November 13, 2015

BREAKING: Liberals' niqab decision means "Canada now officially accepts sharia law"

Brian LilleyRebel Co-Founder
 

Justin Trudeau's Liberals have decided to halt the appeal on the case involving a Muslim woman with terrorist ties who wanted to be sworn in as a Canadian citizen while wearing the Muslim face covering known as a niqab.

When Stephen Harper's Conservatives were in power, they filed an appeal to overturn a court decision in the woman's favour.

However, Trudeau's majority government is wasting no time overturning many of Harper's policies, including this one, even though polls showed most Canadians oppose the niqab.

This is just another hypocritical decision on the part of so-called "progressives" and "feminists."

And in terms of creeping sharia in Canada, it is just the beginning.

 

Believe that Muslim face coverings have no place in Canada?
The Rebel Store has the t-shirt for you:
“Separation of Mosque and State”

Enough is enough: Every Canadian must show their face to vote.
SIGN OUR PETITION to Elections Canada now!

READ Brian Lilley's book CBC Exposed -- it's been called "the political book of the year.”

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2015-12-01 14:29:40 -0500
Oh how the Rebel loves to be disingenuous. And while I feel that face coverings can be a way to try to make woman second class citizens using religion, I respect their beliefs. WHERE is the rebel’s up roar over the Catholic Church’s refusal to allow woman to be priests? That can make women second class citizens using religious beliefs.
I guess the rebel also does not believe in Canadian Law. In the Citizenship Regulations Section 17.1 (b) CEREMONIAL PROCEDURES OF CITIZENSHIP JUDGES it says “Subject to subsection 22(1), administer the oath of
citizenship with dignity and solemnity, allowing the GREATEST POSSIBLE FREEDOM IN THE RELIGIOUS SOLEMNIZATION or the solemn affirmation thereof;
On the Citizenship and Immigration Canada website
”http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/tools/cit/ceremony/oath.asp">http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/tools/cit/ceremony/oath.asp
It spells out policy, procedure and guidance that are used by CIC staff
Under the section Accommodations for Candidates wearing full or Partial Face Coverings
When a candidate indicates at check-in that they are not willing to remove their face covering during the public ceremony due to a sincerely held religious belief, the candidate can repeat the Oath of Citizenship with their face uncovered, in private, before proceeding to the public ceremony.
The private Oath-taking must be done in front of a female judge or presiding official, or, in the absence of a female judge or presiding official, a female CIC official. The candidate then proceeds to the public ceremony and is not required to remove their face covering during the ceremony.
This is the same regulations that were on the website before the election. Nothing has changed.

Look it up.
If Haper was so against the law, he could have created a new one and passed it. Actually when Harper passed the Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act, he did no include anything about banning face coverings.
All they did was send a memo to citizenship courts. But the law as it should supersedes a letter or whatever. The law did not change and part of the law was the way to deal with face coverings. Show your face to a Judge or CIC official and you have shown your face. Their beliefs also come with accommodations as well.
So look it up. It is and was the law. Conservatives don’t like spending money wastefully or on most things. But the liberals knew the money spent would be wasted on an appeal to the Supreme Court that would have upheld the law. So they can spend that money on things conservatives don’t want them to.
All the best neighbours
commented 2015-11-15 15:14:19 -0500
Dear government, you have all different people working yet it seems not one of them is able to do research.
The Niqab to be worn by Muslim women when they are traveling abroad. So if they are canadian the only time they should be wearing it is when they are leaving the country.
More important every country that is controlled(governed) by Sheridan law has also decided that the Niqab is not to be worn in courts. Not sure why exactly something to do with being unable to see the person properly. ALSO in courts the stamen of women is only half the weight as that of a man.
So please if you do decide to allow the Niqab in courts realize that it’s not normal even in Sheridan law .
Before you bash me please realize that unlike most people I have lived and worked in a Sheridan law country and as a white person hate it. I tried to learn but they refuse to teach you and would much rather treat you less then dirt or an animal because I am white.
There is nothing wrong with the Niqab if worn for the right reasons. So when traveling abroad it is a sign for others that your Muslim.
commented 2015-11-15 09:19:53 -0500
Rick Plesnik – my thoughts exactly. There was a reason PET wanted the charter in place, so that he could rule in any way that he saw fit. Being the elitist that he was, he couldn’t possibly allow those peasants any property rights.
commented 2015-11-14 13:04:18 -0500
This is only the beginning. It will get much much worse! Nicole Beaudoin said: “No woman or man who covers his or her face will ever be allowed on my property.” The Lieberals will seize and evict you from your property given that PET removed property rights from the Canadian Charter.
commented 2015-11-14 12:10:16 -0500
Paris…..Immigration without assimilation is an invasion….period!!
Me thinks – assimilate or vacate!!
commented 2015-11-14 02:30:08 -0500
Paris go walk around the no go zones in France and some areas of Toronto with a Yarmaluk and see how much fashion is respected by these same Muslims.
commented 2015-11-14 02:28:28 -0500
Paris what part of their faith calls for that? Please read me the passage. And sorry but people need to prove their identity plain and simple. The brutal subjugation of women is not fashion. You act like they can choose not to wear the damn thing. Enjoy your Burka when the time comes, because by then there will be no one to stand up for you.
commented 2015-11-13 23:44:46 -0500
“Canada now officially accepts sharia law” – What hyperbolic nonsense. This decision in no way, shape or form recognises Sharia in Canada. What it does recognise is that the Government has no business in the regulation of fashion statements & the silent profession of faith.
commented 2015-11-13 22:35:11 -0500
How many people in France were debating this not so long ago?
commented 2015-11-13 22:34:13 -0500
Julien then why was it not okay for Hutterites and the same people who want this allowed attacked them with full on bigotry, and it is not a choice, nor are we saying they cannot wear it , they just need to uncover for id purposes.
commented 2015-11-13 21:29:56 -0500
This is a lib thing – I can only hope real violence comes to Canada – sooner the better.
commented 2015-11-13 21:23:42 -0500
It’s absolutely sickening to watch these demons in action, as these are not real human beings. Anyone who voted for Junior, is going to be participating in these very same situations, much sooner than they think. It will be too late by the time they realize the error of their ways. Next time, make sure you don’t buy into the MSM lies, because that is what you fell for, the media lies and deception.
commented 2015-11-13 19:41:03 -0500
@julien fitzgerald Julien this isn’t about race or religion. This is about swearing a oath to the new country that they want to make home. How do you swear an oath to the country if your mouth can’t been seen. Yes they are taken into a room before the oath and all their information and pictures are taken. But when you swear an oath you are to show pride and respect for the oath that you are swearing.
commented 2015-11-13 19:07:23 -0500
Julien FitzGerald commented
It’s the woman’s personal choice if they choose to wear the niqab and feel that this is just being used as an excuse to rial people up into a hate campaign against ALL Muslims. Come on people, we’re all human beings, we all come from different backgrounds/belief systems/races/creeds etc, why can’t we all learn to understand each other as HUMAN BEINGS rather than categorising someone just because of the way they choose to dress? …"

Watch, learn, think for yourself.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=58a_1447295835
commented 2015-11-13 18:49:51 -0500
Terry Black commented
“Do Canadian citizens’ still get a choice on what we accept and do not accept?”

No.

This is just the very tip of the iceberg.
Pay heed to Shannon’s link – That is the future.
commented 2015-11-13 18:45:23 -0500
JACK PALLANCE commented 36 mins ago
Of course Justin does, because he is an Islamist himself.

And a closet homosexual. Time to out Trudeau.
commented 2015-11-13 18:36:57 -0500
This woman is entitled to her religious beliefs the same as Kim Davis is entitled to her’s!
commented 2015-11-13 18:31:04 -0500
Terry Black – I will say yes, because this new group of radical misfits in our parliament, are not representing all Canadian, using the same laws. When you continually cater to odd groups, that aren’t even citizens, then you no longer represent true democracy. I will defy this government in any way that I see fit, since the lunatics are now in control of Canada.
commented 2015-11-13 18:30:30 -0500
We now have an Islamist in Washington and an Islamist in Ottawa. That happened faster than I imagined.
commented 2015-11-13 18:30:28 -0500
It’s the woman’s personal choice if they choose to wear the niqab and feel that this is just being used as an excuse to rial people up into a hate campaign against ALL Muslims. Just because a Muslim woman chooses to wear a niqab is no reflection on her, as a person, but is a reflection on the hatred that people have on people from a particular religious following.

Come on people, we’re all human beings, we all come from different backgrounds/belief systems/races/creeds etc, why can’t we all learn to understand each other as HUMAN BEINGS rather than categorising someone just because of the way they choose to dress?

Would we or did we say the same thing about Punks, Goths, EMOs, Rockers, Bikers et al? No, of course we didn’t! The only reason why there are attacks on Muslim women is because they belong to a certain religious group, namely Islam. Islam is not a violent religion, nor has it ever been. There are just some, a minority, as there is in any religious sect, that give a bad name to the whole religion. You only have to look at the Roman Catholics for a good similarity, as they expect their female followers to cover their heads in church, but there no outrage about that. It’s no difference when Muslim women CHOOSE to wear the niqab.
commented 2015-11-13 18:23:24 -0500
Do Canadian citizens’ still get a choice on what we accept and do not accept?
commented 2015-11-13 18:11:35 -0500
When I go in 2016 to have my Photo ID for my ON Driver’s License, I will refuse to remove my eyeglasses. I have worn eyeglasses since I was a child. I was told I had to remove them the last time because one can’t properly see my cheek bones. Well, one can’t properly see the cheek bones of a woman who wears a niqab. I was born in Canada many years ago. A Muslim woman, nor anyone else, is no better than I am. We should all be treated equally. I am tired of special interest groups getting special treatment. Muslims, LGBTQ, Aboriginals, so-called environmentalists……..
commented 2015-11-13 18:08:41 -0500
Of course Justin does, because he is an Islamist himself.
commented 2015-11-13 18:08:26 -0500
Here’s the liberals have done this.

Liberals can hire someone from a muslim country, import/immigrate them and let them settle with the “goalie mask” on for their photo ID.

And then the liberals just need to make the “trigger call” and presto, you have a terrorist attack / murder with no way to identify the person who did it.

The liberals used to use Montreal mafia, but those days are long gone.
commented 2015-11-13 18:06:11 -0500
No woman or man who covers his or her face will ever be allowed on my property.
commented 2015-11-13 17:57:59 -0500
Dose Justin Crudeau and his gang of imbeciles, include all citizens of Canada with his, kiss arse, idiotic ideology. Can I go and vote with a paper bag over my head? The fact that there is nothing in the Quran that states that a woman should have her head covered, means that it is just a tradition and nothing more. Crudeau Trudeau has to keep his Muslim friends happy, to repay them for voting for him. Trudeau, you are an idiot, not fit to rule a straight line. Do you honestly think that when the time comes, they will not slit your throat. Moron. Do the right thing and resign, now, before you do anything else to ruin Canada.
Get someone to turn on your PC for you and have them navigate to ‘Youtube/Islam EU’ then ask them to enable all the different moving pictures. Now you can watch what is happening to all the European Countries, who kissed Muslim arseholes, just as you are doing now. You need a head check, Traitor.
commented 2015-11-13 17:26:54 -0500
Justin has his big boy boots on right now, and is following the direct orders of the UN.
commented 2015-11-13 17:24:10 -0500
The beginning of the end