June 19, 2017

Australia: Most NSW “refugees” sent to ONE struggling suburb — far from elites

Mark LathamRebel Host

In one of the great con jobs of Australian politics, the NSW Government promised to settle its Syrian refugee intake in country towns like Albury, Wagga and Armidale.

Then earlier this year, we found out that more than 6000 of the 7000 coming to NSW would go to just one local government area: Fairfield in Western Sydney.
This is breeding future welfare ghettos and ethnic enclaves — more bad refugee policy.
Meanwhile, the pro-refugee Lefties, living in inner-city “candlelight suburbs”, take no Syrians at all.
This is an absolute sham on the Australian people.
Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-06-20 00:45:23 -0400
Nimbyism writ large. Proggy toxic sanctimony in full bloom.
commented 2017-06-19 21:17:06 -0400
Seems to me there’s a lot a desert out there..
commented 2017-06-19 20:27:11 -0400
The Refugees were sent to Fairfield a depressed location. I couldn’t believe how modern and clean it looked compared to what Canadian towns look after the Refugees have been there for a while. Toronto has a slum area representing every 3rd World Country in the World.
To be honest, those Refugees even though they don’t speak English seemed classy compared to the people settled in Hamilton, or in other Canadian areas.
Is there a possibility that the Aussies actually vet the people coming into their Country unlike our Trudeau Government.
commented 2017-06-19 19:08:12 -0400
They are all put in the same area probably because the various islamic councils and associations require it in return of the money they gave to the politicians. BTW, even if they could speak english, they will not talk to you. Lack of integration or order from the Quran to not mix with infidels. Lol
commented 2017-06-19 18:54:54 -0400
Of course, as if the elite hypocrite scumbags would ever practice what they preach. Anyone who thinks different is an imbecile.
commented 2017-06-19 17:34:17 -0400
Since 9/11 – IN THE NAME OF ISLAM (SATAN): 33,548 Attacks, 216,314 Killed, 297,572 Injured that we know of
commented 2017-06-19 17:27:50 -0400
Keith Barnes, I think the to do list of the UN is to de-stabilize the West via mass muslim immigration; deplete our finances and give it away to third world nations; usher in laws promoting Sharia Law; in short, bend over for Islam! The UN is setting the table for a global totalitarian government, and Trudeau is panting to get on the Council, and throwing countless millions at them to buy access!
The UN and EU Parliament are corrupt to the core, and are working in tandem.
commented 2017-06-19 16:15:55 -0400
Remember, the Australian PM, just like trudeau, was selected long before the Elections by the Muslim controlled UN.

Islamic Countries make up the largest voting block in the UN.
commented 2017-06-19 15:58:58 -0400
The Left just doesn’t want to tell people the truth about anything, so they substitute their narrative for the truth.
commented 2017-06-19 15:45:38 -0400
When the candles burn down by the end of the vigil, the loony left consider this a job well done – all this virtue and they can’t back any of it up themselves. A similar street survey in France was posted on YouTube, many questioned about migrants moving to their neighbourhoods ….and the respondents also didn’t have any space at all.
commented 2017-06-19 15:40:44 -0400
If you are looking for the Liberal elites to do their fair share you are in for disappointment. No different then Al Gore and Leonardo Dicaprio doing their share for global warming. Just won’t ever happen.
commented 2017-06-19 15:13:22 -0400
“Most NSW “refugees” sent to ONE struggling town — far from elites”

Sure glad it’s not like that here in Canada!

Why, I bet those bastions of Liberalism like Rockliffe Park and Westmount took in more than their fair share of penniless migrants, right?