March 24, 2016

“Trudeau has chosen sides. He sides with Islam”

Ezra LevantRebel Commander

Almost alone in the western world, Justin Trudeau and his Liberals are not only unconcerned about Islamic terrorism, they’re dismantling what protections Canada already has. It’s nuts.

In Europe, some people are waking up. As Daniel Pipes told us the other day, anti-Islam parties are on the rise. Meanwhile, the central issue in the U.S. Republican primaries is border control.

But Trudeau is starving our counter-terrorism agencies of funding, cutting our military and relaxing anti-terrorism laws.

(It's not just Trudeau. Liberal Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan wouldn’t even make a statement after the Brussels attack, saying he was too busy getting pizza for his kids...)

And then there’s the Muslim migrants: 50,000 a year for four years, coming from the most sexist, anti-Semitic, violent places in the world, and Trudeau doesn’t care, because he’s on their side. He told us that himself.

You can’t do this for long without a taste of Brussels coming to Canada.

Tonight, my guest Claudia Rosett, Forbes columnist and expert on the UN,  reveals just how corrupt the United Nations is.  She talks about Justin Trudeau’s intention to get Canada a seat on the UN security council, and why this process frequently involves “favours and bribes.”

Geoffrey Clarfield of the Mozuud Freedom Foundation talks to me about the ISIS rape slavery crisis. He explains that freedom is at an all time low in Muslim countries, which is one reason young men join ISIS — it offers them sexual and other outlets.

He also criticizes the Trudeau government for favouring Syrian refugees over the persecuted Yazidis; his group is lobbying to bring more of them to Canada.

These are the kinds of conversations you just won't see anywhere but at TheRebel.media.

FINALLY: I share your feedback to me, good and bad!

 

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-03-25 00:45:02 -0400
Trudeau is but the flame of the candle. The moth get instinctively attracted to the fame and get consumed much like any opposing views get ‘extinguished’.
The core feeds the flame, his advisors and ardent supporters in the party. The fuel is the wax and it represents the elected members of parliament. Choke off the fuel and the flame is extinguished.
The problem is therefore not to attack the flame but to persuade the Liberal Members of Parliament to come together and get Justin to change his path (unlikely) force a confidence vote to select a new leader or finally cross to another party thus force a reelection.
commented 2016-03-25 00:04:32 -0400
The bottom line is; If this were 1943 and Trudeau were harming his Country in the same manner as he is doing right now, he would be removed from his office and hung as a Traitor.

Having just read all the comments, even the ones from the unenlightened Left, with their Grammar Checkers I am even more certain that Liberalism and Socialism are truly Mental Disorders.
commented 2016-03-24 23:29:46 -0400
Freedom Rebel, I agree, but nothing lasts for ever. Not even countries. The country has grown and changed since 1867 but, sadly, the institutions and governmental underpinnings have not changed at the same time or at the same pace. Being inflexible they will exercise less and less relevance as time goes by, and eventually the distinct regions of the country will simply slip away into independent regional countries. There are way more than just the two solitudes in the country now, and governments of all stripes have done nothing to try to fix that — they are more concerned with staying at the trough, getting their perks, getting re-elected, and (now) setting world record for getting selfies.
Won’t happen tomorrow, maybe not in my lifetime, but it will happen. Compare Laurier’s vision that “The 20th Century belongs to Canada” with the current “Sunny ways and legalize pot” vision of the current PM, and you’ll see how far politics has slipped in 100 years.
commented 2016-03-24 23:07:50 -0400
JOHN SICILIANO – TL;DR. Get help, fool. First, get a life, though. Then get smart.
commented 2016-03-24 22:37:25 -0400
John Siciliano – I concur with some of your assumptions but your terminology abstraction what you are saying.- certainly we are a limited democracy – certainly there is a ruling class which have more weight in policy making than common electors, by way of running rigid party systems.

I have advocated for independent candidacy and houses for years – break party affiliation in politics and media and you enhance populist democracy and tap into rule by popular will.
commented 2016-03-24 22:23:28 -0400
Wow John, Ezra must have a lot of pull to be able to rig things in Toronto Centre. I believe that riding has been Liberal since 1993, held by such notables as Bill Graham, Bob Rae, Chrystia Freeland and our (now) Finance Minister. Didn’t know he was in bed with some of the most fervent Regressives known to mankind, all to prevent the spread of minor parties. Have you likewise written / complained about this treatment on the CBC or CTV boards too, or maybe whatever board serves the Liberal Party of Canada?
But I digress — my original point has been made, proven, and we’ve both had a good time freely expressing our respective opinions. I think that does make society better. Have a pleasant evening.
commented 2016-03-24 22:18:11 -0400
Mr SICILIANO….You have an exceptional vocabulary……when I was very young I was put in a special stream in the education system for kids who were as precotious as Mozart…..part of the regiemen was to add four new polysyllabic words to our vocabulary…..in the classroom I was punished if I failed to do this…..on the playground of the school that these well meaning fools chose to locate in the public housing district of Rat Harbour…..I was punished if I dared to exercise it……I learned to deal with both forms of bullying….

Sir…..IF YOU THROW AN INTERNET FIT THAT IS HISSY……IN ACADEMIC HIGH SPEACH THAT IS PRISSY……YOU’LL BE LESS THAN SPECTACULAR…….MOST PEOPLE SPEAK THE VERNACULAR…..AND YOU’LL COME ACROSS LIKE A SISSY……..:-)
commented 2016-03-24 22:17:10 -0400
You are side-tracking from the core issue which is we are not a real democracy and we have been lied to our entire lives, and what I stated before is true that people will only do what is routine to them unless they are pushed around too much for them to have to seek out new agendas. A thinking and open-minded populace is not something that the political class wants. And yes you may not believe in false flags but governments lie to sell wars and stories. How is that not what Levant does? He wants more war and expects you to take everything at face value! And yes Levant is fighting for another version of the mainstream agenda. It is secondary that he makes money, employs people and gets people to talk. Social media does that too without Rebel, CBC or the networks. What is more important is how people get their news and how substantial and independent it is, which matters more to influence change and initiate newer viewpoints and real discussions, and what matters most open-mindedness. Comments can also be posted on social media as well. That is all secondary what you are saying, Jim Webb!
commented 2016-03-24 22:11:45 -0400
A picture is said to be worth a thousand words, how much more then is a video?

http://shoebat.com/2016/01/13/canadian-pm-trudeau-prays-at-mosque-with-muslims-gives-speech-praising-islam/

Note what Tarek has to say on that:
http://scaramouchee.blogspot.ca/2013/08/tarek-fatah-has-justin-trudeau-in.html

http://www.torontosun.com/2013/08/20/trudeau-and-bcma-make-a-mockery-of-piety-and-politics?utm_source=addThis&utm_medium=addthis_button_twitter&utm_campaign=Trudeau+and+BCMA+make+a+mockery+of+piety+and+politics+%7C+Home+%7C+Toronto+Sun#.UhSYSb7I1cM.twitter

http://pointdebasculecanada.ca/justin-trudeau-keynote-speaker-for-islamic-relief-in-toronto/

“The eight categories of zakat beneficiaries listed by Islamic Relief Canada and Islamic Relief UK match those mentioned in the sharia manual Umdat al-Salik. This manual is endorsed by many leaders and organizations linked with the Muslim Brotherhood network such as the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), Tariq Ramadan and Mohammad Fadel. … A few days ago, the Swiss bank UBS closed UK-based Islamic Relief’s account and blocked its donations for fear of being involved in the financing of terrorist activities.”

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=777
“The term “Islamophobia” was invented and promoted in the early 1990s by the International Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT), a front group of the Muslim Brotherhood. Former IIIT member Abdur-Rahman Muhammad — who was with that organization when the word was formally created, and who has since rejected IIIT’s ideology — now reveals the original intent behind the concept of Islamophobia: “This loathsome term is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliche conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.” In short, in its very origins, “Islamophobia” was a term designed as a weapon to advance a totalitarian cause by stigmatizing critics and silencing them.”
commented 2016-03-24 22:07:08 -0400
Sorry John, my base point remains the same — Ezra has bugger all to do with making or shaping my opinions. WHY he has a board — well he’s a pundit, and presumably he’s making money, and he’s employing folks, and he gets people talking. Fact remains I am a conservative through no efforts of his, I find I independently come to a lot of the same conclusions he does, and it’s one of the few boards that allows comments on flashpoint stories. Your comments were not deleted or altered in any way, so you got your point across too. Excellent. All boards should be that way.
commented 2016-03-24 22:03:01 -0400
You also Jim Webb did not witness that abhorrent display by the mainstream oligarchy parties in 2013 in Toronto-Centre. They rejected the minor parties and independents from debates to the point of not allowing them in a by-election even after they collected the necessary signatures and required information. This proves my point. People should be outraged. Why are there two-tiered elections and laws in this country?!

As for your opinion whether it counts or doesn’t count, the truth is this network does not do anything to better society, bring people together or further democracy. In fact, I would say that democracy does not exist and has not existed quite frankly ever in the West. Free and fair elections can only occur with parties being very easy to create and people being able to win easily on their merits to the point of parliament having a dozen or more parties.

If that cannot occur, Canada is lying about democracy and human rights.
commented 2016-03-24 22:02:06 -0400
Sean, you wrote (and I quote);
“It shows the right to be an undereducated class of racist xenophobia”.
Do you not see how stupid your choice of grammar makes you look (?) not to mention how ‘undereducated’…pot meet kettle, please.

“If we largely ignore them, they will dissipate”
More nonsense…keep dreaming, you harpy.
commented 2016-03-24 21:55:23 -0400
No but the truth is how is a slightly more radical version of conservative thought supposed to be anti-mainstream. It is very much pro-mainstream because this network is op-ed and promoting a pro-conservative bias to the point of only wanting conservative parties to win. What Canada should have is anti-mainstream networks which are left of the NDP, nationalist, communist, right wing nationalist, left wing nationalist, anarchist and any other ideology without seat representation. Even independents deserve their own network. That would guarantee true freedom. We do not live in a free and fair system when it comes to elections. That is the point of my thesis regarding what true freedom means. Levant is merely playing the game to help out his political allies. It is a culture war game and game-playing rather than wanting a wholesome way to unite all people. Parties that are diametrically opposed only want to fight each other rather than work to help improve the nation and the West is in an era of stagnation and it is because of these self-serving and pro-war parties and very much pro-special interest parties. That should be sufficient enough to show you what I mean!
commented 2016-03-24 21:54:00 -0400
The trolls on this site are the publicans who will grow fat skimming their cut off the Dhimmi Tax. And no ….it was not Ezra Levant’s silver tongued oratry that brought me to that conclusion….I was already there long before I heard of Ezra Levant.

Mr Penson….FUCK OFF AND GET REAL….name me the name of ANY non-white nation that IS NOT…..racist and xenophobic…….I challange all of the trolls who posted on this thread…..to one year hence….produce proof of newly aquired dual citizenship with Mexico…….or Syria…….or any Islamic state……then and only then….will I….or any other critical thinker give one minutes creedence and credibility to the remarkably poorly contrived crap you have posted……who ever paid for your spin doctor expertise….the tax payer more likely than not…..just ain’t gittin thar munnies wurth…in the oppinion of this har ignurunt hillbilly…and all the other red necks on this site…..fuck off you academia fags.
commented 2016-03-24 21:49:45 -0400
Sean pinhead our favorite troll.
commented 2016-03-24 21:49:09 -0400
LOL, read my post slowly and carefully John Siciliano — what I am saying is that anyone here is free to put up whatever view they like, including yourself. I am no more led by Ezra Levant than you are by anyone who may run a lefty board wherever. What YOU are trying to say is only your opinion counts, because it is contra to Ezra’s and therefore ‘more’ valid by reason of its brave difference, whereas because I agree with Ezra based on my own read of the situation my opinion doesn’t count. Bullcrap. It’s your opinion based on your experiences, just as mine is based on my experiences. Or are you going to tell me my experiences mean squat?
Using your unique definition of true freedom John Siciliano, I guess I am experiencing it here too — because I reject your talking points after open minded review. true freedom fulfilled. So look at us — both experiencing true freedom on Ezra’s board. Thanks for making my point.
commented 2016-03-24 21:41:04 -0400
Yes it is true that Levant wants to copy Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity and Levin and wants Canada to go down that road of flat taxes, war on demand, racing to the bottom, normalized states of fear, and he feels that Canada should be completely open to the world and for Canada to have no national identity or protection of key resources.

Globalists always feel that the nation must be sold out and that we do not need no independence in any way.

Which is why the Conservative party nowadays compared with moderate PCs of the past want based on their grassroots selling of crown corporations, selling out key industries, free trade to the nth degree, pledging war on anyone and everyone, and finally probably having an elected senate and judges.

This should never happen and their agenda was thoroughly and accurately rejected by the voting public. People saw the lies of the senate, spending on MPs and the constant atmosphere that the Tories created with the public sector, scientists and media. Canada should have more independence so that the nation can determine its future. Harper and the PMO also had too much power. These are areas that supporters of the Conservative party ignore. As a minor party supporter, I have to say that they caused 60 to 70% of the electorate to be dissatisfied with the Conservative party, and this is because they had omnibus bills and they got so consumed by their power. They just had no ideas at the end.

Which is why Canada needs a serious option to challenge the three big parties, and the Greens are not serious. Canada needs a nationalist option or a centralist option between the CONs and the Libs.
commented 2016-03-24 21:35:52 -0400
Free speech has nothing to do with Levant. Levant wants op-ed networks and to be truly free a nation should have independent networks educating people on the 20 minor party options, as well as probably having propaganda arms for parties if that makes you feel better Jim Webb. The truth is I do not even really watch CBC or CTV for news. That is labeling and thinking people of a particular ideology think the same which is what right wing activists usually believe that are part of set parties, but libertarians from the Libertarian party do not think that, as well as a communist about standard liberals or social democrats.

What you are saying Jim Webb is truthfully that any ideology other than conservatism is either communist, socialist, progressive, statist, nationalist when there are at least dozens of ideologies and within them multi dozen minor types of other dozens for each type of ideology. That is the honest truth and people on here have to realize Levant never talks about political science, but this is just a network for talking points rather than enlightened talk or informing people.

True freedom means being open-minded and rejecting talking points which I try to do on here. It also means doubting the official stories by the mainstream. I want people to move away from the three big parties and seek out new options so that they can be free and more willing to want to pick new parties. The other reason for this has to do with the fact that in business you can have many businesses competing for the same product, but why on such an important matter of governance do we only have three big parties and 2 small parties. Canada has such thing as independents and 20 minor parties. People should check them out.
commented 2016-03-24 21:32:38 -0400
Cant wait to whip out my voter card, and show Trudeau how big it is.
commented 2016-03-24 21:31:59 -0400
That’s about all the bad news that I can take for one night. Thanks for saving the rest for tomorrow.
commented 2016-03-24 21:29:50 -0400
Ah Sean, what can you say about the guy. You know he’s having you all on, don’t you?
commented 2016-03-24 21:27:28 -0400
Always amazes me to see comments on here about “Levant does this” or “Levant misleads that”. I’m fairly certain that folks who comment here have already taken stock of the situation and made up their own minds based on their own experiences, they do not wait for Ezra to tell them what the approved viewpoint should be. And I guess they give their own unvarnished opinions, which makes the Regressives a bit nervous because it doesn’t fit their narrative that Levant is the source of all right wing evil… and hey, what’s with that uncensored free-speech stuff anyway, don’t they know that proper boards should censor anything resembling micro-aggression / labelling /alternate viewpoints like CBC and CTV do?
commented 2016-03-24 21:25:00 -0400
John, I agree in a lot of what you are saying……. But you can’t wake someone up by throwing cold water on them with out pissing them off.
commented 2016-03-24 21:24:26 -0400
This an invidious accusation, and is unworthy of a so-called credible journalist. Just because he doesn’t do things the way Levant wants things done, does not make him an enemy of the struggles against the IS. Accusations, like this, make moderate conservatives cringe. It shows the right to be an undereducated class of racist xenophobia. The IS wants us to fear them, to constantly talk about them, to fight them. If we largely ignore them, they will dissipate. Love and accommodation will prevail, with liberties and rights guaranteed to all
commented 2016-03-24 21:12:46 -0400
Levant is the pied piper!
commented 2016-03-24 21:11:47 -0400
It is also true that the Belgian attacks will mean a full invasion of Syria or advocacy by Western nations for that, which will mean more pre-emptive and illegal invasions of sovereignty of nations. These invasions are purely imperialist and third world hating policies, and they are neo-colonial.

Assad is the leader of Syria, and the people of Syria should be the ones to decide who they want leading them.

Rebel just talks about Islam this and Islam that when the West invaded Libya because of Gadhafi’s Gold Dinar. Iraq was invaded on oil conversion to Euros. Iran converted to another currency recently. Will Iran be invaded? People need to do their own research and not rely on people pushing and advocating for their own ideology. People need to be more open-minded and independent.

This democracy project is just that a project to remake the world in the image of the West, without other people or nations outside that scope wanting it.

This is something Levant never says. They always state what Bush said after 9/11 of you are either with us or against us – the Bush doctrine. This war or appeasement nonsense is just twisting the words around, when peace can be achieved and war is and always has been easier than peace. This is fitting and wanting talking points and fitting them in a mold to suit an agenda. Levant is a rapturist and no doubt for full scale invasion of the Middle East?!

This goes back to that foreign policy of mainstream conservatism that a strong leader is necessary or a vacuum is filled which is nonsense because nations have mouths to talk and work together. This my way or the highway approach simply has not worked until now and it is time for a channel change. Trudeau is merely a Tory-lite foreign policy choice. Liberalism is playing the middle to give the illusion of choice, when Canadians have not ever seen true non-interventionism in our history as a country. If the chicken hawks want war so much, perhaps they should fight. Canadians and Westerners are war-weary!!
commented 2016-03-24 21:08:43 -0400
Ron Christensen.
Please go back to the Peter “Man Crush” Mansbridge’s CBC, that is where all the uninformed voters go.
commented 2016-03-24 21:04:40 -0400
And what do you side with Ron. Peaceful slavery or freedom that may come at a cost. What do you strive to be a sheep or a sheep dog.
commented 2016-03-24 21:00:48 -0400
Trudeau simply panders to Islam because they are a voting block but Trudeau like the Conservatives and the NDP all want interventionism. Levant is just using Islam-bashing as a way for the Conservatives to get back into power.

Remember that is the intention of Conservative parties around the world to use fear to win elections. They do not believe in unity or ways to bring people together but to play on the worst emotions of people.

Levant simply refuses to cover Turkey and their connection with ISIS. Levant simply refuses to mention that the US has been for these wars since 2001 to protect the US dollar reserve currency and the fact that when Hussein converted oil exports in his nation from US dollars to Euros his nation of Iraq was attacked.

All of this is about economics and resources rather than ending terror and the people know it now. Levant is merely repeating the lies and is deceiving his viewers. Nationalists like myself have known this for years that war is just business and it has always been this way. When will the people on here see through the lies I doubt they ever will!

They will continue buying the lies because they have no open-mindedness or willingness to change to different parties as I have during my life. I choose the Canadian Action party. When will Canadians realize the fake left – centre – right dichotomy is just that a fake and false choice.
commented 2016-03-24 20:56:56 -0400
Ezra Levant sides with idiots.