October 21, 2015

If Trudeau was a feminist, he'd stay in the fight against ISIS

Sheila Gunn ReidRebel Host | The Gunn Show

Would a feminist surrender to ISIS?

I ask because Justin Trudeau’s first act as Prime Minister was to announce that Canada would be pulling out of the ongoing fight against the Islamic State.

ISIS is raping little girls and is selling teenage sex slaves in human cattle markets. ISIS is demanding women dress in the niqab. Where are the slut walkers and the fat shaming activists to speak up for their sisters in the middle east? Probably too busy complaining about men who spread their legs too wide on public transportation.

ISIS is real patriarchy. ISIS is male supremacy. These are the sorts of things self described feminists like Trudeau are supposed to care about. He only cared enough to surrender to ISIS.


JOIN TheRebel.media for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.

Who are Canada's radical Muslim leaders?
FIND OUT and fight back at CanadianJihad.ca

Help build The Rebel’s new studio, literally brick by brick!
LEARN MORE at BuildTheDream.ca

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2015-11-01 03:12:37 -0500
First of all, christ can kiss my ass. You need to sop imposing your christian values onto everybody else.

If there is something wrong with the divorce process, maybe the system can make it more friendly to all those involved.
commented 2015-10-31 17:38:12 -0400
Sam…supposing the result of a divorce was that both parents had to lely contribute to a residential school for their kids….or…that the one who intitiated the divorce was the one who got screwed….instead of the feminist model that it was always the man who got screwed….I will bet the divorce rate would plumet….this is not a new issue….Christ had nothing good to say about divorce lawyers.
commented 2015-10-28 00:41:51 -0400
Not all vows are healthy in the long run. Sometimes it is in the better interest of the children that the parents get a divorce. You need to stop stigmatizing divorce.
commented 2015-10-27 21:01:33 -0400
For some portion of your life…if you make vows to another…for the sake of having and raising children…you should live up to those vows……others have managed to do so……life is not totally for your self interest….for the sake of your children ….foresake just a little of your self interest
commented 2015-10-26 20:15:52 -0400
The feminists can have their abortions. If I was pregnant and didn’t want the baby, I’d want the option to choose.

Divorce is not a bad thing, if you are in a relationship that you want to get the hell out of. Forcing people, regardless of gender, to stay in an unhealthy relationship does more damage.

If you are against divorce, then don’t get one. If you are against abortion, then don’t get one. Don’t tell everybody else what they can or can not do.
commented 2015-10-26 05:25:39 -0400
Any culture that trivializes divorce and abortion to the level of a haircut will inevitably be replaced by one that didn’t….that’s not not social justice theory….that’s simple arithmetic.

As well, feminism has never been about the equality of women…it’s goal is to make men redundant and disposable….all of the front runners of feminism bragged and boasted that when feminism was at it’s high water mark.

Under a Liberal government the advocacy of the feminist perspective will be a taxpayer funded exercise in public works. Feminism is not grassroots…..it is government hydroponics and academic astro turf.
commented 2015-10-26 00:51:20 -0400
Then why did you bother to make the point on the destruction of family?
commented 2015-10-25 22:00:04 -0400
That’s my point too Sam……equality involves being squeezed through a dye like a toothpaste tube…..let people seek their own destiny without social engineering on the part of the government….frankly I don’t care who is a feminist….I am concened about those who ae bound and determined that everybody is going to be a feminist …like it or not….you will be assimilated into the BORG…resistance is futile……

nah…..ain’t going to happen
commented 2015-10-25 21:53:03 -0400
The real question is, what business is it of yours to dictate the personal family lives of other people? Don’t other people have a right to choose what their family looks like? It is ultimately up to the individual person whether or not they wish to pursue a career or not. At the same time, I think that the nationalized day care is a bad idea that takes the money of the taxpayers that do not want to use it.
commented 2015-10-25 21:30:42 -0400
Since I posted that last thing…I have been putting myself ie position of the spin doctor who composes Justin’s responses….the relationship is symbiotic…Justin is like that character in that supermarionation thing TEAM AMERICA…..the vetted actor…..durka durka….all lines are written for him….he just has to deliver…the performance.

So the one writing his lines is going to say something diversionary like ….no but under the Liberal funding of universal daycare……blah blah blah…..contempoary Canadian womyn will enjoy the liberation of having other women raise their kids.
commented 2015-10-25 21:20:32 -0400
Sam….are you the sort of new sensitive androgynous male who is willing to stay home and breast feed the infants while your potential domestic rape survivor goes out to persue a career as a divorce lawyer?
commented 2015-10-25 21:12:22 -0400
If that career is as a lesbian feminist divorce lawyer or tenured professor of “womyn and the law”…….make no mistake Sam Young….that is EXACTLY what I am on about. And that EXACTLY describes many of the candidates for election and post election appointees of the Liberal Party
commented 2015-10-25 19:35:42 -0400
Desctruction of family? I hope you’re not referring to women having careers.
commented 2015-10-25 16:23:58 -0400
That’s precisely right Liza and for all the bad reputation I may have gotten as MAUS…I have never had any difficulty or discord when I talked to a reasonable woman. I have differed to the authority of the women assigned to have authority over me and served them well as my performance evaluations will attest.

Any conflict I have ever had with feminists that person has always and invariably been an associate or appointee of the Liberal Party. I found it a breath of fresh air to meet the REAL women who are not dedicated to the destruction of family.

If Justin is proud of being a feminist…bully for him….if he wants to donate the 30% of his income that he has unfairly and inequitably made more than women in the form of a personal cheque to a battered women’s shelter….and sit down to piss in the name of equality…fine…whe he tries to impose that on me then it is not “bully” for him…HE has become a bully….and as anyone who knows me will attest….I do not back down from bullies.
commented 2015-10-24 22:30:49 -0400
They don’t even want any real woman feminists. We’re traitors to them.
commented 2015-10-24 20:25:28 -0400
Of course men are not wanted. And neither are transgendered whether they started off female, or ended up female. This is your new feminism. It’s an all new girls only club, and they justify it in the name of equality.
commented 2015-10-24 18:56:06 -0400
It is not up to ANY man to fight for the rights of women……men are not welcome nor wanted in the “give us back the night” demonstrations.
commented 2015-10-24 18:09:46 -0400
A lot of Christians have that air of superiority too. In the last five hundred years in Canada, it has manifested itself in unhealthy ways too. Maybe this is why people are not afraid to ridicule christianity.

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t want to do things the sharia way. I am fully against how that apartment building refused to accept that disabled guy because he was not muslim. My position on religion, is that it is not to be imposed on anybody else.

Harper had it right on the topic of screening the immigrants. I am opposed to Trudeau rushing in the twenty five thousand by the end of the year. If we are to screen people, it should be on the basis of criminal history. If we get some muslim newcomer, I could care less how they worship, as long as they keep it to themselves.

To go back to the original point, I am not anti women’s rights because I don’t want a war. It’s not a battle that is worth it, and we are not going to get anything out of it. But to anybody that disagrees with Sheila, it makes them anti women.
commented 2015-10-24 15:02:54 -0400
According to the Liberal Party the “true feminists” are that “collegial” crowd that composed Status of Women Canada….they are the policy makers. The chief of the Parliamentary Committee on “women’s issues” is Heddy Fry….she has been for some time….even under Harper. The National Advisory Committee on Status of Women got defunded….before Harper came to office.

From the perspective of the Liberal Party…the “real” feminists in Canada are the academics who teach womyn’s studies and the lawyers who deal in “women and the law”….now called LEAF.
commented 2015-10-24 12:56:28 -0400
Sam, I agree with you that there are extremists in every religion, that’s why I specifically was referring to sharia Muslims, the one who base their lives on sharia law. I can tell you that I’ve researched sharia law, and it’s more primitive and beyond evil and barbaric than any other ideology in existence. From stoning rape victims to death for “committing adultery,” to honour killings of women and girls, like what happened right here in Canada with the 3 girls and their mom. I know there are good Muslims too, mostly the ones who were either born here or at least were willing to adapt to Canadian culture. The ones who refuse to do this, the sharia ones, are the ones I oppose to entering our country. These are the ones who are sexist to the point where they think that if a woman isn’t covered from head to toe, and/or accompanied by a male escort, she’s fair game for rape. The ones who will go berserk if anyone dares to criticize their pedophile prophet in any way. The ones who think it’s ok to kill “infidels.” The ones that think it’s acceptable to rape and marry children. The ones who believe same sex couples, even though they’re consenting adults, deserve death. These are the ones who claim that if Muslims don’t follow sharia law, they are not real Muslims.

Like Liza has already pointed out, Christianity has modernized, while many aspects of Islam remain in the dark ages. Furthermore, if an extremist Christian makes outrageous statements, like the preacher in the U.S. who said homosexuals should be locked up in camps, many Christians will stand up and vocally denounce the statements of the extremist. Few Muslims, on the other hand, will stand up against the sharia extremists. This makes it seem like there are way more extremist Muslims than moderate ones, where with Christianity there seems to be much more moderate Christians than extremists.

My parents are devote Christians while I’m agnostic. I will debate with them about certain Christian beliefs which I find outdated or just illogical, but in the end, I’m fine with them practicing their religion, and they’re fine with my brother and I making our own decision about religion when we were old enough. I’ve had religion shoved down by throat by overly zealous Christians as well, but I don’t hold it against Christianity as a whole, just like I don’t hold sharia against every Muslim I see. The problem is the hypocrisy of far left Liberals who will defend Islam no matter what, but they don’t follow their “freedom of religion” proclamation when it comes to other religions, specifically Christianity. Christians are made fun of all the time, offensive satire is constantly made about Jesus, but Christians are just expected to tolerate it, no matter how offended they may be. Sharia Muslims, on the other hand, will become incredibly violent if there’s ever any indication that the prophet Mohammad is being portrayed in a bad light, even if it’s just satire done for entertainment. Islam is the only religion that I’ve come across where you have to be exceedingly careful about what you say, pretty much walk on eggshells around it. If you were to be openly critical about it, you’d be at the least called Islamophobic by politically correct Westerners, or at worst attacked if a sharia Muslim is in earshot.

Many if not most migrants that Justin is so keen in letting into our country are of the sharia variety, and that’s the kind we absolutely do not want here. They force us to accommodate their beliefs at the expense of our own values, they demand we change our culture to suit theirs. They’ve already done it here with their niqabs and humiliating teenage girls on their periods by making them stand at the back of the room, and demanding that Islam be the only religion tolerated in schools. This is unfortunately not fear mongering or over-exaggeration, Justin and those who think like him are sacrificing Canadian freedoms and values by allowing these people to come to Canada in droves, and silencing anyone who protests with accusations of “racism.” All you have to do is search for what’s going on with the migrants in Europe to learn about the horrible things that will happen in Canada if Justin is as careless as the European leaders.
commented 2015-10-24 12:10:39 -0400
I won’t argue with you regarding comparing Christianity with Islam. One advocates getting rid of infidels, by murder if necessary, and whose main modus operandi is to expand the caliphate. One is a political ideology and one is a religion. If you can’t tell the difference there is nothing to say.

Regarding your professor with the gay son, I would suggest to you that he clearly doesn’t follow sharia law, and is technically not Muslim. You may call that moderate, I call it renouncing sharia, and therefore non-Muslim.

I too know a few people brought up Muslim, who have renounced sharia , and don’t follow the koran.
Muslim is not a race, and Islam is not a religion, it is an ideology of superiority and varying degrees of hate. Many ‘Muslims’ come here to escape the oppression. The ones who come here to spread it via the law of sharia, as spelled out in the koran are not. Except they are in Canada, welcomed in fact, and with Trudeau it will only get worse.
commented 2015-10-24 03:14:32 -0400
The crusades wasn’t even on my mind.

To be perfectly honest, I haven’t studied islam to any great extent. I just know that in my interactions with muslims, they have not troubled me with their religion or enforced sharia law on me. This is not to say that there are no bad people out there that happen to be muslim as well.

The muslim I got to know the best was one of my profs. He didn’t have any of those nasty muslim stereotypes, and he was even very open about having a gay son. On top of that, he was a great proff. At no time, did he push islam on us.

I will, however, say that many christians firmly believe that because of their religious beliefs, it makes them think that they are better people than those non christians. And not just that, christians need to convert other people to christianity. Just look at what the christians did to the aboriginals with the residential schools.

There are parallels in both christianity and islam, such as the need to push religion onto pagans and infidels. I am notfond of either. At the end of the day, the only argument that christians can make against islam, is that islam takes things further than christianity. But more importantly, it comes down to the individual person as to how they use religion. Not every christian has shoved the bible down my throat, and my muslim prof didn’t throw his gay son off a building.

I will say that there are a lot of examples of sexism against women in this world. It’s not just any one culture in this world. There are also lots of people of all sorts of cultures that also believe in gender equality. I wouldn’t paint everybody with the same brush.

But if you are going to have filters as to who can enter the country, I would leave it at criminal history, and not religion.
commented 2015-10-24 02:20:49 -0400
“Can a christian go against the holy bible?”, Sam, if someone calls themselves a Catholic, but agrees with abortion, they are not really Catholics, according to the Church. If an Anglican nun decides she needs a man other than God, she can’t be a nun anymore, but the Bible doesn’t say kill them for it.
As far as I am concerned until a Muslim convinces me their ‘religion’ has been modified for this century, rewritten the koran and has dropped the barbarism, and sharia law, I will continue to have a hard time believing in the existence of ‘moderate’ Muslims.
commented 2015-10-24 02:02:12 -0400
Sam, re: Christians.
It has been said a million times before, but I will say it again….Christians don’t throw gays off roof tops. Christianity is not a political ideology, and Christians don’t gut unbelievers for not being Christian. If you think Islam is respectful to women, then you are the definition of an Islamist apologist.
Sam, you are an apologist why would they give you a hard time. Ask one of them if they renounce sharia and still call themselves Muslim and see what response you get. That will tell you.
To try to compare the Bible to the Koran is just plain ignorant. And don’t give me that ‘what about the crusades’ crap. There is a reason the New Testament was written. Christianity brought itself out of the 7 century, Islam is quite happy to stay there.
commented 2015-10-24 01:32:55 -0400
Can a christian go against the holy bible? Doesn’t the bible have a line or two on how homosexualityh is an abomination?

If I am correct, the most oppressive and sexist part of islam isn’t really islam. It was terrorist groups like the taliban that pushed the veil on women, and banned girls from going to school. Most muslims don’t identify with the taliban.

Religions are indeed like an ideology. The worst ones are the ones where people push their beliefs on others. I have had the bible crammed down my throat. I also do not want sharia law. But to be fair, I have had many christians thump their bible at me, but no muslim has ever given me a hard time over islam.

As for the slutwalk, the idea is good on paper, but stupid in reality. Women should indeed have the right of choosing what to wear. The problem here, is that slutwalks attract the worst of modern feminists. It is ironic how feminists today can be so militant on some things, but are afraid of speaking out against the niqab. After 9/11, some feminists did try to address some of the issues that muslim women were going through. But muslim women responded back by saying that they are not weak.
commented 2015-10-24 00:26:28 -0400
I’ll bet Justine would not be able to read Bravo Zulu’s list of renunciations and agree with any of them. He doesn’t see any reason to renounce sharia himself. Look at what the leftist judges just declared about face coverings at voting stations. One thing the left and Islamists have in common is that neither of them have any respect for human life. I’m not sure how he’s going to juggle the rest of it, when left wing ‘feminists’ get fed up and discontinue supporting his apologist ways. After a while it has to become clear to them that sharia really isn’t too cool from any woman’s point of view.
commented 2015-10-24 00:10:10 -0400
The mentality and behavior of these sharia Muslims is completely perverse and bizarre. I absolutely do not want these sickos with their murderous beliefs and culture stepping foot on Canadian soil. Then, of course, Canadians vote in the one person stupid enough to just let them all in.
commented 2015-10-23 23:44:40 -0400
That is exceedingly weird Michelle H. I don’t even know what to say.
commented 2015-10-23 23:20:30 -0400
Liza Rosie, you’re right, Justin is a spineless coward who would never lift a finger to protect women or anyone else from sharia law, and you’re also right about Islam seeming to be more of an ideology than a religion. It seems like it can vary from moderate to dangerously extreme depending on the person.

I was reading some YouTube comments on a video that had nothing to do with Islam, but it was brought up in the comments for some reason. These sharia types were picking on a gay Muslim who lived in the U.K. He felt safe in the U.K. because it’s illegal there for his fellow Muslims to harm him for being gay. One of the sharia Muslims was telling him he couldn’t be Muslim if he was gay or a feminist, (feminism wasn’t in the video either but it was randomly brought up too). From the comments I read by the gay Muslim, he seemed like a really nice guy, and of course his beliefs were much more toned down and modern. As I read further, I got sick of the others bullying him, so I came to his defense. The sharia Muslim told me that homosexuality was a sin that was punished by death in Islam’s sharia law, and he seemed so casual about this fact. I told him that if he killed a gay person here in the West, he would be sent to jail where the other prisoners would take care of him… if you know what I mean. He told me that it wasn’t an ordinary Muslim that dealt the punishment, it was the ruler. I asked him who the ruler was and he gave me a bizarre answer, something about Obama being the ruler of America, and if he was busy, then he would send him, (the sharia Muslim), to extract the punishment, (killing the gay person). WTF?! I told him no leader of any first-world country would give Muslims permission to murder gays. He then replied “Are you sure you’re a Muslim?” Again, WTF?! I had never said anything about being a Muslim. When I told him that, he stopped responding to me. It was just weird, but the beliefs that these barbaric people hold, this sharia law thing, really does scare me.
commented 2015-10-23 21:56:28 -0400
The slut walk is comprised of women who have been harmed and mindless followers. They are misguided and confused.
I wonder if Justin and ‘his women’ will join the slut walk next year?