February 28, 2016

Top 3 reasons Justin Trudeau should skip Toronto's Pride Parade

Harry KhachatrianRebel Blogger

Justin Trudeau was elected Canada’s Prime Minister to manage our country, spark economic growth and to represent us on the world stage – oh, and legalize weed.

He's so far managed to take a surplus budget given to him by his conservative predecessor, and through the magic of liberal-policies, output a $30 billion deficit.

Moreover, he's managed to singlehandedly get Canada un-invited to meetings amongst world leaders.

And it’s still not legal to get so high (so that at least you could think he was doing a good job.)

Nonetheless, what really matters to Trudeau – the progressive agenda – marches on, as Toronto’s Gay Pride Parade organizers announce that Justin Trudeau will be the first prime minister to participate in the festivities and flamboyances of the parade

Why? Because Canada institutionally discriminates against gays, and routinely executes them in public. Oh wait, no – that's ISIS, the terrorist organization that Trudeau unilaterally stopped us from bombing; and Iran, the nation Trudeau lifted economic sanctions on. We're actually the country that's – for better, or for worse – had nation-wide legal gay marriage from more than a decade.

Here are three reasons why the leader of our country should not be attending a gay pride parade.

Pride Parades – including Toronto’s are vulgar. Really vulgar.
Pride has nothing to do with advancing civil rights for a marginalized group. Gays in Canada are not marginalized, nor do they lack any civil rights.

Moreover, Pride is a mass glorification of highly immoral behaviour. From naked men flaunting their junk in the air to more naked men performing mock sex-acts -- that and more is on public display at this vaunted venue. Effectively, it's a live porno shoot.

By no measure should such behaviour be endorsed, let alone include the participation of a nation’s head of government. This, in many respects legitimizes behaviour that truly ought to be stigmatized for the moral and physical damage it causes to the individual.

It's divisive, and offensive to Christians
For a prime minister who strongly felt the need to lecture us on “Canadian values” when the majority of Canadians felt uneasy about importing tens of thousands of Muslim Syrian refugees from terrorist hotspots, Justin Trudeau seems awfully eager to dive headfirst into an event that promotes values not held by many Canadians.
Trudeau’s participation in this glaring glorification of promiscuity and sexual perversion is highly contradictory of the notion that he somehow cares about our values – two-thirds of Canadians self-identify as Christian.

Seriously. Why do we need Pride at all?
As I mentioned earlier, Canada has had nation-wide, legal gay marriage since 2005. Gays are equal in every way under the Canadian Charter.

If the argument is that a gay Pride parade is necessary to overthrow and combat some innate bigotry, we can dispel that notion with basic statistics.

In Canada, there are approximately 597,720 individuals who identify as homosexual -- 1.7% of the population.

In 2013, there were 186 hate crimes against homosexuals in Canada. That means, as a Canadian homosexual, you have a 0.03% chance of being a victim of a hate crime.    

There are 309,650 Jews in Canada -- 1.1% of the population.

In 2013, there were 181 hate crimes against Jews, in Canada.

As a Jew, you have a 0.0548% chance of being a victim of a hate crime in Canada.
Thus, as a Canadian Jew, you are 82.67% more likely to be targeted by hate crimes than as a Canadian homosexual.

Does this mean we need a Jewish Pride Parade? No, it just underscores the fact that Canada is an open, tolerant and accepting society for gays and lesbians.

Being born with a certain sexual orientation isn't an accomplishment or some mighty accolade to parade about, any more than the thickness of your hair is.

This is with the exception of our Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, of course. Yes, he’s bankrupting our nation – both morally and financially. But hey, he’s got nice hair!  

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-03-01 14:35:26 -0500
@ Harry Khachatrian

All I can say is that I agree with your points, including, “Why do we need Pride at all?” Why indeed: it offers nothing of value or real worth, but only makes a spectacle of itself.

I am quite certain that if some of that which is done during the Parade by its participants, were to be done outside of the self-aggrandizing affair, especially in front of the police, charges would be laid.

I have often wondered why, for certain events, the laws of the land are suspended for what takes place during those events. O Canada. . . .
commented 2016-03-01 02:26:21 -0500
Mannie troll, think bigger than Toronto. Its not like boy Trudeau got in with a majority. You’re just so provincial, and completely illogical I might add.
commented 2016-02-29 20:58:42 -0500
Orville lol that’s good but she reminds me more of Austin powers
commented 2016-02-29 19:43:33 -0500

You are obviously too dumb to understand that Trudeau will be praised for going to Pride and the media will eat it up. So your “plan” would actually backfire.

I don’t think you realize how popular Pride is – even among straight people.
commented 2016-02-29 19:38:01 -0500
Oops wrong key….long day at work……Think, not thing.
commented 2016-02-29 19:37:22 -0500
Gotta wonder what his muslim handlers thing of all this….!
commented 2016-02-29 18:37:15 -0500
Trudeau should definitely NOT skip the Pride Parade. Let the world see him for the disgusting faggot that he is.
commented 2016-02-29 16:53:35 -0500
Michael Mann commented " Joe, You believe in man made fairy tales. I believe in science, logic and fact."

No, you don’t. Your knowledge of science, logic and fact is very limited. As is mine, at least in regards to Science and fact… However, I like to think I have a pretty good grasp on logic. I believe your mind is only open to recognizing that which confirms your preconceived bias, and it’s my opinion that you would probably refuse to follow the evidence if it took you in a direction that challenged your world view. I’m not saying I don’t have a bias myself, but I always try to be open minded; that is open to the possibility that I might be wrong. From all your posts on this sight, it is evident that you never entertain that possibility for yourself. I too believe in science, logic and fact. My examination of the evidence has lead me to the inescapable conclusion that the Christian faith is far more probably the objective truth than not. I won’t elaborate further. You wouldn’t accept the evidence anyway, because it would go against your world view.
commented 2016-02-29 16:00:40 -0500
Its just that he’s so open minded that his brains really did fall out.
commented 2016-02-29 15:54:35 -0500
Elton Braun – once they take down Canada, Trudy will likely be flying off a building, holding Wynnie’s hand.
commented 2016-02-29 15:47:50 -0500
Yes nothing like a nice warm and fuzzy family outing enjoying the perverted gay parade. If I were a journalist looking for a scoop, I’d be over at JT’s mosque asking the imam and anyone else over there what they think about their biggest celebrity Muslim member enjoying all the gay festivities.
commented 2016-02-29 15:20:44 -0500
PM Junior has his priorities totally screwed up and forces onto Canada with the false perception that he has a mandate with less than 40% voting for the Liberals. More than 60% of Canada did not want him. Our voting system is completely screwed up.

Well, S. FEKETTE, I’d like to blame the screwed up voting system too – but that’s not the problem. More than 6 out of 10 Canadians voted for either the Liberals, NDP, or Green. And there is no discernible difference between the three on energy, the environment, immigration, foreign affairs, and a host of other issues.

So here’s my advice: sit back and enjoy the gurgling vortices in the Great White Northern Bowl. After all, it’s what the majority of Canadians voted for.

Today’s Sesame Street has been brought to you by the letter B: bunkers, bullion, bullets, bottled water, beans, and bully-beef.
commented 2016-02-29 14:08:58 -0500
The fruit loops PM!
commented 2016-02-29 13:54:56 -0500
We can certainly tell that from your posts Mannie .
commented 2016-02-29 13:41:48 -0500

You believe in man made fairy tales.

I believe in science, logic and fact.
commented 2016-02-29 13:26:13 -0500
send the picks of Justine and Orville Redenbacher ( kudos to whoever coined that one) at the pride parade to your local mudslum groups.
Mudslums could be useful tools for a little while at least. and after they dispatch him, with extreme prejudice, we can deport them for being non-compatible to western civilization.
simple as…
commented 2016-02-29 13:21:25 -0500
Interesting article, except the “Being born with a certain sexual orientation”. If freedom of choice didn’t exist, then the choice of freedom wouldn’t either; but it does!
commented 2016-02-29 13:08:01 -0500
The only meeting we were “un-invited to” was a meeting of defense ministers that we didn’t need to go to in the first place. We were never invited in the first place, not “un-invited”.

“Yes, he’s bankrupting our nation – both morally … "

And you wonder why they don’t vote for you … you guys just refuse to learn.
commented 2016-02-29 12:52:40 -0500
Why would Turdo attend a parade with such acts going on during the parade. What a nut case Turdo wants to be everyone’s friend. How stupid he is……no brains!!
commented 2016-02-29 12:40:15 -0500
PM Junior has his priorities totally screwed up and forces onto Canada with the false perception that he has a mandate with less than 40% voting for the Liberals. More than 60% of Canada did not want him. Our voting system is completely screwed up.

Dr. Michael Savage: “Liberalism is a mental disorder”.
commented 2016-02-29 12:39:32 -0500
He has to go if he didn’t he would hurt , Wynnie’s feelings. The whole thing is such a joke. Infantile, and not befitting of a leader of a country. I agree that “life is about what you do not who you”, Acuna. And Bill Elders entire post, "I find it to be a regressive obsession for society to “celebrate” what you do with your personal plumbing – is this really what the human condition/development is about?

We should be exploring the galaxy but we are still wallowing in a mire of perverse self-identification over genitalia deployment. Aside from the fact this level of narcissism is very mentally unhealthy, it retards our collective cerebral growth as a species.

Back in the day hippies called these psychological obsessions a “hang up”. "
commented 2016-02-29 12:24:25 -0500
I don’t know what rights gays don’t have yet, why such a fuss every year. At the very least it should be held in the winter, say a winter carnival sort of affair?

In 2011 Rob ford said he wouldn’t allow city funding to the parade if they insisted on including the Queers Against Israeli Apartheid group. I’m sure now boy Trudeau is PM there won’t be a problem with the group joining in. Pride Parade also gets some federal funding.

I think it is mostly ignored by residents. Used as an excuse to be loud, lewd, and obnoxious for many in party animal mode, just a curiosity for others. All in all a good day to stay out of the city with the kiddies.
If its such a wholesome family affair I want to see Justine bring his wife and kids. Photo op please.
commented 2016-02-29 12:18:28 -0500
Top 3 reasons turdo la doo should skip in Trawna’s parade:

(a) he’s good at it
(b) Trawnatonians voted for it
© With some practice between now and then he might be able to chew gum at the same time

Oh, shit…Sorry! I thought it said " skip in".
commented 2016-02-29 12:02:37 -0500
CLIFF LLOYD commented 16 mins ago
Put this sicko up front where he is very visable and maybe someone will do us a huge favor.

You mean someone blows Trudeau’s fkg head off??? I am keeping my fingers crossed.
commented 2016-02-29 11:46:05 -0500
Put this sicko up front where he is very visable and maybe someone will do us a huge favor.
commented 2016-02-29 11:44:28 -0500
This is Justin’s typical party, being an MP from Montreal- Papineau and all. Let the man rage, you go Justin! Another thing to add is the events tendencies to censor and push radical agendas that have nothing to do with the event.
commented 2016-02-29 11:42:41 -0500
Trudeau will likely be handing out free (taxpayer funded) champagne to all the homosexuals that wave their junk in his face. His gleeful little gasp, and lisp will be soooo prime ministerial.
commented 2016-02-29 11:17:44 -0500
Robert Raymond commented = “I suspect that the Canadian tax payer will have to pony up to cover the costs for JT to attend this event”

Of course, it’s the price we pay for accepting institutionalized fraud. It’s all optics spent on propagating a fraud and obfuscation of realities.
commented 2016-02-29 11:13:40 -0500
Ron Christensen commented – “Multiculturalism in Canada has been a great success”

Multiculturalism as a political/government policy has been the most culturally divisive nation-fragmenting failure in the annals of Canadian history and only a sinecured panderer from the Multicult policy industry charged with white washing the failure would define it as anything else.

Forty years ago, then prime minister Pierre Trudeau created a policy — multiculturalism — that allowed immigrants to become Canadians by INTEGRATING into our culture without abandoning their own. He was trying to differentiate between Canadian integration and American assimilation (the melting pot).

Without question, integration is more appealing to newcomers than assimilation. But is it working for everyone?

Within the shaky balance of Franco-Agnglo-Native nation-building cooperation, Canada was built with the help of immigrants who created vital infrastructure to a young nation – like canals, bridges and railroads, and there is no doubt that this proto-Canada is a success story. However, in the second part of the last century, these immigrants were becoming restless because they couldn’t integrate completely as anglophones, francophone or native and they became a social problem because they had no national identity in a country they now considered theirs.

The multiculturalism of Pierre Trudeau filled that gap by creating a social container for the “ethnics,” but what about integration? It was impossible to integrate with the natives and very difficult with the francophones (these are essentially 2 very closed, exclusive cultures), so the only real chance multiculturalism had to work was within English Canada.

Did it work? In my opinion, no. In fact, there is a valid and provable argument that the current system actually penalizes new and old immigrants.

For example, more than a million Canadians live in California and Florida and almost 2 million live in other continents. In 2003 (the numbers are higher now), there were 250,000 people with a Canadian passport living in Hong Kong. For most of these people, Canada is not their country, it’s a life insurance policy, a place to rush to when in need of medical services or secure shelter. Two summers ago, Ottawa had to spend $114 million to repatriate 14,000 “Canadians” living in Lebanon. We sent planes and boats to bring them “home” — and most of them are now back there.

The political rhetoric from the Liberals (who view new immigrants as nothing more than an easily exploited dependant voting block), attempt to imply Canadian multiculturalism is a better system than the American melting pot. However, the reality is that in the States, people like Carson, Cruz, Rubio, or Obama can go right to the top, up to the White House, while we’re still wondering when multicultural Canada can have at least a black or ethnic LPC leader or PM.

At times I wonder whether multiculturalism is a policy to exploit “ethnics” or to keep them out of the command structure of our political oligarchy. In the meantime, we keep writing entitlement cheques to people who are not even living in Canada.

So Ron, to return to your original fabrication, no evidence exists outside of official Multicultural political propaganda , that the policy (as deployed post PET) has been anything other than a national detriment and a crass partisan tool to exploit new voters.
commented 2016-02-29 10:51:13 -0500
The gay movement as the blogger alludes to has lost its raison d’être in terms of activism aimed specifically at establishing equal rights for homosexuals. The majority of Canadians really aren’t that interested anymore and to some extent that annoys those in the gay movement who continue to want attention.
Trudeau will participate in the parade because it is an opportunity to pander to one of the lefts favourite so called minority groups. My only bias against the gay movement is simply that they blithely vote as a block for idiots like Trudeau and Wynne. And they will suffer the consequences along with the rest of us. At least in our misery we will have company.