July 08, 2016

FBI tells woman on Islamic State kill list to “ARM UP”

Victor LaszloRebel Commentator

I have heard it said many times that if you take away all my freedoms and just leave me freedom of speech, I will win back all my other freedoms. 

However, the truth is that without the right to bear arms, our freedom of speech only exists at the whim of the powerful. Leave me the right to bear arms and with that, I shall win back all the others.

Let's compare that to what happened to Australian reporter Andrew Bolt.

He's is a fairly typical media person from a previous, freer eara, but today is thought of as a highly controversial Islamophobe because he is one of the few journalists reporting factually on Islam and its effects on Australian society and culture.

Because of his criticism of the Islamic State, he and his family had to move to a secret location.

This also happens in the USA despite Americans' right to own guns.

Think of Molly Norris and US author Ed Cline, who The Rebel interviewed last month about his visit from the FBI.

Would you want to be warned and have the ability to fight back, or be forced into hiding with no protection?

Look at the Canadian Human Rights commissions, UN resolution 16/18, Quebec's attempted blasphemy laws in the form of Bill 59, and other manifestations of controlled thought and speech around the world.

These laws and pseudo-legal bodies stifle criticism of religion — selectively, of course, so that prohibition only applies to Islam.

However, criticizing Islam is not just a right to a free people. It is a responsibility.

To maintain our free society, we must retain the right to criticize all authority, be it religious or secular.

In nations which either criminalize criticism, especially of a violent, totalitarian, supremacist one like Islam, or forbid citizens from protecting themselves -- especially nations which bring in thousands of un-vetted agents of Islam at the same time — the future is clear.

It is a totalitarian future, and probably an Islamic one.



You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-07-10 00:08:57 -0400
Thanks, Dan. More lefty red herring nonsense. How would breaking this down by the government endanger anyone? We aren’t asking for names only how many have been issued in which categories. Are you smelling a dead rat?

Now that the RCMP are allowed to be political while in office I can’t say I trust them anymore:


Ironic given recent events in the US. Our cops are involved politically. Kind of like the gestapo. No arm’s length anymore.
commented 2016-07-09 12:41:57 -0400
AL PETERSON commented 4 hours ago
“…Dan, how many ATCs do you think have been issued in Canuckistan…The reality is that we are ruled by emotion not facts…”

“…We don’t know how many of these applications were approved because the RCMP won’t tell us.
We also don’t know how many were for concealed-carry permits for people facing “criminal threats” and how many are for openly carrying handguns in wilderness areas to defend against wildlife. RCMP Staff. Sgt. Julie Gagnon refused to break out the two categories.
The RCMP’s access-to-information office also refused to make that distinction, citing a section of the federal Access to Information Act exempting “information the disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to threaten the safety of individuals…”

Those emotions some are ruled by – the left – were inculcated through indoctrination and social engineering, since early school and every exposure to The MSM since.
I had to look up the difference between alogical – opposed to or lacking in logic – and illogical – lacking sense or clear, sound reasoning. I take Lewis’ meaning and see the system we’ve had forced on us by Pierre Trudeau – socialism – as actively working against logic…and reason and common sense and moral absolutes…not to mention our sovereignty, and has pretty much dispensed with any facts that are contrary to their lefty/progressive narrative! This is what makes liberalism a mental disorder…and puts citizens directly at risk who have not only been prevented from defending themselves, family and property, from threats the state and/or police cannot protect you from, but will also put you in jail for defending yourself!
Talk about being pushed into a corner…
commented 2016-07-09 08:33:47 -0400
How much threat would there be to her life if there were no muslims allowed in the country in the first place.? The implications seem obvious: STOP ALL MUSLIM IMMIGRATION.
commented 2016-07-09 08:29:50 -0400
Dan, how many ATCs do you think have been issued in Canuckistan? I’ll wager there aren’t 20 in the entire country but I’ll willingly be proven wrong. Across the Manitoba border in North Dakota there are 40,000 and in in Minnesota 600,000. Both have murder rates far below Manitoba’s. Less than half. The reality is that we are ruled by emotion not facts.

“No emotion is, in itself, a judgement; in that sense all emotions and sentiments are alogical. but they can be reasonable or unreasonable as they conform to Reason or fail to conform. The heart never takes the place of the head: but it can, and should, obey it.”
― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man
commented 2016-07-08 20:37:38 -0400
We don’t have a 2nd Amendment in Canada, but we do have an Authorization To Carry (ATC).
I wonder if those Canadians on the Islamic Hit List were informed by the state of it, and if any of them that applied for an Authorization To Carry, were granted one…because the rule has been the provincial CFO who has to sign off on them…doesn’t.
See Regs:
Or from a MSM source:
commented 2016-07-08 18:41:24 -0400
Only one answer. Deport all and I repeat all, Muslims. They are still living in the 7th Century, and are incompatible with civilization.
commented 2016-07-08 16:24:51 -0400
Since 9/11 IN THE NAME OF ISLAM: 31,298 Attacks, 198,569 Killed, 278,739 Injured.
commented 2016-07-08 15:57:41 -0400
the same fucking FBI clowns that didn’t recommend charges against Hillary Clinton?
fuck anything they ever have to say again. the FBI provides children to bill Clinton and mohammed’s friends.
commented 2016-07-08 14:44:29 -0400
If your an American the f b I will probably warn you , but if you’re Canadian your on your own , probably no warning, it would go against their " new style "