There’s a premise of law in Canada that justice is meted out regardless of who the person is but I wonder, is this being done in the case of Maryam Monsef versus the almost 200 people the Liberals have deported for lying on their citizenship applications?
CBC broke the story on the weekend that since the Liberals have come to power, 184 people have had their citizenship revoked, which puts the Liberals at a much faster rate for this process than under the Conservatives.
So why the different treatment for Maryam Monsef? Do Liberal insiders get one treatment while those without connections, get another?
It leaves a bad taste in the mouth for a democracy that Monsef is in the middle of trying to fundamentally reform.
There is no reason she shouldn’t be treated the same way this English woman in Nova Scotia is being treated. Deportation is what the law requires. She should also be properly vetted now, since she wasn’t in the first place. How did her father die exactly, who are her relatives and what are her families connections in Iran and Afghanistan? Since she is a sitting member of Parliament we have a right to know.
As I have said time and again, tax payer funds should not pay for any government employee with dual citizenship. Public funds should be for Canadian only citizens. Also, no politician should have a second citizenship, such as Monsef, Mulcair and Dion have. There is the appearance of split allegiances. As with Mulcair and Dion, I don’t want tax money paying for their retirement back in France.
Regardless, Monsef should be off the government payroll and out of Canadian politics. Her mother intentionally lied on official documents about her daughter. That is a deportation offence. Or does Baby Doc have one rule for the masses he is bankrupting and another rule for his buds? If he is such a feminist, treat Monsef as he would a male conservative.
All that ended in 2002 when private prosecutions by citizens were protected by statute and reconized as a legitimate criminal or civil court action with the weight of the law behind them – if the feds don’t act – do it yourself
All that ended in 2002 when private prosecutions by citizens were protected by statute and reconized as a legitimate criminal or civil court action with the weight of the law behind them – if the feds don’t act – do it yourself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandamus
Want to get ahead today?
Become a lib and send them cash – they will protect you
o wonder they have been called Liberanos