July 16, 2018

(WATCH) Is Tomi Lahren right about Roe Vs. Wade?

Rebel Staff

Last week, Tomi Lahren drew criticism from conservatives when she claimed it would be "spitting on The Constitution" for Republicans to appoint Supreme Court Justices intent on overturning Roe Vs. Wade.

Matt Walsh of The Daily Wire thinks Tomi's comments amount to "Nany Pelosi-level leftist garbage".

Democrats have already launched a desperate campaign to defeat Trump's nomination of Brett Kavanaugh, we don't need conservatives like Tomi Lahren providing ammunition.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2018-07-17 21:11:07 -0400
Liza Rosie:
I agree with you.
commented 2018-07-17 21:09:54 -0400
Tony Stark:
Your video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMy-V1TIoHI is all about pro-abortionists accusing the pro-life supporters of filming women going into the abortion clinic. What is your point?

Here is the problem with abortion. 45 years ago women were told abortions are ok to have, no problem. Well, 45 years later, women, men, society and the medical profession have now seen the long term effects of abortion, psychologically, physically, societal effects, etc.. The message from 45 years ago, though, is still being used by pro-abortionists who want to justify the abortion industry – or – the abortion(s) they either had or were involved with.

Society needs to start telling women and girls the truth about abortion and how it can and most probably will affect their lives. (breast cancer, uterine and ovarian cancer, suicide, addiction, etc. etc*.). That’s also because women are now telling the world what abortions did to them and their lives, not to mention the men who are now speaking up. Any interrupted pregnancy, either from abortion, miscarriage, etc. affects the woman’s body and can have long term effects on the woman (same as *).

These findings are available and have now been well documented. Any amount of research or reading on this subject will confirm what I am saying. This is not an opinion, this is FACT.

Society needs to start taking care of women and girls who become pregnant instead of subjecting them to surgical procedures (and now chemical abortions, which are also late term methods). Women and girls need help when they are faced with an unwanted pregnancy, not a death sentence.

Look at the Wynne sex-ed curriculum, it doesn’t ever discuss abortion. We’re living in a ‘green’ culture where everyone is so concerned about eating right and the environment, but women are still taking carcinogens (birth control) and the IUD. Have you ever read about IUDs and what they do and can do to a woman’s body? I doubt it Tony.

Anyone who still feels abortion is the answer, at any stage of the pregnancy, does NOT know what an abortion is or how it affects women. If they did, they would NOT want someone they loved to go through this or subject themselves to such a procedure.

Yes, Tony Stark, abortions will always take place. Believe me, if MEN WERE THE ONES TO HAVE ABORTIONS………………….THERE WOULD BE NO ABORTIONS!!!!!

Women just need to smarten up.
commented 2018-07-17 18:07:04 -0400
*off the bat
I apologize for not proofreading earlier.
commented 2018-07-17 16:39:52 -0400
Why are Dems screaming about Trump’s nomination for SCOTUS? Right of the bat, the abortion industry claimed this will infringe on women’s rights. Hmmmm Roe v Wade, isn’t it just a clump of words?!!!
commented 2018-07-17 15:51:37 -0400
liza rosie,

You do realize that the millions upon millions of women who protest in the marches are pro-choice women.

It’s laughable that you say that men are the loudest and it shows just how out of touch you are AS A WOMAN that most women want there to be a choice no matter what.
commented 2018-07-17 11:44:17 -0400
Jan G. I apologise for not responding sooner to your post which was in reply to mine. I have been thinking of how to answer.

I respect your view and don’t argue your valid points. I wish there were never any need for such a procedure. However, it isn’t going away and my stance is that since that’s the case, its possible and an obligation for a healthy society, to have standards. We have standards on many things, standards which are a testament to our development as a society.

Since we cannot ban all abortion in the world, lets have some civilized standards. In the U.S. it looks like overturning Roe vs Wade would be a start to doing that there. I don’t know if there is hope for Canada, we seem too cowardly, lazy or uncivilized to reopen the topic of abortion in this country.
commented 2018-07-17 11:31:37 -0400
The Rebel?
Newspaniard, we both know that there are ample ways to prevent unwanted children. Abortion is not a rational or civilized solution.

Its interesting that those who scream ’woman’s choice’ the loudest, are men. I would bet money Newspaniard that you are one of those male feminists after our infamous Prime Minister Justin groper.

Even animals have more respect for life than the post truth relativists who rewrite objective truth and twist it into subjective excuse. A sad comment on mankind, indeed.

However, the article above is about overturning Roe vs Wade. Tomi Lahren didn’t read up or understand the initial case or what was and wasn’t a right given by the Constitution. Most importantly, that overturning the case would NOT mean the end of abortion in the U.S. only that individual states would make that decision themselves.

Do you think that means all States would dare ban abortion, Newspaniard? I would be surprised if very many actually did. It would however open the door to debate about putting some basic restrictions on a very important issue, respect for life. Both for the unborn as well as consideration for the woman’s autonomy. If you think a first trimester restriction is too much to expect for a woman to respect ( except under extreme circumstances) too bad. Not only is abortion a risk to the woman after 12 weeks, its inhumane to abort a fetus after that time.
commented 2018-07-17 04:59:59 -0400
What a shame that The Rebel doesn’t support a woman’s right of choice on abortion. There are far too many unwanted children in this world.
commented 2018-07-17 03:40:26 -0400
Lots of choices for birth control out there. Women need to take responsibility for their choices/actions. That is not a judgment its just a minimum requirement for anyone who is ‘grown up’ enough to have sex. It is not only irresponsible to use abortion as birth control, its immoral. Because that kind of nihilistic, caviller attitude about human life is a pretty sad statement indeed. We don’t seem to be a very civil society these days I guess.

Overturning Roe vs Wade and giving the decision back to each State would by no means end legal abortion in America. I think that it would be conducive to the implementation of reasonable restrictions, and some restrictions are better than no restrictions, which is the free for all we have here in Canada, I am ashamed to say.

Anything after the first trimester is a dangerous procedure, women need to realise that as well..
commented 2018-07-17 01:27:14 -0400
Any abortion after the first trimester is a dangerous procedure.
commented 2018-07-17 01:10:38 -0400 · Flag
liza rosie,

It’s not a matter of it being normalized – it’s a matter that abortion is never going to go away, so let’s make it safe for women as opposed to back alley coat hanger abortions.

You also have to understand that not everyone feels the same way as you do in regards to abortions and view it as just a clump of cells that isn’t viable outside of the womb – that life begins at birth. Of course this debate will go on forever, but there needs to be the acknowledgment that not all women feel as you do and to MANY women – choice is above all.

I am quite sure people are aware of what goes on with abortions. I certainly do. Plus there are pro-lifers who post abortion videos and photos all over the internet – not to mention send those photos in the mail for their cause. I don’t think anyone is uneducated about abortion, especially those who choose to have one. The problem is you don’t understand why more people are not outraged.

You should watch this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMy-V1TIoHI
commented 2018-07-16 23:43:40 -0400
Roe v Wade should be challenged. The 14th Amendment was used by leftist judges as a basis to turn murder of the unborn into a Constitutional Right…doesn’t make sense if you actually read the 14th Amendment. These judges wandered so far off the path of the Constitution I’m surprised they weren’t eaten by wolves.
commented 2018-07-16 23:28:16 -0400
I really object to it being ‘normalized’, as if it is no different from going to the dentist to get a tooth pulled. It is even being promoted by the left. It is a very serious topic, and people taking it lightly should be given two choices, watch what an abortion looks like and understand what it entails or don’t expect to get an abortion when you use it as a form of birth control.

Tomi Lahren has lots of followers and she did a disservice to women and the unborn, by not doing her homework. Roe vs Wade made a mockery of the constitution. Its just not that fluid a document. No where does it say abortion is a right, and it was a convenient misinterpretation of it.

Damn it , I can’t edit. Below, last sentence of my post, should read – I do not find it acceptable or I find it unacceptable, NOT I don’t find that unacceptable.

Simply – no restrictions are unacceptable.
commented 2018-07-16 23:19:13 -0400
Jan G,

Abortion is never going away. Neither is pro-choice. The law is practically irrelevant, because all that will change is women will now be having unsafe and back door abortions.

Are you fine with that?
commented 2018-07-16 23:11:58 -0400
Since its not going away unless Roe vs Wade is overturned and the States decide for themselves to ban it outright or not(and I have no idea how many would ban it outright) some serious restrictions need to be considered. In Canada there are none. I don’t find that unacceptable.
commented 2018-07-16 22:58:58 -0400 · Flag
Liza Rosie:
When a woman is raped or sexually assaulted by incest, wouldn’t it be better the man be persecuted, instead of the baby?
Unfortunately, in these cases, the woman goes through life with the burden of having been raped, plus the burden of having killed a human being she was carrying, .
Society simply does not take care of people in need. That is when society should be rescuing this woman and helping her get through the heinous act of rape or incest, instead of subjecting her to a surgical procedure that can cause her not only life long psychological impairment, it can cause her future ailments such as breast cancer.
There are many, many women now speaking out on their own cases of having been raped, etc. and why they chose to go through with the pregnancy. There are also many, many cases of men and women who survived the abortion procedure and are now adults.
Many people will simply not listen to these stories or make the effort to research this subject, instead, they reach their conclusion based on what……..their own, unknowledgeable opinion.
Most people who claim they are pro-choice don’t even know what an abortion really is or what is involved with the procedure or what the actual procedure entails.
No abortion is acceptable.
Maybe our laws need to be changed to charge these men instead of executing the babies and making the women responsible.
commented 2018-07-16 22:46:31 -0400
Norma McCorvey (Roe) did not even attend court in the Roe vs Wade legal case. She signed the papers and didn’t hear about it until she read the results in the newspaper. She has stated that many times in her talks on the subject.
She tried to have Roe vs Wade overturned but was unsuccessful.
Norma McCorvey was in a lesbian relationship, got pregnant, agreed to be the ‘guinea pig’ in this case and then went on to have the baby, put it up for adoption. She later had other children.
She changed her views on abortion and became a vocal and ardent pro-life advocate.
This is all documented, is available, has been available to the public for years now. She has spoken openly about this entire case. Here is just one supporting article: http://endroe.org/roebio.aspx

This Tomi Lahren needs to do her research on the subject. There was and is nothing in the constitution about abortion. Roe vs Wade was a hoax, a political scam and it worked.
Generations have been told lies about abortion and most people who claim to be ‘pro-choice’ are pro-abortion because there is no such thing as pro-choice.
You either are or not in favour of it.
commented 2018-07-16 21:31:22 -0400
Correction! Geez. I meant (in my opinion)FIRST trimester restriction, is the least a civilized society should expect to adhere to not third.
commented 2018-07-16 20:43:01 -0400
The argument seems to be that there is nothing in the constitution which gives a woman the right to an abortion. They are not saying that abortion should be illegal , or alternately – legal with restrictions after the first trimester. They are saying that Roe vs Wade should be overturned and each State would have the right to make their own laws regarding abortion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DJ2JB9ic5A
Why Abortion is Legal: Roe vs Wade Explained (short)

In my opinion, a third trimester restriction is the very least a civilized society should expect to adhere to.(barring, rape, incest, or extreme threat to survival of the mother)
commented 2018-07-16 19:28:52 -0400
First of all, Roe Vs. Wade won’t be overturned.

Secondly, even if it was – it’s not going to stop abortions.

So the question becomes – do you want women to have safe abortions or coat hanger abortions.