The United States Defence Secretary is hosting a meeting tomorrow in Paris to plan the war against ISIS. But Canada isn't invited.
Of course not.
Justin Trudeau, in his very first phone call with Barack Obama, told Obama that he was abandoning the military coalition against the Islamic State.
Now, weirdly, it’s been nearly three months since Trudeau told Obama he’d withdraw our jets. And he hasn’t. But Obama has taken him at his word.
Omar Alghabra, the Liberal parliamentary secretary for foreign affairs, is trying to spin this snub. (Wait until you hear what he said. I’ve never heard a more pitiful excuse.)
Remember: Alghabra is the former president of the Canadian Arab Federation and he’s the guy behind Trudeau’s refusal to call Muslim terrorism by its proper name.
But according to Trudeau and Alghabra, if we stop fighting the Islamic State and supporting Israel, maybe the terrorists will leave us alone.
Yet in the past week, one Canadian was murdered by Muslim terrorists in Jakarta, Indonesia, and another six Canadians were murdered by Muslim terrorists in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Those six Canadians killed were all from a Christian church, in Quebec, doing a humanitarian relief mission there. But instead of going to their church in Quebec and standing in solidarity with them, Trudeau went to a mosque in Peterborough, where he precisely did not condemn Islamic terrorism, but rather posed for selfies.
What's that Liberal hashtag — "Canada is Back"? Yeah. Back at the kids table, while the adults meet in Paris, without us.
Guest Marc Lebuis from Point de Bascule Canada is an expert researcher on the spread of radical Islam in Canada. His research provides more reasons that prove that the RCMP's plan for a hijab uniform is a bad idea.
This information comes directly from the writings of powerful and influential imams, including one man who has been referred to as "the Pope of Sunni Islam."
What do they say about the hijab? It is clearly meant to be a garment that differentiates Muslim women from infidels and other "inferiors;" it is NOT demanded for reasons of modesty alone. It is political clothing that is completely inappropriate for any police force.
PS: No other Canadian media has picked up the story we broke about the RCMP hijab. I talk about why.
Later, I go head-to-head with taxi owner/operator Gerry Manley on the "Uber vs. taxis debate." You know what a big fan I am of Uber, so you won't want to miss that!
And finally: Your letters to me! I read a tweet I received from a gay journalist who doesn't agree with me; I invited him to come on the show and debate me, so we'll see what happens.
I give out my contact information at the end of every show, but remember that you can also leave your feedback right in the comments below.
JOIN TheRebel.media FREE for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.
Believe that Muslim face coverings have no place in Canada?
The Rebel Store has the t-shirt for you: “Separation of Mosque and State”
The RCMP is bringing out a new women's uniform -- with a Muslim hijab!
If you agree that this move is unCanadian and anti-woman,
SIGN THE PETITION at ShariaPolice.ca
..disapproves of CONFORMITY to NON-Islamic modes and desires its followers to DEVELOP their own DISTINCTIVE characteristics in appearance, as well as in BELIEFS and ATTITUDES…
Which to me means, THEY WILL NEVER INTEGRATE. Do they have to make it more clear to the pathological utopians?!
If you’d like to read this book for yourself. Just search for: The Lawful and the Prohibited in Islam AND pdf.
Apparently you have problem with reading and comprehension. I said that terrorism existed before 9/11, but Homeland Security and the general public using buzz words like Muslim, Terrorist and Islam every day didn’t become a thing until after 9/11. That is a fact.
Apparently you still have your liberal blinders on. Muslim terrorism has been occurring for the last 1400 years and calling commenters stupid does not advance your argument in any way. Your lack of factual evidence overlooks the first attempt on the WTC in 1993 under your demi-god Clinton.
By the way, I am concerned when I watch the news and see everyday Canadians getting killed by other Canadians. Why should I be MORE concerned by a freak occurrence like the killing of Nathan Cirillo? He is no more important than Mark Ernsting – look him up.
I replied: Right on! You have assessed the situation most accurately. Don’t forget the PMs filmmaker brother is pro-Palestine, pro-Iran, anti-Israel and Junior likes regular mosque visits. For some reason Liberal-lovers believe such things go unnoticed just ‘cuz he’s a pretty boy that gazes lovingly into the eyes of other world leaders. I can guarantee that since JT was elected his father is THE topic of discussion and oh so “fond” memories amongst those that knew Pierre and are still around to tell his tales. This story is an instant replay of the time that big daddy called Margaret Thatcher to tell her that she had forgotten to invite him to a meeting. She said something to the effect, “No I didn’t.” Or what about: “So distrustful was the Reagan administration of Trudeau that it did not inform the Canadian government in advance of the 1983 American invasion of Grenada. It did not consult Trudeau because it considered him a security risk who might not keep the operation a secret.”
The Truth About Trudeau, Bob Plamondon, 2013.
Sunny ways, sunny days indeed!
Apparently you are stupid and took my comment a little too literally. Yes, there was terrorism before 9/11, but terrorist, Muslim and Islam really only became the buzz words that they are now to the general public due to 9/11 and the Bush years.
Do I need to remind you that the United States Department of Homeland Security was created after 9/11 – meaning that 9/11 trigged a whole new mentality when it comes to terrorism that the 70’s and 80’s didn’t.
No shit. Did you just learn that Santa Claus and The Easter Bunny aren’t real too?
IF found guilty pretty unlikely any type punishment that’s even worth talking about will take place…
Big picture wise Pretty small potatoes. And again very unlikely nothing will come of this at all.
Hopefully this sends the message to the Politically Correct DoGooders that we will learn with their disappointment LOL
.
We have heard Barack Obama on two separate occasions declare that when it comes to military might “it’s not even close” yet we should be concerned that those anti-humans (ISIS) are angered at us being in the region, that we embolden them or somehow strengthen their recruitment when someone stands up to them, even though it’s “not even close”!
Every one of our natural allies is at that meeting, we are so going the wrong way on this one, what a shame!