March 20, 2016

Sins of the Fatherland: Germany's past, present and future

Richard AndersonRebel Blogger
 

The New York Times brings out the branding irons:

In the current tussle for the future of Germany, Frauke Petry is what you might call the anti-Angela Merkel.

Where Ms. Merkel, the chancellor, has welcomed refugees, Ms. Petry, a rising far-right leader, has said border guards might need to turn guns on anyone crossing a frontier illegally.

Where Ms. Merkel has urged tolerance, Ms. Petry has embraced the angry populism now running through Europe and the United States.

“The preachers of hatred” was how the news weekly Der Spiegel characterized the new German right on its cover last month, emblazoned with a portrait of the petite Ms. Petry.

Call a Canadian politician "far-right" and visions of corporate tax cuts float into view. Call a German "far-right" and more terrifying images come to mind. So yes, Ms Petry is being compared to the Nazis.

For those who might have forgotten the Nazis were people who invaded other countries in large numbers in order to impose their cultural values. By point of contrast, Ms Petry is trying to prevent large numbers of people from invading her country and imposing their cultural values.

This is a difference wide enough to be obvious to anyone not working for The New York Times.

In 2015, 1.1 million migrants were allowed into Germany, a country with a population of 80 million. For an economy that has been treading water for years -- and whose demographic structure is heading toward terminal decline -- these are inherently unsustainable numbers. The question which Germany faces has nothing to do with prudent and well considered policies of immigration and integration. Those flooding into Germany are not properly vetted immigrants, many lack basic identification and a non-trivial number have questionable ideological allegiances.

Germany is also not a nation of immigrants; it has little of the psychological attitudes and cultural institutions that expedite immigrant integration into a host society.

The question of mass migration -- whether legal or not -- is clouded in sentimentality. For North Americans the immigrant lives in the collective memory as a sepia steeped peasant holding onto the handrail of an ocean liner. No doubt among the large numbers crowding into Germany today we have some who fit that ancient image. Yet once the misty eyed memories subside we are left with numbers and history.

The immigrant of a century ago was joining a culturally confident, fast growing society that could inhale millions of immigrants and - within a generation or so -- turn them into productive patriots. The sclerotic and decadent societies of western Europe simply do not have the economic or cultural capacity to absorb so many people so quickly.

Modern Germany is one of the most highly advanced societies in the world. Virtually all non-menial entry level positions require a level of training that far surpassed what most of these migrants possess or are likely to gain into the near future. As in most of continental Europe, German private sector job growth has been microscopic for decades. Germany is therefore not importing young, skilled workers to take the place of their greying Teutonic counterparts. Instead Angela Merkel has admitted a vast new dependent class that will wreck the country's once formidable economic strength.

To grasp the extent of this madness keep two facts in mind:

There are currently 3 million Turks in Germany. The first Turkish immigrants arrived in Germany in 1961. In more than half a century Germany has failed to properly integrate 3 million people from a comparatively advanced and relatively civilized country. What hope is there to integrate a million people from a hellish backwater in a radically abbreviated timeframe?

Shortly after the first Turks arrived in Germany, the British politician Enoch Powell delivered his notorious "Rivers of Blood speech." In it he prophesied that most of the newly arrived immigrants to Britain from the Caribbean and India would fail to integrate, leading to tensions and eventually open warfare in the streets. With the hindsight of nearly half a century we can say that he was mostly wrong. The vast majority of West Indian and South Asian immigrants have integrated well into British society. Where problems persist it has not been a matter of culture or race but of religion. A combination of weak willed multiculturalist politicians and Islamist rabble rousers has kept a portion of the country's Muslim population ghettoized and radicalized. Yet even with these caveats most immigrants to Britain have been successful.

Merkel's Migrants do not have the same prospects. If the history of the Turks in Germany or the Algerians in France is any guide we will soon see the Rhine foaming with much blood. Why commit so insane an act? When disasters of this scale happen there is an inevitable a mixture of interests both profane and sacred. The profane aspect is easy enough to grasp. If you're a German bureaucrat the creation of a massive new class of perpetual dependents is job security for life. Continental Europeans are notorious for their overly generous welfare states. The corollary of a generous welfare state is a massive administrative state to support it. Each new migrant arriving in Germany means a certain number of bureaucrats must be hired in response. For German officialdom this is a money making opportunity.

The sacred aspect of this German passion play is more emotionally fraught. The central fact of modern German history is the period between 1933-1945. Little in modern Germany makes sense without reference to the Nazis and moral reaction against their crimes. In the quest for "never again" a system of beliefs and institutions emerged after the war. They range from grand policies like NATO and the EU down to the micro-level of laws banning Nazi paraphernalia. This cultural immune system is now more than three generations old. It has acquired its own dogmas, petty prejudices and vested interests. A nation not so riven by guilt complexes would have been far less ready to martyr themselves on the altar of mass migration. As if in a final altruistic act of national suicide the people of Germany will have at last atoned for the sins of their great-grandfathers.

German history stretches back centuries. It encompasses Luther, Gauss, Goethe, Schiller, Planck, Heisenberg and Bonhoeffer. To reduce one of the national pillars of western civilization to a dozen years and a few dozen mass murdering criminals is a gross injustice. If Germany does commit suicide it will not have atoned for the crimes of Hitler, it will have instead deprived the world of a unique and immensely beneficial nation.

 

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-03-24 01:54:50 -0400
Canada needs to place a moratorium on Islamic immigration until all the Islamic terrorism stops.
commented 2016-03-21 15:01:42 -0400
Warren Lagasse commented
“Is this Trudeau’s master plan ? Bring in 25,000 Syrians and shovel billions of taxpayers money into the UN, to get a worthless seat on the security council ? The depth of stupidity is jaw dropping.”

The number is something like 300,000, check the older Rebel articles, one mentions it specifically.
25,000 was just the starting number.
commented 2016-03-21 13:42:43 -0400
I think he has been reincarnated in the body of Geert Wilders.
commented 2016-03-21 13:30:38 -0400
Is this Trudeau’s master plan ? Bring in 25,000 Syrians and shovel billions of taxpayers money into the UN, to get a worthless seat on the security council ? The depth of stupidity is jaw dropping.
commented 2016-03-21 10:45:27 -0400
“Stalin and I are the only ones who envisage the future and nothing but the future. Accordingly, I shall in a few weeks stretch out my hand to Stalin at the common German-Russian frontier and undertake the redistribution of the world with him. "

Continuing from my previous post:

Watch, Learn – actual film footage:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOchkL7LfJA

Hitler and Stalin = Socialist Twins

“The claim that National Socialism and Communism are “extreme opposites” is nothing but a piece of propaganda which made it into the history books and which is defended by postwar leftist propagandists only. Nazism and Communism are extreme Socialism and are BOTH far-Left!

Hitler and Stalin were secret comrades! And the Nazi Party, the NSDAP (National Socialist German Workers Party) was called “Brown Bolsheviks” by many Germans back then."

Hitler admits he’s a leftist Socialist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlGDks_s9sU

http://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/haken32.htm
Those Damned Nazis by Joseph Goebbels
“That is our real task as National Socialists. We were the first to recognize the connections, and the first to begin the struggle. Because we are socialists we have felt the deepest blessings of the nation, and because we are nationalists we want to promote socialist justice in a new Germany.”
_____________________________________________________________
Came across these interesting videos:
Today Liberals Are Actually Nazis (National Socialists)
Parts 1 and 2:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgMCP9DuWHs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTBXUXgJabU

A section of the second part regarding hard-drives sounds eerily similar to that of Wynne’s computers. Standard maneuver of socialists?
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/police-say-ontario-liberals-paid-10000-to-wipe-600000-files-off-hard-drives-in-premiers-office

The Nazis Were Socialists, Not Right-Wingers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzA7QomW4kY

Yes, Hitler was a Liberal Socialist… | Louder With Crowder
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VybWkpt_3Jo

Pat Condell on Liberals (Apologists for evil)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TA3OzSCdCUk
commented 2016-03-21 10:17:48 -0400
“Cultural Marxist subversion is all about mislabeling people and ideas and then pigeon holing them as politically acceptable or censored.”

A very germane comment to read as I watch Billary lie her way to the White House.
commented 2016-03-21 09:58:44 -0400
acuuna commented – “ I do not have the power to take my country to war, nor do I start wars. <> ask yourself just who is creating all these problems…certainly not you and me.”

Absolutely! This is policy created in a vacuum, no better indicator of the health of a democracy – the electorate do not control policy in: a dictatorship, a Monarchy, an oligarchy, a plutocracy and the semi autocracy of a parliamentary Monarchy in which the ruling party has royal prerogative. So take your pick of the rotten apples from that barrel to correctly label what we have here, but it isn’t a liberal Democracy of a sovereign citizenry.

Remember the golden formula: more government = less freedom, less freedom = less prosperity , Concentration of power + more government = more malfeasance

George Luck commented – “It is critically important that people understand that conservativism is not Nazism”
  • Partly true George, you never let your opponent define your identity, OTOH we should never allow this radical left to label liberal democratic concepts and civil libertarian ideals “right wing” nor should reason, rational self-interests and majority rule to be slapped with a political brand on it like “conservative”. Freedom, civil liberty, justice for the individual and populist democracy are universal concepts which transcend political labels. Cultural Marxist subversion is all about mislabeling people and ideas and then pigeon holing them as politically acceptable or censored.


George Luck commented – “Comparing the Obama administration complete with his Fuhrer like ‘executive actions’ and even his proposed ‘Obama youth’ ( for lack of a better term) as well as his other political activities, should warn us all of that parallel.”
  • The comparison is partly applicable – Obama is an Alinski acolyte –Alinsky propagated a form of Bolshevik “street politk” semi-violent arbitrary seizure of power from the existing constitutional order by organized mobs – and the imposition of a form of institutionalized theft of Middle class power and property. Obama’s actions with forced government service, using government agencies to oppress political opposition, and radicalizing youth then setting against the middle class reflects his Alinski schooling – Alinskism has been imported into Canada by Trudeau’s election team – when it rears its ugly head in policy making you will know it when you see it.
commented 2016-03-21 01:36:39 -0400
Zero population growth is the only solution if we are to meet our Green carbon goals.
commented 2016-03-21 01:36:39 -0400
Zero population growth is the only solution if we are to meet our Green carbon goals.
commented 2016-03-21 00:37:43 -0400
“With the hindsight of nearly half a century we can say that he was mostly wrong. The vast majority of West Indian and South Asian immigrants have integrated well into British society.”

No, most of them didn’t integrate the progressives bent the rules and undermined cultural values to feign multicultural is successful.
commented 2016-03-21 00:00:24 -0400
no matter where you go, the problems start with the political class . I do not have the power to take my country to war, nor do I start wars. immigration…I say no. I like the idea of zero population growth. I don’t ask for higher taxes nor do I get us into debt. I never embraced islam nor did I ever want to.
ask yourself just who is creating all these problems…certainly not you and me.
commented 2016-03-20 23:22:06 -0400
Well , anyway—- When I meet a German — I really expect to meet a German.
Not a Moroccan, not a Syrian, Only a German.
commented 2016-03-20 22:08:17 -0400
Bill Elder – Thank you so much for your post. The ‘big lie’ about Nazism has been propagated by the left since the last war. It is critically important that people understand that conservativism is not Nazism and the today’s left is but a close cousin of Nazism. Without that knowledge we, as a democracy, tread a narrow path between total government control, and complete lack of personal freedoms. Comparing the Obama administration complete with his Fuhrer like ‘executive actions’ and even his proposed ‘Obama youth’ ( for lack of a better term) as well as his other political activities, should warn us all of that parallel. Our current occupant of the big chair in Ottawa is, as all liberals will, following that same dark road.
commented 2016-03-20 20:47:44 -0400
HYACINTH;
After viewing the video, I read your excellent comment.
I am fed up with being called a Nazi just because I vote Conservative.
___________________________________________________________

The future of Canada looks bleak and our boat will be rocked, just as the UK was rocked in the 50s and 60s.
Multiculturalism is the root of all racial problems, that are and will continue to be major problems for Canada. All immigrants should be made to understand that if they come to Canada, they must be prepared to assimilate the Canadian way of life. Assimilation would include giving up barbaric traditions, like FGM and Inbreeding. They should also agree to covert to a religion that is acceptable in Canada. Believing in the Political Platform of Islam, should be made a criminal offence, punishable by Deportation.

Our biggest problem in changing our Laws is of course, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who dances to the UN Jig.
commented 2016-03-20 19:45:02 -0400
It’s obvious these Brussels-connected globalists (neo-Trotskyites) are trying to demonize anyone who challenges the wisdom of their anti nation-state policies by inferring they are Nazis – the globalist code word for Nazism is “extreme right”.

They are, of course deploying the greatest political lie ever told – that Nazi fascism (National Socialism) is “right” and Bolshevik communism (statist Marxism) is “left” – when in practical application both despotisms are identical twins. This “big lie” was actually concocted by Stalin himself as a propaganda tool to flush his ideological/military alliance and friendship with Hitler (Von Ribbentrop-Molotov pact) down the memory hole after he jumped ship to remain a western capitalist puppet following the 3 international financial syndicates who also abandoned Hitler to bankroll the western alliance.

In the post war world, cultural Marxists from the Frankfurt school continued to propagate Stalin’s big lie through their agents in western academia because it was the perfect ready-made cloak for the inherent despotism of Marxist Bolshevism taking root in western academic culture. Notice the 60s Bolsheviks (Hippies) preached love, world peace but used rioting and violent revolutionary tactics – it continues today in politically correct Bolshevism and globalist Trotskism.

Although as Ideologies Fascism and Marxism have some major differences, all these are erased when these theories are taken to practical application by aggressive statism (Nazism/Bolshevism), then they bear many major similarities;

A) anti-intellectualism, repudiation of rationalism and reason, emotion over reason
B) single party state leader presumed to represent the will of the people
C) the state and politically connected groups over the individual
D) party supremacy, nationalism, national jingoism
E) social class stratification under constant struggle narratives
F) action for actions sake, violence to strengthen party/nation
G) corporation-state amalgamation, command economy
H) commanded faith in the party and the leader
I) cult of personality hero worship of party officers
J) police state, state police and secret police crushing dissent

The bottom line in delineating where a party or political ideology sits on a scale is to put total government control on one end an no government on the other Nazism and statist Communism both hug the big government/despotism end of the scale. Rule of thumb in picking a political party/ideology : more government = less freedom. Less freedom = less prosperity. Simple age-old self evident formula which Leftards and sundry true believers have never understood.
commented 2016-03-20 18:30:28 -0400
Though clumsy in his delivery, Powell was addressing the fact that segregation and conflict along ethnic and religious lines already was happening, and had long been happening, in the immigrant’s’ country of origin. Rivers of Blood was a thoughtful warning of what awaits without consideration of the consequences of every act.
commented 2016-03-20 18:16:40 -0400
The radical left having forced multiculturalism on the willing western civilized world, by setting up separate living zones are now seeing the results. Multiculturalism is a disaster it has failed, instead of drawing people together it has separated them, not only black white but cultural. The way to welcome people into a society is to integrate them teach them the language and culture spread them into the society. Within one generation they will be integrated the oft used saying “borders, language, culture” is true and it will work.
commented 2016-03-20 18:02:36 -0400
The New York Times brings out the branding irons …. “Call a Canadian politician “far-right” and visions of corporate tax cuts float into view. Call a German “far-right” and more terrifying images come to mind. So yes, Ms Petry is being compared to the Nazis." For those who might have forgotten the Nazis were people who invaded other countries in large numbers in order to impose their cultural values. By point of contrast, Ms Petry is trying to prevent large numbers of people from invading her country and imposing their cultural values."

Excuse me, what the __ ? What is infecting the populace (globally) that causes them to rewrite history? What do they teach kids in school? What passes for education these days? Nazism is
left wing not right wing, the name says it all:
NAZI = National Socialist German Workers’ Party

FACTS:
“On 16 June 1941, as Hitler readied his forces for Operation Barbarossa, Josef Goebbels looked forward to the new order that the Nazis would impose on a conquered Russia. There would be no come-back, he wrote, for capitalists nor priests nor Tsars. Rather, in the place of debased, Jewish Bolshevism, the Wehrmacht would deliver “der echte Sozialismus”: real socialism. Goebbels never doubted that he was a socialist. He understood Nazism to be a better and more plausible form of socialism than that propagated by Lenin. Instead of spreading itself across different nations, it would operate within the unit of the Volk.”

“Hitler told Hermann Rauschning, a Prussian who briefly worked for the Nazis before rejecting them and fleeing the country, that he had admired much of the thinking of the revolutionaries he had known as a young man; but he felt that they had been talkers, not doers. “I have put into practice what these peddlers and pen pushers have timidly begun,” he boasted, adding that “the whole of National Socialism was based on Marx”.”

“Stalin and I are the only ones who envisage the future and nothing but the future. Accordingly, I shall in a few weeks stretch out my hand to Stalin at the common German-Russian frontier and undertake the redistribution of the world with him. "

http://jonjayray.tripod.com/hitler.html
“So all the most condemned features of Nazism can be traced back to Marx and Engels, right down to the language used. The thinking of Hitler, Marx and Engels differed mainly in emphasis rather than in content. All three were second-rate German intellectuals of their times. Anybody who doubts that practically all Hitler’s ideas were also to be found in Marx & Engels should spend a little time reading the quotations from Marx & Engels” – http://marxwords.blogspot.ca/

https://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/l/e.htm
Marxism stands on the left-wing of politics in a revolutionary way. Nevertheless, the spontaneity of a mass movement is one thing, and political leadership is another. Marxist political theory had its origins in both a critique of capitalism and the left. “Young” Hegelians, “True Socialists” and Utopian socialists, the left-wing of politics of the 1840s – (See The German Ideology); Lenin’s last major work, addressed to the supporters of the Russian Revolution in the West, was entitled “Left-Wing” Communism: An Infantile Disorder – a critique of the “left-ism” of those who wanted to imitate the Russian Revolution, without paying attention to the specific conditions of their own country. Marxism is scientific socialism; it is not a spontaneous politics.

https://democraticpeace.wordpress.com/2009/05/23/hitler-was-a-socialist/
http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/

Local university libraries should have these books:
Fascism: A Very Short Introduction, Evans, University of Cambridge
Chapter 5
page 111
More recent interpretations of Nazism have demonstrated that race
pervaded all aspects of Nazism. Hitler himself adhered to all the
premises of politicized biological racism. In Mein Kampf he sorted
races into a hierarchy with Aryans at the summit, assumed that
there was a Darwinian struggle for domination between races, and
argued that there was a will to purity within each race. Individuals
and social groups gained fulfilment through self-sacrifice for the
good of the race. … Indeed, all hereditary diseases were said
to be spread by Jews. Hence his advocacy of
eugenicist solutions to the racial question: selective breeding,
sterilization of the unfit, welfare legislation for the sound elements
of the population, and encouragement of healthy women to
reproduce. Hitler did not speak of extermination, but the language
he used to describe Jews – bacilli, leeches, parasites – could, and did,
legitimate extermination. Antisemitism, eugenicism, anticapitalism,
and anticommunism were different aspects of the same policy.
pages 143-144
The Nazi Party also included a strong trade union wing in the form
of its factory cell organization, the NSBO. After 1933 NSBO
leaders, thinking their day had dawned, threatened bosses with
concentration camps if they didn’t pay higher wages. Hitler’s
suppression of the SA in 1934, partly as a result of conservative
pressure, was a heavy blow to radicals. Already in 1933 the NSBO
had been incorporated within the corporatist German Labour
Front (DAF). In practice the destruction of left-wing unions and
the banning of strikes, together with endorsement of
management’s right to manage, ensured that German workers
lacked collective representation. Yet like other Nazi agencies, the
Labour Front did provide jobs and advancement for ideologically
committed workers, and it became one of the ‘fiefdoms’ which
undermined the old state hierarchy. The Nazis also retained much
of Weimar’s welfare system and set up a ‘Strength Through Joy’
movement to regulate workers’ leisure – but harnessed these to
their racial and eugenic projects. Welfare served the goal of
incorporating all classes into an ethnically pure, militarily strong
national community.

The Trial of the Germans: An Account of the Twenty-two Defendants before the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, Oct 14 1997 Eugene Davidson

The Making of Adolf Hitler: The Birth and Rise of Nazism – Apr 7 1997 Eugene Davidson

These books and links barely scratch the surface, there is so much more but I tire of writing.
Nazism is left wing not right.
commented 2016-03-20 18:01:44 -0400
All this proves is that history does repeat itself. Though trying to guise the German movement as Nazi-like, nothing could be further from the truth. They are not advocating genocide, as Hitler very clearly laid out in Mein Kampf. Rather, their concerns are linked to the security and the health of society for all Germans. (that is the people already in Germany) The incidents in Cologne and elsewhere in Germany, and the organized cover up by the state, serves to remind everyone of the true intention of the Progressivist-Sodomite Agenda: to cause social unrest and assure endless powers and jobs for the statists.
commented 2016-03-20 17:53:12 -0400
Dale, I agree, the Nazis were socialists. The left/socialists around the world it seems are determined to rewrite history and re-brand Hitler as right wing fanatic. They intentionally ignore that not only did Hitler spout socialist propaganda. Not to mention his party, the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, has the name socialist in it.
commented 2016-03-20 17:02:09 -0400
NAZIs were LEFTISTS through and through . . . much of their Fascist agenda is promoted by the LEFT today as Progressive Thought.
Don’t believe me? Why don’t we ask an Expert . . . .
And let us listen to Hitler himself on the matter:
“There is more that binds us to Bolshevism than separates us from it. There is, above all, genuine, revolutionary feeling, which is alive everywhere in Russia except where there are Jewish Marxists. I have always made allowance for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the party at once. The petit bourgeois Social-Democrat and the trade-union boss will never make a National Socialist, but the Communists always will.”
Another quote:
“Of what importance is all that, if I range men firmly within a discipline they cannot escape? Let them own land or factories as much as they please. The decisive factor is that the State, through the Party, is supreme over them regardless of whether they are owners or workers. All that is unessential; our socialism goes far deeper. It establishes a relationship of the individual to the State, the national community. Why need we trouble to socialize banks and factories? We socialize human beings.”
(Both quotes above are from Hermann Rauschning in Hitler Speaks, London, T. Butterworth, 1940, also called The Voice of Destruction.

And this policy manifesto:
9. All citizens of the State shall be equal as regards rights and duties.
10. The first duty of every citizen must be to work mentally or physically. The activities of the individual may not clash with the interests of the whole, but must proceed within the frame of the community and be for the general good.
Therefore we demand:
11. That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished.
12. Since every war imposes on the people fearful sacrifices in life and property, all personal profit arising from the war must be regarded as a crime against the people. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits whether in assets or material.
13. We demand the nationalization of businesses which have been organized into cartels.
14. We demand that all the profits from wholesale trade shall be shared out.
15. We demand extensive development of provision for old age.
16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a healthy middle-class, the immediate communalization of department stores which will be rented cheaply to small businessmen, and that preference shall be given to small businessmen for provision of supplies needed by the State, the provinces and municipalities.
17. We demand a land reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to confiscate from the owners without compensation any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land.
So who put that manifesto forward and who was responsible for the summary quotes given before that? Was it the US Democrats, the British Labour Party, the Canadian Liberals, some European Social Democratic party? No. The manifesto is an extract from the (February 25th., 1920) 25 point plan of the National Socialist German Workers Party and was written by the leader of that party: Adolf Hitler. And the preceding summary quotes were also from him (See Vol. 2 Chap. 5 of Mein Kampf and O’Sullivan, 1983. p. 138).
commented 2016-03-20 15:21:55 -0400
Germans – they are now reaping what they have sown – cowardice in the face of adversity.

In fact this has been happening in kraut land for some time now – this new attack of rapefugees is simply the topping on the cake.

See this rape map of Germany – rapefugees doing women and children and in some cases men.

It is sorted to make tracking easier:

Rapes on women – purple
Sexual attacks and rapes on children – red

http://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/world-economy/cologne-is-every-day-europes-rape-epidemic/news-story/e2e618e17ad4400b5ed65045e65e141d

Germans – so guilt ridden they will let their own people be raped and murdered and they do nothing.

Come to think of it Germany is no different than all other countries in Eurabia.

They deserve everything that happens to them.

No pity from me.