February 22, 2017

I like Milo, but this time he’s wrong

Rebel Staff

Before I criticize Milo, I just wanted to say that I like him. Milo is a troll who stands up for free speech against a tide of censorship and offense-culture. Milo is a gay Christopher Hitchens. (I hear he likes black men, too…)

Now that that’s out of way, let’s criticize Milo. He deserves it.

Recently, media outlets put out a hit piece on Milo, uncovering a “Drunken Peasants’ podcast where Milo advocates hebephilia — that is, having sexual attraction to children who are going through puberty.

(I’ll play the clip, but here is the entire show.)

In the podcast, Milo says the age he’s talking about is 13 years and older. In another interview, with Joe Rogan, Milo says he means 15 years and older, but the same principle is applied.

When given the chance to explain, he stated almost exactly what the media is reporting he did.

What Milo is advocating for, legally speaking, is pedophilia.

This is deeply immoral.

Children, even early teens, can’t consent to sex because regions of the brain connected to sexual pleasure haven’t developed. There’s a high likelihood that kids introduced to sex that early grow up with behavioural issues, including but not limited to depression and suicide.

So, Milo, when I read your public statement on Facebook, and you wrote, “I am implacably opposed to the normalization of pedophilia”? Yeah, I’m not really buying it. 

You claim to be a victim of sexual abuse, but I can’t really believe anything you say.

Regardless, you seem a little broken.

I love the work you do, but what you advocated for in those videos was unacceptable.

I’m not going to ignore it or pretend I agree with it just because I like the work you do.

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-03-16 11:46:06 -0400
I increased my vocabulary today! Knew pedophile. But learned:
Relearned that ignorance is bliss.
commented 2017-02-26 10:14:05 -0500
As well Glen… Christ would seek out sinners and try to show them the way so the garden was the highest concentration of sinners so what better way to reach as many as you can at one time… Christ went there to save them he didn’t go there to join them
commented 2017-02-26 10:04:04 -0500
Glenn Craig… Make no assumptions about me..!!
If you are looking for a Pharisees look to your elected progressive pope who is “ROMAN.. CATHOLIC
The Lord destroyed humanity by flooding the world to give Noah and a select few of his followers a sin free world to repopulate and as well he promised never to flood the world again and sealing the pact with the rainbow… He made no such promise not to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah for the boundless evil towards themselves, Lot, his daughters and the two angels that he sent to protect them.!
christ also said “he came as the lamb and he will return as the lion”
God hates the sin but loves the sinner and will forgive anyone who repents away from their sins…
When God abandons a nation for its capitulation it seems they never recover as you so adamantly like to point out Rome and Greece.
commented 2017-02-25 02:55:59 -0500
@leviticus 2013…I don’t know what it is that causes you to choose that scripture reference as your nom de guerre….but no doubt it wasn’t nice.

I could have gone along with the corruption. …I wouldn’t

I could have worn the dog collar and been called “reverend”…I walked away.

But even if I had, I would still say the same thing to you now. You may fancy yourself to be a christian but you are not. Christians are redemptionists…you are a pharasee.

Christ hid out in the Garden of Gethsemane the night he was arrested. Prior to the Maccabean uprising and rededication of the Temple the Greeks had desecrated the site. The Romans were pretty freewheeling about homosexuality…but the Greeks made even the Romans blush.

The Garden of Gethsemane was known by another name…The Grove of the Sodomites…It was where the “Temple Prostitutes” plyed their trade during the period of the “Great Abomination”.

Even in Christ’s time it continued to be where the gay prostitutes and doggers went to play. That’s why Christ thought it would be safe there…no pharasee would be caught dead there.

Oh and I can just picture it…the Sanhedrin arriving with Judas and a couple of Roman soldiers…Judas outing him with a kiss…a young man nearby being grabbed by the cloak …running off naked leaving the cloak in the soldier’s hand….gotcha Jesus….Cheers of Hosannah less than a week earlier turning into chants of CRUCIFY…and GIVE US BARABBAS….
commented 2017-02-24 23:18:22 -0500
Glen Craig… There was a reason that homosexuality is a horrific crime and why it was illegal both a man’s world and God’s

if you understand the frog in the pot theory can you understand the crack in the door, go back and read some of my earlier posts on this thread pertaining to that subject… Nobody wants to stone anybody but we should not have to live with the insanity of these affected people dictating there wants from outside of the closet..
Homosexuality deserves no publicity and does not need any support just like hetero’s don’t need any publicity and don’t need any support.!!
Just go about your private lives in private.!
commented 2017-02-24 22:37:54 -0500
I can remember being 18 years and a few months old. Being under arrest for the possession of a piece of canabis resin about the size of the first joint of your baby finger. I was in a GAOL (correct spelling at the time) ..the warden’s name was “Pushie” (no I’m not making that up) and he was exactly like that prick in “A Clockwork Orange”. (After he was forced into early retirement by his daughter being busted he changed his outlook).

My name was at the chalk board in red chalk …I had committed the worst felony after rape and murder. The penalty of lashes had just been repealed not long before. I got interviewed by the LeDain Commission.

I got interested in the law and warden Pushie loanded me his copy of the Criminal Code to read.

Homosexuality was on the same page as “statutory rape” , incest, and buggering sheep.

All of you who piled on to Milo…all of you who expressed condemnation and distain….if you do not live long enough to eat crow and humble pie on this subject matter….you will be remembered in history like those who turned on Oscar Wilde and Allan Turing.

Jehoshua ben Josasaph was the product of an arranged marriage. Arranged because Mary and Joseph had liniage back to King David. Mary was a “virgin” by virtue of the fact that she was no older than fourteen. Joseph may have been in his fifties.

Let the stoning begin.
commented 2017-02-24 17:27:07 -0500
Fascinating how James Richie comments almost exactly like the other socialist degenerate trolls, words, sentence structure, insults the same.

My guess is that we have here maybe about 3 or 4 different trolls with several accounts each that post their vile comments, proudly parading their lack of morals as good and insulting those here that have a moral center.
commented 2017-02-24 13:40:12 -0500
I was just revisiting REBEL COLUMNIST, JAMES CAMPBELL’s, January 18, 2016, “I came out as a gay conservative in Vancouver. Here’s what happened.” piece:

Very interesting…
commented 2017-02-24 02:03:30 -0500
The truth can save you or destroy you. If he hasn’t harmed any children I wish him peace. If he has I wish him a cleansing hell. God will decide.
commented 2017-02-24 00:48:25 -0500
Leviticus 2013,

Well since I haven’t lied and I am not being a hypocrite here – as you haven’t proven a thing, it’s all good for me.

Listen to Pope Francis – he is talking to you.
commented 2017-02-24 00:29:25 -0500
That is a classic sign that you have run out of game James… Leviticus 20:13 is disengaging you as you no longer have or ever had a platform to speak from and are no longer worth the effort to explain to.
But before I go I challenged you to give up one sin.!! So give up either being a liar and tell the truth for the rest of your life, the real truth not the one you make up or give up being a hypocrite.. Both are sin’s and one could be your choice..
I am willing to bet you either are unwilling or incapable of such a monumental feat.
Good night from Leviticus 20:13
commented 2017-02-24 00:22:25 -0500
Leviticus 2013,

I haven’t lied or insulted you at all. A factual comment about you isn’t an insult.

I didn’t just quote somebody – I quoted The Pope, who is closer to God than you or anyone else.
commented 2017-02-24 00:19:53 -0500
Yeah it’s so much easier to quote somebody else from something else than it is to engage me directly and call me out on where I’m wrong without hurling insults or lying again.
commented 2017-02-24 00:17:36 -0500
Or maybe you’re just so far gone down the rabbit hole that you don’t even know what an insult is anymore… or the definition of hypocrisy.. I feel sorry for you.
Now I know I’ve giving you too much to read so you’ll just glaze over it instead of looking to see the platform I am providing for you… I fully expect not to read the postings in their entirety and extrapolate anything beyond what you will try to use against me.
Again no surprise there eh.
I challenge you to pick one sin of the very many you have and try and give it up or do you believe that you are sinless and you are the only other person to be able to walk on the water.
In fact it’s easier to live with sin than it is to acknowledge it and give it up..
commented 2017-02-24 00:10:19 -0500
Accusing people of incestuous relationships as you said in a couple of postings blow this one is a horrible thing to say and by my age I have known a lot of women, however now the rest of it is probably true.
So yes you were hurling insults and that makes you a “liar and a hypocrite”
No surprise there eh.!!
Incidentally and while speaking of the door being opened a little more all the time, incestuous relationships have never been more common and almost celebrated as today further supporting my argument and therefore removing from yours.
And again a "liar and a hypocrite.
commented 2017-02-23 23:58:09 -0500
James Richie… when the door is opened and the crack allows one perversion to escape if somebody likes that perversion then the door must be opened wider to allow further perversions to escape that are deemed tolerable and acceptable overtime by other people right up until the point that the door couldn’t be opened any wider and every horrible thing that man can conceive is going to be practiced and tolerated. Support one perversion and you must support them all
or be deemed a “hypocrite”.
Living under God’s law man is free, living under man’s law man is enslaved by greed power and lust.
And you James are representative of that fact as you fall into one of the three categories if not more.
commented 2017-02-23 23:37:42 -0500
Leviticus 2013,

It’s not insults – it’s the fact that you don’t know what century we are living in. I realize you are probably older than dirt and death is coming for you soon, but it’s never going to be 1940 again.
commented 2017-02-23 23:12:23 -0500
Blah blah blah here we go again, I speak fact and truth you hurl insults.!
commented 2017-02-23 22:38:33 -0500
You keep vomiting the same old same old perversions… and they uphold exactly how I was describing torn fabric of society.. Nothing new here.!
commented 2017-02-23 21:57:00 -0500
Leviticus 2013,

Sure I was paying attention. I told you that women kissing women is HOT! Have you ever paid attention to a lesbian porno?
commented 2017-02-23 21:35:06 -0500
I think Milo’s time may be done, unless he can somehow defend the charges. He could produce other gay conservatives to back him up, but it would take a pretty brave person to do that. I really liked that there was a conservative voice that the left couldn’t use their usual slurs against (homophobic, racist, and sometimes anti-semetic). Check out 2 minutes into his thing on Maher, he says he won’t hire gays and nobody says boo, until a few seconds later when he says he won’t hire women either (because it’s okay to hate a misogynist but not a gay hating gay man, apparently). You can not only hear the gasp when he says that about gays, but it’s like reading the minds of all the liberals in the audience “He just said he hates gays, but we can’t boo him because he’s a gay man, but he just said he hates gays, but we can’t boo him because …” I’m sure the warriors who booed him when he said he wouldn’t hire women were soooo relieved! I hope Milo can bounce back from this, or that there’s another like him out there. I’d miss knowing that someone has the ability to make liberals’ heads explode so effectively. To those who would just write Milo off, reconsider. Think of Robert Downey, Roman Polanski, etc.
commented 2017-02-23 21:17:38 -0500
And Jamie… As I see it and what’s going on around you, you still aren’t paying attention..!
Either that or you like that kind of thing..
You’re beating up Lisa and beating up Milo for what he is and done but you support questionable ethics involving the little girls change room… That makes you a hypocrite and a pervert supporter.
commented 2017-02-23 21:14:21 -0500
No Jamie… Maybe you just weren’t paying attention.!!
commented 2017-02-23 21:07:38 -0500
Leviticus 2013,

I am 45, so I guess I missed the evolution of what’s making you lose your mind.
commented 2017-02-23 21:05:23 -0500

Why do you keep ignoring the fact that conservatives exposed Milo with the video, conservatives are now disgusted with him and conservatives no longer wanted to work with him (Brietbart) or have anything to do with him. You keep making this about liberals vs. conservatives or an attack on conservative media and it’s not that at all.

CONSERVATIVES DID THIS. What is so hard for you to understand here?

It’s about a douche who thought he was bullet proof and could say whatever he wants without consequence, but he crossed a line now where even his biggest supporters can no longer defend. He is a pariah now among human beings – never mind left or right.
commented 2017-02-23 20:09:08 -0500
And furthermore James what I described below is exactly what’s happening right now… There is various stages of sexually confused possibly predator type people (if you could call them people) that are doing exactly as I described in the little girls change rooms.
I would not want to live in your world.
Maybe you’re one of those guys that like the new ruling so you can watch those little girls and get off on it..
Judging by your lack of character to stand up and say that that is wrong that means you are for it.!
commented 2017-02-23 20:05:50 -0500
James Richie… There’s nothing over dramatic about it. Obviously you’re not old enough to have seen the evolution of what’s happening and once the door was opened it opened all the way and the title wave hasn’t finished passing through the door yet.!!
commented 2017-02-23 18:42:13 -0500
Ross while I wouldn’t argue that Milo is a breath of fresh air, that is not exactly how I would describe him. However, Milo is not the point. The point is that he was taken down by the establishment because he was a threat, and if it can happen to Milo because of tapes (some edited) from a year or two ago, then it can happen to any outfit of any influence. He was a threat to the narrative. I will not define what that is I will that to others. Milo was not saying the ‘correct’ things politically. He was conservative, pro Trump, ant EU, pro Brexit, pro borders, etc. he had the ears of a new youthful audience in Universities. He had been invited to CPAC, had a huge book deal with a respected publisher. He was getting too big for his britches, they took him out.

James, you tell me I am defending Milo. What I am defending is free speech and conservative media, both of which are being targeted. That is Milo’s crime, not any perceived unacceptable sexual behaviour. Your question is, would I do the same if it were a liberal? Defend a liberal’s free speech? I would defend anyone’s free speech. I would like to point out here that Milo’s accusers are guilty of what they are accusing Milo of. The most obvious and mainstream aspect of that being the normalizing of sexualizing young children. Conservatives can’t take liberals out for their depraved behaviour because as you can see for yourself, when the left does it, for some reason it’s okay.

If you mean would I defend a Liberal perv, I would say I would not defend any perv. Perv’s, as in pedophile’s should be in jail. Milo was a victim of sexual abuse as a young adolescent, he has done nothing illegal, but said some unsavory things, which have landed him here. Why does the left promote pedophilia through actually normalizing it and grooming our kids in our public schools, promoting it through movies and TV, take part in it in secret,( just ask any the child actors in Hollywood), then turn around and take Milo down for some ill chosen words, not acts, and no one thinks there is anything going on but a bad man is getting what he had coming to him.

I don’t know how to say it any other way. There are a few layers to this story. It’s political. It is a warning shot to conservative alternative media. ’Don’t say the wrong things or we will find something on you and take you out’. If you don’t understand , you are either a part of it and condone it, or you just don’t get it yet. If you just don’t get it yet I would say, keep watching, there is much more to come.
<-- /_page_stream.html -->