February 28, 2018

High profile critic of BC’s “sex activist” agenda speaks out (Guest: Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson)

Sheila Gunn ReidRebel Host | The Gunn Show

 

Comprehensive sex-ed programs across the country have one recurring theme: Intrusiveness by the state into the sanctity of the family.

Parents often feel left out of the formal sex-ed discussion altogether. They feel the government is imposing the state’s values, with the state’s timeline, onto other people’s kids without the parent’s consent or consultation.

But a rising tide of people are fighting back.

Donna Trimble of Parents for Choice in Education in Alberta, Tanya Granic-Allen of Parents as First Educators in Ontario and Chilliwack school board trustee Barry Neufeld are the new public faces in the fight for parents rights in Canada.

These folks aren’t scared of being called a bigot by politicians and activists just because they oppose the introduction of gender theory to younger and younger children.

And more people from some high profile places, are stepping forward to oppose comprehensive sex-ed.

My guest tonight is an author and Christian broadcaster living in British Columbia. Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson is the host of the 700 Club and Laura-Lynn and Friends. She is one of the most vocal and visible opponents of BC’s new SOGI 123 sex-ed curriculum.

Tonight she explains her opposition to what she calls the “sex activist” agenda in BC and now she joins the list of people whose careers are under attack because they spoke up.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2018-03-01 16:40:09 -0500
@Tammie, you are referencing Ontario curriculum. They have weaved it through all the subjects, and even though Wynne said a opt-out could happen in the beginning, they recanted later on. In Ontario, they refuse to allow someone to opt out their children, and this is a major reason I pulled my children from the public system. It is only a matter off time before they remove the ability to opt-out in every province.
commented 2018-03-01 16:25:05 -0500
Excellent interview with Laura-Lynn. Her energy and dedication is remarkable.

The radical militants pushing gender fluid ideology into the school curriculum are also using early sexualization of children strategies in order to create confusion and undermine the family unit. Marxists use early indoctrination by the state; parents do not have to tolerate this.

Keep your children at home for the first 22 days in September, this will massively disrupt their planning and budget.

I am re-posting a suggestion I made on Jan. 31/18
TAMMIE PUTINSKI-ZANDBELT commented 2018-02-01 16:20:47 -0500
Liza, you’re right. Parents can have an impact if they move forward as a unified group.

In the meantime, they can speak to teachers directly and insist their child be “opted out” and make arrangements with the school library for their child to work on other subjects or read independently. If the teacher is reluctant to handle it in this manner, go directly to the school principal. If the principal also proves useless…advise the Parent Council you will be elevating this matter to the Superintendent of Schools and Board Trustees. Don’t hesitate to clearly state your intentions at every stage. Also, it wouldn’t hurt to go public if all you encounter from the School Board is resistance.

I would also suggest parents download and print the curriculum and read it carefully. Next, highlight areas which are problematic for you. This is in preparation of opting your children out so you can give concrete examples to support your position. You may also be questioned by the teacher, principal, Superintendent of Schools or Board of Trustees.

Grade 1 – 8
http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/elementary/health1to8.pdf
Grade 9 – 12
http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/health9to12.pdf
commented 2018-03-01 14:09:52 -0500
It is confirmed in the posts they make on The Rebel. When one makes racist, bigoted, hateful and homophobic comments – what do you think it means? When someone calls gay people faggots and sodomites, make mocking comments about glory holes – does that sound like a person who supports gay people as a compassionate human being?
commented 2018-03-01 13:43:07 -0500
@ Andrew Stephenson

So Andrew, in another article you claimed, “Isn’t it better to stop it [gun crimes] from happening in the first place?”, implying you know a way to stop gun crimes from happening.

Can you please explain how to stop gun crimes from occurring?

Really! We all want to know how to solve this issue!
commented 2018-03-01 13:34:11 -0500
Vincent/Jack/James/Jimmy said, “I hope your God forgives you for your racism, bigotry and hate.”

Typical extremist SJW response. Just call the person names, but don’t provide any proof those name are applicable … just insults.

What you call “racism, bigotry and hate” is simply me having a different opinion than you.

Would you care to post some comments of mine that are “racist, bigoted and/or hateful.” Be sure to include the logic on how they are “racist, bigoted and/or hateful.”

No? I though not. You are just full of insults for those who do not believe the same things you do.

@ Andrew Stephenson who said, “The actual question here doesn’t even revolve around that, but rather, who ultimately owns a woman’s body and should be ultimately responsible for decisions pertaining to it – the woman, or the government.”

That is for sure what the baby murderers like to change the subject to because it redirects from the real issue … the baby’s right to not be torn apart with forceps while in the womb and the baby’s right to live. That is the true issue.
commented 2018-03-01 13:28:21 -0500
Pedophilia is the end game for the sex-ed agenda so it isn’t surprising that the far left is embracing a curriculum designed by a pedophile. Any parent who backs a government that supports this is admitting that they see their kids as nothing more than accessories. Take God out of the schools & invite the devil in. That will end well I’m sure. Of course the left are desperate to censor opposition to this. Any actual debate will be devastating to their narrative & their policies. As far as the Ontario PC leadership race – Ford, Allen or the Trillium Party. I don’t trust the others.
commented 2018-03-01 13:14:30 -0500
“Sixteen or older is a time when kids are curious enough to attempt to grasp this stuff in a more mature way”

Puberty starts at age ten, sometimes earlier. 16 is far too late, a lot of kids have already had sex by then.

“Peter Netterville commented 2018-03-01 07:31:43 -0500

Ahhh, so you are admitting that you, the man who worships science, is admitting to believing in the fantasy that gender is fluid …

and might as well add from another conversation we had, the fantasy of a gay gene not supported by science " Sexual orientation appears to have*some* genetic basis, but is indeed largely environmental or stochastic (and what genetic influence there is, is probably influenced by many genes, not a single discrete locus). This does not mean it’s “unnatural” – not sure why this talking point is such an aha moment for conservatives, it’s like any other physiological trait. Many human traits aren’t directly controlled by genetics; gender is strongly but not entirely genetic.
" that the baby is just a clump of cells until it magically gains life the very nanosecond it comes out of the womb, which is not supported by science either. " The gametes are also alive, as are the cells shed when you blow your nose. Never NOT been alive, at least as far back as the first recognizable cells 3.5 billion years ago. The actual question here doesn’t even revolve around that, but rather, who ultimately owns a woman’s body and should be ultimately responsible for decisions pertaining to it – the woman, or the government.
commented 2018-03-01 12:51:29 -0500
I don’t believe that children should be sexualized in any way shape or form, before they are of an age to understand these things. Sixteen or older is a time when kids are curious enough to attempt to grasp this stuff in a more mature way. Young children must be protected, by their parents, until they are older and ready to learn it. Great interview, Sheila, and Laura-Lynn was a great guest. Two knowledgeable ladies with lots of information.
commented 2018-03-01 11:27:27 -0500
Please Vincent Cassini, please disprove God for us. Take all day if you must!

I’ve got the popcorn and beer ready. Lol!
commented 2018-03-01 10:43:21 -0500
I hope your God forgives you for your racism, bigotry and hate. I can disprove God in a matter of seconds, but I realize you are weak and need that crutch, so I won’t blow you mind with the truth.
commented 2018-03-01 07:36:01 -0500
@ Maurice who asked, “Why do atheists always seem to be so angry?”

I agree with Gerry, it is the cultural Marxism they love so much that is not filling their empty soul, so they lash out in anger at those who do have inner peace.
commented 2018-03-01 07:31:43 -0500
Vincent/James/Jack/Jimmy/et. al. said, “There is no science to back up that there is a man living in the sky, but that doesn’t stop you from believing in fairy tales.”

Ahhh, so you are admitting that you, the man who worships science, is admitting to believing in the fantasy that gender is fluid …

and might as well add from another conversation we had, the fantasy of a gay gene not supported by science …

oh, yes, and might as well add the conversation we had when you were pretending to be Jimmy Da Silva (and Jack Carter), that the baby is just a clump of cells until it magically gains life the very nanosecond it comes out of the womb, which is not supported by science either.

For a man who mocks those who have faith in God, you certainly do believe in a lot of fantasies that are not supported by the science you worship so much.

From what I have seen of your many comments on this site over the past three years, your whole live is one big fantasyland full of unicorns, pixie dust to power the world, and made-up “science” to fit your perversions.

Now, who is it that is “believing in fairy tales”?
commented 2018-03-01 07:29:18 -0500
Its Marxism at work.
commented 2018-03-01 04:30:54 -0500
Why do atheists always seem to be so angry?
commented 2018-03-01 03:06:06 -0500
Vincent… You believe in science and what technology allows…

I’msure you believe in the accuracy of carbon dating as well… LOL
Science is a failed science.!! Almost 100% of science is based on theory and popular believe.. The most popular statement in science… “Popular theory believes” what a joke.!!!
commented 2018-03-01 02:50:04 -0500
God bless you, Martin. Yes we can certainly pray.
commented 2018-03-01 02:22:51 -0500
MAURICE POTVIN, I hear you loud and clear when you say, “Laura-Lynn is doing something about it. I wish I could support her financially but, alas, with only CPP and OAS to live on, I can barely make it through the month.”
I too am in the same boat named CPP/OAS as you. I get very frustrated at not being able to do more, to not being able to support these brave people that are fighting these very necessary fights, but alas the resources are just not there. As you state it is a fight to be able to make it through every month.
However, I pray, I pray very hard for these brave people that are fighting.
commented 2018-03-01 02:09:09 -0500
VINCENT CASSINI, I pray for you and your soul, and I’m positive that all of the people on here that you insult and disparage also pray for you, because our prayers are the only hope you have of ever meeting with your maker – who by the way will and does forgive you for your ignorance and your insults.
God Bless.
commented 2018-03-01 01:51:21 -0500
Say hi to the man in the sky for me and his talking snake.
commented 2018-03-01 01:31:48 -0500
Then I can rest my case, Vincent. You are completely irrelevant.
commented 2018-03-01 01:14:28 -0500
I believe in science and what they are able to explain as technology allows. There is far more proof in evolution than there is your God. However feel free to continue believing in man made fairy tales that were created to keep people in check.
commented 2018-03-01 00:23:10 -0500
How did I know that “Mister Irrelevant” would be commenting on this post? The late William F. Buckley described the left perfectly when he said, “Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there ARE other views”. By the way, Vincent, if God does not exist then everything you have to say really IS irrelevant. You’re simply a bio-mechanical machine that evolved from a rock and your so-called life force, along with all its ideas, is simply the result of random electrical impulses firing between the neurons in your brain. You’re pre-wired to say the stupid hypocritical shit you spew out. There are only three options when choosing the cause of existence, Vincent; 1) God created the Universe for His own divine purpose, 2) The Universe just spontaneously popped into existence for no particular reason, or 3) The Universe has existed from all eternity. Which one of those choices do yo believe?
commented 2018-02-28 23:43:46 -0500
Tired of the name-calling and human rights commissions by the left to shut down and silence debates. One definition of a bigot is “a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions”, so call me a bigot for not upholding or willing to tolerate the secular government’s view that sex is fluid. However, in my mind, the height of bigotry, or worse authoritarian bullying (“social fascism” according to Tyler Thompson) is using the powers of the state to enforce others to uphold the state’s views on this matter. Accordingly, the BC Minister of Education is a big time bigot and bully!
commented 2018-02-28 23:41:49 -0500
Vincent Cassini, what is “fucking crazy” is believing that gender is fluid.

There is no science to back that up. Do you not think science is a good thing?
commented 2018-02-28 23:19:50 -0500
Leftist always run first to the “Your a Bigot” . It is not bigoted to have an opinion that the left doesn’t like.
Hopefully thoughtful, yet less radical people on the left start seeing through this ploy to discredit people with opinions other than the radical left as ridiculous and question it. The old left used to like freedom of speech. The new left calls it hate speech
commented 2018-02-28 22:49:54 -0500
I’m so glad that people like Laura-Lynn are fighting the good fight tooth and nail. People like me who don’t have the resources, or the audience, feel awfully frustrated just sitting around in our one-room apartment and cursing the darkness at the depravity of mankind without the ability do anything about it. Laura-Lynn is doing something about it. I wish I could support her financially but, alas, with only CPP and OAS to live on, I can barely make it through the month.
commented 2018-02-28 22:36:06 -0500
You’ve done it again SHEILA GUNN REID
I’m gobsmacked.
That Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson sure is a firecracker!
-
In regard to Justin’s allegiance attestations, this sounds very much like how the German people were forced to switch their allegiance from the state to the man, and how much Germany changed after that.
END TIMES? Not so farfetched these days…

“…The term Hitler oath (German: Führereid or Eid auf den Führer, “Oath on the Leader”) refers to the oaths of allegiance, sworn by the officers and soldiers of the German Armed Forces -——and civil servants———- of Nazi Germany between the years 1934 and 1945. The oath pledged personal loyalty to Adolf Hitler in place of loyalty to the constitution of the country…"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler_oath
commented 2018-02-28 22:28:41 -0500
Is this what you call critical thinking with questions like that?

LOL.

It is the same reason why Erin Berry doesn’t post here anymore. There is reasonable and rational conservative and then there is fucking crazy. You represent the fucking crazy conservative and that’s why people like you are ridiculed.