May 10, 2018

If a Democrat had appointed Gina Haspel, she'd be CIA Director by now

Amanda HeadRebel Contributor


Yes, it's a scary thought, but work with me...

If Hillary Clinton had won the presidential election and nominated Gina Haspel as the new director of the CIA, she would have been praised (correctly) as the most qualified candidate for the position in history.

Simply the fact that a 9/11 mastermind opposes Haspel's nomination should tell you something, but among her colleagues, she is known as the "spymaster." What more do you want?

So of course, the hearings are dragging out, simply because she is Trump's choice.

PS: I explain why I think waterboarding is a good thing...

 

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2018-05-10 23:24:56 -0400
The left is full of pathetic children. Get a kick out of interviews on Youtube where the interviewer says Hillary or Bernie instead of Trump and the anti-Trump idiots agree with the presented policies , after the interviewer tells them that it was a Trump Policy proposal they are stunned. It is quite funny how easily the sheep are led.
commented 2018-05-10 23:00:15 -0400
I’m not against waterboarding when terrorists are in custody.
commented 2018-05-10 17:03:43 -0400
Dems have held up so many nominations, they are obstructionists through and through.

Gina Haspel has the fortitude to lead. Bad actors have either been removed or have resigned since President Trump has been elected. A deep cleaning of the CIA was long overdue, and, the Trump administration must remain ever vigilant to root out any Obama/Bush/Clinton holdovers.
commented 2018-05-10 15:54:40 -0400
This was tweeted by Jack Posobiec. I think it’s the best comment:
“If Gina Haspel doesn’t make it, Trump should say ‘okay’, and immediately nominate General Flynn”
commented 2018-05-10 14:37:11 -0400
Why do I believe you? Who doesn’t like a strong women and a Jets fan? Only a terrorist.
From The Ground Up