December 31, 2015

How to replace a transmission

Gavin McInnesRebel Commentator
 

Today we focus on a heavy-duty utility transmission which is actually an update on the old clutch we're taking out (the new one even includes an extra clutch in the critical intermediate clutch)

(LANGUAGE WARNING:)

We're going to use a beat up old Chevy to show you how easy it is. None of us really understand the guts of the transmission so all we're going to do in this video is unbolt it safely, show you wear to send it, and then demonstrate some handy tricks for bolting in this impressive upgrade.

If you don't think you need to jack your truck up for this, you're kidding yourself. There is a lot of weight coming down and your transmission is one of the biggest parts of your truck. Get it up high so you can comfortably get to each bolt without breaking your back.

Ladies, if you're still reading this, stop. None of this concerns you. It's super boring.

 

JOIN TheRebel.media FREE for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.

READ Gavin McInnes' "gut-punchingly hilarious" memoir, The Death of Cool.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-01-07 10:18:53 -0500
But a legend NONETHELESS!!! ;) It’s been fun Judy. Jesus loves you baby. I still think you’re an ignorant slut, however, just saying. Cheers
commented 2016-01-07 08:40:25 -0500
GT…a legend in his own mind!
commented 2016-01-04 21:48:37 -0500
Liza… I was trolling for a reason… to expose Judy the SJW and prove a point… namely that she would declare me a “danger to society” for mean words on the Internet, just like the Crown prosecutor Marni Goldenberg did for SJW Steph Guthrie in the Greg Elliot case. SJW’s like Judy and Steph like to demand a special privileged class for themselves simply because they are women. They like to throw stones from the safety of the glass houses that the government has built for them. Their hypocrisy is repulsive and the only antidote for it is the sunlight of exposure, which is why I did what I did. It was a stunt, and it worked. If Judy can’t stand the heat then she should stay the f**k out the kitchen, we on a mission. Your comments regarding Trulander’s election are accurate and appreciated. Well done. Trump 2016. Conrad Black for Prime Minister of Canada 2019.
commented 2016-01-04 20:17:49 -0500
Love it Love it keep up the good work!
commented 2016-01-04 17:28:53 -0500
oops, …the rest of it I am going to stay out of. I tend to stay away from threads where name calling drops to the level of " ignorant slut" . Clearly some men and women are pigs. I’m not saying Judy is, I don’t know.
commented 2016-01-04 17:23:19 -0500
I said, it has little to do with masculine or feminine. Do I believe some women voted in Justin (as an example) because he is young(ish) has good hair or is the son of P.T., yes I do. I also believe many men, driven by a misguided socialist ideology, voted for him because they have bought into the agenda 21 crap. You could switch that around or put both gender in either example if you like. Justin got in for all the wrong reasons.

The rest of it
commented 2016-01-04 17:23:17 -0500
I said, it has little to do with masculine or feminine. Do I believe some women voted in Justin (as an example) because he is young(ish) has good hair or is the son of P.T., yes I do. I also believe many men, driven by a misguided socialist ideology, voted for him because they have bought into the agenda 21 crap. You could switch that around or put both gender in either example if you like. Justin got in for all the wrong reasons.

The rest of it
commented 2016-01-04 17:23:17 -0500
I said, it has little to do with masculine or feminine. Do I believe some women voted in Justin (as an example) because he is young(ish) has good hair or is the son of P.T., yes I do. I also believe many men, driven by a misguided socialist ideology, voted for him because they have bought into the agenda 21 crap. You could switch that around or put both gender in either example if you like. Justin got in for all the wrong reasons.

The rest of it
commented 2016-01-04 15:58:39 -0500
Judy, that’s PERFECT… words on the Internet that offend you make me a “danger to society” according to you. You are not a conservative Judy. You are a rabid Social Justice Warrior. You are Anita Sarkeesion. You are Steph Guthrie. It wasn’t that difficult at all to expose you with a little trolling. Too bad I’m anonymous and you can’t send the thought police to come and get me like they got Greg Elliot, eh Judy? Go cry more. Tommy Robinson is a rough Englishman so, trust me Judy, he will insult a woman when the situation calls for it, and he’d definitely agree that you are an insufferable cunt.
commented 2016-01-04 15:12:59 -0500
REPLACE THIS TRANSMISSION: GT et al… Don’t compare yourselves to Ezra and Mark Steyn etc. who are conservative gentlemen…they don’t call women ‘sluts’ or ‘idiots’…even those they disagree with…they have shown themselves to be conservative GENTLEMEN and I don’t include ANY OF THEM in my comments here about you……many of the men, like you, on the comments section of this site are hiding behind their coattails, as if you really think you are like them. Some of you men commenting here wouldn’t stand up to Islam any more than you would stand up to the left because you ADMIT you are “emasculated men”…this is how you describe yourselves and you even blame your emasculation on women. If you are emasculated by women what makes you think you could stand up to Islam…what a joke! Here is a man, Tommy Robinson, evidently another gentleman…try to learn from him and stop insulting conservative women here…I can see why you really do need to hide your identities, because, from your reactions to simply discourse, it is becoming increasingly clear that some of you are even, possibly, a danger to society. Ezra and Mark Steyn and Tommy Robinson and Maggie Thatcher are among my heroes, and I DO stand behind them…but you are impossible to defend.

Here is Tommy Robinson…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyzGayfI400
you will not hear him insult women or try to degrade them as you do…He is clearly a man of INTEGRITY and courage… I am frankly sick of those who are “imitation” conservative men here in the comments section whose ongoing obsession with misogyny is both pathetic and immature. Get over it.

Drew W…I agree…and the left or radical feminism is not the answer at all…clearly. But we need real conservatives…not those who would divide us on gender lines by insults and degradation due to twisted views caused by hatred toward women who are half of the supporters of this site, like me. As Liza Rosie said, women are not the problem…
commented 2016-01-04 12:53:31 -0500
Judy if you think the left or the feminists will stand up to radical Islam you are pretty blind. They have had many chances and have not done so. Those small stories you posted are hardly even the tip of the iceberg.
commented 2016-01-04 11:20:35 -0500
Judy you ignorant slut, why don’t you focus on the REAL problem in the stories you’re posting, namely ISLAM. You want evidence of conservative men who fight Islam, hmmmmmmmmm… where would we ever find such men… oh wait a minute… what about that guy that runs this website? Yeah, that Ezra Levant guy! Didn’t he get in a heap of trouble with the Canadian government for publishing Mohammed cartoons and then go on to become a crusader for free speech, dare we say, a “REBEL”? Oh but you’re probably saying that he’s an outlier, aren’t you Judy? Oh but wait a minute, what about that Mark Steyn guy? He did an article critical of Islam that got him and Maclean’s magazine in a heap of trouble with the Canadian government, then he went on to get in a heap of trouble in America over his criticism of global warming hysterics, yeah he seems like a conservative guy that takes on Islam. Hmmmmmm, seems like there’s a few of these guys. What about Robert Spencer? Oh yeah, didn’t he get himself banned from Britain for speaking out? And then there’s Tommy Robinson, he’s been to jail for it. How about Paul Weston, who was arrested on the steps of the Winchester Guildhall for reading passages from a book by Winston Churchill that are critical of Islam. Hmmmmmm… and what about this guy Dr. Bill Warner (clip linked below)?…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oimshetU-Z8

And how about this guy Sam Solomon (clip linked below)?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwzZa_-kuc8

Gee Judy… it seems like I could do this all day doesn’t it? It sure does seem like there’s a lot of conservative men speaking out against Islam, and getting in trouble for it. Funny that it doesn’t occur to you that there’s a vapid feminist cuck in 24 Sussex right now who supports Islam 100% and that most of the people who voted for him were women and gays who think he’s “really hot, you know?” Puzzling that it doesn’t occur to you that there is a long-legged mac-daddy pimp in the White House who gets votes from women and gays who SWOON over him (Google “bath house barry” and see what happens). Funny that these fact do not demonstrate to you that there is a serious problem with toxic feminism in our society assisting complete idiots gain political power as they are manipulated by their rich puppet-masters like George Soros. You keep sticking your little ostrich head in the sand and ignoring these hate facts Judy, because they’re just so damn RUDE, aren’t they? It’s much more fashionable to just blame everything on “conservative men” and criticize them for not exercising the power and authority that feminism TOOK AWAY from them when it emasculated men a long time ago. You keep up the war on men Judy. Men’s rights end where your feeling begin. You useful idiot.
commented 2016-01-04 09:34:31 -0500
Many of us have replaced Transmissions in our older cars. Not sure if I would try it in a front wheel drive. One time I changed my Transmission in my college’s parking lot, actually I just took it out and found the problem then put it back together and back in. Not that I have a thing against women, I think all men should have one, but I have never seen a woman change a transmission. Not sure why but its I bet they would say that is a mans job. And to me, that is bigotry to relegate that work to what they consider a lower class of people. Still, I will willingly and without shame do those manual labor jobs and be glad to contribute in my roll. Yes boss.
commented 2016-01-04 07:55:22 -0500
Note in the Toronto Sun comments section re: “halifax-woman article..” how the Indiana-guy has no sympathy for the woman who was working on her black belt being pushed aside to accommodate the NEW student, a Muslim man (who refused to either touch a woman OR bow to anyone in the class). It is my concern that conservative men like this Indiana-guy consider every woman who asks for respect and equality as a rabid feminist and discounts their sensibilities as aggression rather than a simple and ENTIRELY REASONABLE request as a human being. In this fashion they are enabling Islam to get its claws into our culture and Sharia to become established…If they want their daughters and grand-daughters to have any life they should consider that when they support Islamic attitudes towards women in any way they have become part of the problem with Islam.
commented 2016-01-04 07:22:35 -0500
commented 2016-01-03 16:25:46 -0500
I am familiar with the 3 cases Judy has mentioned, and it is a disgrace that it happened in Canada! But I am not surprised. We as a society will have to endure many more slaps to the face, before we start pushing back against this shariah creep.

I agree with M-J Rou, that it most certainly is not just women. (stupid rant Gavin). There is no shortage of male stupidity in politics, it looks pretty even across the board to me. And I most whole heartedly agree with this statement of Judy’s, “Few women I know would vote for a woman just because she is a woman…how utterly foolish to vote for a person from ‘your’ minority group just because of that! Democracy in a nation of ignorant people can truly be a dangerous thing.” and that last sentence is it in a nutshell, and has little to do with masculine or feminine.
commented 2016-01-03 13:10:41 -0500
Oh Judy, it would have never worked out between us.
commented 2016-01-03 07:59:14 -0500
GT said: “We need Canadian men to rediscover what being a man is all about and reclaim manhood. You want to be like Thatcher Judy? Do what the Iron Lady did… support your men.”

The Canadian men I know don’t have to reclaim manhood…they don’t have to ‘rediscover’ their manhood…they ARE men and they don’t RELY on my support to BE MEN. And further, the men Thatcher dealt with actually supported HER enthusiastically…until some of them turned on her and ‘stabbed her in the front’. “Your” Thatcher is a fantasy. Thatcher’s man supported her completely.

I have no idea who these emasculated men are you are talking about…have never met such a creature except here in the backwater comments section where the preponderance of them is quite shocking. “Ghost Tiger”…You demand I support ‘my men’ and call me belittling names like: “you little hammer-head”, "idiots like you " and “You useful idiot”. Is it any wonder women give you trouble?

re your comment: “You have ignored almost everything I’ve said you little hammer-head”……..and you, GT, wonder why?

Few women I know would vote for a woman just because she is a woman…how utterly foolish to vote for a person from ‘your’ minority group just because of that! Democracy in a nation of ignorant people can truly be a dangerous thing.
commented 2016-01-02 22:04:27 -0500
@ Ghost Tiger: I agree women vote for women, and minorities vote for minority bias leaders. My point simply was that its not just women. This problem extends well beyond them, though they and other minorities are a part of it.
commented 2016-01-02 20:55:11 -0500
Judy, I don’t know which specific cases you’re talking about, but I do know about some cases of Islamic misogyny in Ontario, and I reiterate… the Premier of Ontario is a grotesque example of a WOMAN who has granted her full cooperation to the implementation of creeping sharia. Kim Dong Wynne and Trulander loves them some haji votes. I have a daughter that I care very much about, that’s why I’m on here arguing with idiots like you and trying to turn this country around from the highway to socialist hell that it is on. You have ignored almost everything I’ve said you little hammer-head, but the readers of these comments can see that for themselves. I’m done trying to get through to you. You maintain that ferocious solipsism sister, it suits you.
commented 2016-01-02 19:48:36 -0500
You are right GT…It was very foolish of me to expect any outrage over the young women in the 3 situations where these young school girls were ousted from classes and sports because Muslim men demanded they be kicked out. It was accomplished with the immediate cooperation of CANADIAN men…and the story died immediately…the precedent is set…I hope none of you have daughters and granddaughters that you care about.

As for Thatcher…she hadn’t much use for ANY politicians…it wasn’t her responsibility to help one gender over another, but to get the job done…how much spare time do you think she had?…half of the men she worked with weren’t up to snuff either!… She was running a country, for crying out loud, and a major cultural REVOLUTION, GT!

But her view of men was singular: "As Matthew Parris evocatively put it in Monday’s Times, “She rather liked men (preferring our company, perhaps, to that of women), [but] she thought us the weaker sex.” and "This attitude – that men are fun but dumb, women are smart but strident, a view of the sexes that seems to come straight out of a Judd Apatow film – led to various quotes of hers that some like to twist into proof that Thatcher was an unwitting feminist. These include, “We have to show them that we’re better than they are”, and “Women can get into corners that men can’t reach!” “she was a classic example of a certain kind of conservative woman who believed that all women should pull themselves up just as she had done, conveniently overlooking that not all women are blessed with the privileges that had been available to her, such as a wealthy and supportive husband and domestic help…” (not to mention a politician father who talked to her endlessly as a child about politics) Here are a few more treasures from the Iron Lady: “In politics, if you want anything said, ask a man. If you want anything done, ask a woman.” (1965)
“I’ve got a woman’s ability to stick to a job and get on with it when everyone else walks off and leaves it.” (1975)
“I don’t think there will be a woman Prime Minister in my lifetime.” (1973)
“Any woman who understands the problems of running a home will be nearer to understanding the problems of running a country.” (1979)
“The battle for women’s rights has been largely won.” (1982)

Well she was wrong in one case! ☺1973
commented 2016-01-02 16:09:50 -0500
M-J Rou, When most special privileges are offered to women, what sort of “people” do you think women will vote for? Pastor James David Manning talks about how Obama got himself elected and describes Obama as a “long-legged mac daddy” who made the old ladies swoon at his campaign speeches. Obola is a pimp. And so is Trulander.
commented 2016-01-02 15:58:53 -0500
Judy, what I meant was, Thatcher HERSELF considered women generally unqualified for political power, which refutes your assertion that most conservative women are just like Thatcher, according to the Iron Lady HERSELF. Here’s a quote from the uber-feminist left-wing Guardian:

“Far from “smashing the glass ceiling”, she was the aberration, the one who got through and then pulled the ladder up right after her."

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/apr/09/margaret-thatcher-no-feminist

You frame every issue as a women’s issue and that is what limits your understanding and shows that you are no Thatcher. You ask “What have Canadian men done? Why are Canadian men standing by?” as if women in Canada today have no power, authority, or agency and therefore should not be expected to anything or be called out for “standing by” while the problems you describe rage on. What a crock of shit. Ontario, Alberta, and B.C. have women premiers and our Prime Minister is a vapid feminist cuck. You want to know why Canadian men aren’t fixing your problems Judy? Because they’ve been emasculated by the toxic feminism of the matriarchy that’s been forced upon them in our little socialist gulag called Canada. You want to know more about my first-hand experience with said toxic feminism? Read here:

http://ghost-tiger88.livejournal.com/713.html

Maybe you’ve heard of Greg Elliot, arrested in Canada and banned from the Internet and impoverished for sending wrongthink TWEETS to members of the new privileged Canadian super-class, namely WOMEN:

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2015/11/19/a-life-ruined-by-feminists-and-the-state-only-the-internet-can-save-gregory-alan-elliott/

Canada is a mess Judy and Canadian men have effectively been made into an underclass of sub-humans by feminists like you. Watch this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJ5sVZHds-I

The problems you described won’t get fixed by the women in charge of Canada right now Judy, that’s the problem. We need Canadian men to rediscover what being a man is all about and reclaim manhood. You want to be like Thatcher Judy? Do what the Iron Lady did… support your men. Your tired feminist arguments have been refuted. Open your eyes, get over it and be part of the solution. Why do you think I use an alias when I communicate like this? Because I’m a Canadian and that means thinking the way I’m thinking is now outlawed by the feminist state and I need to stay out of the gulag. Guys like me and Greg Elliot… we’re all Samizdat now. You useful idiot.
commented 2016-01-02 14:19:28 -0500
There is a glowing misconception here. ITS NOT WOMEN, Its the fact that people vote for anyone that offers them special privileges in return (*minority rights). So those electoral candidates offer those special privileges in order to collect BIAS VOTES, rather than actual earning votes by showing intelligence and correct leadership skills. “IT’S A CON!!”
(or rather “It’s a Liberal.”)
commented 2016-01-02 11:29:01 -0500
Well guys, time to close this discussion ….Mother Superior has spoken……And as we all know and nobody would dare question closing such discussions will make the idea just go away…….:-)
commented 2016-01-02 00:14:41 -0500
You guys just proved my point about conservative men….thanks!

Glenn…Muslim men will be glad to keep your misogynistic company and as the trend is coming, you will soon be able to practice your hatred under sharia law. Would that be enough to heal you?

As far as sharia…it isn’t women who are bringing sharia courts into Europe and North America…I DO despise how Muslim men treat women…with every fiber of my being! But why have our men allowed Sharia courts to be established then if they don’t agree with Muslim men?…And why have CANADIAN men stood by while (three particular) women have been ostracized from CANADIAN classrooms,schools and sports because of Muslim complaints to college professors and deans, martial arts instructors and soccer coaches at Catholic schools here in CANADA? Explain THAT to me! I would to God they would have stood up for Canadian women when Muslims called for their ouster from their presence, but instead some Canadian men caved in to Muslim demands…why? Ask yourselves why! Explain to others why there was no outcry from conservative men about this!

Of course the left ignores Muslim women, that is their fault, but you guys point to Muslim men and compare yourselves favorably to their absolute failure…can’t you do better than that?

The horror of how Muslims treat women is, however, made more frightening by the recognition that the cold indifference and nastiness of how some fundamentalist Christian men treat women is only different by a matter of degrees. The two are on a bell curve, just at different places.

I love Thatcherism…some of you just can’t read, and despised the fact that a few of the conservative men in her party deprived Britain and the world of more of her wisdom and political skill…But one person said “Just because a minority person (woman) successfully attains a position of power does not, and should not, automatically mean that they hire or appoint more people like them to key positions.” I agree. That was not Thatcher’s job.

As another woman said: “Why is it not enough that Thatcher proved that women were electable, that she proved herself competent and tough, that she led her country in wartime? Thatcher had been active in politics since the 1950s, only being elected Prime Minister after holding other offices for fully twenty years. She earned her way on her own merits…In essence, Thatcher clawed and hacked her way through the undergrowth, blazing a path that other women can choose to follow on their own two feet. Why should anyone expect more than that? Must she also carry us?” I say, amen to that! She hired the best people for the work she had to do…if they were not women at the time…so what? That doesn’t prove no women are ever qualified…what is your point “Ghost Tiger”?
commented 2016-01-01 18:22:04 -0500
Gavin did this just to see how fast a feminist would shit it up.
well done Gavin!
commented 2016-01-01 16:55:14 -0500
Judy, you’re delusional. Margaret Thatcher declined to promote women to positions of political power because she considered them unqualified for these jobs. Thatcher was 1 in a million. Check your ego. You women need to stop trying to be men, wash out the blue hair dye, and try to rediscover what it means to be a woman. Great job Gavin McInnes on the tricky title! Well done sir.