February 28, 2019

Canada’s feminist PM evades question about SNC-Lavalin exploiting sex workers for Gadaffi's son

Sheila Gunn ReidRebel Host | The Gunn Show

Back in 2008, Muammar Gadaffi was in Canada for several months meeting with politicians at the behest of the Liberal-linked, Montreal-based engineering firm that’s at the centre of PM Trudeau’s latest scandal, SNC-Lavalin.

French language publication, la Presse, is reporting that evidence collected by the RCMP and gathered for a civil dispute between a former SNC executive and the company, showed that SNC-Lavalin was using petty cash to pay for hookers, porn and parties for the dictator’s son, Saadi Gaddafi, in Toronto and Montreal.

Calgary-Nosehill Conservative MP Michelle Rempel asked the Prime Minister about the payments in the House of Commons during Question Period, and you won’t believe the utterly idiotic response he gave.

He said he was “protecting Canadian jobs” and that doing so was in line with his “values.”

It wasn’t clear if Trudeau was talking about the jobs of sex-trafficked women or their abusive pimps.

Today I’ll show you that clip and remind you of another time from 15 years ago, that the Liberals turned a blind eye to vulnerable women being exploited in the sex trade.

Yet, they still won’t shut up about being feminists.

No matter how many quota hires and proclamations about whatever the current year is, the Liberals are, and have always been, this way. They use women as props but in reality, treat them as a disposable means to an end, not unlike the way they are treating Jody Wilson-Raybould now.

The Liberals were thrilled to show off their shiny new Aboriginal female Attorney General as a symbol of their “wokeness,” but when she wouldn't bend the knee and sacrifice her principles to please a powerful man like Justin Trudeau and allow him to corrupt justice for political gain, the Liberals drove the bus over her.

They demoted her, and called her a liar.

The Liberals don’t just turn a blind eye to the exploitation of women. They are showing everybody how it's done, one more time.

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2019-03-02 16:30:25 -0500
$30,000 on porn strippers and hookers? Man, the guy must be an addict! Too bad that’s not the most concerning thing about Ghadafi’s son being ‘entertained’ in Quebec.
commented 2019-03-02 00:55:14 -0500
Day after day, week after week, year after year, trotting out crime after scandal after treason after stupidity of Jihadi-Justin-Groper and his LPC clown show…don’t you guys at THEREBEL ever get bored with it?
Because I sure don’t get bored reading about it all…
commented 2019-03-01 22:29:25 -0500
90 days and no sign of a hammer falling.
commented 2019-03-01 17:31:13 -0500
In fairness to Trudeau, I don’t think he intended to answer the question about the payments to the hookers, he was merely repeating his well rehearsed lines to avoid making a real response to the question. In this case, it ended badly for him.
This is what happens when you are not that bright and you rely on pre-prepared talking points during Question Period.
commented 2019-03-01 11:44:58 -0500
What would Trudeau have done if PM Harper was behind this scandal? Do you think Trudeau would just sit back and shrug it off? No chance. This bandit would have gone into conniptions and suffered a stroke from how loud he would have been screaming at Harper for his “crimes against Canada”.
Trudeau is the poster-child for hypocrisy. Talk about a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
commented 2019-03-01 09:40:59 -0500
This is great reporting Sheila. You are the necessary chemotherapy for the terribly mestastasized stage 4 cancer called the Federal Liberal Party. Keep up the great work.
commented 2019-03-01 08:19:10 -0500
JANIE JONES , I have one word -——— CRIMINISTER!
commented 2019-03-01 08:07:53 -0500
CBC keeps us well informed during hurricane season , it’s a Cat 3 ,now it’s a Cat 4 . Upgrade and downgrade by the minute.
Yesterday their on screen graphic categorized this sordid criminal affair as SNC-LAVALIN CONTROVERSY. Well isn’t that British understatement.
I wonder if the might upgrade it to SCANDAL or CRISIS today. I doubt it.
Just an example of how biased and twisted even the nuances are at the state broadcaster.
commented 2019-03-01 07:36:34 -0500
Al Peterson said, “Peter, I think you are reading too much into Daniel’s comments.”

That could very well be. It wouldn’t be the first I have done that.
commented 2019-03-01 03:38:27 -0500
Andrew Stephenson i agree with you, she could have taken the easy way out and sold herself for political gain and position but she kept her integrity.
commented 2019-03-01 00:35:41 -0500
JWR = future PM. Probably the most honest politician Canada’s seen in decades.
commented 2019-02-28 23:01:23 -0500
Watch Marc Garneau standing in the background grinning like a Cheshire Cat. He knows he’s likely next in line after the DoHH!!!…-phin starts his prison sentence. Hitler agrees!

commented 2019-02-28 22:52:22 -0500
I wonder if the “feminist” is OK with SNC paying 30,000 dollars on prostitutes for Kadaffi’s son while in Canada ?
commented 2019-02-28 21:37:21 -0500
So true, Sheila. Libranos only care about themselves and their racket. It’s much like The Party, starring Peter Sellers, when a woman refused a producer’s sexual advances and was blackballed from ever working in Hollywood again. These Libranos work the same way.
commented 2019-02-28 20:38:03 -0500
Peter, I think you are reading too much into Daniel’s comments. Nixon was the only president to resign in face of impeachment. There have been lots of nefarious deeds done by democrats ( ahem, Clinton) but none were forced out.

He is just stating that what Justin is accused of got Nixon turfed. It is a warning and reminder.
commented 2019-02-28 20:30:31 -0500
“They speak mere words,
With worthless oaths they make covenants;
A judgement sprouts like poisonous weeds in the summer field”.

Hosea 4

“Declare a holy fast;
call a sacred assembly.
Summon the elders
and all who live in the land
to the house of the Lord your God,
and cry out to the Lord.
15 Alas for that day!
For the day of the Lord is near;
it will come like destruction from the Almighty”

Joel 1
commented 2019-02-28 20:02:05 -0500
It is fascinating, Daniel, that with all the plethora of Democrats who have obstructed justice, you choose from the very few Republicans as an example of obstruction of justice.

Obvious where your bent is oriented.
commented 2019-02-28 19:57:07 -0500
Here are two words that will now always work well together in a sentence;
commented 2019-02-28 19:37:05 -0500
interesting to remember:
President Nixon was forced to resign because he obstructed justice, and about a dozen members of his administration went to prison for it, and without the pardon he got from President Ford is it almost certain Nixon would have been sent to prison too. Fooling around with the system of justice is no joke in a democracy.