November 10, 2016

Doctor: UN ignores evidence on e-cigarettes

Lauren SouthernRebel Commentator
 

At the Delhi "nanny state" convention on tobacco regulations, the World Health Organization has exiled the experts on e-cigarettes, leaving them to protest outside the gates.

The goal of these exiled e-cig dissidents?

To save lives.

Throughout their studies and research these experts have found that e-cigarettes could save up to a billion lives if they replace smoking.

Yet the World Health Organization isn't interested in hearing their opinion.

These bureaucrats would rather do it on their own without the advice.

Or rather, they don't want the advice because of their political agendas:

Funding from Big Pharma, state owned cigarette companies and cigarette taxation all play a role in their legislation and state positions.

Of course they want you to think E-cigs are bad, but what do the experts think? 

PS: Check out my show "Stand Off", only available to Premium Members of TheRebel.media. You also get access to programs by Ezra Levant, Gavin McInnes and more.

We've got THREE different membership levels, too. Sign up HERE!

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-11-11 18:00:56 -0500
Those bigs organizations (WHO,UN, IMF etc.) have other agendas than the good of the people in general and journalists should investigate their members to discover their hidden agenda. Just sayin!
commented 2016-11-11 00:56:38 -0500
Mongrel they have empty shallow lives so they have to make ours the same.
commented 2016-11-10 21:29:03 -0500
They ignored the evidence of toxic vaccines as well – at least they’re linear in their misanthropy.
commented 2016-11-10 13:26:36 -0500
Saving the lives of millions of useless eaters is contrary to the Globalist’s Agenda 21/30 plans for all us billions of useless eaters…
commented 2016-11-10 10:54:13 -0500
I still can’t and never will understand why regressive socialists cannot let people have their comforts that make their lives pleasurable. I am not a smoker, but I will not deny the 15-20% that are their pleasure.

I even believe restaurants, bars, pubs and other businesses should be permitted to allow smoking or cater to smokers, I’ll just make my free choice not to patronize them. However, if their are sufficient smokers to patronize these businesses why not?

Just let people live their lives and leave them alone.