This morning, the Crown requested that disgraced former Ontario Deputy Minister of Education Ben Levin serve three years and six months for counseling a person to commit an assault, and creating and possessing child pornography.
They are also asking for a 20 year term of probation.
The Crown described Levin as "a leader in the online world," especially in incest chat rooms.
Do you think that sentence is appropriate punishment for Levin's crimes?
Speak your mind in the comments!
JOIN TheRebel.media for more news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.
Ontario's sex-ed curriculum sexualizes young children, undermines parental authority and imposes the government's morality on every Ontario family. TAKE ACTION and visit ProtectOurKids.ca to sign the petition.
Ahhhh, I see. If men claim there is male abuse, they are whiners. Biased much?
Who says we men have not voiced our anger to this and other bloody perverts? I am just as livid about Levin’s heinous crimes and that of others as you are, of that I can guarantee.
Is there something specific that you are looking for that we men should be doing that you have not observed, or are you just spouting off your anger at men in general, you know, because we are all bastards, right?
As men, you need to tell society you are not going to stand for this and will protect our/all children. Men, like Levin, will continue to be predators if they know men won’t do anything about it. Who was it that said he’d be digging a grave if his daughter was raped? That’s not quite what I mean.
Society needs to be very vocal about this, especially men, for not just your daughter but for daughters and sons living with people like Benjamin Levin.
With an insulting sentencing of 3 ½ years…no wonder why its not being taken seriously and will only continue to grow. As I said before, sexual predators will seek out the environment they need to fulfill their sexual needs. They are patient, cunning and secretive. 3 ½ years is nothing to them.
I would like to hear from Levin’s children.
(Let’s not create the same debate as last time, ok? You know what I mean!)
You read THAT into what I posted? You might want to stick with what I write, and not what you imply from what I write. Just a suggestion.