May 12, 2015

From the Rebel Community: "Why I Oppose Child Sex Ed"

Amanda AchtmanRebel Blogger

Check out these submissions we received from The Rebel online community about why they oppose the child sex curriculum. 

Ontario Liberal Premier Kathleen Wynne's child sex curriculum sexualizes young children, undermines parental authority, and imposes the government's morality on every Ontario family. Here are some submissions we've received at The Rebel for why this curriculum has got to go. To sign the petition to the government demanding that they repeal it, visit

Tell us in the comments section why you oppose the child sex curriculum or send me an email with your photo submission to 

"I oppose the child sex curriculum because school is not the place for your own sexual ideas, Kathleen Wynne!"
- Anna

"I oppose the child sex curriculum because... it's way too much, way too young."
- Michael

I oppose the child sex curriculum because it is not age appropriate and overtly sexalizes young children! Protect childhood innocence.
- Kacie

"I oppose the child sex curriculum. Is it education or is it grooming?"
- Gary

"I oppose the child sex curriculum because it destroys their innocence."
- Karem

"I oppose the new sex ed curriculum because it is highly inappropriate for young children and creates confusion. I do no agree with gender fluidity."
- Mary

"I oppose the Ontario child sex curriculum because it is the work of elitist state social engineers who are usurping the rights of parents. Indoctrination is not education!"
- Michael

"I oppose the child sex curriculum because it answers questions that children are not making themselves yet!! #EveryChildIsDifferent #ProtectOurKids"
- Nelly

"I oppose the child sex curriculum because it sexualizes young children."
- Ezra

Tell us in the comments section why you oppose the child sex curriculum or send me an email with your photo submission to Thank you to everyone who participated for taking a stand!

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2015-06-21 15:36:56 -0400
I am amazed that the people above were able to generate enough brain power to write their idiocy on a piece of paper. Absolute fucking morons – every single one.
commented 2015-06-16 09:02:33 -0400
Here Joan Abernethy goes again. She always plays the victim card. Someone is bullying her, or trying to silence here, or whatever. But then she’ll say she isn’t a victim and will never be one – “but stop bullying me, I am entitled to my opinion”. Now it appears she is being stalked. Serial victim!!
commented 2015-05-15 03:25:21 -0400
MacMaster – you are obsessed. Quit stalking me. I am not a pedophile nor do I or have I ever “cheerled Ben Levin”. You should be ashamed of your serial lies about me.
commented 2015-05-14 19:32:55 -0400
Great comment Nancy Paul. You said it all so well.
commented 2015-05-14 07:11:31 -0400
Developed by Benny-the-Diddler, quarter-backed by Wynne, with Joan Abernathy as a cheerleader. Now that’s an “A” team, isn’t it?
commented 2015-05-14 00:27:55 -0400
There is something very wrong going on today under the guise of protecting the Children.
You teach them about every vile and disgusting perversion and then tell them that it is all NORMAL. It ain’t normal.
Maybe it was for Mohumadd. Peace be Upon his perverted Soul.
commented 2015-05-13 23:36:59 -0400
I oppose the child sex curriculum, because it is the long arm of the gov’t trying to take control of a whole generation, under several guises by the look of it. This curriculum in no way teaches Canadian values to immigrants, if that is one reason for it,(the curriculum DOESN’T reflect Canadian values for a start). Also, robbing children of their innocence is too big a price to pay for educating them against possible abuse. I don’t believe it would work in protecting anyone from anything, and would only do damage. This is put to us the same way anything is shoved down anyone’s throat, in this case its, “if you don’t agree, you must not care about children’s safety against predators…”. There are many layers to this bamboozle. Political, very political.
commented 2015-05-13 00:07:50 -0400
I agree with all above.
Why is the Wynne Government so intent on forcing this massive social experiment down everyone’s throats?
I would think that she – like any parent – would want to ensure that EVERY concern has been checked and supported before moving ahead. Sort of like a Social cost-benefit analysis. Where is it?
This issue is playing with the most vulnerable in society – our children, and so to behave in such a cavalier fashion towards them smacks of something way more sinister than politics.
commented 2015-05-12 20:44:07 -0400
I agree with every single one of the comments above. They are all absolutely right on.I also wonder where does Kathleen Wynne come up with “consent” for underage children. It could be making them targets for pedophiles by making them believe they can give consent, not realizing they are being manipulated. It is unacceptable and unnecessary.. Actually a person can easily go through life without needing to know any of this. If a person exhibits such tendencies the proper course of action would be to seek professional help. In my view, this curriculum is also grooming or confusing children about gender. When I was a child, I’m sure many can relate to this, a lot of girls were called tomboys, what would happen to those girls today if Wynne had her way? Would they be coerced into believing they were boys in girls’ bodies? I would like to see teachers with enough integrity to refuse to teach this agenda driven curriculum.
commented 2015-05-12 18:15:46 -0400
This curriculum was created with input from a convicted pedophile and a lesbian with an agenda. There are males and females. That the drooling leftist freaks think there are 6 or 7 or 22 sexual agendas is not something that should be taught to impressionable children of any age. Sexualizing young children has one motive and only one – it’s called grooming. For Christ’s sake, homosexuals, you have gay marriage, you have acceptance now will you kindly shut the f up or go back into the closet. Life is actually about more than sex and no, small children are not interested in the reasons behind Johnny’s 2 Mommies .
commented 2015-05-12 15:38:29 -0400
I support everyone of the comments above. Even though I am not from Ontario I read the carriculum and found things I didn’t know and some I really didn’t want to know. I have survived for 67 years without that knowledge, so i wonder why we need to teach it. Every student needs to be able to do basic mathematics, but they don’t all need to know how to do differential calculus or laplace transfers.