September 09, 2015

When it comes to free speech, some Jews still don't get it

Mindy AlterRebel Blogger
 

A crash course in "human rights"-type thinking is offered by one Lita-Rose Betcherman, a former "human rights" apparatchik whose letter to the editor appears in the September 10th issue of the Canadian Jewish News (link not yet available online.) 

In response to the news that the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (unofficially, Canada's body of Official Jews) is opposing proposed Quebec legislation that aims to curtail "hate speech," the mightily affronted Ms. B. writes:

As a Jew and a former member of the Ontario Human Rights Commision for 11 years, I deplore the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs' criticism of Quebec's proposed legislation to combat hate speech, dubbing it an abuse of freedom of speech ("Quebec hate bill could stifle free speech, CIJA says," Aug. 27).

As the primary target of hate-mongering, for Jews to be an outspoken critic of Quebec's proposed legislation is enough to discourage governmental bodies from proposing similar legislation. Let us leave that position to our enemies.

As to the merits of the Quebec bill as drafted, its purpose is clear and with any judicious improvements, its effectiveness will emerge from its administration.

Spoken like a true believer in the efficacy of Canada's "human rights" inquisitions. The fact is, however, that what always – always - emerges from such measures is, to employ the most apropos and colourful lingo, do bupkes to protect Jewry, serve the interests of those who admire shariah-style speech restrictions, and end up biting us Jews in the tuches.

(See, for example, the experience of attorney David Matas, who was subjected to a lengthy prosecution by Manitoba's "human rights" racket for saying something at a conference that offended a Muslim; at the time, her name was kept secret such that Matas and B'nai Brith Canada, the organization he represented, did not know who had lodged the official "human rights" complaint against them.)

It is heartening that CIJA, the organization that subsumed and replaced the Canadian Jewish Congress - for many years, one of the foremost opponents of free speech in the land - has twigged to the dangers of the anti-"hate speech" mishegas, and has spoken out against the proposed bill.

Someone else who was late to see the damage wrought by anti-hate speech provisions in Canada's "human rights" codes, but who vociferously opposed them towards the end of his life, was Alan Borovoy. I wrote about him and his "aha" moment in a letter last week to the National Post, a response to this column by the great Barbara Kay (the letter was considered for publication but didn't make it in):

Some years ago, I attended a talk by the late Alan Borovoy, one of the architects of Canada's "human rights" apparatus. During the talk he lamented the fact that the system he, with the best of intentions, had helped animate, had taken a very wrong turn. Instead of concerning itself with adjudicating and eliminating instances of discriminatory practices in the areas of say, employment and apartment rentals, "human rights" had morphed into something monstrous, something that, shades of Orwell's 1984, was seeking to eliminate free speech, the human right that's a prerequisite for - and that safeguards - a free society. 

It seems to me that Jacques Fremont, in his guise as chief of the Quebec Human Rights Commission, is exactly the sort of lumbering Frankenstein monster that Mr. Borovoy - who, after all, was the "doctor" who gave the beast life - was warning us about. Given a little power, this "human rights" commissar isn't content with solving picayune instances of discrimination in daily life. He claims for himself the right to oversee nothing less than a complete overhaul of society such that an individual's very thoughts, should they go to a place that dares to question or criticize or question any aspect of one of the world's religions, would be deemed unlawful--a crime against the state. 

While I can't presume to speak for Mr. Borovoy, I am confident that he would decry this deplorable and frightening overreach by a "human rights" body, and encourage Quebecers and, indeed, all Canadians to do the same.

Alan Borovoy, "human rights" advocate extraordinaire, finally saw the light. Sadly, the likes of Ms. Lita-Rose Betcherman, Jew and former "human rights" commissar, as well as - go figure - David Matas, likely never will.

 

Follow The Megaphone on Twitter.

JOIN TheRebel.media for more news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2015-09-14 12:43:08 -0400
Human rights commission Hog Wash!!! Like multiculturalism designed to divide and conquer! UN driven drivel pathological deviant populated agency! Oh and where are the political class? Just like other special interest control group the political class butt kissers endorse these a orations of humanity. Period! Geez be men not mice.
commented 2015-09-10 16:26:58 -0400
Want to get rid of hate speech? Get rid of Islam in our country. I will continue to hate hate speech from these hypocrites.
commented 2015-09-10 06:17:33 -0400
I really can’t believe that Quebeckers are stupid enough to enact such legislation and I am totally bamboozled as to how any Jew could be copacetic with this BS. What the hell is going on in this Country?
commented 2015-09-10 03:23:37 -0400
Rae this is a policy manifestation of the principle that jihadis wouldn’t resort to violence if all of us kuffars just paid our dhimmi tax and refrained from insulting Islam.
commented 2015-09-10 01:21:03 -0400
Please—- Could you favour me with your understanding of this PQ Law. I honestly don’t get it. I thought that Quebec was against Muslim domination and were the one Province in Canada to fight against Islamic Imperialism.