June 14, 2017

It’s Pride Month, and queer children are the new status symbol (Guest host: Faith Goldy)

Ezra LevantRebel Commander

I'm Faith Goldy, sitting in for Ezra Levant. I’ve been so busy keeping up with terror attacks and “Islamophobia” here, I almost forgot that it’s World Pride Month. 

Yes, what began as a parade and then morphed into a week-long event has now become a month-long celebration of the sexual alphabet soup.

This week, one video out of Montreal made waves across the internet:

An interview with an eight-year-old drag queen.

This young boy who impersonates females goes by the (rather odd) stage name “Lactatia” and he vogue dances and catwalks in front of hundreds of adults in nightclubs and bars across the city.

Where did he get the idea? Well, let me introduce you to his mother…

Meanwhile, did you know that all across this country, in PUBLIC libraries, there are drag queens leading story time for little tykes, teaching them gender-bending nursery rhymes?

I looked into the background of one of these performers, and it wasn’t pretty.

There are only two reasons to do this to a child:

The first is grooming.

The second is because queer children are the new status symbol in North America.

NEXT: I’ve been reporting extensively on Canada’s border crisis.

Tonight, Rebel Australia contributor Claire Lehmann is in studio to compare notes about the impact her country’s migrant policy is having “down under.”

THEN: Dan Lyman, foreign correspondent for Infowars, joins me to talk about the EU’s ultimatum, telling the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland have 24 hours to start taking in refugees — or what?

 

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-06-18 15:26:01 -0400
JIMMY REECE ; you are clearly a minority here. gays have been around naturally for thousands of years. that doesn’t mean they have to have parades focussing solely on their sexual orientation. how would it look if an annual national heterosexual proud parade was declared right across the god damned country ? the gays, SJWs and other snow flakes would be having temper tantrums, cry ins ,diaper wetting sit ins and rock throwing riots all over the world.
commented 2017-06-15 23:28:10 -0400
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

I am not walking back anything. People like you and Peter believe in God, so I was only speaking in your terms IF God exists.
commented 2017-06-15 23:24:45 -0400
Jimmy Reece, seems to me you are walking back from earlier posts.

If you don’t want to answer, that’s fine. Just stop calling people dumb when you are asked specific questions after you make a declaration or accusation.

I saw that George Carlin clip quite a while ago. I prefer some of his other stuff, like his rant about what’s in the fridge.
commented 2017-06-15 22:57:34 -0400
Sorry Jimmy, you failed to explain why YOU have this belief. I don’t particularly pay attention to movies etc… though Alanis is entertaining, I don’t find that a compelling reason to explain your position.
What I’m trying to ascertain is how deep you hypocrisy runs when it comes to spirituality, and more specifically God. You make fun of people who have faith, and deride them…yet, you will default to God being male — Wow! You will readily rail against Rebels and claim a high ground, but, fail to see you are holding onto to some pretty rigid beliefs yourself.

On the topic of gays, many people say so what! I say so what! It’s not important to me, I have more pressing concerns than who does what in their bedroom. I want human rights for all, that’s it. Our laws are inclusive and it’s not up to me to tell another person who they can love. I don’t have to support Pride Parades and hoist a rainbow flag, it’s people like you who feel the need to to signal your support to the world. I prefer to treat people I meet with dignity and respect, if they do something for me to question this approach, I adjust and proceed with caution.

I would like you to take your manufactured outrage to the dump, you really don’t impress anyone with your attitude.
commented 2017-06-15 22:32:17 -0400
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

Um, because God is commonly called a he. And every image of God is typically a man and when movies and TV shows depict God, it’s usually a man. However in the case of Dogma, Alanis Morrisette played God.

What a dumb question to ask.
commented 2017-06-15 22:16:41 -0400
Jimmy, you are just going around in circles because I have answered all you questions already. So go back and reread my answers to you.
commented 2017-06-15 22:09:33 -0400
Poor Jimmy, resorts to name calling when asked specific questions… I didn’t say one way or the other how I feel about the Pope.
Open hearts you say, who talked about this concept….only you, and, you didn’t ask anyone else about this concept.

Again Jimmy the Deflector, Why are you assuming God is male? There must be a reason you said this…what is it?
commented 2017-06-15 22:00:42 -0400
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

It’s pretty clear why I brought up The Pope, but I understand – you are dumb.

Try to follow me here – regardless of what YOU think of The Pope, he is highly respected around the world and considered the closest to God. If he can open his heart to gay people, surely a bunch of fucking useless nobodies on The Rebel can do the same.
commented 2017-06-15 21:51:05 -0400
Peter Netterville,

Does you mean you go around calling black people niggers, because that is a word they use?

There is no hate when I use fag. LOL. Fag and faggot is hateful and makes you a bigot.

People have been using gay forever. You are not that old. I am sure you recall the backlash a few years back when people kept saying things like “that’s so gay” or "you’re so gay? Gay people didn’t like it.

We both know that fag is a negative. Don’t be a dumb cunt.
commented 2017-06-15 21:39:33 -0400
Peter Netterville,

By all means, please introduce me to your imaginary friend.

You are a moron because if you logically thought about it, there are too many factors that go beyond it just being a choice.

There are conservatives that believe people are born gay even if we don’t have the technology yet to back up what is clearly common sense when it comes to genetics. What do they acknowledge which you can’t.

So you think teen boys that only show an attraction to other male teens and have zero attraction towards girls, are simply making a choice? Answer this question. Why would a teen boy going through puberty – be attracted to other teen boys, when typically teens at that age are getting erections over girls and hopes a certain girl likes them.

They are simply wired to be attracted to other boys – I don’t know how you can deny this. As virgins they are not at an age where they are going to make such freewheeling sexual decisions. Their body’s natural impulse and reaction is due to have they feel about another teen boy. Perhaps because you are single and have never been with a woman, you don’t understand all the factors that go into one person being attracted to another.
commented 2017-06-15 21:29:34 -0400
Jimmy Reece, you didn’t provide an answer to my question. I asked,I really don’t know why you brought the Pope into the conversation if you really believe what you stated. What’s your point?
Why are you assuming God is male? There must be a reason you said this…what is it?

I did not see anyone claiming to have an authority on God. Why are you saying this?
commented 2017-06-15 21:26:45 -0400
Jimmy said, “Because the Pope is more accepting of gay people over some extreme right conservatives on The Rebel that think they are more of an authority of God than The Pope is.”

Jimmy, the New Testament does not support one person as a priest between the people and God, such as is the Pope. If that is what Catholics want to believe then all the more power to them.
commented 2017-06-15 21:21:10 -0400
Jimmy said, “Certainly more so than some fucking dipshit IT guy who posts on The Rebel.”

Jimmy, was that your childish feeble attempt to insult me? Certainly you can do better than that! Well, then again maybe you can’t.
commented 2017-06-15 21:19:06 -0400
Jimmy said, “The Pope is the closest person to God if he exists.”

No. Not that you will, but I suggest you read Hebrews. It will explain that all believers are equally close to God.
commented 2017-06-15 21:16:55 -0400
Jimmy said, “You call gay people fags – that is hate and bigotry right there.”

No, Jimmy. It is not. They call themselves fags. The term “fag” is what I grew up with. “Gay” was not used when I was a young. In addition, there is no hate in the term when I use it. Really. I know if I exhibit hate. You do not. I know my emotions. You do not. And it does not fall under the term bigot. You should learn to read the dictionary. Bigot is the wrong term. Damn you are stupid.
commented 2017-06-15 21:16:15 -0400
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

Because the Pope is more accepting of gay people over some extreme right conservatives on The Rebel that think they are more of an authority of God than The Pope is.
commented 2017-06-15 21:12:45 -0400
Jimmy Reece said, "There is zero evidence of your imaginary friend, but that doesn’t stop you from talking to him. "

Well actually, that is not true. You just refuse to see it. However, there would be no need for faith if God’s existence was obvious.

Jimmy says, “If you logically think being gay is simply a choice, you are a moron.”

First off, explain why I am a “moron” if I think being gay is a choice?

Second, you as a lover and believer of science believe in facts provable using the scientific process are absolutely necessary above all, yet you believe that this “gay gene” exists that causes some people to be born gay without evidence, without facts.

That belief is contrary to your beloved science and scientific process, so you have no right to criticize me for believing in God, when in fact I have never claimed that I must have evidence of God to believe in Him. I accept the fact that my belief is in faith. Your science precludes you having no evidence to believe you “gay gene” theory.

i.e. I can have faith because that is what I profess. You cannot have faith because your science precludes it.
commented 2017-06-15 20:12:13 -0400
Jimmy Reece said in part, The Pope is the closest person to God if he exists.

I really don’t know why you brought the Pope into the conversation if you really believe what you stated. What’s your point?
Why are you assuming God is male? There must be a reason you said this…what is it?
commented 2017-06-15 20:07:19 -0400
Drew Wakariuk,

No they don’t. I have been to Mardi Gras. There are also countless photos on Google Images of naked people at Mardi Gras. They weren’t arrested.
commented 2017-06-15 20:05:26 -0400
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

I am not assuming anything. The Pope is the closest person to God if he exists. Certainly more so than some fucking dipshit IT guy who posts on The Rebel.
commented 2017-06-15 20:03:13 -0400
Peter Netterville,

There is zero evidence of your imaginary friend, but that doesn’t stop you from talking to him.

If you logically think being gay is simply a choice, you are a moron. Even Gavin acknowledges that gay people are born that way, because wanting to have anal sex isn’t something that you can turn off and on like a radio.

Not to mention teen boys who are not attracted to girls at all, but to other boys only. Do you really think at that age that they are making a choice of who to be attracted to? It’s who they are. It’s their natural reaction like heterosexuals have.

You call gay people fags – that is hate and bigotry right there.
commented 2017-06-15 19:42:01 -0400
Why people allow their children to watch a gay pride parade is beyond me. It is never okay for young children to see adults behave that way. That, to me, is the real child abuse here. People exposing, on purpose, their butts, breasts and simulating the sex act in public is not a comfortable or appropriate family event. I am not homophobic, I just feel that there is a time and place for everything. That is X-rated to me.
commented 2017-06-15 18:05:59 -0400
Jimmy Reece sorry to tell you but if you flash your boobs or your wang at Mardi Gras , the cops do arrest you you moron. So no that did not answer my question.
commented 2017-06-15 17:59:41 -0400
Peter Netterville, so true!
commented 2017-06-15 17:29:11 -0400
Tammie said to Jimmy, “Jimmy Reece, you are assuming Peter is Catholic.”

Jimmy assumes a lot of things. Almost all of them are wrong, but that does not stop him from running with his assumptions as though they are facts. But what more can we expect from our resident socialist troll?
commented 2017-06-15 17:14:22 -0400
Jimmy Reece, you are assuming Peter is Catholic. He may not be; so, bringing the Pope into your argument is premature. There are many Catholics who disagree with the Pope on a variety of things. They can do this and still have a relationship with the Church and most importantly, Jesus.
commented 2017-06-15 17:01:30 -0400
Jimmy, there is no proof that gay people are born that way. We had this discussion before, but as usual you cannot grasp that there is no evidence of a “gay gene”. It is a fairy tale you believe in.

Bigot: a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.

Apparently according to you, being gay is not and “opinion” but genetic, so I can hardly be described as bigoted against gays.

Hateful: arousing, deserving of, or filled with hatred.

The emotion of hatred does not factor into my “disgust” of their life style, neither does my being “ill” at their sexual practices factor into hatred.

So, no Jimmy, I do not “define bigotry and hate with a simple quote”.

You might want to consider getting a dictionary and finding the correct label for my attitude towards gays. … … Oh, right. I have already done that for you, but the words I used were no insulting enough for you, so you used the inaccurate labels of “bigotry” and “hatred”.
commented 2017-06-15 16:40:01 -0400
Peter,

Yes, this isn’t bigoted or hateful on any level:

“They (gay human beings) disgust me, make me ill, and I feel sorry for them that they are so confused (born that way). But no, I do not fear FAGS at all”.

You define bigotry and hate with a simple quote.
commented 2017-06-15 16:09:26 -0400
Yep, what would we do without troll, and his unending wisdom. Always on point, never using ad hominem attacks instead of an argument. Impressive lad our troll.