June 02, 2017

Globalist scolds react as Trump puts America first over Paris climate deal

Brian LilleyArchive

Donald Trump put the interests of average Americans above the globalist Paris climate pact when he announced the United States will withdraw.

I explain Trump's rationale and the reaction from elsewhere in the world which ranges from vulgar to lecturing.

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-06-04 17:42:47 -0400
Again..To all anti American Canadians..go to Breitbart to get some more info about yourselves..and who is more anti Canadian than trudeau?
commented 2017-06-04 17:11:04 -0400
It was good to see our Climate Barbie whining to the news media that President Trump didn’t listen to her sage advice… But his senior staff evidently did listen back in February (?) when our Dr. Tim Ball spent several hours at the White House talking to senior staff members… Oh Boo-Hoo Barbie, say it isn’t so!…
commented 2017-06-04 15:44:06 -0400
Critical thinking: I’ve yet to see a troll explain why jetting all the fancy people to a foreign tourist destination to be ferried around in luxury cars and staying at high end Hotels paid for by taxpayers is even helping “Climate Change”. The technology currently exists that these meetings could be conducted electronically, thereby not contributing to pollution by jet fuels etc if these people really believed the crap they are spewing. It is really just an excuse for all the fancy people to party at taxpayer expense!
commented 2017-06-03 16:49:14 -0400
Bill Elders…Same here..Mr.President Trump is the fresh breath of positive air we need in North America…especially because of who is representing Canada at this moment(does trudeau represent Canadians?). You anti American Canadians should take an extra look into the history books of trudeau and his regime. Why do you think trudeau is trying to erase all of former Prime Minister Harper’s document’s?
commented 2017-06-03 12:25:04 -0400
Peter… I think he participates in “creative disinformation”
commented 2017-06-03 10:01:43 -0400
@ Leviticus – Re: your comment to Jimmy.

From what I can see, Jimmy is not capable of original thought. I think he, like most of the dullard socialist nimrods he would consider his friends, just parrots what he sees from other websites. From what I have observed, Jimmy does no critical thinking.
commented 2017-06-03 09:14:55 -0400
JIMMY REECE commented 17 hours ago
It is pretty pathetic that The US will join Syria and Nicaragua as the only nations that aren’t part of the Paris agreement.
Do you make this shit up as you go…???
commented 2017-06-03 02:39:01 -0400
I am so grateful for Trump.
commented 2017-06-02 23:24:59 -0400
Duuh… And needless to say, it is not going to be China or India, the major polluters…
commented 2017-06-02 23:23:50 -0400
Carole Masse… “hysteria” indeed… But the real reason is the dawning of the realization that now that the United States is no long willing to be the fool and major contributor to this “theatre of the absurd”, WHO is going to pick up the tab for those annual overseas junkets, parties, canapes and wine??… Macron?… Merkel?… Trudeau?… The UN?… WHO!?!?.. Hence the real reason for the “hysteria” you noted…
commented 2017-06-02 22:27:30 -0400
Watch as a pro-climate-deal mayor crashes, burns on the Tucker Carlson show,. The mayor can’t contend with logic and common sense, just spins out his mantra:
The leftist supporters rolled out a whole host of terrifying consequences of America pulling out of this accord. CNN hysterically warned of mass extinctions and flooding on the street of New York City! I didn’t know that CO2 emissions caused asthma, a claim made by John Kerry that American kids will have worse asthma in the summer, one of the terrifying consequences of scuttling the Paris accord. Get a grip!
In his opening monologue, Carlson, points out:
“We are no longer talking about science here, but a priesthood defending its faith.
Skepticism, the essence of science, is not allowed…Questions equal apostasy; shut up and believe.”
Reminds me of a similar observation by Dr. Ivar Giaever, a Nobel Prize-winner for physics in 1973. Noting the halt in global temperatures, over the past 18+ years despite rising CO2 emissions, he questioned the basis for rising carbon dioxide fears, logically concluding, “When you have a theory and the theory does not agree with the experiment then you have to cut out the theory” and, as a result, “Global warming really has become a new religion. Because you cannot discuss it. It’s not proper”.
commented 2017-06-02 22:01:53 -0400
Jimmy Reece said, “Yes, the Care all wrong.”

Another fabrication from the “too-stupid-to-think-for-themselves” AGW religious crowd.

If you traced the flow of money from multiple hundreds of billions dumped by politicians into this AGW scam, I can guarantee that most of those “vast amount of scientists worldwide” are receiving some of that money.

So of course those same scientists are going to say that AGW is real because to say otherwise would mean their cash flow would dry up.

It is too bad you cannot grasp that, Jimmy.

I trust in the science based upon the raw data obtained from the weather monitoring systems used by the IPCC.

That data indicates that even though the level of CO2 has steadily been increasing for the last 19 years, the global mean temperature of the planet has not. This data indicates that the increase of CO2 does not cause the increase temperature.

But facts and empirical data do not factor into the AGW religious cult.
commented 2017-06-02 21:39:59 -0400
BILLY HOWARD commented 3 hours ago
For the sake of argument, let’s just say man-made climate change is a problem…
Solution: tax the polluters not the citizens.
That won’t work Billy because the expense just gets pushed down hill to the bottom end user and that is the working class if they still have any money left to spend.
commented 2017-06-02 19:38:19 -0400
Macron, please go back under your rock you little piece of merde.
commented 2017-06-02 19:20:49 -0400
I am so proud of this man!!! Standing tall against transnational corporatists, the money interests, the treasonous deep state, fake media and fake science – I can just hear the heads exploding at Bilderberg.

America goes back to the petro dollar and with clean coal coming on line to provide cheap energy, and limiting cheap 3rd world labor , will be an economic powerhouse. Feminist Truedough will look like an economic wank job with a stalled/nose-diving economy after killing the Canadian energy advantage over the US – watch the trade surplus rise and the GDP tank. See ya at the polls selflie boys.
commented 2017-06-02 18:44:36 -0400
Funny to see the hysteria of all those who would have pocketed the money stolen from the taxpayers. The Paris agreement was the biggest theft of all times, to redistribute the wealth, jobs, industries, of the West to the globalists and the biggest polluters. We better keep our industries in our country where they have to comply to environmental stantards than transfer them to the developing world where no regulation exists.
commented 2017-06-02 18:36:12 -0400
For the sake of argument, let’s just say man-made climate change is a problem…
Solution: tax the polluters not the citizens
Tax/tariff the goods made in countries like China from factories powered by low-tech carbon dust spewing power plants.
Tax/tariff the goods made in Indonesia based on their annual deforestation by fire that’s choking the earth.
Heavily fine the worn-out trucks that some companies still use that spew out that cancerous heavy smog.
Increase taxes on non-essential gas-guzzlers (like Ferraris, but not pick-up trucks)
Increase fines on dumping and littering.
Tax-free electric cars/bikes
Tax-free electricity from renewable sources, such as hydro dams
Tax-free solar panels

Carbon taxes are nothing but a scam, and any half-wit knows that.
commented 2017-06-02 18:21:56 -0400
LAURA LACEY Nah you’re wrong and Dr. Patrick Moore does not know of what he speaks. I can prove it, just scroll down about six comments and you will see that the great Jimmy Reece has declared that the ’ Yes, the vast amount of scientists worldwide are all wrong.’
I mean who are you going to believe the scientists or the great Jimmy the idiot Reece?
commented 2017-06-02 18:09:31 -0400
Jimmy Reece, why, after researching and generating the climate report for the IPCC, and viewing what the UN did to modify the results in the executive summary delivered to the press, why did these very scientists have to threaten to sue the UN if their names were not removed from the report and summary, which the UN did oblige? Why would they have to threaten to sue? Because the UN changed the findings of these scientists to suit their agenda.
Why did the former chair of the IPCC, after retiring from that position, team up with Lord Monckton to, via the world court in the Hague, go after anyone globaln who financially benefits from the global warming scam and have them charged in the world court? Now why would he do that?
You are a fool. The climate is always changing, has for eternity, and is directly correlated to the suns activity. That big ball of fire 93 million miles away does not accept credit card or cash to change it’s activities that are responsible for the climate change here.
Will you also cap all volcanoes since just one eruption would wipe out any emissions controls efforts of 30 years? Will you stop all forest fires like the one that hit Fort McMurray which had the same effect?
Please answer these directly or go away. You sound like Gordo Steele.
commented 2017-06-02 18:08:21 -0400
So many upset globalist pigs will not get their hands on the money the US was supposed to hand out. LMAO!
commented 2017-06-02 18:07:38 -0400
People like Jimmy are welcome to put their money where their mouths are , but for some reason they do not. Jimmy you are free to go without fossil fuels and that means you cannot burn wood as it emits even more carbon.
commented 2017-06-02 18:06:05 -0400
Jimmy Reece what happened to that ice age they were all so sure of before?
commented 2017-06-02 18:05:40 -0400
jimmy Reece India and China do not have to do anything and the US would have to send out tons of money.And that 97% of scientists is BS.
commented 2017-06-02 17:54:33 -0400
My argument is this: Even if (and that’s a giant if) climate change is being accelerated by human activity (because the climate changes, sometimes quite rapidly and naturally anyways), the “solution” proposed is complete and utter B.S. It is a proven FAILURE throughout Europe. It IS a scheme to skim and transfer money. That’s it. To oh so green France and their elites: If Climate change is such a true threat why in the hell did you launch the Harmony of the Seas last year, the worlds largest cruise ship at a fit and trim 120,000 tons (as a comparison, the USS Ronald Reagan a Supercarrier, is 103,000 tons for Gods sake)? A floating city of 7500 people pumping their garbage directly into the Ocean, and just what was the offset for what must be an astronomical amount of Co2 to build such a monstrosity, much to operate it (that is purely for the world’s elites to play on, complete with an ice rink. Seriously, an ice rink.) But Hey, make sure you put another sweater on next winter Canada and don’t mind the job losses, we wise, green, elites will be drinking Mai Tai’s while trying to run over dolphins.
commented 2017-06-02 17:44:08 -0400
Jimmy 97% of scientists would lose their funding and thus their jobs if they didn’t agree. I’ll ask again, please give us your opinion of Trudeau’s new socks.
commented 2017-06-02 17:40:53 -0400
Ahh Macron!… You’re such a noble little prig… I’m sure Leonardo and Barbara and Meryl are packing their bags right now to take you up on your offer…
commented 2017-06-02 17:34:24 -0400
Chemical reaction for Photosynthesis:
6CO2 + 6H2O + Light Energy = (renders) C6H12O6 (complex energy) + 6O2

This is grade five science. Climate Barbie needs to learn about the Carbon Cycle. Her body needs the energy and oxygen rendered from CO2 during Photosynthesis. There is no significant scientific correlation between CO2 and global temperature.

Every living thing on earth is dependent on CO2. Ecologist Dr. Patrick Moore explains it well: (26 minutes) https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4bJjBo5ICMc
commented 2017-06-02 17:09:26 -0400
Peter Netterville,

Yes, the vast amount of scientists worldwide are all wrong.