October 19, 2017

“Blade Runner 2049”: Rebel Reel Review

Ben DaviesRebel Host | Rebel Reel Reviews

With A-list Hollywood names, stunning visual effects, and a big studio budget, Blade Runner 2049 is one of the most anticipated films of 2017.

But does it live up to the hype?

And how does it compare to the original Blade Runner, 35 years its senior, which I reviewed here?

I break down and compare both films as a critic, as a viewer — and through the lens of faith.

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-10-22 01:22:57 -0400
Jack, I think your post to Paul is lacking. What is your source?
commented 2017-10-21 11:35:04 -0400
Paul McCullough,

Liberals are the one going to see the movie. Not conservatives.
commented 2017-10-20 21:23:43 -0400
Reboots, remakes, sequels, prequels. Hollywood puts out mostly crap. If the SJWs hate it, it might be worth watching though. Sounds like it’s worth checking out.
commented 2017-10-19 21:25:02 -0400
Even Harrison Ford couldn’t save this stinker. If you never get tired of a flimsy plot being an excuse for endless boring artsy-fartsy camera work then this is your flick, if you expect to be entertained by clever plot lines and great acting, then you will feel cheated of the 2hrs it took from you life to sit through this dog. Yes, it really was that bad. If you must watch it, don’t pay for it, that would add injury to insult.
commented 2017-10-19 19:19:32 -0400
Go figure. A movie targeted to entertain the audience. Sounds like one to watch…finally.
commented 2017-10-19 19:08:06 -0400
Thanks Ben. It’s available in my town in 3-D.
commented 2017-10-19 18:59:42 -0400
Thanks Ben.
I’m waiting for it to be available outside the movie theater chains. I lost interest in going to movie theaters some time ago.
commented 2017-10-19 18:58:59 -0400
I’ll have to give it a try. Thanks for the review, Ben!