December 17, 2018

Hypocrite feminists praise trans Miss Universe contestant

Martina MarkotaRebel Contributor

The theme of this year's Miss Universe pageant was "Empowered Women." This gets a bit confusing for me because the left and feminists have been railing against pageants (except ones including little boys dressed in drag.)

The Miss USA program has been witnessing poor ratings, with Miss Universe fairly steady but still down.

They tried eliminating the swimsuit competition after the #MeToo movement got involved. Now, the first transgender contestant took part, and she was favoured to be the winner.

The left has gone too far: Trans "women" are taking over every aspect of women’s activities. Men have taken over women's athletics, "woman" of the year, and now beauty pageants.

Where are the feminists? Don’t they see that men are taking over women’s territories?

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2018-12-18 21:02:26 -0500
Sorry but Dudes have Adam’s Apples, even with the wedding tackle removed.
commented 2018-12-18 16:10:30 -0500
William Kay:
I agree to a point about that.
If the intent is to reproduce themselves, they’re just idiots & hypocrits. Not to mention outwardly cruel to force a sexual orientation on another human being.
commented 2018-12-18 14:09:03 -0500
Well said, Martina.. There are only 2 genders… It will take time for Western Society to bounce back from this SJW nonsense. This is an issue of Mental Illness.
commented 2018-12-18 11:18:26 -0500
Insurance companies should implement the stupidity clause in cases like that.
commented 2018-12-18 10:58:15 -0500
A guy in Edmonton said to his insurance company he identify s as a woman and wanted the cheaper rate. They would not give it to him/her. I think feminist turdo should intervene. This is a case for the human rights commission.
commented 2018-12-18 10:11:27 -0500
Karen:
If the homosexual couple are actually paying a couple to have a child for them, then they are increasing the population, and the Malthusians would be displeased.
If the homosexual couple are adopting an already existing child to raise as a homosexual; then the Malthusians would be doubly pleased.
commented 2018-12-18 09:46:57 -0500
William Kay-
Its the intent to rear a child. If they want to adopt, they want procreation of some kind.
commented 2018-12-18 06:39:26 -0500
The problem is that trans doesn’t exist. That’s just a guy dressed like a girl.
commented 2018-12-18 00:00:27 -0500
Call it the Miss Parallel Universe contest.
Karen: Adoption is not procreation. As per the same-sex babies some lesbians are now having; you are correct, the Malthusians never anticipated this. Generally though, the lesbian demographic, which the Malthusians through educational and media mastery have increased 100-fold, are having almost no babies.
Arianna: point taken, especially considering the brazen indoctrination going on in Women’s Studies and Queer Studies faculties. We shouldn’t, however, discount past struggles for women’s emancipation. The Taliban shoot people for teaching girls to read. One needn’t journey too far back into European history to find similar mindsets.
commented 2018-12-17 21:00:24 -0500
How about this: Mr. Universe, Miss Universe, and Other Universe.

Girls now in Boy Scouts, girls now in boy’s hockey, boys now in girl’s hockey and field hockey, et cetera. Too complex. Make it simple again. Genetic sex determines your competitive group, otherwise, create your own miscellaneous membership group.

250 lbs man competing against 150 lbs women in sports; so now there is a woman soccer player with a broken leg because the “I feel like a woman” man ended up breaking her leg. Sounds PC but really, just accommodating the man with a dysphoria.

Not everyone must be included in every group. Inclusivity has become a damaging philosophy. Diversity is far from strength.
commented 2018-12-17 20:57:37 -0500
Will the sick twisted lefties stop it with all this transgender,transsexual,gender fluid nonsense,you are confusing the Muslim rape gangs!!!
commented 2018-12-17 20:30:27 -0500
It’s a guy,no it’s a woman,no we’re not sure what the hell it is anymore!! You left wing bastards are sick in the head period,what ever you are!!
commented 2018-12-17 20:09:32 -0500
As far as I am concerned, anybody can go and compete in these beauty pageants. Whether or not they win is a different story.
commented 2018-12-17 19:12:01 -0500
William Kay – the right to education…didn`t do much good!
commented 2018-12-17 19:10:01 -0500
It looks like every special event has turned into a joke in today`s world.
commented 2018-12-17 19:09:31 -0500
The world is downright weird! Where is the reset button! Maybe a re-installation would be best.
commented 2018-12-17 19:06:26 -0500
Excellent comment William Kay.
Except these men and women earned the right of adoption for same sex couples. Some actively seek to make children through same sex dna. I don’t know if that’s true to neo-malthusian theory.
commented 2018-12-17 19:01:29 -0500
Feminists hate women so much, they love fake immitation women over themselves. As long as a fake woman gets all the sexual attention, feminists are free to act like men. They want to switch genders. They hate sex. They hate their bodies. They hate femininity. They destroy themselfs and then have the audacity to call themselves feminine. Absolutely backwards.
commented 2018-12-17 18:59:04 -0500
This is the second video of MM’s, in a row, that I’ve enjoyed. I’m moving from critic to fan. My issue revolves around the terms “left” and “feminist.” MM might want to qualify these terms. “Second Wave Feminism” is actually a male-dominated subsidiary of the Neo-Malthusian movement. Their function is to promote: abortion, homosexuality, contraception, gender deconstruction, sterilisation, and any manner of non-procreative sexual lifestyle. “First Wave Feminism” got women: the right to vote, the right to own property, the right to advanced education…
<-- /_page_stream.html -->