December 15, 2015

Will a robot take your job? (Part Two)

Denyse O'LearyRebel Blogger
 

Last time out, we looked again at whether artificial intelligence would kill our jobs, and it seems that may depend on what we understand our jobs to be.

There are those, of course, who think that robots will become fully functional human beings, entities one could marry or trust to care for loved ones.

I don’t see that happening, but it would be only fair to introduce ourselves to Bob the Robot, who gave a TED talk recently:

As neurosurgeon Michael Egnor explains, Bob is really pretty cute but a clarification is in order:

Robots don't deliver addresses, except in an instrumental way -- as a tool used by programmers.

Robots can't think, nor can they create speeches. A robot can be said to give a speech only in the way that a pencil can be said to write a play.

People give speeches, using robots (or public address systems, or televisions, or radios, etc.). The process of programming a robot to deliver a human speech (human speech is the only kind of speech there really is) can lead to permutations and unexpected outcomes, but the only intelligent agent involved is the human being. The robot is a tool, nothing more.

However, a robot can stand in for a human, perhaps in a difficult or dangerous situation.

Consider, for example, space exploration. If we wanted to explore the newly discovered mountains on Pluto,  3.67 billion miles from the sun, we would need robotic equipment like the Mars Rovers.

But it might be even better to have a robot that acts as a virtual body for a researcher sitting at a desk in Houston or Beijing.

Dashing the dreams of science fiction, if we want to explore planets outside our solar system, we will likely need such equipment.

More generally, though, if anyone supposes that the robot is doing the research, well, they may as well say that, in an everyday lab, the researcher’s sterile gloves are doing the research.

Research belongs to the world of ideas, and robots belong to the world of things we create in order to develop our ideas.

Incidentally, I don’t think Bob, below, has the right voice for the job. I wouldn’t doubt a better one can be bought at a robotic voice supply house.




JOIN TheRebel.media FREE for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.

”Don't blame me: I voted Conservative"
The t-shirt and bumpersticker that says it all — ONLY from TheRebel.media store!

Energy in Ontario costs billions more than it has to --
And the cost keeps going up thanks to Liberal policies.
Hold Energy Minister Bob Chiarelli responsible:
SIGN THE PETITION at FireBob.ca

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2015-12-15 20:24:48 -0500
You won’t see robots do much for the next fifty years, because the cost is the prohibiting factor. But I would say software advancement and shrinking technology is what we should be paying more attention to.

And why would you want a robot to give a speech anyways? Just what will that do?