September 20, 2017

“I’d like to make Catherine ‘Climate Barbie’ McKenna a deal...”

Sheila Gunn ReidRebel Host | The Gunn Show

Outgoing conservative MP Gerry Ritz is in a little trouble with the Media Party and our overly sensitive minister of Environment, Catherine McKenna.

Why?

He sent a tweet referring to Catherine McKenna as "Climate Barbie".

McKenna tweeted back, the Media Party is smearing him, and the prime minister's principal advisor, Gerald Butts, is using this to attack conservatives — and Rebel supporters — as backward misogynists.

First, let’s look back at the many times Catherine McKenna couldn’t find her Twitter fingers to speak out against sexism perpetuated by her team.

The day McKenna stops smearing people who don’t think taxes change the weather as something akin to Holocaust deniers —thereby minimizing the horrors of Holocaust at the same time — is the day I’ll stop calling her “Barbie.”

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-09-21 01:43:22 -0400
Oh and this is from the CBC. No whining form the left on that one though. And Climate Barfie demonizes other who do not buy her green lies, so she can get bent.
commented 2017-09-21 01:41:09 -0400
Andrew Stephenson sorry but liberal women are usually hideous and vacuous spoiled brats. Conservative women are better looking. Wynne and Notley are not easy to look at. Christy Clark was a decent looking women , but not many others i could think of as good looking. And speaking of Qualifications , if that is a plus then Justin must be a HUGE MINUS! Right?
commented 2017-09-21 01:32:58 -0400
I apologize to David White and others. You felt that our federal cabinet is made up of weak minds. In retrospect you see them as courageous men and women trying their best to represent the big issues.

Probably the best cabinet in our lifetime. Let’s show them some respect.
commented 2017-09-21 01:27:49 -0400
By “Valley Girl” I suppose that the commenter is a Canadian, dried in the wool, who wants to comment as if our Federal ministers live in the United States.

No. They are Canadians elected to represent us. Please, David White and others, give some thought to what these ministers do on your behalf.
commented 2017-09-21 01:17:41 -0400
Jay….Bedtime, but before Mom tucks you in, would Climate Barbara suited you better? What is insulting is that the valley girl is an MP, a cabinet minister no less. The only suffering at the Rebel is because the handful of morons here, of which you and Andrew Stephenson are members.
commented 2017-09-21 00:58:05 -0400
Many people just do not get it. To call a minister “Barbie”, probably because of her blonde hair an slim figure, is just insulting.

That is why a media outlet like The Rebel suffers so much. Did we really intend to call this cabinet minister “Barbie”?
commented 2017-09-21 00:47:58 -0400
“Pile of bimbosity”

David White, that is classic.
commented 2017-09-20 23:43:16 -0400
“ALthough yes, McKenna is indeed quite attractive. Liberals age very well indeed.”

Yeah it’s that gummy smile and nasal impediment that’s the real turn on. She acts like an immature person, that is why I thought she was younger. She looks her age.
commented 2017-09-20 23:28:01 -0400
Andrew Stephenson, “liberals age very well indeed”.

That is because they do nothing! – Hell, if I’d had sat on my ass for 60 yrs – living off other peoples’ $$$ – vacationing continually I’d be aging pretty well too.
commented 2017-09-20 23:24:41 -0400
Andrew Stephenson – it’s so glaringly obvious – you’re a blatant Lieberal Libtarded Climatard fool – so why are you here?
In case you haven’t noticed most people on this forum are normal, conservative people – do you really think you are going to sway anyone’s beliefs by all the wacky, insane, ludicrous diarrhea you think you are blessing us with –
Learn something – Conservative people do not believe any Lieberals’ LIES & bullcrap – the more you lunatics talk -the less your credibility as with Climate Barbie, Climate Barbie, Climate Barbie, Climate Barbie, Climate Barbie
commented 2017-09-20 23:12:13 -0400
Andrew Stephenson, “liberals age very well indeed”. Ya, that Wynne is hot.
commented 2017-09-20 22:36:28 -0400
I love the term and use it in every discussion at work – as does nearly everyone I know.

LOL
commented 2017-09-20 21:32:20 -0400
Climate Barbie is the perfect, succinct description – thanks Sheila!
Butts must stay awake at night dreaming of his twitter attacks….too bad this mealy mouthed Marxist doesn’t realize his messages are ineffectual!

Katherine McKenna/Climate Barbie – please make an appointment with a speech therapist! Once some progress has been made, please see a psychiatrist.
commented 2017-09-20 21:27:22 -0400
Is she not the one who got suckered in about the “safety lights”?
commented 2017-09-20 21:26:52 -0400
So the initial cry was that Climate Barbie was a sexist comment. Should we have called her Climate Bill? Maybe Climate “X” Gender? Such phony liberal bull shit as usual. Climate Clueless or Climate Idiot would be closest to the truth. This is the pile of bimbosity that INSISTS relentlessly (along with her boss) that CO2 is POLLUTION. Please dear God a peer revue proving that atmospheric pressure and the sun are the major drivers of climate, not the mania of the CO2 hoax. Then the ass wipe libs would have NO credibility on climate and would NOT be able to cripple the country with immoral illegal carbon taxes, and Soros and the corrupt useless UN could go fuck themselves.

LIZA…I think Andrew was referring to the resume of Barbie the doll, the one our Climate Barbie should be playing with, she acts about 9. Funny, that’s about her IQ as well.
commented 2017-09-20 21:16:48 -0400
Heh, where to start on these two posers – so much failed personality to work with.

Let’s start with Climate Barbie (Thanks Sheila for this very apt moniker) – here’s a so called degreed moron who proves the old adage ; “Information is not knowledge. – Knowledge is not wisdom. – Wisdom is not truth. – Truth is not policy.
Policy is not empathy. – empathy is not rational. But drama sells best all things considered.”

Butts? Pffffft ha ha ha ha, yowie zowie what an over inflated ego with a morbid reflex to take himself too damn seriously – give him spotlight and his verbal prat falls would make a good stand-up comic – except he’s too much of a quack to dig humor.

Given that these two clowns are major public policy makers in this demented dominion, reason, ethics and logic are in deep trouble.
commented 2017-09-20 21:13:17 -0400
Sheila, you are so much more intelligent than this empty-headed Climate Barbie who has to fake an accent when speaking to appear better than she is. Before being nominated a minister by the other empty-head prime, she was a nobody and she will return to that status in a couple of years.
commented 2017-09-20 21:00:33 -0400
Liza, it’s Barbie that is all of the above.

ALthough yes, McKenna is indeed quite attractive. Liberals age very well indeed.
commented 2017-09-20 20:28:15 -0400
cLIEmate UNscientists have yet to produce even a single Peer Reviewed Paper refuting the Null Hypothesis, which is that “Climate Change” is driven by nature. https://informthepundits.wordpress.com/2013/09/20/the-ipcc-and-the-null-hypothesis/ They have yet to produce even a single Co2 driven model that can skillfully predict observed climate. The fake 97% “consensus” is based upon models that are 97% wrong… http://joannenova.com.au/2013/06/even-with-the-best-models-warmest-decades-most-co2-models-are-proven-failures/ The models cannot work when Alarmists are unable to list ALL climate forcing’s. They are also unable to quantify them. In fact the IPCC admitted they have little to no understanding of “known” climate forcing’s upon which their failed models based.

“Models and simulations are critical to the IPCC’s case for man-made warming but in its Third Assessment
Report (TAR) the IPCC admitted that the level of scientific understanding (LSU) of 7 of 11 climate factors
was “very low” and that for another the LSU was “low” (see figure). A similar table was absent from the
Fourth Assessment Report – would it be an admission that science had advanced very little? – but a table of
various radiative forcing’s did appear and again many factors were poorly understood.
It beggars belief that the IPCC can put such faith in understandings, estimates, reconstructions, simulations
and models when it has already acknowledged that scientists lack detailed knowledge of many factors. It is
folly to assume that understandings, estimates and reconstructions will be accurate and is totally illogical to
suppose that accurate simulations and models can be developed." http://mclean.ch/climate/IPCC_evidence.pdf Cracks are beginning to appear however. Climate Barbie needs to read this.

http://climatechangedispatch.com/climate-alarmists-finally-admit-we-were-wrong-about-global-warming/
commented 2017-09-20 20:23:08 -0400
How that qualifies her for environmental minister is beyond me.
correction: she is 46.
commented 2017-09-20 20:20:26 -0400
Her real resume is actually quite impressive, although very sjw and no education or experience in climate. The woman is barely 40.
She holds a master’s degree from the London School of Economics and a law degree from McGill University. A human rights lawyer and a marxist economist? that is kind of an oxymoron isn’t it?
commented 2017-09-20 20:13:15 -0400
…clearly she wasn’t any good at any of them or she would have stayed with one.
commented 2017-09-20 20:10:40 -0400
Good god Andrew are you kidding me??
“architect/dentist/scientist/presidential candidate etc”

What the blue blazes would an architect know about climate science and I don’t mean building site location for optimum southern exposure.

Scientist, like what?

Presidential candidate for what?

My favorite is ‘dentist’ for obvious reasons.

The women isn’t old enough to have gone to school and obtained any accreditation in all of those careers. Who you kidding Andrew?
commented 2017-09-20 20:07:29 -0400
I’d like to see her and Sheila duke it out in the ring, Barbie against Ken.
commented 2017-09-20 19:46:00 -0400
McKenna tweets “…we need more women in politics…” No, actually what we need is more COMPETENCE in politics and it doesn’t matter one iota which of the 63 genders those politicians are identifying as.
Try to keep up…
commented 2017-09-20 19:44:42 -0400
Given Barbie’s extensive resume as an architect/dentist/scientist/presidential candidate etc, I’d say it’s actually a compliment to be compared to,

That being said, Ritz’ comment was obviously intended maliciously. And, now we know he reads the Rebel.
commented 2017-09-20 19:35:24 -0400
And to ALL of the “male feminist” masochist white knights who came to this distressed damsel’s aid….(with half hearted appologies to John Phillip Sousa)

Be kind to your feminist’s friends …..for that cuck may have had a single mother…they live in a hole in “the swamp”…where the climate is always damp…you may think that this is the end…well it is, but to prove the press are liars…they’re going to sing it over again…only each time more stridently higher.
commented 2017-09-20 19:31:56 -0400
Think about how pathetic it is for Butts and Justin to even be commenting on it. They will use anything to try to distract from the real issues. They are transparent alright!
commented 2017-09-20 19:30:09 -0400
McKenna is embarrassing competent women who actually have credentials and are hired for their qualifications. I am seeing quite a few women in politics, and very few of them are worth a dime. In fact they are becoming problems by their incompetence. I would name, Batters, Rempel , Bergan, and Gallant as the few women who obtained their positions not because they are women but because they have the goods. I am sure I have missed a few, Climate Barbie is not one of them.
So she aspires to be up there with the big boys as climate matron of nonsense, well good for her, that’s all she deserves. Personally I think ‘climate Barbie’ is too good for her, but I wouldn’t want to be mean, so I won’t explain why.