June 19, 2016

Napolitano on gun bans: "Gun free zones should be called killing zones"

Victor LaszloRebel Commentator
 

Judge Napolitano lays down suppressing fire against those who would want to remove American's second amendment rights under the newspeak term, "Gun control".

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-06-20 01:41:56 -0400
GLENN CRAIG ; You need the right to have it on your person 7 days a week . Aint happening here in this socialistic quasi commie country.
commented 2016-06-20 01:34:34 -0400
On saturday I did not have a gun with me…..most saturdays in the summer I do and I will next saturday . But saturday past I attended a shooting match with some of the best shooters in the region….miitary….serious amateurs…and police tactical.

I was at the most beautiful range in eastern Canada…it was a perfect day…temperature just right… sunny.. and just enough wind to keep the bugs away…and I felt free.

And it occurred to me that I was in the safest place I could possibly be in our world gone mad…if anyone came with grudge or grievance…they would be dead on the spot where they stood within a heartbeat of that being recognized.

Fuck “gun free” zones.
commented 2016-06-19 19:44:12 -0400
I bet the firearm owning gays in Texas and Arizona will give up their firearms.

Probably carrying to the bars and parades. Hence, no Orlandos happening there.
commented 2016-06-19 16:48:24 -0400
Yeah the blame-the-NRA/second amendment harangue was made invalid in Paris, Ottawa and Brussels – Those who repeat it mindlessly after every increasing violent Islamic killing are not just stuck on stupid but bent on suicide as a reaction to spontanious Islamic terror.

Napolitano is a student of constitutional history and he knows that the founding fathers specifically wrote in the second amendment to put the “battle field rifles” of the day into the hands of citizens so that no where in America would there be a “gun-free” kill zone for the terrorist agents of hegemonic imperialists who hated America ( British, Spanish, French Jacobins) .

Second hand rights of self defense through a police monopoly on armed self defense was at play in Orlando, Ottawa, Paris and Brussels – they get the bad guys eventually but only after they run out of ammo and victims. It’s a suicidal reflex to surrender your right to direct spontaneous armed self defense to a disaffected 2nd or 3rd party who have no liability if they fail to defend you.
commented 2016-06-19 14:36:18 -0400
They are killing zones – why do you think they are attacked?

Good men need no laws.

Bad men are not made better by the.,

While living in Israel some years ago the islamics used to attack Jewish school and usually many children were killed.

Jewish school teachers were armed. After two unsuccessful attacks on Jewish schools where all attackers were killed – the attacks stopped.
commented 2016-06-19 14:00:51 -0400
Well Canada, what do you have to say about that? We in Canada don’t even have a right to keep guns, never mind “bear arms”( carry) . In Canada they call owning and keeping a firearm that is uselessly locked up in your safe is a “privilege” not a “right”. Its just a matter of time before some “radicalized” nut case Islamist pulls a mass shooting on a group of disarmed , defenceless Canadians and then our Canadian Sheeple will still want to curled up on the floor in the fetal position disarmed and completely vulnerable. Do you think Canadians will ever have the balls to seriously force our PUBLIC SERVANTS to change the laws and permit concealed carry? Maybe when enough of their own friends and family members are wiped out by armed Islamic nut jobs, then it just might happen.
commented 2016-06-19 13:44:30 -0400
Obama wants guns banned to open the way to mass slaughter of Americans.

The only thing keeping the librano pigs from doing this here is the Monroe Doctrine.

Europe still sees the US and Canada as their colonies.

The finanical collapse of Europe will be a wonderful thing when it happens.
commented 2016-06-19 13:24:24 -0400
Judge -- you be the JUDGE
Why can’t you be president
commented 2016-06-19 13:14:09 -0400
It would be great if he replaced Scalia.
commented 2016-06-19 13:01:30 -0400
Right on Judge Napolitano!