there are a large group of scientists who escaped the politically correct consensus of peak oil and think oil is abiotic and manufactured in the mantle – I remember the hysteria surrounding the ozone hole and how we would all be fried (if we didn’t buy new refrigerators and air conditioners). I recall when I was going to school how our primary grade teachers had us worried about perishing in a new ice age – I recall Hollywood pumped out dozens of horror and disaster films on the climate crisis ice age crisis theory – never see them on TV today.

It’s hard to separate science from sensationalism and venal politics these days but it is far better to be rationally critical (AKA skeptical of unlikely theories) than a dupe for pseudo- science politics
commented 2016-10-27 08:35:59 -0400
Bill Elder,

I like your list of faux science predictions. However, one correction if I may. There has been a global increase in malaria, dengue, and other mosquito vectored disease. However, the reason fits right in with the theme of faux science in your post: doom and gloom scenarios about DDT and DEET such that poor countries could not control mosquitos. Once ‘humanitarian’ aid was tied to a country ending the use of these control measures, malaria and related deaths exploded: all due to socialist science tied to the environment.

Socialists, always looking out to create meaningful deaths.
commented 2016-10-27 08:33:06 -0400
@bill Elder….That’s a nice power point collection of sky is falling hoaxes. The fact that this fellow was willing to believe that SUVs and cow farts could knock a planet out of orbit shows just how gullible the people are that we are dealing with.
commented 2016-10-27 05:47:23 -0400
What made Canada strong is the people who immigrated here back when you had to earn the right to come to Canada. The Liberals are using this as a justification to allow millions more to enter. The do not employ the same criteria as our fore fathers did. What the liberals are doing is taxing our support systems by caving into the extreme demands some of these groups are making. Some do not care to work which is their right given to them by the Liberals when they were in power over the last 5 decades. When the right wing says we can’t afford it, the Liberals cry Racists. Canadians are that stupid. It disgusts me what the average Canadian will settle for. They do not realize that North America, is going to have a financial collapse brought on by Government’s debts. That goes for both sides of the 49th. Liberals in the USA are not as foolish, but they are getting there. When the systems can tolerate no more, the liberals will cry “Someone should have done something!”. Answer them with this “Someone did do something every election. They voted in irresponsible government so suck it up!”. One thing a liberal does not understand, rising tides affect all ships. They continue to think they will be okay.
commented 2016-10-27 04:35:55 -0400
i resent these idiot liberals that speak of “believing the science” , whos science? Al Gore? HES NOT A SCIENTIST!!! REAL Scientist do not believe Al Gore, only leftist liberals worship Al gore.
commented 2016-10-27 01:50:37 -0400
Stop all govt. welfare/dole schemes the immigration to western countries will be reduced by 90% and so will the taxes.
The welfare should only be at the times of national crisis, people who have families & kids should themselves be responsible for their well-being. No aid in any form to foreign countries.
The whole system of grants, welfare, refugees, charity & foreign aid is a big scam being perpetrated by our politicians and their minions, we need to put stop to it.
commented 2016-10-27 01:50:27 -0400
Let me get this straight. If the polar regions melt the moon will crash into the earth. Now that is scary. Actually grade 3 science will tell you that when ice floating in water melts, the water level stays the same. The northern polar ice is floating on water.
commented 2016-10-27 01:35:10 -0400
I see the climate zombies believe everything they read in the tabloids.
The track record on doom predictions is poor. The primary reason to be skeptical about dangerous climate change is that environmental predictions of doom are always wrong.

Here’s a list of “scientific” predictions made with extensive media coverage in the in the 1970s_
• the population explosion would be unstoppable; We have a birth decline today
• global famine would be inevitable; GMO rice yields saved millions
• crop yields would fall;
• a cancer epidemic caused by pesticides would shorten lifespan; Avg. life span has increased
• the desert would advance at two miles a year; Arid areas are greening
• rainforests would disappear; (the planet is 14% greener today)
• acid rain would destroy forests; Not really
• oil and gas would run out; We have 600 yrs reserve with shale gas
• and so would copper, zinc, chrome and many other natural resources; Nope
• the Great Lakes would die; Still kicking
• dozens of bird and mammal species would become extinct each year; as they always do and new ones are discovered
• and a new ice age would begin; Heh heh
All these were trumpeted loudly as “scientific” predictions in the mainstream media. Not one of them has come even close to becoming reality.

These were later joined by more predictions of doom:
• sperm counts would fall because of solar radiation;
• mad cow disease would kill hundreds of thousands of people;
• genetically modified weeds would devastate ecosystems;
• nanotechnology would run riot;
• computers would crash at the dawn of the millennium, bringing down civilization;
• the hole in the ozone layer would cause blindness and cancer on a global scale;

Many predictions of climate doom have already been proved wrong, as simple observation points out.
Many of the impacts of global warming have not happened as predicted either:

• malaria was going to get worse because of rising temperatures; it didn’t.

• snow would become a thing of the past; yet northern hemisphere snow cover shows no trend

• hurricanes/cyclones would get worse; they haven’t they’ve decreased.

• droughts would get worse; they haven’t

• the Arctic sea ice would be gone by 2013; it wasn’t, it’s increased.

• glacier retreat would accelerate; yet more than half the retreat of glaciers happened before 1950.

• sea level rise would accelerate; it hasn’t

• the Gulf Stream would falter, nope no change here either
All these predictions have also failed to materialize .

• James Hansen in 1988 said that by the year 2000, the West Side Highway which runs along the Hudson River will be under water. And we will have to put tape across our windows because of high winds. Nothing near this has happened

• The UNEP predicted in 2005 that by 2010 there would be 50 million climate refugees. In 2010 they tried to delete this embarrassingly wrong web link.

• Ten years ago, Al Gore said that within ten years we would pass a point of no return in heating – but Satellite data says that Earth hasn’t warmed in nearly 20 years.

So we should take predictions of climate crisis and doom with a pinch of salt.
commented 2016-10-27 01:34:46 -0400
Poligamy should be illegal for this very reason. The man who would marry multiple wives and have as many children as possible to collect the highest welfare cheque possible in the West should not be allowed.
This is typical third world tradition, Have as many children as possible because they are employees of the family and will help provide for the family. Makes sense, right? More children = more money.
Sorry not here. Here we have children we can provide for. Here we don’t use our children for personal gain but for personal gratification that we are giving to the world rather than taking.
Another one of the stark differences between cultures. I won’t be saying “you bet” to any polygamist cultures soon.
commented 2016-10-27 00:40:48 -0400
Germany sucks
commented 2016-10-26 23:20:15 -0400
To The Architect:

Yeah, they’ve been saying that for about the past 15 years and it hasn’t happened yet…Al Gore stated years ago that in 2014 all ice would disappear and then in 2015 there was a record amount of ice…you’ve been drinking the Kool-Aid Bud.
commented 2016-10-26 22:47:58 -0400
How many times have you seen judge Judy chew some person woman or man for having children they can’t support.And yet these people have been living somewhere with all these wifes and children.How and why?How is this any different to people in court that are told if you can not support them don’t expect the state to support them,Wake up suckers.NO DIFFERENCE.
commented 2016-10-26 22:28:00 -0400
D.H Chaisson

Listen, you ignorant fuck… The Rebel has picked up this story from “The Daily Express” as stated in the column.
That being said, privacy laws in Germany, just like in Canada, would prevent the release of this persons identity as a private citizen. However the information in regards to how much the government spends on a single private individual is fair game.

But an ignorant liberal sheep like you isn’t smart enough to know that. You simply spout off with your typical uneducated erroneous opinion.
commented 2016-10-26 22:25:11 -0400
@the ARCHITECT…..I have attended the end of the world too many times to be impressed……and besides….

“I know who you are ARCHITECT and never again shall you build my house……I have cracked the rafters and rooted out the king post and from this day I am homeless…I have become enlightened for the sake of all living things…the earth shall bear witness”

Siddhartha Gautama
commented 2016-10-26 22:04:26 -0400
Canadian welfare laws were made – as a stop-gap measure to help the poor and downtrodden. Muslims and Islam - have made a mockery of out Laws.
commented 2016-10-26 22:03:28 -0400
Hey Ezra, can you provide a name of this supposed German migrant so we can fact check another one of your hyperbole conspiracies? No? …Didn’t think so.
commented 2016-10-26 21:59:09 -0400
Why do you think Greece is bankrupt. They have been hosting and letting in immigrants like the syrians since 2010 and those immigrants are all on the welfare system over there. Furthermore, they demand and destroy properties. Now France and Germany are on the same path, their systems are becoming bankrupt. No media is telling us the truth. But THE REBEL is.
commented 2016-10-26 21:51:21 -0400
Ezra you are going to have to (as the name the Rebel implies) do the work the luegenpresse will not. The useless msm will never report this stuff – they prefer to tackle things like the Mike Duffy non-scandal. Keep up the good work.
commented 2016-10-26 21:46:38 -0400
And I agree with Philip also.
commented 2016-10-26 21:45:43 -0400
Charles….James is being sarcastic. Did you look at the link?
However Charles, I agree 100%. Not about you James.
commented 2016-10-26 21:42:28 -0400
James… you want them then you foot the bill. I don’t want them. I don’t want one of them and I don’t want to have to pay taxes just to ruin my own countries future. Trudeau is a fool and this Syrian immigration is just plain stupid.
commented 2016-10-26 21:36:34 -0400
James S

You want to pay more taxes for these animals and their children? Go right ahead!!! But those of us with a brain know that children grow up into adults and become a product of their environment, just like the vast majority of every other Muslim!
These “innocent” little kids are already proving that they are violent animals in many schools across Canada.
commented 2016-10-26 21:24:25 -0400
This is exactly why that POS Trudeau increased the child benefit payouts for people who can’t afford to support their own kids, and will incent them to breed even more!!!!

Trudeau is trying to breed poverty into Canada.
commented 2016-10-26 21:19:44 -0400
This has been going on since the 1990’s. I remember news reports from then.

You know, there’s accommodating immigrants, and then there’s just plain being a complete doormat with no regulations at all.