December 28, 2016

9 ways Trudeau's Liberals are making us poorer

Brian LilleyArchive

Justin Trudeau loves to talk up the tax cut he brought in for the "middle class" as proof that he and the Liberals care about average, hard working families but that’s far from the truth.

Watch as I explain that while there has been one tax cut, it really helps those at the top the most.

Meanwhile, a whole bevy of Trudeau tax hikes and elimination of Harper era breaks, means Canadian families are paying more now and will be paying much more to the government in the future. 

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-12-30 12:04:20 -0500
Jay . . . . YOU like Trudough are ignorant beyond belief.
Justin thinks John Kerry is smart . . . many Dhimmicraps don’t !
We are ALL Ontar-i-owe now Jay . . . Canada is “Done” . . . but the USA is Back after Jan 20 !
commented 2016-12-30 10:21:05 -0500
Jay Kelly tax breaks that benefit the middle class. Name them what are they, and better yet define middle class.
commented 2016-12-30 05:34:56 -0500
Jay Kelly… There is absolutely no benefit to the incredible tax burdens that Canadians are experiencing under the administration of Justin’s team. Their lust for our labor knows absolutely no bounds.
When the velocity of money slows to the point where it stalls that is known as “capital failure” the only thing that creates capital failure is Fiat currency and taxes in any form.
The only form of taxation that should exist is a consumer tax..
If a brand-new washer and dryer or TV or car ect. is too heavily taxed then people just won’t buy it until the price/ tax is adjusted and made reasonable.This is the easiest way to hold your government financially accountable and contained in power and size…
Keep in mind Jay…
“A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have”.!!
commented 2016-12-30 01:13:51 -0500
Jay Kelly Trump wants the country to benefit and for people to have jobs and self esteem. Justin is raising our taxes.
commented 2016-12-29 23:32:30 -0500
Brian Lilley wants to show that Justin Trudeau’s tax cuts are more beneficial to the rich than to the middle class.

This is the language of Donald Trump south of the border, that the rich should benefit more than the middle class.

I prefer the original language of Trudeau — that the tax breaks benefit the middle class.

Brian Lilley prefers the rich in the United States over the ordinary guys in Canada.
commented 2016-12-29 20:53:57 -0500
Henry…However.. We do agree about the issues surrounding our queer and homosexual community which endangers mainstream people by their “right to give blood”and the normalizing of this kind of behavior.
They want to be treated the same way as heterosexual mainstream people but when will they understand that their lifestyle endangers more than just themselves, up to and including our young people who are at a very hard and confusing time in their life.
Minority special interest groups that represent well under 1% of the population should not have any influence to the government beyond their voting base and no minority special interest group should have their private flag flying on our very public Parliament Hill to receive more privilege than the majority of mainstream tax paying Canadians.
commented 2016-12-29 19:49:57 -0500
Leviticus said, “Please please please for all that’s right, please support Brad Trost in his bid to fix the wrongs in this country.!”

He’s got my vote. Certainly the NDP will not.
commented 2016-12-29 19:19:16 -0500
All the N.D.P. GOVERNEMENTS are run by union goons into the shitter every time.
commented 2016-12-29 19:05:20 -0500
Henry said..!
“Tom Mulcair doesn’t speak in riddles like Y’all, VOTE NDP in 2019 "
And I say…!!!!
Seriously…??!!! Haven’t you seen the almost permanent destruction that this party causes, in all the provinces that have been ruined completely like British Columbia and Ontario as well as Manitoba… these provinces have been taught how to become unproductive, how to go into debt, how to introduce green policies that supersede the needs of people and so on and so on that they have become accustomed to having their heads pissed on while being told it’s raining on them.
The people have been made so docile by poverty in these provinces that they acccept any fate that is handed to them because politically they don’t even have a choice or even believe that the next politician they elect would do the right thing. And there has been enough brainwashed people that fall for the same piss drops on their head each and every time that keep voting the same way expecting a different result. And then there are those that are just naturally stupid and believe that the new normal changes they experience in their life is just the way it is now. If the NDP is in power long enough they will suck the fight right out of that province and replace it with social justice warriors, Green religion and bad economic policies.
Saskatchewan came back quicker than most because they actually have politicians in the province that care about the province and the people more than they do about their careers.
I could not imagine the devastation and the ruination that would accompany the NDP government with a federal mandate in this country.
Please please please for all that’s right, please support Brad Trost in his bid to fix the wrongs in this country.!
You said you’re 60 years old and surely to God by this time with your faculties intact you must know and understand how dangerous the NDP government in this country is to our way of life.!!
and for the love of freedom don’t split the vote.!! A vote for the NDP is like a vote for the Trudeau government.
commented 2016-12-29 18:20:06 -0500
So right now I get to write off my extended health plan on my taxes as a medical expense. Is that going out the window as well? Is this in addition to having to pay taxes on the insurance, and on the money I get back from the insurance company?

Now talk about a triple dip.
commented 2016-12-29 16:43:07 -0500
The NDP federally or provincially could not run a kiosk without running it into bankruptcy ! And if you don’t like pipelines I’ll be happy to close the valve on anybody’s gas pipeline to they’re house or apartment ! Oh the verbal diarrhoea coming from mental midgets mouths ! GFY !!!!!!!
commented 2016-12-29 16:23:18 -0500
Henry said, " … [insult, insult, Pops, insult, daddio, insult … [YAWN!!]] … and why are all the sea creatures dying off Nova Scotia shores this week? Nothing to do with pollution ?"

Of course it is to do with pollution, just not CO2. I already said pollution was an issue. Anthropogenic Climate Change is, however, a lie. CO2 is plant food. CO2 is good. Give your local CO2 atom a hug today!

Your characterization of Trudeau, I agree with. ( “Justine The Closest PM”, “trudeau-pink”)

The rest of your copy and paste about homosexuality I did not read. You won’t find me disagreeing with it.

But we are off the topic a bit, are we not?

Address this one question,
“Considering how every provincial NDP government has destroyed the province they have governed, what rationale can you present to convince me to support the federal NDP?”
commented 2016-12-29 14:16:11 -0500
PETER NETTERVILLE I can drop by anytime POPs, I was born in 56. I am 60 guess that makes me wise hey PoPs?
Should I bring my black belt? No Petey I will spare you this time. I don’t take kindly to insults just beware I could surprize you like Kato. I am the all seeing Eye. Just remember that.
Co2? Stand up Dad they’re goin over your head. In short. Tom Mulcair doesn’t speak in riddles like Y’all, VOTE NDP in 2019 These Cons are double talking as usual. L7 Yawn…. lol Happy New Year 2 more years of Justine The Closest PM. destroying Earth and The Ocean Plastic soup and why are all the sea creatures dying off Nova Scotia shores this week? Nothing to do with pollution ?? Worrisome I’d say. No you can fool some of the people some of the time but ya can;t fool me daddio I have been around.

Check it out.
Justin Trudeau Submits to LGBT Demands – REALity


Justin Trudeau can’t say “no” to any demands made by the LGBT community, (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered). He is an obedient servant to their cause.

In July, 2016 he made two specific controversial commitments to them:

I. Blood donations from homosexuals to be accepted after only one year’s abstinence from their having same-sex relations;

However, a tragedy occurred in the 1980’s when Canada experienced one of its greatest health disasters due to tainted blood donations causing 800 deaths, mainly due to blood donations contaminated by AIDS. Consequently, Canada, along with many other countries refused blood donations from homosexuals who had sex with another man during their lifetime.

Under political pressure from homosexual activists, this ban was relaxed in Canada in 2013 to permit blood from homosexuals who have not had sex with a man for a five-year period. This latter decision, however, was unacceptable to homosexual activists who claimed that this five year ban was discriminatory and “intrinsically abhorrent to the fundamental Canadian values of equality and non-discrimination”. They screamed, of course, that the Canadian Blood Services was “homophobic”. There was no concern at all expressed by them about the public’s right to protection from receiving contaminated blood. The latter was irrelevant to them even though gay men make up 49% of new HIV cases in Canada.

As a result of this pressure, on July 12, 2016, the Liberal government reduced the waiting period to donate blood for homosexual men even further, from five years to one year’s sexual abstinence.

Although there is a still-imperfect scientific technology to test for HIV, the LGBT community is still disappointed with the one-year deferral period, as is also, apparently, the Liberal government, as Canadian Health Minister, Jane Philpott, cheerfully announced in July, 2016:

There is an incredible desire and certainly a commitment on the part of our government to work toward further decreasing that donor deferral period. The desire is to be able to have those deferrals based on behaviour as opposed to sexual orientation.

It is homosexual behaviour that contaminates the blood system. Is she going to rely on a homosexual donor’s assertion that he never has homosexual relations, or if he does not, he always uses condoms, and as a result, his behaviour is safe? Some protection for the public that is going to be!

II. Lowering the age of consent for anal sex.

Trudeau has announced that his government will be lowering the age of consent for anal sex from eighteen to sixteen years of age in the Criminal Code. This will make it legal for adult men to engage in anal sex with 16-year old adolescents.

It is a concern, however, that the homosexual lobby organization EGALE forwarded to the Liberal government in June, 2016, a report (see below) listing numerous demands. Included among these demands was one that the government repeal entirely S.159 of the Criminal Code which provision legalizes anal sex conducted in private for consenting adults 18 years and over. S.159 also provides that anal sex must be in private i.e. only two persons take part, or be present. Since there is no other provision in the Criminal Code directly relating to anal sex, repealing S.159 entirely means that there will be no limits on anal sex. That is, anal sex would be permitted at any age, in Canada, with any number of persons whether or not it takes place in public.

It may well be that reducing the age of consent from 18 to 16 is only for public consumption, and is a cover-up for the real intent of the homosexual activists i.e. to remove all limits on age and consent for anal sex whether performed in public or in private.

In its report, EGALE also calls for the repeal of the bawdyhouse laws (S.210 and S.211 of the Criminal Code). A “bawdy house” is defined in the Criminal Code to mean a place used for the purpose of prostitution, or acts of indecency. This provision also prohibits public sex. This latter provision has been used in the past by police in its bathhouse raids.

In effect, if S.159 is removed in its entirety as well as the provisions against bawdy houses, as demanded in EGALE’s June report, it would mean that anal sex would be available anywhere, anytime with anyone without any restrictions as to age. This is alarming!

Age of Consent for Anal Sex

The issue of “age of consent for anal intercourse” first arose in 1987, when the Criminal Code was being amended. Homosexual MP Svend Robinson, requested, at that time, that consent for homosexual sex be the same as that allowed for sex between male and female. The Minister of Justice Raymond Hnatyshyn stated:

Medical evidence does indicate different kinds of psychological or physical harm may attach to different types of intercourse for young persons. Medical experts are not certain at what age sexual preference is established, and many argue that the age is fixed only in the later teen years. Also the question here is the heightened danger of contracting Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome or other sexually transmitted disease from penetration.

The reason for the age discrepancy for anal sex and other sexual acts was to protect adolescents from exploitation and health complications of anal sex. This fact is apparently of no concern to homosexual activists.

The Liberals are also now studying even further demands submitted to the government by the homosexual organization EGALE in its report.

These include:

(i) Individual compensation to those who suffered past discrimination because of “who they were or whom they loved”;

(ii) Providing all police officers or others in the justice system with human rights training with regard to the historic wrong of treating members of sexual minorities as criminals, etc.;

(iii) Providing training to Customs officials to prevent banning homosexual materials from crossing the border;

(iv) Implementing procedures to protect the dignity of transgender or intersex persons in prisons or jails;

(v) Eliminating laws re keeping a bawdy house or criminally charging those who visit a bathhouse or who practise group sex.

III. Trudeau to Apologize to Homosexuals.

In August, 2016, Trudeau agreed to publicly apologize on “behalf of all Canadians” to those who were imprisoned, fired from their jobs or otherwise persecuted in the past because of their homosexuality.

However, there has been a law prohibiting homosexuality since 1892 when the Criminal Code first came into effect. This law reflected the views of the Canadian public at that time, who rejected homosexuality because they thought it repugnant. (This is the reason that British writer Oscar Wilde was jailed for homosexuality in England in 1900, since he contravened the law prohibiting the unacceptable homosexual activity of sodomy). Because homosexuality was illegal and unacceptable to society, homosexual persons in the military and public services in Canada and elsewhere were particularly vulnerable to blackmail and a security risk. That is why they were dismissed from employment in the past.

Like much else about Justin Trudeau, he doesn’t think very deeply, and doesn’t understand the history, complexity and ramifications of his decisions on this issue and most others. As a result, he may well accede to these unreasonable homosexual demands.

REALity Volume XXXV Issue No. 10 October 2016
commented 2016-12-29 13:44:58 -0500
We seriously need a TEA Party Movement because our feckless oppostion parties are ill equipped and lack motivation to stall or stop the agenda of the out of control socialists in Ottawa , Ontario and Alberta.
commented 2016-12-29 13:23:36 -0500
Interesting how you always have at least one green earth advocate cheerleading with their COMPUTER. For once it would be refreshing to see an advocate that actually lives the life he/she advocates (“save the earth” concept).

Petroleum based and reliant items all a NO NO, recycling a must. No use of computers, no cell phones, no appliances, no buses/cars/bikes/airplanes/motorcycles, no man-made or synthetic fabrics for clothing or furniture, no looms for weaving fabric either for they need tools which are reliant on petroleum to be created in the first place, no use of plastics, no store bought foods (food only harvested by hand not machinery and not transported by trucks), no refined products as they all need machinery to refine. No home heating aside from a fire in the fireplace for natural gas, nuclear, hydro-electric are all reliant on petroleum at some point be it in the machinery or delivery equipment. Mind you no use of an axe to chop the wood either nor a chain saw, you would have to collect naturally fallen branches from trees.

But I digress, what do I expect? They are ALL complete hypocrites. So easy to preach from behind a keyboard or from atop a soap box rather than actually walking the talk.
commented 2016-12-29 12:38:37 -0500
Henry that is not destroying the earth. And try some real figures on those. Now keep using your toxic electronics. There are millions of kilometers of pipe there are very few incidents.
commented 2016-12-29 11:47:34 -0500
Henry I think you read and believe to much on the Internet . The mainstream media in Canada is payed off to lie to us so the spinless lieing hypocrite government can steal all the working people’s hard earned money . Unless you like paying taxes ? Remember these chicken shit polititions are elected by the people to work for us , not us work for them.
commented 2016-12-29 11:47:23 -0500
Junior is doubling down on stupid. Meanwhile, in Ontario, Wynne is merrily destroying the Liberal brand. This could be interesting in three years.
commented 2016-12-29 11:29:04 -0500
Henry Rychlicki said, "Ya Dig me POPS? "

With age comes wisdom.

Henry said, " Try saying that to my face… lol "

No problem. My location is easy to find. When shall I expect you?

I will acknowledge that certain pollutions need cleaning up, such as land fill sites, toxic waste dumps, raw sewage being dumped into the rivers and oceans.

However, CO2 is not a pollutant, it is plant food. And anyone who believes that CO2 needs to be reduced is a pure unadulterated brain dead idiot. I’ll say that to your face too.

When are you going to drop by?
commented 2016-12-29 10:55:52 -0500
HENRY R….. So please throw out some accolades for the ndp gold standard, that brilliant government in charge in Alberta. Do you actually think they are doing a good job? You never did address PETER Ns querry about the end result of every ndp foray into power on a provincial level. What makes you think that them attaining federal power will bring a different result? Are you a supporter of the Leap Manifesto? As for your pipeline comments, the green energy carbon tax BULLSHIT will do more long term harm to earth and humanity than all the pipelines in the world. Go ahead and vote ndp so we can LEAP into the past.
commented 2016-12-29 08:58:51 -0500
Drew Wakariuk commented: “We get poorer and they get richer. I wonder what they will do when taxes take 100% of our income? HA HA Silly me, they will raise them some more.”

You’ve heard of the new and improved income tax return, yes? Only two lines.
1. How much did you make? 2. Send it all in!
commented 2016-12-29 06:05:10 -0500
Yeah Stupid? Try saying that to my face… lol
Your opinion and you can have it Pete Netterville.
Tom Mulcair is the only man I see who talks sense in Canada and that is my opinion. That is why I am voting NDP with or without Tom. I hope with. He doesn’t miss a trick and is as sharp as a pencil.

Like I said Conservatives are L7 Square Stuffed Shirts and that’s just not Cool. Ya Dig me POPS?

PETER NETTERVILLE commented 10 hours ago
Well Henry, we both agree that the Libranos must go.

However, I will never vote for the NDP. Just look at what they have done provincially to every province they “governed”. Destroyed the economy of each province and did nothing whatsoever to “save mother earth” (even if you are stupid enough to believe mother earth needs saving). You are living in a dream world if you think the NDP are actually saving the planet.
commented 2016-12-29 02:43:34 -0500
Anon yep and pretty much everything else will be taxed soon as well. So much for libs being all about health care for the masses.
commented 2016-12-29 02:06:06 -0500
Wait a minute. So pretty soon there is a good likelihood that I have to pay taxes for my extended health plan? So when my insurance company sends me money for a claim, will that money also be taxed as income?
commented 2016-12-29 00:52:52 -0500
We get poorer and they get richer. I wonder what they will do when taxes take 100% of our income? HA HA Silly me, they will raise them some more.
commented 2016-12-29 00:51:43 -0500
Henry pipelines do not kill the earth.
commented 2016-12-28 23:52:43 -0500
There is only ONE way these LIEberal fkwits are making us poorer . . . . . . . . by being in power!!!
commented 2016-12-28 23:15:04 -0500
HENRY RYCHLICKI commented 6 hours ago
I’ll be voting NDP in 2019.
And he will be the only one…
What a waste of a ballot.!
<-- /_page_stream.html -->