August 17, 2018

Defenders of Wynne’s “radical” sex ed in a “tizzy” over unspecified changes

David MenziesMission Specialist

Keeping a promise made almost daily on the campaign trail, the Ford government will begin consultations in the fall on a revised sex-ed curriculum.


This was welcome news for many parents, given that there was virtually no consultation with them when the Wynne Liberals pushed full-speed ahead with what some have deemed a radical sex-ed curriculum.

Many complained that some of the materials in the new curriculum aren’t age-appropriate, and are concerned with the way gender is presented to children as young as eight, as a changeable social construct.

But even before any specific changes have been released by the Ford PCs, those in favour of the current curriculum are in a tizzy, including the Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario.

If this group in connection with gender-bending rings a bell, it might be due to the union being a subject on a Tucker Carlson show last December when it was revealed that the ETFO had expanded LGBT to “LGGBDTTTIQQAAPP.”

At their recent Queen’s Park protest, ETFO President Sam Hammond said the union will “vigorously defend” any teacher who sticks to the current curriculum.

In other words, he’s advocating that teachers break the law to defend it, and they aren’t the only ones going to extremes to defend the radical curriculum.

At the end of the day, shouldn’t these people at least wait to see what’s being proposed before protesting?

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2018-08-17 19:26:12 -0400
Anyone that promotes the idea of anal penetration, because it has nothing to do with sex, is promoting the spread of disgusting diseases and major medical and physical maladies. The rectum was never designed for that type of violent prodding. It is the sewage system of our body. What’s next? Swimming in the sewers? People get grossed out if a piece of poo even gets close them and yet some are willing to insert their “most prized” body part into someones septic system. Even Grosser.
commented 2018-08-17 19:25:21 -0400
If it was really about ‘the kids’, they would make sure they had access to information on a need to know basis through the medical system. Basic sex ed is all public schools need to be offering, and if they can’t do that than they should stay out of it.

Regardless of what weirdos like Horwath say, sex really hasn’t changed that much and normalizing gender fluidity is not doing kids any favors. They want to have full control over our kids, if this weren’t true, they wouldn’t be so viscous and desperate about having that power taken away from them.

Teachers should not be co-parents. Gender dysphoric kids are few and far between. Teachers Unions have no right to force this on people who want nothing to do with it. It is social engineering and it will be fought. Do it through the medical system NOT through the schools. No government body should have that much control over our children. If teachers are going to wilfully break the law its time for parents to start laying charges and suing. I hope this move is played across the country. Enough with the sexualization of minors.
commented 2018-08-17 18:52:18 -0400
Liberals are a bunch of sick bastards led by the sickest of the all, Feminist Trudeau the leader of Peoplekind ( whatever the hell that is – maybe its another gender?. What gender is ‘sick in the head’ Trudeau?)
commented 2018-08-17 18:49:01 -0400
Wynne’s sex education program was nothing more than perverted birth control. I wonder how many kids were not born as a result of her brainwashing.

As a Gay person, she needs to look at the new Sharia law books and then throw herself of the top of the CN Tower.
commented 2018-08-17 18:26:31 -0400
Gender theory is based on pseudoscience. The theory comes from French existentialist Simone de Beauvoir who believed that sex was learned (& also believed that it was binary) & not something you were born into. This theory was later tested by psychologist, sexologist John Money who can best be described as a pervert & a pile of crap with glasses. He did a disgusting study on twin boys which is held up as proof of the validity of the theory despite the fact that the “female” would revert back to being a male later in life & both twins would go on to commit suicide. Third wave feminist Judith Butler then used this failed study to come up with the idea of gender fluidity.
commented 2018-08-17 18:03:42 -0400
The usual suspects are just that!
commented 2018-08-17 17:00:50 -0400
… “Sex ed” is simply an opportunity for the Left to indoctrinate children with their perverse moral and social ideas.
… Nothing more.
commented 2018-08-17 16:56:09 -0400
They just love messing with young kids . Explains the young snow flakes we have now . 15 years of Liberal brain washing .
commented 2018-08-17 15:53:33 -0400
Gee, don’t know why the teachers union isn’t dragging in the former Deputy Minister of Education – responsible for the sex-ed curriculum – to support them on this.
You know….just to give them a bit of credibility.