September 14, 2017

OK Cupid partners with Planned Parenthood to help pro-abortion singles avoid pro-life users

StaffRebel Columnist

Ultra left-wing dating service OK Cupid has formed an alliance with Planned Parenthood to make it easier for pro-abortion users to avoid pro-life individuals.

On Twitter, OK Cupid posted an image that read, “I would never date someone who doesn’t support Planned Parenthood. (OkCupid makes it easy to find them.)”

According to Breitbart, the platform will attempt to filter out users by making their views Planned Parenthood public on their profile pictures.

The report claims, “The badge will read ‘#IStandWithPP’ and will be prominently displayed on the profile of every OkCupid member who has publicly responded ‘no’ to the question ‘Should the government defund Planned Parenthood?'”

OkCupid’s CMO Melissa Hobley issued a statement saying the company was “really exciting because it enables us to help people connect on the issues that matter to them.”

“In this current climate, this matters more than ever when it comes to finding ‘your person,” she added. “We know that Planned Parenthood is driving conversations, support and education that millions care about. When we looked at the data, we saw that our community on OkCupid was talking about Planned Parenthood…so we decided to make it easy to find the folks who cared about the same thing.”

Meanwhile, Dawn Laguens, Executive Vice President of Planned Parenthood claimed in a statement, “Knowing your prospective date supports equal rights, access to reproductive health care and the best, evidence-based sex education is undeniably sexy, and OkCupid’s new Planned Parenthood badge will let users see that immediately.”

Well, at least now pro-life users will have an idea on who to avoid.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-09-18 12:28:07 -0400
Interesting.
This whole ‘debate’ about so-called women’s rights vs murdering human babies in the womb – over Five Million babies murdered in the womb in Canada to date – is very indicative of the lefty/progressive mindset, and how it manifests as unstable.
When the left isn’t calling you a racist or bigot or some kind of ‘phobe or ’ist, or bashing you with one of their DOWN WITH FREE SPEECH signs at one of their riots, one or two of them may take a stab at debating you…LOL…but as always happens, they either throw junk-science and disproven theories or inappropriate or outright delusional statements from one of their authority figures at you – as in lecturing you – or twist the truth so much it becomes unrecognizable, or just make stuff up to fit their indoctrinated narrative, and after they have tried to assassinate your character and shut you down with demonizing labels and chauvinism, they take their ball and run off home, pouting…when they realize they can’t bully you into accepting their unstable New-Think, or they realize you won’t be trapped into allowing them to frame the question, or as they see it – realize they’re not ‘winning’ the ‘debate’!
Why should we try to debate these shit-disturbers, obfuscators, liars, creepy little retards, paid, or un paid trolls, or delusional basement dwellers? They have nothing to offer but BS, so F**k ’em!

WHAT ABOUT THE RIGHT TO LIFE OF THE HUMAN BABY IN IT’S MOTHER’S WOMB!?
commented 2017-09-16 02:48:34 -0400
Andrew if women do not want a baby then use protection or abstain. Why is there no responsibility on their part?
commented 2017-09-16 02:47:20 -0400
James Van Halen quit acting like women get them due to being victims , that is pathetic.
commented 2017-09-16 02:46:17 -0400
James Van Halen if a woman goes to some hack that is her own stupidity , no one forced her to spread her legs. People go get plastic surgery in Mexico and it goes bad, does not mean others should have to foot the bill for their life choices. And what regulations? The left had a cow when there were supposed to be some. IN CANADA THERE ARE NO LIMITS.
commented 2017-09-16 02:44:04 -0400
Andrew why are men FORCED to support a baby even if they want no part of the kid? Oh right, it is fine to force your crap on people.
commented 2017-09-16 02:43:20 -0400
James if it was about choice it would include the father or allow him to opt out if the mother goes through with the birth. Pro choice is a lie.
commented 2017-09-16 02:42:30 -0400
Andrew we are paying for this crap, IT IS BEING FORCED ON US!
commented 2017-09-16 00:18:40 -0400
Jack, go back to your last post. You sound like a man who has experienced loss, and, is not allowing himself to grieve that loss.
Your living grandchild is a blessing, always remember that. In times of reflection, also remember your other grandchild with love.
commented 2017-09-16 00:16:42 -0400
JAMES VAN HALEN commented 1 hour ago
Jan G

Are you clueless? Abortions will never stop.
________________________________________________________________________________

Neither will murder and child abuse but we still have laws against them.
commented 2017-09-16 00:09:53 -0400
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

Good, I am glad that you are not so crazy that you think every ejaculation HAS to be used to create a life and if woman swallows, that is the waste of a life.

One of my own that doesn’t actually exist.

When my daughter decides to have a baby in your little scenario after having an abortion previously – I won’t love my grandchild any less and wish it was the aborted fetus instead or even think about the abortion. This child who was born is my grandchild.
commented 2017-09-15 23:56:13 -0400
Jack, blow your wad wherever you like (as long as there is a consenting adult), ejaculating into a Kleenex is your business!

You can’t bear to think about one of your own being terminated; that’s indicative of something larger, I wish you well in figuring out what that is.
commented 2017-09-15 23:50:27 -0400
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt

It’s not my decision and they wouldn’t exist anyway, so your question is ridiculous.

If my parents chose to have an abortion – that’s fine. I wouldn’t know about it, because I wouldn’t exist.

It’s not like aborted fetuses hang out at a night club talking about when they were aborted.

Do you think when sperm is shot into a condom – that is the waste of a potential life or when a man masturbates into a kleenex?
commented 2017-09-15 23:37:12 -0400
Jack, how you preach! So, if your child; grand-child; or great grand-child was deemed for the “little scrape” how would you react?!! Remember, your objections don’t count!

Pretending to know how misguided women look at abortion is quite lofty of you!
commented 2017-09-15 23:21:12 -0400
Jan G

Are you clueless? Abortions will never stop. So would you prefer back alley abortions with coat hangers or some regulation with professional doctors involved?

Until you walk in their shoes – you are in no position to comment on why they had chosen to have an abortion.
commented 2017-09-15 23:11:35 -0400
Peter Netterville,

You can do all the challenging you want, but the abortion debate has been settled and pro-choice will NEVER become a thing of the past.

Life doesn’t start at 24 weeks in the US – that is only the indicated period where you can’t have an abortion – they still have to be born to become actual people with all rights and privileges as everyone else who has been born.

I am not adverse to any changes or limits regarding Canadian laws – just as long as the choice is still there.

You seriously think the government should have control of a woman’s uterus, especially considering the conservative position of small government and stay out of my business life and personal/private life? Should women be forced to have babies against their will? Make up your mind regarding government interference.

No contradiction at all – I was referring to normal conservatives that don’t post on The Rebel. In the bubble here, it’s extreme conservatives pointing fingers at liberals and not acknowledging that the right has pro-choice supporters as well.
commented 2017-09-15 22:54:21 -0400
I wonder how much $$$$ Planned Parenthood gave OK Cupid?
commented 2017-09-15 22:53:31 -0400
Anyone still supporting abortion is doing it for their own selfish reasons, eg to avoid responsibility, commitment, or because (and this is usually the case) they have had an abortion or they got someone pregnant and ran.
commented 2017-09-15 21:54:59 -0400
How is this picture:
https://d.ibtimes.co.uk/en/full/1420706/auschwitz.jpg?w=1180

Different than this picture? :
http://www.abort73.com/images/abortion/abortion-24-01.jpg

Or this picture?:

https://ca.images.search.yahoo.com/images/view;ylt=A2KLktkxhLxZpzQAaj4.7olQ;ylu=X3oDMTI0NHRibG0zBHNlYwNzcgRzbGsDaW1nBG9pZAMwYjk1OWY4OWUzODExMTk4ZmU1NDRhMTE0YzM4NzZiMQRncG9zAzIxMgRpdANiaW5n?.origin=&back=https%3A%2F%2Fca.images.search.yahoo.com%2Fyhs%2Fsearch%3Fp%3DSlavery%26fr%3Dyhs-rotz-001%26hsimp%3Dyhs-001%26hspart%3Drotz%26nost%3D1%26tab%3Dorganic%26ri%3D212&w=728&h=425&imgurl=www.worldatlas.com%2Fr%2Fw728-h425-c728x425%2Fupload%2Fd3%2F19%2F74%2Fgordon-s-scourged-back.jpg&rurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.worldatlas.com%2Farticles%2Fwhere-did-slavery-first-develop.html&size=45.6KB&name=Where+Did+%3Cb%3ESlavery%3C%2Fb%3E+First+Develop%3F+-WorldAtlas.com&p=Slavery&oid=0b959f89e3811198fe544a114c3876b1&fr2=&fr=yhs-rotz-001&tt=WhereDid+%3Cb%3ESlavery%3C%2Fb%3E+First+Develop%3F+-+WorldAtlas.com&b=181&ni=128&no=212&ts=&tab=organic&sigr=127dl3acc&sigb=13reosnup&sigi=12ihov5f7&sigt=11o7ds7aq&sign=11o7ds7aq&.crumb=vditcZvawkN&fr=yhs-rotz-001&hsimp=yhs-001&hspart=rotz

Nothing really. All are arbitrary decisions about personhood as administered by the machinations of the leftist state. Because its 2017 changes nothing.

“The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?”
Jeremiah 17:9
commented 2017-09-15 21:52:56 -0400
James said, “It’s not a cop-out at all. It’s the reality we live in even if you don’t like it. A person is only a person with those rights and privileges WHEN THEY ARE BORN.”

James, since you place such absolute authority on the law’s definition of when life starts, would you then support the law if it was amended to declare that life starts at 24 weeks like it is in the US and around the world?

OR do you only support the law as it is now because it supports your position of life at birth?
commented 2017-09-15 21:49:22 -0400
Al Peterson, the reality of abortion is carefully tucked away by pro-choice supporters who often don’t know what exactly they are supporting. When they are presented with facts, it seems to get their hackles up.
Great post Al!
commented 2017-09-15 21:43:58 -0400
Andrew said, “The government cannot tell you what you can or can’t do with your uterus.”

Why not?
commented 2017-09-15 21:42:03 -0400
JAMES VAN HALEN commented 1 hour ago
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

It’s not a cop-out at all. It’s the reality we live in even if you don’t like it. A person is only a person with those rights and privileges WHEN THEY ARE BORN.
________________________________________________________________________________

And that “reality” is completely arbitrary. No question of the baby being human only a question of being bestowed with the legal subterfuge of “personhood”. Blacks used to be considered non-persons as did Jews in Germany by the same means. Only a lefty could be so desperate so as to define people in and out of existence by judiciary fiat. Usually by a left leaning judge.

As I pointed out earlier lefties like to salve their consciences by mental gymnastics and rephrasing “reality”. The reality is that a completely independent human being with a separate DNA from the mother is being torn limb from limb. No matter how you twist the wording and try to put it into clinical and sanitary terms it is murder.

JAMES VAN HALEN
The woman supersedes the glob inside of her…
________________________________________________________________________________
Here is that glob you speak so derisively about:
http://www.abort73.com/abortion/abortion_pictures/#

Now tell me that is not a human. I’m sure you can use some twisted logic to make the attempt.
commented 2017-09-15 21:38:31 -0400
Andrew said, "Yet none of you seem able to address them. "

Who is “them” in this context?
commented 2017-09-15 21:34:35 -0400
James Van Halen said to Terry MacLeod, “All I ever see here are conservatives pointing fingers at liberals only when it comes to being pro-choice and how “sick” they are.”

Yet earlier James said to me, “… there are pro-choice people on the right, hence it’s not a “left” issue at all, …”

A bit of contradiction there, James?
commented 2017-09-15 21:34:04 -0400
Yet none of you seem able to address them.

I wonder why that might be.
commented 2017-09-15 21:31:39 -0400
James Van Halen said, "A fetus doesn’t officially become a life until it is born by society and legal standards. "

Do you consider those who make the laws in our country to be omniscient, or could there possibly be a law that rightfully should be challenged?
commented 2017-09-15 21:25:03 -0400
James said, " … there are pro-choice people on the right, hence it’s not a “left” issue at all, but you want to try to make the case for lefties wanting to “murder babies” without pointing the fingers are conservatives that want the same thing as well using your words. "

James, I do wish you could read.

The only sentence I wrote that tied pro-abortion to the Left is:
“Very cruel and inhumane … and oddly supported in the highest percentage by the self-proclaimed humanitarians, the political left.”

Now if you can read, you will notice that I said “highest percentage”. Reread what I wrote and you will see that I was not leaving out Conservatives who are pro-choice, but specifically saying the highest percentage of pro-choice are left leaning.

Jame, please do try to read my comment as I have written it.
commented 2017-09-15 21:14:47 -0400
Mike Krchnak, yes indeed, Andrew’s posts are exactly like Chinese Water Torture…drip, drip, drip
commented 2017-09-15 20:54:40 -0400
Tammie…I was doing just that with the all knowing Andy’s posts. So I chuckled when I read yours. The all knowing Andy rhetoric gets tiring quickly, like the sound of a dripping faucet. Drip?……I just unintentionally defined all knowing Andy….hhmmm.