October 12, 2016

Al Gore’s “crooked” charity has shocking ties to Liberal Party

Sheila Gunn ReidRebel Commentator
 

Earlier this week I brought you the story of a Telus PR person named Jill Yetman who was trained to be a “climate leader” by Al Gore and his fake charity here in Canada called The Climate Reality Project.

But there is even more to the story. That fake charity, Climate Reality, had been breaking the laws related to how a charity can operate in Canada.

The Canada Revenue Agency prohibits a charity from seeking to oppose or change the law, policy, or decision of any level of government in Canada. According to Canadian tax law, a charity can neither support or oppose a political party's policies.

But that hasn't stopped the Big Green Gore Machine.

Watch my video to see examples of how Climate Reality has ignored the tax law in Canada and see their shocking ties to the Liberal Party of Canada.

Don't expect much to change when it comes to these crooked charities now that their friends are in power.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-10-13 14:53:05 -0400
I signed up in Aug for a two year contract but when my two years is up. I am gone. Will post back in two years if God forbids.
commented 2016-10-13 14:47:32 -0400
@william Collins…so this makes me curious …if Ezra filed an inquiry with revenue canada on this matter back in 2012 when the tories were in what came of that? The REBEL should file an FOI or even a ministerial inquiry with the deputy minister specifically on what happened to that request for action.

I am aquainted with several revenue canada employees and it just isn’t in their nature or character to give a tax break to anyone.

And what Sheila has uncovered is really partizanship on the part of private company executives which while it may be highly inappropriate is not “lobbying” per se. nor is it conflict of interest. No measure taken by the government on these matters is going to put one nickle in the pockets of the people named and there is nothing here that would prove or indicate that the elected representatives have received bribes or other inticements and they are free to support and act on that which is their own personal beliefs and in concert with those who voted for them.

Churches do not loose their charitable status just because an elected member is one of their deacons who attended their Bible study courses.
commented 2016-10-13 13:49:38 -0400
Glenn…the rub is lobbyists have to be registered with the government in order to lobby. Also, charities are strictly prohibited from direct political action or lose their tax free status. Sheila’s beef is Gore’s charity still retains its tax-free status while engaging with MP’s.
commented 2016-10-13 12:15:28 -0400
Sheila…the United Way has salaried staff. Charities are not required to be run by volunteers.

Being a member of a shooting sports association does not disqualify you from public service or public office, but all these organizations serve to do is policy lobby.

Conflict of interest is assessed on a case by case basis and is only invoked when there is real or perceived conflict of interest. Elected representatives being members of organizations that support the ruling party’s policies would never be deemed a conflict of interests.
commented 2016-10-13 11:45:00 -0400
Sheila, charities CAN lobby in Canada and many do, it’s just that since the Harper regieme they risk loosing their tax credit on donations which might serve as a disincentive to doners.

The organizations that were hardest hit by this policy were feminist advocay groups which only functioned to lobby. They also lost their funding from Status of Women.

Best way to defund any lobby group is to damage their credibility with potential doners.
commented 2016-10-13 11:22:41 -0400
@harrold Hoff….the site http://www.mensrighthelp.com has a forum dedicated to this very issue and an extensive body of research on this subject matter. The moderator with the moniker OUTDOORS is quite knowledgeable. CAS is not simply a charity, it is a non profit NGO and family law is not federal jurisdiction.
commented 2016-10-13 09:03:50 -0400
Funny how the yank politicos are bitching that Russia is trying to influence the outcome of the US elections by somehow interfering with the electoral process.
They have no problem with the US meddling in the internal affairs of foreign countries to the point of assassinating foreign political leaders.
These US politicos need to take a long look at themselves in a mirror to understand the what is going on in the world.
DJBT
commented 2016-10-13 08:38:16 -0400
@ Harold Hoff – pretty big leap you did – accusing me of child abuse?!? You really are a dweeb!
commented 2016-10-13 02:21:03 -0400
I can still remember his wife doing her best to censor video games and such.
commented 2016-10-13 02:20:26 -0400
I had a good laugh at Obama crying that Russia should not interfere in the election, meanwhile he interferes as he sees fit, including in ours. Russia is just doing the job the media will not do.
commented 2016-10-13 02:19:15 -0400
Harold Hoff the green groups do those things.
commented 2016-10-13 00:31:15 -0400
This man needs our assistance..!!!

HAROLD HOFF commented 5 hours ago
WOULD YOU kindly provide the ORIGINAL source for the statement, “The Canada Revenue Agency prohibits a charity from seeking to oppose or change the law, policy, or decision of any level of government in Canada. According to Canadian tax law, a charity can neither support or oppose a political party’s policies.”? It’s a serious question because if true (and maybe you need to do this story…)

I’ll finally have a legal lever to petition the CRA for the revocation of the “Charitable Status” of Children’s Aid Societies that promote “Repeal 43” to criminalize parenting, so they can benefit from increased child apprehension (abduction) and trafficking-into-foster-care quotas for funding to meet revenue targets. It’s a serious question, I hope you will answer.
commented 2016-10-12 23:11:25 -0400
These politicians and community organizers are like pedophiles, they insidiously work they way into the system and gradually groom their victims. Victims who go along with the brainwashing and are afraid to say anything.
commented 2016-10-12 23:09:44 -0400
DARYL HERMAN
Thanks for your very thoughtful and informative comment. While we work to stop the abduction of children from loving and safe homes so CS can maintain quota and revenue targets, you obviously support that. Forget the “dweeb” comments, child abuse enablers like you should be spending time in our federal institutions. We hate child abuse, whether by individuals or state sanctioned. Rubbish like you are part of the problem. Child abuse is NEVER OK, and people like you who promote it … well never come near me or mine, you moron
commented 2016-10-12 22:01:30 -0400
That Al Gore hypocrite & when Hillary becomes President (her words), Mr. Gore will be her climate change advisor. That should take care of all the floods, snowstorms, hurricanes, etc that have been happening for centuries & I know he peddled his bike all the way from his home to Clinton’s rally venue, what a hero!!!!!
Sheila, you have done a fantastic job on this as usual.
commented 2016-10-12 20:53:23 -0400
@ Harold Hoff commented 2 hours ago

Hope Sheila doesn’t answer that – you are a dweeb who is just being a dick!
commented 2016-10-12 20:46:51 -0400
@ John Day commented 1 hour ago
Telus will simply change thier name, offer a cheaper product, and grow old and rich. The Canadian way!

No they won’t! They are PH**UCKED.
commented 2016-10-12 20:18:37 -0400
Al Gore attended only one natural science class while at Harvard and earned a “D” in the course. His professor, Dr. Roger Reveille, former Director of NOAA questioned Gore’s subsequent promotion of man made climate change and Gore publicly called him a senile old fool. Meanwhile the class dunce increased his net worth by $300 million by selling his special brand of guilt to idiots around the globe.
No shortage of stupid.
commented 2016-10-12 20:12:14 -0400
Get on board everyone – the Trump like train is roaring to speed and all libtards are going to be extricated!
TruDope – ya had better find a “familiar” country to find your sorry ass in! You POS!
commented 2016-10-12 19:45:14 -0400
Telus will simply change thier name, offer a cheaper product, and grow old and rich. The Canadian way!
commented 2016-10-12 19:41:24 -0400
AGW= Al Gore Warming. A bullet is too good for that tit. I’m still cleaning up last nights puke as I barfed listening to Killary campaign with the Goracle. It truly was sickening. She proved she is clueless on the climate front or is a real good liar. Hmmm. I guess she could be both. Al gore gives feces a bad name.

Dump Justin and our 2 climate wiches
commented 2016-10-12 19:19:09 -0400
I thought Al Gore was run out of town on a rail after he made that infamous cartoon about man made global warming. The man is a gibbering idiot.
commented 2016-10-12 19:18:07 -0400
@ Bill Elder commented 40 mins ago
Gore = Armand Hammer = Soros = soviet money laundering and invetment – neo- trotskyite globalist political networking – which Tater Tot and papa tater are anchored on
_______________________________________________________________
And it would seem Telus is supporting them as well.

Breaking the law is nothing new to LIEberal supporters and if I might say – LIEberal ministers as well. Especially one LIEberal minister who seems to be unaware of her birth place, or her mother who definitely lied about it.

All protected and approved by the fag boy pm

The average canucklehead is so low info it disgusts me – and for that matter the majority do not even seem to care!

Well done Sheila.

Well done indeed.

Now, when do you think the fed supported media will tell this story?

Yeah, I agree – never!
commented 2016-10-12 19:13:14 -0400
WOULD YOU kindly provide the ORIGINAL source for the statement, “The Canada Revenue Agency prohibits a charity from seeking to oppose or change the law, policy, or decision of any level of government in Canada. According to Canadian tax law, a charity can neither support or oppose a political party’s policies.”? It’s a serious question because if true (and maybe you need to do this story…)

I’ll finally have a legal lever to petition the CRA for the revocation of the “Charitable Status” of Children’s Aid Societies that promote “Repeal 43” to criminalize parenting, so they can benefit from increased child apprehension (abduction) and trafficking-into-foster-care quotas for funding to meet revenue targets. It’s a serious question, I hope you will answer.
commented 2016-10-12 18:39:53 -0400
Gore = Armand Hammer = Soros = soviet money laundering and invetment – neo- trotskyite globalist political networking – which Tater Tot and papa tater are anchored on
commented 2016-10-12 18:39:09 -0400
I believe that charitable donations of any charitable group should NOT receive special tax credit status. If one believes in a charity, they will donate. Also, the charity is forced to prove its validity. My favourite charity is COPE in Laos because it does solid work with respect to victims of the American bombs left lying around after 1973, and instructs the local villages in deactivation. It is Australian, so I get no tax credit, but it does real work so I don’t care. I believe the same thing for political donations as well, no tax credit. If one believes in their party, that should be reward enough.

No charitable tax credit for any organization frees up the charity to be as political as they want. They just don’t benefit by gaining off tax payers, which tax credits do by spreading the donation.
commented 2016-10-12 18:29:59 -0400
SHEILA , you are definitely earning your wages

When the majority of Canadians see that there is no law anymore there will be hell to pay , it will lead to the closure of major hiways , ports , railroads , gas stations , grocery stores ect.