October 20, 2016

SPECIAL report: The real reason a UN censor blacklisted Rebel reporters — and why we’re STILL going to Marrakech

Rebel Staff
 

This is a first for The Rebel: We've decided to take this episode of "The Ezra Levant Show" and make it available for free.

That's because this story is so important, we're asking everyone to share it. 

As we reported earlier this week, a censor at the UN named Nick Nuttall has refused The Rebel's request for official media accreditation, so we can cover the climate summit in Marrakech, Morocco. 

Three thousand other journalists have been approved, but we've been blacklisted.

WATCH as Nick Nuttall explains why -- not to us and our lawyers or Canada's professional journalist associations, all of whom have written him formal letters in protest.

No, Nuttall went on the CBC to make his case that The Rebel is a "one person" enterprise, and furthermore, we're "extremist." 

Even the CBC host wasn't buying it!

I'll play you clips from his trainwreck interview, then talk to my guests Lorne Gunter and Sheila Gunn Reid about the UN's refusal to allow any dissent from its "global warming" talking points.

Finally, I'll tell you what our next step is in this fight for press freedom.

Go to LetUsReport.com for all the ways you can help us get to Marrakech. Because we're going anyway. Some UN censor isn't going to stop us!

PS: WATCH my show five nights a week when you become a Premium Member of TheRebel.media.

It's fast and easy to join — just CLICK HERE and get instant, exclusive access to news, analysis and interviews the mainstream media won't show you.

PLUS you get to watch weekly shows hosted by Faith Goldy, Gavin McInnes, Lauren Southern and Tiffany Gabbay (with more programs in the works.)

Choose from THREE membership levels — Learn more HERE!

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-11-14 07:16:19 -0500
Mr. Kokes: Perhaps if the Leftist ‘scientists’ spent less time writing 1/2 million peer reviewed love letters to each other they might spend a little more time listening to the massive numbers of scientists who just don’t buy their twilight zone, information that is so popular with politicians who want to collect more taxes…yup they are useful idiots and so are we if we believe them. When ‘science’ becomes popular with politicians it has sold out science…as you recall it was with Hitler and the Left when their science made forced sterilization and murder their goals…yes, even here in Canada…this is sold-out science.
commented 2016-11-14 07:10:42 -0500
Leftist believe that Leftists must have all freedoms to do whatever they want…and anyone who doesn’t like it is beneath their elitist contempt and, as Hillary said, “Breitbart has not RIGHT to exist”…because after all they are university graduates who have been “mind-cleansed of the irrelevant thoughts, facts, history and realism of the right”…enabling them to enter their ethereal twilight zone. The leftists are truly ‘PRETENDING THEY ARE SOVEREIGN’…and it is time the Right said goodbye to our lethargy and save them from themselves…Americans have already done so. No wonder they are called snowflakes’, although that is a terrible insult to those natural wonders of beauty, yet they truly are unnatural wonders beyond the imagination of humanity.
commented 2016-10-29 12:35:30 -0400
LIZA ROSIE commented 3 days ago
….he’s baaaaaaack and getting spammier and spammier. Must have hit a nerve.”

Yes, I did respond to you liza rosie coloured glasses but I see your response bares no cognitive reasoning to the many facts I presented. You are truly the alpha female Neanderthal of the group and contrary what the others think, that is not a good thing.
commented 2016-10-29 12:30:27 -0400
I see the Neanderthals have gathered again to garner emotional support rather than present any facts to dispute what I have said.

I must have really touched a nerve with all the name calling hypocrites who responded. Funny as while they condemn me for calling them out as to who they are, they have no problem spewing descriptors at me. But here’s a newsflash for you high fore-headed uni-brows, I was responding to Billy ELDERLY and not to the rest of you who felt you had something to say but instead proved to all the fools you have truly become in the big winds that came from their empty caves.

Then again, what can I expect from a bunch of hand dragging Neanderthals how believe it is more important to support each other’s dim witted view then to read, learn and become educated from the many scientific links I had provided. Pathetic really but not unexpected.
commented 2016-10-26 23:45:37 -0400
The ogre, Mr. Kokes, has reared his ugly head yet again. By his estimation, everyone must march in lock step with his opinion lest that they should be judged and arbitrarily reduced in species from Homo sapiens to Homo neanderthalensis as he sees fit. I actually suffered the dreaded reduction from Homo sapiens to a Pan troglodyte upon his whim. But really, Kokes isn’t God and he has no right to stifle freedom of opinion. While Kokes seems clever in conjuring up scores of links to support his claims he lacks the ability to convince and sway due to his his extreme and offensive arrogance. I had nominated him as the “Pompous Ass of the Year” but I think “Pompous Ass of the Century” might be more fitting. I adjourn from this thread…
commented 2016-10-26 22:01:53 -0400
Koke head……your mental illness is glaring in your posts. Seek help SICKO!
commented 2016-10-26 17:08:48 -0400
Mr. Jokes stated…."Actual temperatures as measured by scientific instruments such as thermometers bla bla bla. Yes oh Sage of the CO2. Let’s see, we can put a thermometer in that oven over there, another one in that oven over there, oh, don’t put one in there, that oven isn’t hot enough. Nice scientific study. Your as bad as Hillary, believing your own lies not so good. You are so pathetic Kokes I actually was feeling kind of good with your brief hiatus. Kinda sad to see you back, a know nothing know it all. Bill Elder has more knowledge, intellect and common sense on the tip of his dick than you do in your entire being. Maybe Liza is the alpha female hear, she has no problem kicking your beta male ass.

DJBT and the others
commented 2016-10-26 15:29:46 -0400
I would think that when our tax dollars are being spent we should want anyone who wants to insure our money is being spent wisely should have a say or at least be allowed to hear what is being said for themselves. People that aren’t doing anything wrong don’t act like they have something to conceal and would recognize that their own actions are only fuel for conspiracy theorists if untrue.
commented 2016-10-26 15:24:34 -0400
Mr Kokes said “Conversely, the UN wants people to attend the meeting who believe in the cause, to be productively helpful and to come up with well-reasoned decisions”. Since when did being a reporter or journalist require belief in a cause?
commented 2016-10-26 11:41:06 -0400
….he’s baaaaaaack and getting spammier and spammier. Must have hit a nerve.
commented 2016-10-26 11:25:41 -0400
“BILLY ELDERLY commented 1 day ago”
So from the research I have read or care to, I remain unconvinced we are in a climate crisis mode and I certainly do not believe the science is settled as it is still being corrected.."

Once you have done the reading in the scientific links I provided, here is some more scholarly papers for your reading pleasure. The first link may take you awhile with over 1/2 million peered reviewed papers regarding man-made climate change: :)
https://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=scientific+journal+articles+global+warming&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwivtfDK3PjPAhVowVQKHfbkBCgQgQMIGjAA
http://libguides.sjsu.edu/c.php?g=230209&p=1527689
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2015/noaa-analysis-journal-science-no-slowdown-in-global-warming-in-recent-years.html
commented 2016-10-26 10:48:43 -0400
LIZA ROSIE commented 1 day ago
Bill Elder I just want to say that with your posts you have completely wiped the floor with Koke’s arguments. Much more effective than Kokes insulting ramblings( that he thinks are ’reasoned arguments). Well done.”

There is no doubt in my mind that you are the Neanderthals alpha female. And all I can say is that it’s best to remain silent and have people think you are a fool than to speak up as you just did and confirm to all that you are. I hope your misguided friend ELDERLY will recover from the scientific slapping he just received but I doubt that. lol

You on the other hand will be put on “ignore” because I have yet to see an intelligent word come out of you. Nothing more than a big wind from an empty cave. So have a good life and I do hope you live in a coastal area. I know, you’ll have to think about that one.
commented 2016-10-26 10:44:48 -0400
“BILLY ELDERLY commented 1 day ago”
Kokes, NASA and Hansen have been caught tampering with temp record data sets too often to be deemed credible – so ancient cut and paste alarmist evangelism doesn’t impress me. “

You are likely referring to “Climategate” which has run its course a few years back. And the so called tampering was found to be untrue. Have a read here, http://www.factcheck.org/2009/12/climategate/
This site and many others confirm the following:
“Claims that the e-mails are evidence of fraud or deceit, however, misrepresent what they actually say. A prime example is a 1999 e-mail from Jones, who wrote: “I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (i.e., from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.” Skeptics claim the words “trick” and “decline” show Jones is using sneaky manipulations to mask a decline in global temperatures. But that’s not the case. Actual temperatures, as measured by scientific instruments such as thermometers, were rising at the time of the writing of this decade-old e-mail, and (as we’ve noted) have continued to rise since then. Jones was referring to the decline in temperatures implied by measurements of the width and density of tree rings. In recent decades, these measures indicate a dip, while more accurate instrument-measured temperatures continue to rise.

Leading scientists are unequivocally reaffirming the consensus on global warming in the wake of “Climategate.” White House science adviser John Holdren said at a congressional hearing on climate change: “However this particular controversy comes out, the result will not call into question the bulk of our understanding of how the climate works or how humans are affecting it.” The American Association for the Advancement of Science released a statement “reaffirm[ing] the position of its Board of Directors and the leaders of 18 respected organizations, who concluded based on multiple lines of scientific evidence that global climate change caused by human activities is now underway, and it is a growing threat to society.” The American Meteorological Society and the Union of Concerned Scientists have also reiterate their positions on climate change .”

“BILLY ELDERLY commented 1 day ago”
First off Kokes, …”

If you want to continue with your personal biastview commentary of who you think I am that I will respond in kind. You have been warned. “BILLY ELDERLY commented 1 day ago”

That said, I have to correct the defamatory falsifying you spew about my position on climate. First I am in “denial” of nothing that can be scientifically objectively proven. Climate changes – this is a primordial fact born out by archeological and geological evidence. Second, I’m not a scientist nor do I pretend to be, I’m an engineer and I offer nothing but my personal opinion on the evidence presented – an opinion which is subject to change as more objective evidence appears or fails to appear. “

Firstly archaeologists and geologists are not climate scientists so cannot speak with any authority on climate change. That would be like asking an electrician how plumbing works. Secondly, you are no different speaking from an engineering background. But at least you admit that all you provide is your personal opinion. Unfortunately, for reasons just stated, your personal opinion means nothing. And you suggesting that you base your opinion on objective evidence sounds good but is also meaningless when you don’t provide creditable links containing this so called “objective evidence”. Now why not take the time to do so now. Just ensure that the “objective evidence” has merit in science. I mean, with your engineering background, you should at least be able to differentiate between what is a scientific report and what isn’t so please don’t waste my time on the latter.

“BILLY ELDERLY commented 1 day ago”
My experience is in statistical control methodology. This is why I disagree with the idea we are in a climate “crisis” all evidence points to the climate as being within chronological norms. The heating hysteria started because the early climate models have been provably incorrect from the actual measured temperatures and the objective evidence defies the predictions as we pass each model milestone. Modeling (building reliable prediction on known data and known variables) is a tricky undertaking to begin with. We have seen repeatedly that the climate models used to predict climate trends are found provably faulty (and often corrected) as the heating predictions do not match measured observed temperatures by margins of error which are unacceptable to deem the model data extensions to be remotely accurate either by incomplete/incorrect data sets or omitting other mitigating factors. So by demonstration the science and conclusions made from constantly corrected models is NOT settled.”

Blah, blah and more blah. All you have done here Billy is regurgitate what the climate change deniers have been saying. This is not “objective evidence” this is nothing more than propaganda that lacks any support in science. And I understand that your experience has been in a controlled environment but when assessing the global temperatures, even you would agree that it is not a controlled environment as there are so many factors affecting those temperatures. Ocean currents, water vapour, winds, etc.

“BILLY ELDERLY commented 1 day ago”
Most recently I was impressed by the number of scientists and mathematicians coming forward with papers showing that the reason the climate models always run hotter than objective measured temperatures, is because there are basic mathematical flaws in the algorithm used to determine thermal feedback sensitivity (and the over estimated roll CO2 has in this function). The consensus of these propositions explain why there is always a >3 degree error in the models. I tend to accept the validity of these arguments and await the peer review of the papers. “

Are you referring to “Climategate” again Billy? Regardless, you will be waiting for a peer review on those trumped up papers until you turn blue because that will never be forthcoming. Why, because those so called scientists and mathematicians with their so called science, will have no credibility with the scientific community. None whatsoever! And just to prove this, why don’t you post a link to one of these so called studies that impressed you so much. Just ONE! But be prepared for my scrutiny of it.

“BILLY ELDERLY commented 1 day ago”
So from the research I have read or care to, I remain unconvinced we are in a climate crisis mode and I certainly do not believe the science is settled as it is still being corrected (and debunked as the NSA Temp data was) and adjusted as new data becomes available and new mitigating factors are injected into the computations. Nothing you can offer aside from qualified peer reviewed fact will change my personal opinion. So this is where I end any further need to justify my personal opinion to someone who evangelizes the science is settled. We are done here.

https://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/Why_Models_Run_Hot.pdf
http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/when-will-climate-scientists-say-they-were-wrong
http://icecap.us/images/uploads/Crux_Flawed_Science.pdf

Oh, we are not done yet. Not for awhile yet. But if you give up, I will understand.

And you “remain unconvinced” because you do improper research. Your research is not objective as you claim and you obtain your skewed view of things from organizations such as no friends of science, the oxymoron of oxymorons, who receive funding from the fossil fuel industry to promote the lies. With respect to their PDF on “Why Models Run Hot” that has been debunked by 97% of the scientific community. Here are a few links that dispute the bullshit spewed by so called friends of science:
http://wmbriggs.com/post/15346/

As for the author, Lord Monckton, is a non-scientist AGW denier, who has had articles published in The Guardian and in a non-peer-reviewed newsletter. The following link is very interesting with his affiliations and such, but more importantly, “According to a search of Google Scholar, Monckton has never published peer-reviewed research in any journal at any time. http://www.desmogblog.com/christopher-monckton

And then there is this…lol http://grist.org/climate-energy/famed-idiot-lord-monckton-banned-for-life-from-un-climate-talks/ “Famed idiot Lord Monckton banned for life from U.N. climate talks”

As for Patrick Michaels, who authored the report in your second link, admitted that “40 percent” of his funding comes from the oil industry”. http://www.desmogblog.com/patrick-michaels

And as for your final link, the author, William Gray, his affiliation is with fossil fuel funded Heartland Institute — Previously listed as a “Global Warming Expert” by the Heartland Institute. The HeartlessLand Institution of Idiots collectively received over $67 million from ExxonMobil, the Koch Brothers and the conservative Scaife family foundations. http://www.desmogblog.com/william-gray

So please Billy, find another source of your research because yours is severely and significantly flawed. My recommendation would be for you to research some actual “scientific papers”, ones that are peer reviewed for credibility. And here is what I am talking about:

From the Union of Concerned Scientists supported by the 97% of Scientists that agree with Anthropocentric global warming.
http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/science/CO2-and-global-warming-faq.html#.V04GcuS0eiw
NASA: Water Vapor Confirmed as Major Player in Climate Change
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/vapor_warming.html
What NASA has to say:
http://climate.nasa.gov/400ppmquotes/
What the American Institute of Physics has to say:
https://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm
What the EPA has to say:
https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/kids/scientists/proof.html
The basics:
https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/basics/
The National Center of for Science Education
http://ncse.com/climate/climate-change-101/how-much-human-responsibility-for-climate-change
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
http://www.globalissues.org/article/233/climate-change-and-global-warming-introduction#WhatisGlobalWarmingandClimateChange
National Wildlife Federation:
https://www.nwf.org/Wildlife/Threats-to-Wildlife/Global-Warming/Global-Warming-is-Human-Caused.aspx
The European Project on Ocean Acidification:
http://www.epoca-project.eu/index.php/what-is-ocean-acidification.html
State Universities:
Yale University:
http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/global-warming-real-has-consequences-part-i
http://e360.yale.edu/feature/soil_as_carbon_storehouse_new_weapon_in_climate_fight/2744/
http://www.columbia.edu/~vjd1/greenhouse.htm
http://climate.ncsu.edu/edu/k12/.greenhouseeffect
Natural Geographic:
http://ocean.nationalgeographic.com/ocean/explore/pristine-seas/critical-issues-ocean-acidification/
U.S. Geological Survey
U.S. Energy Information Administration
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
CIA World Fact Book
World Energy Council
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2009: Independent Statistics & Analysis.
U.S. Energy Information Administration, Department of Energy. March 2011.
The following is a summation of the above all neatly packaged for ease of understanding:
http://burnanenergyjournal.com/the-connection-between-greenhouse-gases-climate-change-and-global-warming/

Now read the above scientific articles above and take heed. btw, 97% of the scientific community agrees with global warming caused by man, the 3% you seem to cite receive funding from the fossil fuel industry and have been totally discredited.

However as an engineer, you should know better than to spew the unfounded rhetoric you find on the web. I am disappointed Billy I expected more from learned man! The next time, please provide links to credible science sites and papers that have been peered reviewed. Don’t rely on the dribble you get from the Rebel and other organizations like them (No Friends of Science, Heartattackland, etc.) And good luck with that, you will need it..lmfao
commented 2016-10-26 10:36:18 -0400
“KEITH AND HELEN HARVEY commented 6 hours ago
Hey, Mr. Kokes, Yes you are afforded free speech at this Rebel location. Unfortunately The Rebel isn’t afforded free speech at the UN. Because self serving organizations like that don’t like the truth being spread around. What other reason would there be to deny The Rebel access? And as heard on an interview session, The Rebel was not accepted because of their views. That’s called censorship, and where there is Climate Change Enforcers, there is censorship.”

Problem is Arbys, the Rebel chooses not to believe in climate change. They, along with their cohorts like Ball, spin a tale of lies for the fossil fuel industry and are rigid in thinking outside their Neanderthal box. So why on earth would the UN intellectuals want the ignorance of the Rebel and anyone who thinks as they do, to attend a meeting to address climate change when they themselves do not believe it’s happening. That would be akin to you attending a meeting in the North Pole on claims that Santa Clause exists there. Conversely, the UN wants people to attend the meeting who believe in the cause, to be productively helpful and to come up with well-reasoned decisions.
commented 2016-10-26 02:58:03 -0400
Hey, Mr. Kokes, Yes you are afforded free speech at this Rebel location. Unfortunately The Rebel isn’t afforded free speech at the UN. Because self serving organizations like that don’t like the truth being spread around. What other reason would there be to deny The Rebel access? And as heard on an interview session, The Rebel was not accepted because of their views. That’s called censorship, and where there is Climate Change Enforcers, there is censorship.
commented 2016-10-25 12:19:05 -0400
@liza Rose Glad to. There are a certain number of issues during this election that are forefront in my mind. I don’t think I have ever witnessed so much extreme vitriol and lopsided coverage by news medias in any other election. The huge amounts of cash being thrown towards the Clinton campaign suggests to me they believe everything is on the line in this election. Then when I consider the blatant law breaking and lack of political desire to address it. Consider Hillary Clinton not only deleting emails but physically destroying evidence and the lack of outrage from the courts. it makes it hard to believe when you contrast in our recent election how the media was out to destroy Harper with the suggestion he had read an email (not deleted it, not destroyed it) when he was the one who contacted the R.C.M.P. when he had heard of the situation. So I can reasonably deduce if the situation was reversed n the U.S. with a Republican pulling half of the crap that Hillary has would have bit the biscuit a long time ago. Then I hear the all too familiar rhetoric that if Trump gets elected the Markets might crash. Seems I heard that about Britain during brexiit which if true only makes me think the economy was never as sound as they have tried to make it appear. I think the way the left has over reacted has only shown their hand. When you add to this mess the plan to increase mass migration despite what has transpired in Europe it only adds to my belief this is an attempt to fundamentally change our system with or without our consent. It also makes sense why Russia would want to interfere as they are a petroleum based economy who will be left out by the over zealot green nut bars. I don’t mean to imply caring about your planet makes you crazy but it needs to be kept in check and challenged as all ideas are. When we get to the point we no longer tolerate dissenting opinions we are no longer a democracy.
commented 2016-10-25 11:47:13 -0400
Censorship by the UN is an indication of how significant this news outlet is becoming. The Rebel is too dangerous to be given a voice; a loose cannon that can’t be controlled from a back room. There is no back room. Best to silence if possible, discredit, and of course mock. Nuttall’s feined ignorance about Ezra and the Rebel was of course a thinly disguised put-down. If the Rebel is so marginal and unknown, why so much attention? Did he also visit websites for all the other organizations represented by the 3000 or so “controlled” reporters?
commented 2016-10-24 22:32:40 -0400
Bill Elder I just want to say that with your posts you have completely wiped the floor with Koke’s arguments. Much more effective than Kokes insulting ramblings( that he thinks are ’reasoned arguments). Well done.
commented 2016-10-24 22:27:34 -0400
The UN is pretty omnipotent. As Ezra has pointed out, what does the UN care about bad press. Who’s ‘gonna make them?’
commented 2016-10-24 22:23:04 -0400
Good article Edward, thanks for the link.

Snippet from link:
“Radical socialism has far from disappeared. It has simply gone green. The transition to a low-carbon economy is still code for a transition to more political control, less freedom and less wealth,” Foster writes.

The muzzling has only just begun.
commented 2016-10-24 20:34:18 -0400
Liza Rosie. I know Ezra has mentioned some of these ideas before but the more I look at it the more it totally makes sense. I posted an article I found online on another site and someone referred a book to me called Watermelons (The green movements true colors by James Delingpole) and the article I found and posted elsewhere. http://www.cochraneeagle.com/article/Radical-socialism-has-gone-green-20160908 When you think of it how else does this make any sense in light of some of the devastating decisions our leaders have been making and the way the media has been so compliant and the public so in the dark about why are energy bills are skyrocketing.
commented 2016-10-24 16:22:36 -0400
Sheila should go out there undercover find herself a fake CBC accreditation and infiltrate those leftist scammers , let’s try to see which other element of the universe they intend to put a tax on, Carbon tax then why not a chlorine tax ? and a consolation price for the CBC interviewer that questioned Dr. Nuttall (the voice) she was not too bad for a commy.
commented 2016-10-24 15:30:37 -0400
Kokes, NASA and Hansen have been caught tampering with temp record data sets too often to be deemed credible – so ancient cut and paste alarmist evangelism doesn’t impress me.

First off Kokes, you have never been civil or reasoning nor do you “debate” in any form I’ve seen you post – you insult and evangelize some lay-religion of climate crisis dogmatism. Your position is that there is nothing to discuss, there is no correction or contestable aspect of the data put out by the climate crisis proponents (which is the antithesis of scientific method) so there is no reasoning with you – you are unreasonable and uncivil – this is called fanatic zealotry FYI.

That said, I have to correct the defamatory falsifying you spew about my position on climate. First I am in “denial” of nothing that can be scientifically objectively proven. Climate changes – this is a primordial fact born out by archeological and geological evidence. Second, I’m not a scientist nor do I pretend to be, I’m an engineer and I offer nothing but my personal opinion on the evidence presented – an opinion which is subject to change as more objective evidence appears or fails to appear.

My experience is in statistical control methodology. This is why I disagree with the idea we are in a climate “crisis” all evidence points to the climate as being within chronological norms. The heating hysteria started because the early climate models have been provably incorrect from the actual measured temperatures and the objective evidence defies the predictions as we pass each model milestone. Modeling (building reliable prediction on known data and known variables) is a tricky undertaking to begin with. We have seen repeatedly that the climate models used to predict climate trends are found provably faulty (and often corrected) as the heating predictions do not match measured observed temperatures by margins of error which are unacceptable to deem the model data extensions to be remotely accurate either by incomplete/incorrect data sets or omitting other mitigating factors. So by demonstration the science and conclusions made from constantly corrected models is NOT settled.

Most recently I was impressed by the number of scientists and mathematicians coming forward with papers showing that the reason the climate models always run hotter than objective measured temperatures, is because there are basic mathematical flaws in the algorithm used to determine thermal feedback sensitivity (and the over estimated roll CO2 has in this function). The consensus of these propositions explain why there is always a >3 degree error in the models. I tend to accept the validity of these arguments and await the peer review of the papers.

So from the research I have read or care to, I remain unconvinced we are in a climate crisis mode and I certainly do not believe the science is settled as it is still being corrected (and debunked as the NSA Temp data was) and adjusted as new data becomes available and new mitigating factors are injected into the computations. Nothing you can offer aside from qualified peer reviewed fact will change my personal opinion. So this is where I end any further need to justify my personal opinion to someone who evangelizes the science is settled. We are done here.

https://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/Why_Models_Run_Hot.pdf

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/when-will-climate-scientists-say-they-were-wrong

http://icecap.us/images/uploads/Crux_Flawed_Science.pdf
commented 2016-10-24 14:27:17 -0400
Edward Jobin, good post on why the left want to silence any dissenting voice. I think also, followers of the ‘theocracy’ of man made warming are really determined and passionate about their agenda. They have big money and many foreign and corrupt regimes backing them. They are powerful, and they thought this was going to be easy. They are coming to the realization that the group who are not buying it is growing and becoming a problem for them. They are starting to run scared or they wouldn’t be digging their heels in this way. If we don’t go away and continue to gain momentum they won’t be able to ignore us. Free speech is for everyone , not just for the left and they must be harassed until they relent and allow those who question their agenda equal access to this and any other public event. Who ever in our sitting government who encouraged the UN to ban us should be ashamed.

I heard a democratic senator in the states unabashedly admit that climate change is’ a wonderful business opportunity’.
I also think it is a step in their ladder of social engineering and global control. If nothing else we need to give their Marxist agenda a run for it’s money.
commented 2016-10-24 12:07:19 -0400
Koke head spewed….“I reminded the Rebel that I am entitled to FREE SPEECH just as those Neanderthals like yourself are and to leave me in peace. Also told them if they ban me I will just bot up and return with a vengeance. I believe they now understand.”
A classic statement from a leftist regressive fucktard, i have free speech but you don’t. I talk, but you can’t responde, wa- wa- wa leave me in peace. You have also proven again that you are the poster child, yes child, for the person described in the article in the link you read. " i will stomp my feet, wa-wa-wa-wa, and i will bot up, wa-wa-wa-wa and come back with vengeance." How fucking juvenile there koke head, and you are a bot that’s for sure, one of Stalin’s useful idiots. Enjoy your sad existence. I will be sure to let The Rebel know of your plan to " Bot Up " Keep clicken!

in case you were unable to read my lips…..Fuck – you….. useful idiot!
commented 2016-10-24 11:44:45 -0400
MIKE KRCHNAK commented 18 hours ago
In closing, i will give one thing, your juvenile posts are some what amusing and the Rebel thanks you for every time you click…”

I do hope it is “in closing” Krying Mikey" as you offer no more added value to this discussion.

As for the Rebel, they warned me once when another krying member like yourself reported on one of my posts. I reminded the Rebel that I am entitled to FREE SPEECH just as those Neanderthals like yourself are and to leave me in peace. Also told them if they ban me I will just bot up and return with a vengeance. I believe they now understand.
commented 2016-10-24 11:37:10 -0400
BILL ELDER commented 17 hours ago
Kokes – you have again no reasoned argument – just more xenophobic bigoted name calling and zero intellectual input.
If we are talking about discovering “inner selves”, I suggest you start this catharsis soon, because the defamatory factually unsupportable drivel you spew here shows a pathology of chronic neurosis.
As for you moral and intellectual superiority posing; I’ve seen more evolved social/technical consciousness festering in a petri dish.
Make a cogent factual point or crawl back into your petri dish.”

Got to admit Billy ELDERLY, I do love your use of those powerful word symbols. However, I have provided you with “reasoned arguments” in the past and you chose to ignore them. Likely because you cannot dispute logic.

So, here is yet another attempt in providing the science that speaks to global warming and the impending climate change. Words on a page seems difficult for you to comprehend so perhaps videos will help this time:
NASA: | Feeling the Sting of Climate Change
https://youtu.be/vd0uvqYYUQw
NASA: Earth is warming at an ‘unprecedented pace’
https://youtu.be/0k70_u4stVw
NASA Warns Of Mass Extinction If We Don’t Fix Climate Change
https://youtu.be/Al4giu0rgoI

That’s just the start. Now take the time to analyze what is being said supported by the empirical data and I will be happy to help you understand the gravity of this situation. In other words, I will dumb it down for you.
commented 2016-10-24 09:46:22 -0400
The reason why they don’t want the rebel is because in order for indoctrination to work you need to silence the voice of reason and inquiry. I believe the reason the reason is because radicals who are trying to hijack Western democracies are eagerly wanting to push through their watermelon agenda (green on the outside but red on the inside) agenda which is why we have seen the American election take such a no holds barred nasty turn and why justice is not only blind but become deaf and dumb. The iconic symbol of the blind folded woman holding the scales should be replaced with the three monkeys.
commented 2016-10-23 18:53:59 -0400
Kokes – you have again no reasoned argument – just more xenophobic bigoted name calling and zero intellectual input.

If we are talking about discovering “inner selves”, I suggest you start this catharsis soon, because the defamatory factually unsupportable drivel you spew here shows a pathology of chronic neurosis.

As for you moral and intellectual superiority posing; I’ve seen more evolved social/technical consciousness festering in a petri dish.

Make a cogent factual point or crawl back into your petri dish.
commented 2016-10-23 17:25:06 -0400
Well….Ms.koke head and its morally superior posts are nothing but rhetoric spewed by the leftist regressive fucktards to those that don’t fall into line with the u.n. / globalist psychopaths. I know you are the sick minded individual that was described in the article and so do you. You’re a puppet and one of the useful idiots.
Carbon dioxide is an inert gas that is critical to the existence to life on the planet. Taxing this element would do nothing to change its levels in the atmosphere and any fucktard that thinks otherwise is…..well……a fucktard. As far as your juvenile claims that we are all in caves, lets set the record straight, thank the good lord for hydrocarbons. In a harsh world, fucktards like you would be the first to go, so live your life of hypocrisy and keep on enjoying your sad existence that is surrounded by oil and gas and its byproducts. In closing, i will give one thing, your juvenile posts are some what amusing and the Rebel thanks you for every time you click so read my lips…. VAC-UUM!