April 01, 2016

Ghomeshi trial triggered “unholy dustup” —- hypocrisy of modern feminism EXPOSED for all to see

Sheila Gunn ReidRebel Commentator

I’ve watched the Jian Ghomeshi drama unfold from the beginning. From the initial allegations, to the trial and now to the verdict, I’ve had to challenge myself to put aside my own dislike of Ghomeshi in support of the rule of law

In my video, you can see my interview with prominent anti-feminist blogger and vlogger, Karen Straughan from Girl Writes What. Karen shares her thoughts about the trial, Ghomeshi himself and the defence counsel Marie Heinen.

The Ghomeshi trial has been an unholy dust up between the two sides of modern feminism that turned into a street fight. It’s a battle between what feminism sells itself as and what feminism is in reality.

A self empowered female prosecutor is under attack for not giving women victims special treatment. The poster child for what feminists tell us is success is now hated for holding women to the exact same standards as men.

As for me, I’m happy to watch the brawl from across the street.

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-04-06 15:49:19 -0400
Excellent Sheila, as usual! I was glad Jian was found not guilty. I think he is a reprobate, but his accusers were not much better! The law is the law. He had a great and capable lawyer. Kudos to her for doing her job well!…..and I am glad that the law won!
commented 2016-04-03 14:53:07 -0400
These third wave fems just make themselves look ridiculous attacking Marie Heinen for doing what amounts to a bang up job. She did her job according to the law of the land, and the prosecution made it easy for her.
The fact that the feminazis would have been satisfied if Ghomushy had been locked up by the court of popular opinion instead of by the law as it is written just shows their ignorance of their own safety.
Public opinion is leaning towards the feeling that third wave fems are too stupid to walk the earth, and how dare they call themselves feminists, but I wouldn’t advocate they all be taken out behind the barn, even if they deserve it. Ghomeshi is slime, but the law is the law, the prosecution blew it, the witnesses blew it.
commented 2016-04-03 11:37:09 -0400
The roots of ‘modern feminism’ can be found in the writings of the Mary Wollstonecraft’s, and in the actions of women in the industrial revolution. The raison d’etre of those feminists was a repair and maintenance of the traditional family unit – one man, one woman, making and raising children, bettering the community/society.
Today’s ‘modern’ feminists (radical feminists) are man-haters and emasculaters, haters of the family unit and what they call ‘the patriarchy’ – which is in fact Democracy, and they are in fact some kind of Marxist/socialist totalitarian haters of democracy who think the state should raise your children – like the rest of the lefty liberals.
It’s a good thing that filthy bugger Ghomeshi was outed, and the corrupt atmosphere of power and degeneracy at the CBC was exposed.
It’s a good thing that Ghomeshi likely won’t be poisoning the airwaves with his sick brand of whatever…for a while at least.
It’s a good thing the " hypocrisy of modern feminism (was) EXPOSED for all to see", yet again…not that it will make a bit of difference to any of those blind lefties.
It’s a good thing Sheila is branching out from Alberta…
commented 2016-04-02 11:42:44 -0400
Sleezan Gomeshi has always been a womanizing, lecherous, abusive bas-turd, ( Emphasis on the Turd ).
As I have family and friends that work in the entertainment industry, who know him, and know of him via his reputation, I can say with extreme confidence that he has reaped what he has sown.
In fact, I am shocked that some husband, boyfriend, brother or father, hasn’t beat him within an inch of his life yet…………
commented 2016-04-02 07:06:12 -0400
@ Sam Young commented 4 hours ago
Bravo, if I did not know any better, from your post I would say you almost envy the Muslim way of life.
Sam – too funny.

While this comment could also get me a visit from the police – you could not be further from the truth.

If someone were to commence the killing of every islamic on earth – I would simply grab the beer and popcorn – a comfortable seat – and watch.

I might even help them if they asked me nicely.

They might not even have to be nice when they ask.
commented 2016-04-02 02:46:34 -0400
Bravo, if I did not know any better, from your post I would say you almost envy the Muslim way of life.
commented 2016-04-01 23:23:19 -0400
No wonder the population is going the wrong way – shrinking every generation.

Men are avoiding women because many are becoming the bitches from hell.

I know I avoid the vast majority of women that are under 55 years of age as – not all – most are ball breakers or nut busters.

On the other hand the islamic population is growing because they still force their women to marry at a young age, force them to have sex and force them to stay home and raise the kids.

Any back talk gets them beat up or the honour kill can be let loose.

Oh, this is quite verifiable even if politically incorrect.

Does this mean I get a visit from the OPP or RCMP?

I can give them stats and video as proof. However, telling the truth is never considered appropriate if it is considered to be politically incorrect. Especially by police, lawyers, politicians and media.

Western women have no idea how well off they truly are – yet they will not step up to the plate and help any islamic women – I have always wondered why?

Which is why I will yet again post this two minute video – produced as proof – and all things in it are – again – verifiable – watch it and send it to your friends because there is much truth in it. I am certain you will find it quite humorous as well.

commented 2016-04-01 20:58:46 -0400
The dork the guy is doesn’t make him guilty. The lawyer that his was doesn’t make her betraying women. It makes her upholding the law hence a respectable person. Even though she’s a woman. Right feminists? I’m not supposed to think she’s respectable by default because I’m an evil man and she’s a woman. She knows the law and knows its not based on your gut feeling or your (like the Liberal Party has) Heart. It’s based on the facts you present or the facts that can be backed up with 100% proof. Feminists can find fault in a sausage party.
commented 2016-04-01 19:55:16 -0400
The modern feminists only care about screwing over men.
commented 2016-04-01 19:36:03 -0400
Peter I have an idea of what Glen is saying, but I to lazy today to back into the deep recesses of my mind to unlash, just a more pointy way of putting it !

DEborah ____. You might then bobbitize him ! Yikes !!
commented 2016-04-01 19:12:02 -0400
Can any of these so called feminists explain what it is exactly that they want? I see strong willed , smart women lawyers being hated here, try blaming the women who are perpetual victims and kept going back to see Gomeshi.
commented 2016-04-01 19:08:33 -0400
They can complain all they want, the women who made the complaints did stupid things and kept seeing him and held back information, i am no Gomeshi fan , but not guilty was the proper verdict.
commented 2016-04-01 15:22:08 -0400
@ Glenn Craig – I am sure that feminism was call a variety of derogatory names in the past by a few group, but that is not what society as a whole called feminism.

So what is you point by highlighting that the “The Women’s Christian Temperance League” and “The Women’s Auxilliary of the Ku Klux Clan” called feminism, “political lesbianism”?
commented 2016-04-01 13:36:46 -0400
Three very basic lessons from the trial:
1) When the investigator asks “Is there anything you haven’t told me?” that’s a hint; don’t try to hide stuff.
2) When the court asks you to swear to tell “the truth, the whole truth,” it’s not just a tired old formality.
3) If you don’t want to become one of those “witnesses put on trial,” don’t set yourself up for it by ignoring 1) and 2)
commented 2016-04-01 13:18:51 -0400
All I can say is that if anyone roughed me up that way for sexual pleasure, they had better not fall asleep afterwards!
commented 2016-04-01 13:13:06 -0400
I am sure feminism has it’s place, just not in western civilization.
however it is amazing to watch how they eat their own.
commented 2016-04-01 12:47:37 -0400
@joe NOBDY….in the past it was called “political lesbianism” “The Women’s Christian Temperance League” and “The Women’s Auxilliary of the Ku Klux Clan”
commented 2016-04-01 12:41:24 -0400
Ghomeshi was a lousy goobmint appointed lifer for CBC and used this position to play rough with women who liked to play rough.

Illegal?? No. Unethical??? Oh yes and now Ghomeshi is fired.

And for those “like it rough” women, they should come clean and tell the world that getting choked while getting fkd is enjoyable for them – many other women out there are same.
commented 2016-04-01 12:28:01 -0400
Whatever feminism was in the past, it is not that now, and it is a cancer on civilization.