October 25, 2015

"Four men died so Obama could win reelection": Email proves Hillary Clinton knew Al-Qaeda carried out Benghazi attack

Ezra LevantRebel Commander

Late last week, we heard the most damning revelation so far in the Congressional Benghazi hearings.

(CONTENT WARNING:)

An email Hillary Clinton sent to her daughter (and later deleted from her secret server) proves she knew all along that Al Qaeda had been behind the attack on the US consulate in Libya.

But it was vital that Hillary keep that a secret.

Obama was campaigning for reelection on the claim that he'd won the war on terror and "Al Qaeda was on the run."

That's why the White House stuck to their ridiculous story that the terror attack was motivated by an obscure anti-Islamic YouTube video.

All politicians lie, but how many, like Hillary Clinton, have the blood of four men on their hands.




Help TheRebel.media expose media bias once and for all:
DONATE HERE to give ordinary Canadians a chance to be heard!

JOIN TheRebel.media FREE for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.

READ The Enemy Within: Terror, Lies, and the Whitewashing of Omar Khadr, Ezra Levant’s new book about domestic terrorism and radicalization.


Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2015-10-26 01:38:41 -0400
Hillary’s email to her daughter Chelsea proves she knew the Benghazi attack was a terrorist attack, and not a spontaneous demonstration that got out of hand. This is corroborated by the transcript of a phone call she made to Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak that also came out in the recent Senate hearing, in which is was revealed that she told Mubarak that she and others knew that the Benghazi attack had “nothing to do with the film”, i.e. the video the corrupt Obama administration had blamed the attack on. In that call, Hillary also said that they she and others knew that it was a pre-planned attack and not a spontaneous demonstration. Hillary lied about Benghazi, plain and simple.

Three of the American personnel who went from the CIA annex in Benghazi to rescue the U.S. Ambassador and others at the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi were on Fox News tonight, explaining that they were indeed told to stand down and not go to rescue the diplomatic personnel, including Ambassador Stevens. Who ordered that stand-down and why are still unanswered questions. Why didn’t Hillary answer it long ago? She is definitely hiding something. One thing is for sure, though: Those four dead Americans won’t be answering those questions. Dead men tell no tales.
commented 2015-10-26 01:19:06 -0400
@peter, no there is obviously larger things at play with the whole email scandal. However, cherry picking one email out of what’s probably thousands isn’t balanced journalism nor does it prove a point. Similar things take place here in Canada – politicians use Blackberry Messenger because they are not readily accessible via ATIPPA requests because of the nature of the messages. Top that off with what has been in the last 10-12 years, a move to prevent any government (and cabinet) information out of reach of such access legislation, you have people doing this. I would bet there’s not a government and/or government official that hasn’t used similar tactics, regardless of party affiliation. The problem with this particular story is that it shows just 1 email, there’s no context to it other than what Ezra Levant spouts off about. I have no problem with holding people accountable for their actions or their views, but to go down this road is very dangerous.
commented 2015-10-26 00:57:30 -0400
The American MSM, who are in the can for Hillary for Prez, are trying to bury her self-damning emails that have just been discovered. Those emails reveal her to have lied to the Benghazi terrorist attack victims’ families and the American people. The MSM are trying to say that nothing new or important came out of the Congressional search for the truth. The MSM are unconscienable liars like Hillary herself. These liars should all be prosecuted as traitors.
commented 2015-10-26 00:51:01 -0400
Yousa, if it was one innocent e-mail I doubt they would have spent $4.7 million in 8 separate investigations or hold a congressional hearing
commented 2015-10-26 00:46:42 -0400
Hillary is just using the hearing to turn herself into some kind of a victim. Simple as that.
commented 2015-10-25 22:55:51 -0400
I couldn’t help but think, why Hillary said she lost more sleep over this Benghazi attack than everybody in the hearing put together. Hmmm…could it be because, it was for fear of being caught in the lie, rather than the four innocent lives lost. After all she sat back and did nothing to save them. Can’t see her loosing any sleep over collateral damage. They had an election to win after all…….. All of a sudden I feel like throwing up.
commented 2015-10-25 22:33:53 -0400
I love how you take an email, where someone is expressing their concern for the loss of life & you turn it into this type of trash. Make no wonder you’re sued by so many people & have to continually defend yourself in front of tribunal after tribunal. Haven’t you got the hint yet? lol.
commented 2015-10-25 22:06:37 -0400
Robert,

You mean Carly Fiorina’s own quote?
commented 2015-10-25 22:03:06 -0400
Jimmys not stupid, he’s evil. Ask Vlad. The sad thing is… He has no clue what that is. Like Hillary.
commented 2015-10-25 22:00:53 -0400
Jimmy Da Silva

Hey Jimmy, your statement was wrong, own up to it.
commented 2015-10-25 21:54:15 -0400
Bill,

Trudeau – who backs the murder of unborn babies?

LOL.

It’s called Pro-Choice, which is what most Canadians are.

You are dreaming if you think ANY conservative candidate will try to make abortion illegal in Canada.

This is not a battle that you will ever win. Pro-Choice will always win out.
commented 2015-10-25 21:50:07 -0400
Robert,

I was told that I was wrong here endlessly when it came to Harper losing and Trudeau winning – we saw how that turned out. Don’t make the same mistake twice.
commented 2015-10-25 21:44:30 -0400
Here it is October 25, 2015, and we Canadians are saddled with a new, PM Justin Trudeau, who backs the murder of unborn babies, and is a dictator with his own Party, forcing each and every one of his MPs to accept his support of the murder of unborn Canadian babies.
Even the Pope Francis, couldn’t be part of PM Trudeau’s party, as he doesn’t support the murdering of unborn Canadian babies.
On top of this, he announced this week, the withdrawal of Canadian Forces, against the wishes of the vast majority of Canadians, from the war against the most brutal force on Earth today, ISIS, leaving women and children to their demise at the hands of ISIS.
Personally, I am ashamed that this man, who supports murder, acts as a dictator, acts against the wishes of the vast majority of Canadians, and leaves women and children to suffer rape, slavery and death, is my Prime Minister.
The 60.5%, the majority of Canadians, who didn’t vote for this man of low moral character, should stand up TODAY, not in 4 years, to stop him before he continues further to bring total discredit to our great Country.
commented 2015-10-25 21:43:06 -0400
At this point, it is still too far early to make any meaningful predictions in the american elections. But I will agree with Ezra that 13 hours may make a difference.
commented 2015-10-25 21:31:53 -0400
Sorry but did anyone notice the smug smirk on Obama’s face when he said it was the fault of a video?
commented 2015-10-25 21:31:18 -0400
Jimmy da silva you may do the I won you lose grade school chant. But time will tell in all honestly all Canadians lost unless your Muslim. Even the pot heads lost because marijuna won’t be legalized. So Jimmy da silva we all
Lost just wait and see. And when it happens. We will accept your apology. When you say liberals screwed us and your taxes r through the roof in Ontario. Oh oops did it just say where your from Jimmy. Oh I also know where you are posting from your computer. I found you IP address and where your pinging from. If anyone wants to know where Jimmy da silva lives I can give a dress and where their IP address is pinging. Haha Jimmy jokes on you. Anyone wanna see what this dumb idiot looks like. I will gladly give you their info. Jimmies stupid. Jimmies stupid.

I wanna ask people on here. Has anyone thought abt wearing the old famous white sheets again in public. I say we start wearing them again in public and just walk around no labels. Just do what Muslims are doing And see if we can get Trudeau to a rally and out one on because he says. He’s for Canadians and bringing us together well what if we all join and wear white sheets and head piece with eyes cut out and see if Muslims and media and Trudeau will give us respect and equal rights of not isn’t that considered racist on their part and see if we can walk the streets peacefully. If you wanna challenge media and Trudeau and others. Then let’s start a rally of people wearing white sheets and head pieces. Let’s see the Muslim community and Trudeau and media accept us for our rights and freedoms too.
commented 2015-10-25 21:20:43 -0400
Hillary is going to be President, so that’s all that matters. Especially against Trump. Even Carly Fiorina can concede that.

In an interview with “The John Gibson Show,” presidential candidate Carly Fiorina took a shot at rival Donald Trump, saying that he was the only Republican incapable of beating Hillary Clinton.

“Do you think that if Donald Trump was the nominee and up against Hillary Clinton, that he could win?” asked Fox New Radio host John Gibson.

“I do not, and I think that much of the — it is very early,” she said. “But much of the head-to-head match-up data says that the one person that Hillary Clinton TROUNCES in a general election is Donald Trump.”

The polling data largely backs Fiorina up. At no point in the 2016 race has Trump ever beaten Clinton in the RealClearPolitics average of the five most recent polls, although occasionally an outlier poll will show him with a lead.
commented 2015-10-25 21:17:31 -0400
Glenn,

Or The Rebel will just shut down one day and you will all have to scramble to find some other extreme right wing blog to spew your views. You are among a kind of conservative that conservatives hate.
commented 2015-10-25 21:01:52 -0400
Myth,

I didn’t say the same – I said varying degrees of liberal or center left. If Mulcair had won – as a liberal, I would have been completely fine with that. Liberals/progressives were simply covering their bases.

But again, what difference does it make – I won and you lost.
commented 2015-10-25 20:51:00 -0400
Jimmy da silva. I’m not surprised at how stupid you are. Watched the video clip of republicans pretty much talking abt Obamacare on hannity they mentioned the committee to question Hilary. Well duh of course they. They are there to point out she is lying abt Benghazi you moron be used democrats won’t wuestion it become they were involved and killed the 4 men you moron. So of course the republicans are going to get the evidence to prove the truth you idiot. That is what would show Hilary is a liar and untrustworthy That video is so easy to understand yet you seem to see it a different way. That’s because you are stupid. Let’s start the chant again jimmies stupid. My friends who are mentally challenged wanted me to ask you again Jimmy da silva. How are you more stupid then them when they have a legitimate disability. It’s the million dollar question on everyone’s mind? Please people go watch the video clip Jimmy posted abt hannity and you can all see for yourselves. The republicans are trying to find out the truth abt the lying democrats. That’s what justice does. Their not admitting to trying to debunk Hilary. They r saying looked are proving she is lying and her ratings are going down. Jimmy da silva that’s called true journalism. Investigating the truth and evidence You know Jimmy your favorite csi shows do that too it’s called collect evidence and prove people are lying and hiding things. Jimmies stupid…… Jimmies stupid….. Jimmies stupid….. Are you married Jimmy? I really feel for your wife and poor kids if you have any. God help them
commented 2015-10-25 20:38:36 -0400
About the same time that the fiasco that is the subject of this thread happened….Harper bailed the staff of the Canadian embassy in Tehran…..September 11…the anniversary of the defeat of the Turks at the gates of Vienna…was comming up….they knew something was in the wind…..I caught wind of it from a relative of someone involved…..so…..three stooges….if you want to shout down the rebellion at theREBEL ….you are going to have to do much better that that.
commented 2015-10-25 20:31:38 -0400
Jimmy da silva the NDP the bloc and the Green Party of one are all different then the liberals. So for you to say they r the same is completely stupidity. If they were along the same then why is their platforms all so different there Jimmy. Like I said you can’t teach stupid. I think Jimmy is exercising the demons. Amazing how yousa figured out to shit it’s mouth but Jimmy da silva here is still just being stupid is stupid does. So considering 39.5% is smaller then 60% that means majority of Canadians didn’t vote liberal. So once again you never answered my mathematical question. Can someone please start the chant on here. Jimmies stupid. 👏👏 jimmies stupid 👏👏jimmies stupid👏👏👏. You know Jimmy da silva. I have a lot of respect for people that are mentally challenged and they are reading your posts. And they have even said to me this Jimmy da silva is even more handicap then us. N we have a legitimate disability. They wanna know what’s your excuse. Does Jimmy need some hugs from trudope. I think mayor nenshi in Calgary is inline fist to hopefully take it up the bum from trudope before you do Jimmy da silva
commented 2015-10-25 20:27:59 -0400
Jimmy Yousa…Terry…any of you who think you can demoralize us into giving up….all of us have experienced prevailing over adversity…..political power is a very fickle friend.

Among the powerless beaten nobodies wearing striped pajamas at Mauthausen was this pain in the ass named Simon Weisenthal….boy did the turn keys there ever regret not takeing him seriously….

Be careful Mr Trudeau how you treat those you have power over…for wether or not you will have power over them tommorrow remains to be seen.

We are not going to just cave in and shut up…..you are going to have to kill us if you want our silence….and my read on you three whimps is….none of you got the stones to do it.
commented 2015-10-25 20:25:14 -0400
Awesome video, Ezra. By far the best summary of Clinton’s involvement I’ve come cross in all news.

You should be doing more videos like this one, and less on things like how Trudeau made the loonie fall by just becoming PM.
commented 2015-10-25 20:18:48 -0400
“Sorry that I represent most Canadians, but at least you have your little cute place here to hang out with likeminded people. "
Sorry, you represent 39% of Canadians. That, only in a liberal world, represents a majority.
The infighting in the Republican party has absolutely nothing to do with the now proven fact that Hillary and Obama both lied about Benghazi, and who was responsible. Further they lied, conveniently until Obama’s return to a second catastrophic term was in the bag. You can argue about the motivations of the Benghazi committee but the fact, the proven fact, is that Hillary, Obama and an assortment of other officials lied to influence an election. They should all be doing time in the ‘big house’, not the White House.
commented 2015-10-25 20:15:24 -0400
Well Jimmy just like the Liberals and the Duffy affair. They could not have cared less about Duffy. It was their chance to get Harper.
commented 2015-10-25 20:04:49 -0400
JIMMY! JIMMY! JIMMY! JIMMY!!!!!!!!!

Pretty please, could you answer my question? Give me a single straightforward answer as to what the Rebel supposedly faked and you can earn yourself a little credit. It’s very simple and not that hard.
commented 2015-10-25 19:57:59 -0400
“…Democrats and many media pundits suggest Clinton’s performance boosts her 2016 White House bid. Hoekstra strongly disagrees.
“We took a success story that was built on 20 years of bipartisanship and with a single decision to flip sides, we took Libya from an island of stability into the chaos that we see today,” Hoekstra said. “It is exporting weapons, ideology and fighters all supporting radical jihadism. They want to destroy America. We unleashed that because of the decisions that Secretary of State Clinton made…”
http://www.wnd.com/2015/10/busted-hillarys-benghazi-lies-go-even-deeper/
commented 2015-10-25 19:46:01 -0400
Some of you may find this interesting. Republicans don’t give a shit about Benghazi – this was all about trying to derail Hillary Clinton from winning in 2016.

The man set to take the job as the top Republican in the House just made a crucial admission about the true nature of the wild goose-chase known as the House Select Committee on Benghazi — its aim is to take down Hillary Clinton.

While the revelation may come as no surprise, its source should. Outgoing House Speaker John Boehner recently warned his party of “false prophets” and after Fox News’ Sean Hannity worried he’d been wrongly labeled as such, he somehow elicited a confession from Boehner’s would-be successor that is heresy to right-wing orthodoxy on Benghazi.

“Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right?” House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy offered as “one example” of a Republican win in Congress. “But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today?” the California Republican asked. “Her numbers are dropping.

Watch McCarthy admit to Sean Hannity that the Benghazi investigation is just a ruse to derail Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Qq7nIIvRFAE

Another Republican lawmaker says the House Select Committee on Benghazi is meant to go after former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Rep. Richard Hanna, R-New York, said Wednesday on New York’s’ WIBX 950, “Sometimes the biggest sin you can commit in D.C. is to tell the truth.”

“This may not be politically correct, but I think that there was a big part of this investigation that was designed to go after people and an individual, Hillary Clinton,” said Hanna, who is not a member of the committee. “After what Kevin McCarthy said, it’s difficult to accept at least a part of it was not. I think that’s the way Washington works. But you’d like to expect more from a committee that’s spent millions of dollars and tons of time.”

Clinton is scheduled to testify before the panel on October 22.

At the first Democratic debate on Tuesday night, Clinton slammed Republicans, telling the audience that the committee is “basically an arm of the Republican National Committee.”

“It is a partisan vehicle, as admitted by the House Republican majority leader, Mr. McCarthy, to drive down my poll numbers. Big surprise. And that’s what they have attempted to do,” Clinton said, adding later, “But I’ll be there. I’ll answer their questions.”

Brian Fallon, the Clinton campaign’s press secretary, said Wednesday that Hanna’s comment show that “House Republicans aren’t even shy anymore about admitting that the Benghazi Committee is a partisan farce.”

“Hillary Clinton will still attend next week’s hearing,” Fallon said, “but at this point, (Chairman) Trey Gowdy’s inquiry has zero credibility left.”