August 14, 2017

EXCLUSIVE: Google picked Anti-Defamation League to help censor YouTube — now The Rebel reveals ADL execs’ far-left bias

Laura LoomerShillman Fellow

YouTube recently announced that it plans to censor what it’s calling "controversial" religious and supremacist videos.

It is part of their widespread effort that has been described as a “commitment to fight terror content online.”

That seems fine at first glance. But don’t be fooled:

“Terror” for YouTube is just another word for “conservative” and “right wing.”

In order to crack down on videos YouTube doesn’t like, they will now hide and demonetize any videos they deem to be “controversial” or “supremacist.”

There is a lot of content on the Internet that is posted daily, which is why YouTube announced that it will utilize the help of “Trusted Flaggers” to help identify problematic content.

One of those “Trusted Flaggers” is the Anti Defamation League (ADL).

The ADL describes itself as a non-partisan organization that “speaks up for those whose voices are not always heard.”

But only if you’re liberal.

After the ADL published its now notorious defamatory hit list that accused 36 conservatives of being anti-Semites, it became increasingly evident that the ADL is not “non-partisan”, as it claims to be.

The ADL is not the voice of the Jewish people, either. Instead, it is a far left organization that has historically aligned itself with anti-Israel Democratic politicians and even extreme pro-Islam sentiments.

It is easy to call the ADL a far-left anti-conservative organization.

But at The Rebel, we wanted to prove to you how left wing and anti-conservative the ADL is.

On the ADL website’s “Our Leadership and Staff” page, 16 ADL senior staff are listed.

So the Rebel conducted an audit of their FEC donations and social media, and discovered that ADL leadership has a documented liberal bias – an extreme liberal bias, thirty to one.

Along with the executives’ donations to Democratic candidates and Super PACS, an overview of ADL leadership social media also reveals a strong anti-conservative bias, especially with regards to conservative social media – the very job that YouTube has hired them for.

So much for being neutral referees.

WATCH my exclusive report and ask yourself:

If ADL leadership thinks we need a “Trump free safe space," what is going to stop them from flagging pro-Trump or pro-conservative content on YouTube to create a virtual safe space?

If the ADL and other left wing organizations serve as content filters for the entire YouTube community, we may find out what a virtual liberal safe space on YouTube looks like sooner than later.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-08-21 10:11:11 -0400
As always The Rebel “hit the nail on the head”! Good analysis Laura!
commented 2017-08-15 02:10:56 -0400
The left deserves what they are bringing on themselves very very much.
commented 2017-08-15 02:10:12 -0400
Yeah sure LMAO! Can still remember Fecesbook telling me that some Arab who repeatedly threatened to slit peoples throats on the Sun News page was not violating any of their community standards, sadly they were being honest.
commented 2017-08-14 18:49:18 -0400
Space Moose, you have at your fingertips the most powerful collection of database and human knowledge assembled into an easy to use interface. i.e. look it up!
commented 2017-08-14 18:25:55 -0400
What the hell is a shillman fellow?
commented 2017-08-14 17:01:46 -0400
Thanks LAURA , very informative

Not social media , but socialist media
commented 2017-08-14 15:05:27 -0400
Great reporting Laura!
We all need to boycott U-Tube & Google – they work their power through $$$.
It would be better to make a Conservative operation wealthy than these demi-gods.
commented 2017-08-14 14:46:07 -0400
Laura’s best report so far.

When people complain directly to YouTube, or Google, about a hate site, it may take months, if it even gets removed, to exclude hate sites. Why the sudden rush and almost entirely against critics of Islam or the anyone who is on the right?

I went to Pat Condell’s site yesterday. All his commentary videos was removed. He was for Brexit, against Islam and its teachings, against lonnie leftists. I guess people complained because its back up today. But many sites are now don’t earn a cent because they aren’t PC.

A year or two ago some Israelis conducted an experiment. Two identical Facebook pages. One promoting Israel and its side of the story, and the other support for the attacks on Israelis. Within a few days the pro-Israel site was blocked but the other site remained untouched. One promoted peace, the other promoted hatred. So much for social media…
commented 2017-08-14 14:26:04 -0400
No surprise that a leftist Google would choose a leftist ADL to help censor the YouTube.