December 08, 2015

"This is fascism, Soviet-style": Foreign-funded Ecojustice wants climate change "deniers" silenced "for 10 years"

Rebel Staff

A U.S.-funded group of environmentalist lawyers in Canada called EcoJustice has filed a complaint with the Competition Bureau demanding they investigate people who are skeptical of the theory of manmade global warming.

What on earth does the Competition Bureau have to say about whether people can disagree about global warming?

What kind of authoritarian bullies run to the government to try to get their opponents censored?

Look who they're going after:

Some home-made style billboards put up by the group Friends of Science. Just a few old-timers in Calgary, some engineers, scientists, professors.

They put up some billboards with some very simple messages. Like “The Sun is the main driver of climate change" and "Climate change your mind."

That’s what EcoJustice is after: A few low-budget billboards.

In their complaint, they say:

"Either a finding of criminal guilt or reviewable conduct would demonstrate that climate science misrepresentations are contrary to law and harmful.”

This isn’t just that crackpot David Suzuki. He’s always demanding people be thrown in jail. This is Ecojustice, a leftist law firm.

They claim to be acting in the name of six complainants, including Stephen Lewis, the socialist millionaire, former diplomat, father of socialist Avi Lewis and father in law of Naomi Klein.

EcoJustice is also a registered CRA charity.

They launder their political attack money through a charitable number. $5.8 million of it last year.

Could you imagine if anyone tried to sue David Suzuki into silence?


JOIN FREE for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.

READ Ezra Levant's bestselling books debunking environmentalist propaganda against the energy industry:
Groundswell: The Case for Fracking and Ethical Oil: The Case for Canada's Oil Sands

Rachel Notley's Alberta NDP just announced a $3 billion a year carbon tax.
SIGN THE PETITION telling them to cancel this job-killing tax at

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2015-12-08 13:56:11 -0500
I just watched a panel show on CTV in which the host and three panelists were discussing the “red alert” for air pollution in Beijing as a climate-change issue, implying somehow that climate-change is responsible for the pollution. So if we tax carbon dioxide in Canada it will be good for the climate and reduce air pollution in China. Yea, really. Where does CTV find these people?
commented 2015-12-08 13:45:56 -0500
I am scared ! I often refer to NASA report that Mars is also warming. I also deny driving my SUV on Mars. When will I be taken away ?
commented 2015-12-08 13:34:40 -0500
Did you hear about the recent eruption of a volcano in Sicily? Did you know that emissions from a single volcano eruption dwarfs ALL of man made, oh sorry, sorry, Anthropogenic, ones COMBINED? But no, no, the media party would not discuss volcanic contributions, no it’s too unpalatable.
I recommend these hacks to file a complaint in Sicily and ban this volcano from ever erupting again or at least if mother nature could offset her emissions, you know, like they offer you when you buy a plane ticket? Maybe nations could be fined for each eruption as well.

End runt :)
commented 2015-12-08 13:30:48 -0500
Canada is way past the point of dealing with these mercenaries via our laws, processes or democracy, our systems are too corrupted now. The only way to NOT be a part of this totalitarian usurping of freedom in Canada is to separate Western Canada as an independent republic free from the dictates of these parasites.
commented 2015-12-08 13:23:19 -0500
If ecojustice had to defend themselves against every lie they told, they would be tied up in court for so long nobody would ever hear from them again. Climate change is a myth created to keep lefties and liberal cronies rolling in dough.
commented 2015-12-08 13:23:18 -0500
@ Daniel Olchowecki – “I would actually support an investigation into climate claims with purveyors of misinformation being punished.”

That is a slippery slope, investigating people for pushing their opinions, even if they are wrong. It should never be a criminal investigation, but done through a law suit or other means. Making it a legal issue invites abuse, even if you specify that it must be done by “unbiased” scientists. How would you go about qualifying scientists that are not biased, for example.
commented 2015-12-08 13:12:14 -0500
I’ve seen very little coverage on this story by the main stream media. That is very disturbing as we now have university professors that are wanting the government to set up a thought police agency.
commented 2015-12-08 13:11:10 -0500
If you see a denier hiding behind a bush , you should kill them…………. Oops wrong terrorist group
commented 2015-12-08 13:08:07 -0500
Harper was soft. He should have banned foreign meddlers in Canadian politics (and elections). And he should have blocked foreign funding of mosques and terror organizations like “Dr.” Farhat Hashmi’s Al-Huda International. You remember her? San Bernardino mass killer jihadi Tashfeen Malik went to her madrassa in Pakistan. Hashmi has been “teaching” in Toronto since 2004.
commented 2015-12-08 13:03:01 -0500
liberal leader, ecoterrorist gerald butts, will show us all..
commented 2015-12-08 12:58:51 -0500
That’s quite the Rebelation!
In fact, while they have no legitimate case, we have a legitimate case against them for Breach of Trust. Uni prof’s have a Fiduciary Duty, a Duty of Care, to ensure open debate, and to ensure they teach truth. There are so many holes in the GW philosophy it’s hard to count them, and that being the case, doesn’t qualify as “science”. Have they reviewed all the relevant science? Have they taught the kids that the founder of this scam, Maurice Strong has stated it’s all about destroying the West? If not – and I’m pretty sure they haven’t or they themselves wouldn’t “believe” – they’re in Breach of Trust. There’s no way one can believe unequivocally in GW if they review ALL relevant data. Ironically, aren’t they exposing that it’s really all about fascism when they advocate such fascist policies? They’re so in-your-face-obvious some will miss it!!
commented 2015-12-08 12:53:46 -0500
I would actually support an investigation into climate claims with purveyors of misinformation being punished. Of course, I would expect it to be carried out by unbiased scientists and scutinize the claims of carbon tax proponents. Put everything on the table and let the chips fall. The left will be exposed in their deceit.
commented 2015-12-08 12:42:14 -0500
Create a really scary phoney crisis, take away all their guns, tax away all their money, silence the critics…