May 24, 2015

"National crisis" over election debates is a Media Party invention

Brian LilleyArchive

Why do "progressives" cling to the past? The media hysteria over the upcoming federal election debates is a perfect example.

The mainstream media consortium's insists on keeping control of the federal election debates.

It's understandable why broadcasters care so much, but why are their print counterparts losing their collectivist minds on this topic?

See if you agree with me...


 
JOIN TheRebel.media for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.

Richmond Hill city council won’t sing O Canada because it contains the word “God.”
SIGN THE PETITION to SaveOCanada.ca

READ Brian Lilley's book CBC Exposed -- it's been called "the political book of the year"


Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2015-05-24 13:58:37 -0400
" . . . our society would still be living in caves for the most part, and fire would have never been allowed or invented."

Well, it would be invented for the elite, but not for the rest of us peons.
commented 2015-05-24 13:36:04 -0400
The Socialist Media once again creating a narrative by inventing spin. This is all about control, their control to skewer the PM and make their boy, Trudope look good. Realistically, only two debates tightly scripted and edited are not going to provide a complete picture of the Federal Leader Wannabes. This is what they want of course. More debates lends to greater information for voters to make their opinions. So called “Progressives” are anything but. It is only progressive if it falls within their narrow scope of think. Had progressives been in charge a thousand years ago or so, chances are pretty firm our society would still be living in caves for the most part, and fire would have never been allowed or invented.
commented 2015-05-24 13:08:48 -0400
Brian, the people on the print side of the media are upset because they are as anti-Harper as the consortium and they see this as yet another way to bash Harper. It’s all about Harper bashing. It would be so nice if they acted mature.
commented 2015-05-24 12:39:52 -0400
And that is why I seldom have anything to do with main stream media – a complete waste of time
commented 2015-05-24 12:34:54 -0400
Harper proved in 2011, for the first time in history, that you don’t need the MSM and you don’t need Quebec to win a federal majority. This panics the MSM. Quebec just keeps spinning itself into the abyss.

Now the MSM is getting booted to the curb when it comes to debates. Historically, the MSM has been the word to the voter from the Liberal pig show over the decades (Mulroney was a Desmarais pick to get rid of pete troodo and in effect was also a liberal pig). Game over MSM douche bags.

Stephen Harper also runs his own media show http://www.stephenharper.ca/24seven/. If you want emailed updates about what Harper does, you go here. MSM is liberal pig fodder.

The MSM will lose this battle too – but they will report like nothing happened and will keep driving their crap – over the edge of the cliff.
commented 2015-05-24 12:29:08 -0400
Could the consortium’s debate end up being an empty head talking to an empty podium?