September 29, 2016

Poker champion, viral video claim Clinton used HAND SIGNALS to communicate with Holt during debate

Rebel Staff
 

Was Hillary Clinton using hand signals to communicate with moderator Lester Holt in her debate against Donald Trump?

A new video explains why this might be the case, and points to a conveniently-timed nose scratch as the signal that she wants to get a zinger in.



According to InfoWars, when investigating these claims, author Mike Cernovich reached out to professional poker player Mike Matusow for help. The World Series of Poker champion agreed that Clinton was in fact using hand signals.

In addition, reporters at TruePundit analyzed Clinton's previous debates and speeches and determined that, “Clinton never previously used these hand motions to supposedly scratch her face. In fact, she rarely touches her face at all.”

What do you think? Was the debate rigged? Sound off in the comments below.

UPDATE: The video has been removed. This story will be updated if the video is reuploaded.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-09-30 12:51:40 -0400
Republicans have this tendency to self delusion. I saw it last election with Romney. The polls weren’t correct, they said, but it proved they were election day. Let’s face it. Trump got killed in that debate. It was all rigged. The signalling from Clinton to Holt, and Holt debating with Trump. Why Trump agreed to this moderator and forum I will never understand. Further evidence of desperation are the attacks on Bill’s character. It will take a miracle to turn this around.
commented 2016-09-30 03:33:01 -0400
Andrew do you remember Soldiers on the streets Women’s rights will be taken away Harper’s hidden agenda , when did any of that happen? And what was that HIDDEN agenda anyways? Oh yeah , it was a progressive conspiracy theory. And complete and utter bullshit.
commented 2016-09-30 03:29:09 -0400
Love how left wing fools get all upset if someone accuses their gods of misdeeds, yet they lie and demonize in ridiculous amounts.
commented 2016-09-30 03:28:13 -0400
Andrew if you say so. You seem to know who scientists vote for? Yet a poll taker cannot ask a simple question before the main question? And why did Hillary only lead in the CNN poll? What a joke. GO cry like a baby. Hillary lied and she did not win the debate.
commented 2016-09-30 03:27:01 -0400
The obvious point for every thoughtful person is: – Would such a “fix is in/collusion” theory even have been entertained, or seen the light of day, in any US presidential candidate up to now??… But it evidently is, GIVEN HER PAST HISTORY… The Clinton’s “chickens” of the past 40 years are indeed – thank God – coming "home to roost’…
commented 2016-09-29 22:59:22 -0400
Bill Elder: "You deliberately distorting realty here. The polls that show Clinton leading have been proven fraudulent in their sampling twice as many Democrat respondents as GOP supporters – They got caught using fudged sample sets that includs Reuters,NPR, CNN, MSNBC and others. You know polling is being corrpted when you see numbers differ so widely between sources. "

What’s the ratio of Democrats to Repubs in the web polls you’re citing?

Oh, wait, it doesn’t exist, because nobody is tracking that. Since you seem to think it an important number, it might be hypocritical to be upset about one poll asking too many Democrats, while giving a free pass to a poll that didn’t even ask that. What WAS the incidence of mutliple-voting in those polls and why did the Trump lead only show up in web polls where that was possible?

Besides, if the polls WERE correct, what’s with the sudden appearance of the conspiracy theories the day after, insisting his performance was sub-par because it was rigged? Didn’t he win? Isn’t it weird that they all started bubbling up through the alt-right media with just enough time for the underlying superPACs to have actually done a quick, actual poll to see what Americans really thought?
commented 2016-09-29 18:52:39 -0400
How Reuters “Tweaked” Its Latest Poll (Again) To Show A Clinton Lead

the latest Reuters/Ipsos polling “tweak” is truly amazing. Having run out of options for slyly “tweaking” questions and categories to sway respondents in their preferred direction, Reuters has apparnetly resorted to blatant poll tampering by altering their polling samples to include a disproportionate number of democrats.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-29/how-reuters-tweaked-its-latest-poll-show-clinton-lead
commented 2016-09-29 18:21:50 -0400
Debates are always rigged. Remember the second debate between Obama and Romney when the moderator went on the attack against Romney after Obama was proving to be in trouble. It is always the same with post debate analysis, the media always claim victory for Democrats the day after, or Liberals here.
commented 2016-09-29 17:24:03 -0400
Totally rigged. Trump needs a good 5% cushion in each state to compensate for voter fraud.
commented 2016-09-29 17:11:24 -0400
OK jack fair enough ,god forbid some one would associate me with those two .me i figure if trump doesn’t win then it will confirm the election was rigged like our election in Canada last year and i still cant believe that mental midget moronic pansy turdo is pm ,one of my worst night mares as i totally despised his so called father .
commented 2016-09-29 17:10:18 -0400
Mark September 26, 2016 in your calendar and remember the name Lester Holt. That man and that date mark the end of the Republic and the start of the one party state in America. Trump had the momentum but now that momentum has been stopped and Hilary is ahead by 2 points. The conspiracy of NBC/Holt with Hilary meant she walloped Trump in that debate. Republicans have this tendency for self delusion. Trump lost that debate. The only thing he has now are the next 2 debates, but he already agreed to the moderators and the format. Hillary and the media will cheat again and he will look like an ass. He is trapped. Another win by Democrats, three terms, and the GOP may as well just fold its tents. So say hello to the end of the working middle class. They will be the main victim of this upset.
commented 2016-09-29 16:20:46 -0400
“The polls that allowed multiple voting showed Trump winning. The ones that limited respondants to one vote each, showed Clinton winning.”

You deliberately distorting realty here. The polls that show Clinton leading have been proven fraudulent in their sampling twice as many Democrat respondents as GOP supporters – They got caught using fudged sample sets that includs Reuters,NPR, CNN, MSNBC and others. You know polling is being corrpted when you see numbers differ so widely between sources.

This is The Tavistock Institute system of misuse of Public Opinion Polls. Dating back to 1913, the Tavistock Institute used polls to shape public opinion into accepting Britain’s entry into World War I.

The plan to ‘create’ public opinion through the fake reporting of bogus polling date began as a propaganda factory centered at Wellington House in London.

John Coleman, the author of the classic book Conspirators Hierarchy was one of the the first writers to call attention to the existence of Tavistock. Subsequently, we learn from Coleman’s work that these push polls were designed to not really measure public opinion, they were designed to shape public opinion.

One of the chief methods that unscrupulous pollsters use to report fake results is to select a biased sample. For example, if one is using phone samplings to gather voting preferences, one merely needs to target neighborhoods which historically favor one party over the other in order to get the predetermined results that one is looking for. This violates the principle of random selection of subjects to poll and this completely invalidates any survey results. This was done throughout this election cycle by Dem partisan media pollsters.

None of this tampering or lying or negative propagandizing will save Clinton. The Dems are out of popular favor and the electorate wants a change.
commented 2016-09-29 15:49:28 -0400
ANDREW STEPHENSON;

It is a pity that you cannot understand. The fact is, ever since you attended junior grade school, you have been brain washed by Socialist, Communist Marxist, who were just like you are now. This explains why your head is so screwed up.

What a shame,
commented 2016-09-29 15:47:20 -0400
OK, so Andrew doesn’t believe, if he is telling the truth, that Clinton used hand signals. Interesting because I think it is rather clear.
commented 2016-09-29 15:46:21 -0400
Lawrence, my post was not clear. The first sentence was the only one for you.

I meant Andrew and others are the trolls, and the question was for them.
commented 2016-09-29 15:17:42 -0400
“Calamity Marcy commented 1 hour ago
Andrew, how the fuck do you know Trump was on coke? You read the leftist bullshit online then you assume it must be correct. Your whole approach to this is exactly what the CNN would say. Just because someone sniffles a bit doesn’t mean they’re on coke. "

I think the cocaine allegations are precisely as veracious as the hand signal ones. Both bear remarkable similarity of gross overinterpretation of meaningless tics.

The difference is, that Colbert is self-aware of the irony behind this, as it’s very deliberate and sort of an oblique potshot at the alt-right rumourmongering.
commented 2016-09-29 14:33:43 -0400
jack pallance you should read my post again ,either you don’t know how to read or you didn’t understand plain english, i post here quite often and in no way have i ever supported clinton or turdo or their insane policies and as for the debate all i said was i do not personally know if there was signals and that is what i stated ,but i also stated in would not surprise me ,so jack learn to read before you jump on somebody .
commented 2016-09-29 14:16:34 -0400
Andrew, how the fuck do you know Trump was on coke? You read the leftist bullshit online then you assume it must be correct. Your whole approach to this is exactly what the CNN would say. Just because someone sniffles a bit doesn’t mean they’re on coke.
commented 2016-09-29 13:49:35 -0400
I see no video says its being blocked for copyright reasons
commented 2016-09-29 13:49:30 -0400
“Bill Elder commented 2016-09-29 12:44:34 -0400
All polling indicators (including the left wing institutions of Time and Wapo) showed the viewers said Trump won. Of course for shallow thinking partisan leftists they are content to diaper-wet or preen over the cult of personality and hollow talking point rhetoric. "

The polls that allowed multiple voting showed Trump winning. The ones that limited respondants to one vote each, showed Clinton winning. All this tells us is that there are a bunch of Trumpists with too much time on their hands, spending their days spamming web polls.

“Calamity Marcy commented 38 mins ago
No, Andrew, you’re the one who snorts drugs. "

Based on what, exactly? It was not I who sniffled and pouted my way through that debate.
commented 2016-09-29 13:10:17 -0400
No, Andrew, you’re the one who snorts drugs.
commented 2016-09-29 12:51:24 -0400
Clinton……………..a woman that apparently lies at the drop of a hat, a woman with blood on her hands, the blood of her own countrymen, a woman that will do anything to win this election and who has a husband that will help her do anything to win because he wants to get back into the White house.
So, how can anyone be surprised that the debate was rigged? The election is going to be rigged as well, wait and see.
We saw blatant rigging of an election in our own country not so long ago, by the same organizations that are planning their dirty business in the USA.
I believe this will be the most important election for an american president in many, many years.
In order to keep everything the same as it has been under Obama, they, the MSM, and others like Soros, will do everything to defeat Mr. Trump maybe even as far as an assassination attempt.
I pray to God to keep Mr. Trump safe and to let him win and become POTUS.
Sane people do not want Clinton as POTUS, I just hope that evil does not prevail.
commented 2016-09-29 12:44:34 -0400
All polling indicators (including the left wing institutions of Time and Wapo) showed the viewers said Trump won. Of course for shallow thinking partisan leftists they are content to diaper-wet or preen over the cult of personality and hollow talking point rhetoric.

the rea ideals at war on that stage was networked insider corruption against grass roots spontanious populism. Any other analogy is fallacious circular argumentation.

A good non-partisan review is available here-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W08M50N_0Q8
commented 2016-09-29 12:34:12 -0400
’Jack Pallance commented 12 mins ago
Don’t know if he won or lost. But he was facing baseball signals, an earpiece in Hillary’s ear, the fact she got the questions ahead of time, and having to argue false “facts” from Holt. "

They both had earpieces. It’s part of live TV, and they both got the questions ahead of time.

What did they do with that? Well, Clinton studied and prepared. Trump, apparently, snorted a bunch of coke.
commented 2016-09-29 12:26:16 -0400
Lawrence, the last election they used the IRS to harass conservative think tanks. I hate feeding trolls, so I will ask the Democrats on the site to be honest, as hard as that might be. But do you honestly believe that Holt and Clinton didn’t have a private meeting before this debate to hand out the questions and coordinate with baseball signals? Or do you think they probably did, but think the ends justify the means.
commented 2016-09-29 12:22:07 -0400
the whole clinton campaign has been rigged by msm and political so called elites as for the debate i don’t know but it would not surprise me .
commented 2016-09-29 12:21:13 -0400
Don’t know if he won or lost. But he was facing baseball signals, an earpiece in Hillary’s ear, the fact she got the questions ahead of time, and having to argue false “facts” from Holt.
commented 2016-09-29 12:18:55 -0400
The more I watch the more obvious it is. Can’t believe the level of media corruption for Holt to organize baseball signals with Clinton. If they can do this they can cover up her health issues. How can you watch this and NOT see it?
commented 2016-09-29 12:16:47 -0400
There are all sorts of wild conspiracies that I’m sure could keep Trump avoiding culpability for not preparing for the debate for years to come.

I’m pretty sure the alt-right talking point is still that Trump won the debate, not that he lost and here’s the wild conspiracy behind that. Or, can you just not keep your propaganda straight anymore?