October 06, 2017

Left-wing Hollywood mogul admits sexual harassment — but “pussy hat” feminists still hate Trump more

Ezra LevantRebel Commander

Would you agree that the biggest scandal for Trump during the campaign was when a 2005 recording of him surfaced, using a vulgar phrase.

It’s remarkable that in Trump’s entire life, there has never been a credible complaint of sexual harassment against him.

Now look at no less than the liberal New York Times

Decades of Sexual Harassment Accusations Against Harvey Weinstein

You may not know Weinstein well. But I bet you know his movies:

Shakespeare in Love. Kill Bill. Chicago. Starring beautiful young actresses, like Rose McGowan, Jennifer Lawrence and Ashley Judd.

The stories are gross, and the New York Times found dozens of them.

Today, “everyone” is saying Weinstein’s behaviour was “an open secret” all along, yet it’s just coming out?

Now compare that to the Hollywood typesincluding Ashley Judd — who marched, with pussy hats, denouncing Trump.

Weinstein hosted a fundraiser for Hillary Clinton. He made 13 visits to the Obama White House — more than most world leaders did. The Obamas sent their daughter, Malia, to intern with him.

So what will happen to him, after these damning revelations?

Oh, nothing. He’s going to take some “tutoring”.

Yeah, you’ve got to hear the official statement he and his celebrity feminist lawyer, Lisa Bloom, came up with. The same lawyer who went after Bill Cosby and Bill O’Reilly for sexual harassment. She’s on board with Weinstein.

Because they’re both Democrats. And Democrats always get a pass for sexual harassment and rape.

(Ask Monica Lewinsky. Or Mary Lou Kopechne — oh, right, she’s dead.)

Weinstein even squeezes in the recent Las Vegas shooting, and vows to shut down the National Rifle Association:

“I am going to need a place to channel that anger, so I've decided that I'm going to give the NRA my full attention.”

That’s Hollywood. And the media. And Washington.

The people who tell you how to live, and tell you you’re "deplorable."

TONIGHT'S GUESTS: Andy McCarthy of National Review comes on to help makes sense of Trump's comments on the Iranian nuclear deal; then Christine Van Geyn of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation joins me to talk about their new campaign, WynnesMovingCompany.ca.


You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-10-11 12:09:46 -0400
Typically no one seems to understand that this goes beyond sexual assault. People need to start researching what they watch. It is interesting that back in the heyday of Hollywood the FBI and CIA ran investigations in that town. Read biographies of people like Reagan and Stewart. These issues go way back. I am sorry to say this but you have a few Jewish producers/directors in Hollywood who are Marxists. To name a few you have Weinstein, Cohen Brothers and Lorne Michaels a Canadian Jew that owns Saturday Night Live. AGAIN before I get all the antisemitic accusation crap, I want to clarify that there are obviously Jews on both sides. HOWEVER those with almost supreme power are committing crimes and brainwashing people. This goes WAY back to 1848. In my opinion there are good Jews and bad Jews. The bad Jews have been REALLY bad. It is a FACT that Jewish supported terror groups going back to the murder of Czar Alexander have created a lot of the mess we live in today. It is a FACT that they brought on the Holocaust by their support for Marxism. Now you have people like Lorne Michaels of Saturday Night Live making statements regarding Weinstein and why they did not mention him on the show that it was a “New York thing.” What he should have said was it was a Bad Jew thing. Donald Trump is a New Yorker and they mock him every night!!! They only difference, he is not left and he is not a Jew. Apart from Michaels, you have the films of Weinstein and the Coen brothers. Has anyone on here actually seen Bridge of Spies and Trumbo? Ever bother to find out the truth ? These people have NEVER stopped pushing their Marxism. Both films are full of lies. For example the ENTIRE premise of the movie Bridge of Spies would never have existed if it was not for several Soviet / Communist Party of the United States spy rings run by Jews operating within the US and its Government. After stating that the Communist spy situation in the US was a lie and what did exist was overblown, they neglect to tell the audience that Gary Powers U-2 aircraft would not have been shot down without one of these Jewish led groups handing the GRU new US technology on surface to air missiles. In short, there would not have been a story or a movie. The main character in the story Rudolf Abel was a Jew and he infiltrated the US using a Canadian passport ( HINT HINT) Then there is their glorification of Hollywood writer Trumbo. Yet no mention of his support for the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact or his writing glorifying the murder of innocents by Communist aggressors. As stated by many, this is the tip of the iceberg but it not only involved sexual assault, it involves global espionage and the brainwashing of generations. Again I wonder why the Rebel seems to have no interest in these stories. I have always viewed Ezra as a GOOD Jew. What we need is a Jew to explain to the rest of us why so many Jews get off on Marxism???? I am really curious.
commented 2017-10-10 22:47:02 -0400
Seems like feminists favor rape & pedophilia over normal relationship!
The main reason Weinstein wasn’t punished earlier is because Demoncrats favor criminality! Way too much proof of that.
Time for open season on criminal Demoncrats – evil bastards & feminists! Same people are not at all concerned with FGM & honor / mass killings – these people do not deserve to exist.
commented 2017-10-09 19:45:32 -0400
Miramax, Disney & Weinstein Company should void the NDAs of all the women.
Serial sexual predators have a predictable pattern, once exposed, they admit to “lesser” offences while denying everything else. When additional evidence comes to light, and, more victims step forward; they tend to deny more vehemently through legal counsel. Any previous cooperation with authorities, as minimal as it may have been, is scrapped.

Now the celebs who were so silent for so long & politicians (Dems) who benefited from Weinstein’s donations are in damage control mode! Watch them spin some pretty award winning performances. The Twitterverse is on fire, banal virtue signaling is what will be served up.
commented 2017-10-09 18:14:17 -0400
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

I am not dismissing anything or Rose McGowan. And there are no “others” yet that have made a sexual assault claim.

Weinstein reached at least eight settlements with women who accused him of sexual harassment – not rape or sexual assault. There is a difference. Same with sexual advances or requests in exchange for career advancement.

Harvey Weinstein should totally go down for what he has done and he will, but it should be for things that he has actually done. As for now, no one is calling him a rapist yet.
commented 2017-10-09 17:52:55 -0400
Jack, keep telling yourself that. Dismiss Rose McGowan and others all you like, you defend the indefensible. That says a lot about you. Your creep factor has tripled since you decided to post on this story.

Clueless Meryl Streep was too old for Weinstein, she also jokingly referred to him as “God” in one of her acceptance speeches. Dame Judy Dench is another one with too much time on her clock for Weinstein to coerce, commit sexual misconduct, sexually harass and be referred to as her rapist.
commented 2017-10-09 17:35:37 -0400
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

Well let’s wait for the charges then. Again, jerking off in front of someone or asking them to watch you take a shower isn’t rape. My claim isn’t outrageous at all. It is a fact as we know it today.

Well I am glad you are not uptight and puritanical to the point that you would judge women that happily posed for Playboy. If you did that, I would really feel sorry for your husband/boyfriend if you have one.
commented 2017-10-09 17:21:33 -0400
Jack, Rose McGowan has publicly stated he is her rapist. He hasn’t been charged yet, but, your claim he hasn’t raped anyone is outrageous.

For those women who were of age and consenting to posing nude for Playboy, there is nothing for me to say. It was their decision. Some probably regretted it, while others did not.
commented 2017-10-09 17:02:10 -0400
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

When it comes out that Weinstein raped women – then we can have that conversation. Until then, there is a universe of difference between sexual harassment and rape.

I never said Hefner was perfect or that he hasn’t done questionable things, but he certainly isn’t some monster like you seem to want to make him out to be.

I suspect you are bothered by the countless women who did make the choice to pose nude in Playboy’s history – that you are bothered Playboy even existed.
commented 2017-10-09 16:22:57 -0400
Hugh Hefner published Marilyn’s photos in Playboy without her consent, Madonna too. They weren’t willingly posing for Playboy now were they?!! The women posed for a different photographer who later sold them to Hefner for a song. There were other former playmates who over the years have come out publicly to shed light on what happened at the mansion and Hefner’s odd demands. Jack, since you have brought up Cosby on this thread several times, I think it’s important to note he was good friends with Hugh Hefner, and ,at one time was a regular at the Playboy mansion.

Jack, you seem so sure Weinstein never raped anyone, why is this such a certainty in your mind? You are defending him when you post the above, I think it’s an odd thing to do. It’s also early days, more women will come forward.
“They shamed me while adulating my rapist,” Rose McGowan wrote. In the wake of the recent revelations about Harvey Weinstein.
commented 2017-10-09 14:36:37 -0400
Jan G,

I am not defending anyone. I am simply stating the reality of the situation and the facts. Weinstein never raped anyone. While what he DID do was horrible, let’s focus on that and not what he didn’t do. Weinstein is no Cosby.
commented 2017-10-09 14:31:57 -0400
Jan G,

Yes, because Hugh Hefner held a gun to the women’s head who posed for Playboy, which makes all the Playmate tributes to Hef when he died odd.

Are you really that puritanical, uptight and sexually repressed to the point that you are offended by women who CHOOSE to pose nude.

Are you bothered that Playboy was a coming of age thing for countless teens and overall was a respected magazine?
commented 2017-10-09 14:13:25 -0400
Robert Evans probably bought Playboy for the articles (!!!) and made sick old Heffner rich by degrading women.
Separate the art from the artist……….you must be pro-choice too?
Relativism….that is what you are talking about.
commented 2017-10-09 14:09:02 -0400
Robert Evans: You said to Tammie…."You do know the difference between rape and sexual harassment right? Weinstein never forced a woman to have sex. He didn’t throw Ashley Judd on the bed and force himself in between her legs.
Let’s at least be accurate here. "

How do YOU know what happened or what he did to Ashley Judd? The media is calling it sexual harassment, but was it more and they are euphemizing it?
Do you know what it’s like for a woman to be overpowered physically and sexually? Do you have daughters or a wife? Have you taught your daughters what to watch out for and how to protect herself? Have you taught your sons how to treat women?

Honey, you are defending a sick, perverted sexual deviant. Same as Benjamin Levin. La meme chose.
commented 2017-10-09 09:16:38 -0400
Jack, surely you understand the meaning of “unwanted sexual contact”, “coercion”, “sexual misconduct”
The media has suppressed Weinstein’s depravity for a long time; only now publishing some information. Yes, there will be additional victims.

I never said Ashley Judd was raped.

The women on list of NDAs should demand Miramax, Disney & Weinstein Company void these agreements allowing for them to come forward. Better yet, these companies should cancel NDAs and publicly do so. Weinstein Company fired him because of the publicity, not because of his actions.

Separating art from the artist…. Hitler painted and I still despise him!
commented 2017-10-09 03:38:23 -0400

I see you can’t make a point in one post.

What is the hypocrisy exactly? I can separate the art from the artist – can’t you? I don’t have to like someone personally, but I can still like their movies, music, whatever.

Again, not every issue is connected to Sharia and Islam. You seem to really be living in fear and are consumed by it to the point that you can’t stop talking about it, even when it’s completely irrelevant to the discussion that is going on.

Talk about Sharia and Islam – when people are actually talking about Sharia and Islam. Not when they are talking about Harvey Weinstein and Hollywood culture. Could you not figure this out yourself?
commented 2017-10-09 03:02:37 -0400
Robert Evans if they actually care about women then they should act like it, selective outrage is hypocrisy. PURE AND SIMPLE!
commented 2017-10-09 03:01:42 -0400
Robert Evans so what if she doesn’t , the point is the hypocrisy of the left and Hollywood. They are filthy hypocrites. And they want no borders which brings in Sharia and Islamic terror. They are left wing filth.
commented 2017-10-09 02:49:22 -0400
Drew Wakariuk,

Are you not capable of making your point in ONE post and comprehend what you read?

I never said Polanski wasn’t rape. I simply stated that she doesn’t want him prosecuted.

What the fuck does Sharia and Islam have to do with Harvey Weinstein and the casting couch in Hollywood? Not everything is about Muslims and terrorists.
commented 2017-10-09 01:19:21 -0400
Robert Evans when these so called Feminists start protesting sharia and Islam i will take them seriously.
commented 2017-10-09 01:18:39 -0400
Robert Evans you are the one making false equivalencies, Trump never harassed anyone , Weinstien did. And Hollywood are filthy hypocrites. And Hillary destroyed a woman her husband raped, and Hollywood loves her. Not much more to the story. `
commented 2017-10-09 01:16:24 -0400
Robert Evans he fed her drugs and asked to have sex, she said no, he did it anyway. THAT IS CALLED RAPE, NO MATTER WHAT SOME WEBSITE SAYS. I am smarter than you will ever be.
commented 2017-10-09 01:12:57 -0400
Drew Wakariuk,

Huge check? You don’t even know what you are talking about. Please research the Polanski case and her comments and then you can hopefully talk intelligently about it.
commented 2017-10-09 01:11:07 -0400
Drew Wakariuk,

I am not defending anyone. Do you know what separating the art from the artist means or do you need me to draw you a map.
commented 2017-10-09 01:09:55 -0400
Robert go support Justin once again funding terror after Harper cut them off.
commented 2017-10-09 01:08:39 -0400
Who cares if she got huge check to say he shouldn’t be prosecuted? Are you so pathetic you think that should matter?
commented 2017-10-09 01:07:35 -0400
Robert Evans now show me all the liberal outrage over Ben Levin in the liberal media. LMAO! Trumps locker room talk was all over the liberal media while a liberal politician who hangs with Wynne and Justin is found out to possess and PRODUCE CHILD PORN is largely ignored. Such amazing journalism. LMAO!
commented 2017-10-09 01:03:25 -0400
Robert Evans he was talking, please show me when he actually did so. Now keep trying. And keep defending losers who defend pedophiles. And they kiss Polanskis ass.
commented 2017-10-09 00:49:24 -0400
Robert Evans let me know when they crap all over Polanski, he anally raped a 13 year old girl. And Hollywood still loves him. I await your sad excuse for that.