Sharia creep in the west will intensify and manifest itself in the most unlikely places, aided and abetted by Liberal apologists who serve as useful idiots for the very people who despise western values.
That’s the case with a couple from Georgia who teamed up with the ACLU to sue the state over the proposed surname of their infant daughter.
They want it to be “Allah,” even though the mother’s surname is Handy and the father’s is Walk. Under state law, a child is required to take the surname of one of the parents but rather than compromise, they’re taking it to court.
They want this surname because it’s “noble”, but what was stopping them from including Allah as one of the child’s given names? When pressed why Allah must be the daughter’s surname, the father, Bilal Walk told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution:
“Simply put, we have a personal understanding that we exercise in regards to the names. It is nothing that we want to go into detail about, because it is not important. What is important is the language of the statute and our rights as parents.”
On one hand, papa says the unspoken reason for the Allah surname is unimportant, but apparently it’s important enough to launch litigation against the state of Georgia.
The couple has a 3-year-old son named “Masterful Allah”, which apparently wasn’t a precedent but rather an error that needs correcting.
Mama wants this naming mess cleared up ASAP because she’s expecting Child #3 and wants the Allah surname for that bambino too, and until they get their daughter’s surname certified, she remains ineligible for Medicaid and food stamps.
Yes, this family is dependent on state welfare yet are fighting the state because they don’t want to follow the rules of the state.
They’ll take the money but don’t want the state’s rules and are bringing more babies into the world they apparently can’t support without financial assistance from the state.
If this isn’t the very definition of unreasonable accommodation, I don’t know what is.