May 08, 2017

In post-terror attack London, steel barriers won’t stop a toxic ideology

Rebel Staff

After the Westminster terror attack, bright yellow steel and concrete bollards, gates and barriers have been appearing all over central London.  

I describe the similarities between today's fortifications and those that covered London during the Blitz, claiming these new barriers are far less effective in the face of an ideological enemy.

 

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-05-09 11:33:51 -0400
DREW WAKARIUK;
Well the Maginot Line could have been a good deterrent if someone other than the French were manning it…
The ‘toxic ideology’ we should be most concerned about are the Marxist/Globalists that have taken over government, media and schools!
At some point all good citizens will have to bloody our hands to protect what is being stolen from us…or we can choose collectively to be devoured by Islam…
commented 2017-05-09 03:54:07 -0400
How hard is it to send a ton of border agents to the channel tunnel entrance?
commented 2017-05-08 23:38:36 -0400
Almost every country in the world in the past decade has seen increased migrants from Islam nations. All these​ countries are having nothing but problems. Look at the Philippines, their rebels pledge to Isis and their beheading western travelers. All over Europe, terrorists attacks, rapes, assaults, violence, theft, etc. What does it all have in common. All these countries where fine 25-30yrs ago. it’s the liberal attitudes that have changed the face of the world.
commented 2017-05-08 18:39:03 -0400
Yeah cause the Maginot Line was such a great deterrent.
commented 2017-05-08 18:18:02 -0400
ART VANDELAY, “This is worse than WWII. The Nazis never got their boots on the ground in the UK”.
I thought of the same. England, while fortifying itself and preparing for battle against Nazi Germany wasn’t at the same time so insane as to open its borders to warmly welcome the enemy to come in as immigrants! Sheer insanity!
commented 2017-05-08 17:13:59 -0400
They’re not fortifying the city, they’re protecting the assholes making these stupid decisions
commented 2017-05-08 16:55:40 -0400
This is worse than WWII. The Nazis never got their boots on the ground in the UK. Not only are the boots on the ground, they got their guy elected fking mayor of the biggest city. It’s over. And if anyone is stupid enough to believe that May will win in a landslide you’re not paying attention. She stupidly took the bait, the election will be in the bag, and Britain is toast. The point of no return in the west has been passed, Trump won’t make 2 years. I hope I will eat my words…but I highly doubt it. Great comments from Caolan, what he showed isn’t winning, that’s losing. Big time.
commented 2017-05-08 16:30:23 -0400
Great post Billy Howard… Outstanding points and commonsense rules that would quickly turn things around if that’s what the powers that be and the elite wanted.
However with fake news rigged polling systems and interference in our elections from international money I don’t think any of what you listed will be the standard.!!
commented 2017-05-08 14:53:53 -0400
Caolan, with reference to WWII, you pointed out “the last time London looked like this we were at war”. However, Islam means ‘submission’ and divides the world into two spheres of influence, Dar al-harb (House of War, non-Muslim land) as opposed to Dar al-Islam (House of Islam, land already submitted to Islam). Accordingly, unbeknown to most citizens of Britain, England is at war, and, as BILLY HOWARD notes, “these barriers show surrender to the enemy”, putting England well along the road to becoming Dar al-Islam.
commented 2017-05-08 14:13:27 -0400
Since 9/11 – IN THE NAME OF ISLAM (SATAN): 33,267 Attacks, 214,094 Killed, 295,282 Injured that we know of
commented 2017-05-08 13:32:04 -0400
It is possible that after the Elections, come next June, that Theresa May, who will have a vast majority, will start to act. Her best promise, to cut down immigration and control the kind of people permitted into the Country and in addition to deport undesirables, will be a good start.
commented 2017-05-08 13:26:33 -0400
@ Edward Jobin

I agree completely.

Since the main stream media, especially in Canada, almost literally owns the air wave, and TV medium via the CRTC, the only available medium is the Internet as Ezra has pointed out several times.

This means that the legacy mediums of radio and TV must be necessarily be fazed out, forcing people to use the Internet as their main go-to source for information and news.

It is using the Internet that right wing media outlets like The Rebel have an equal playing field, a playing field that the main stream media desperately does not want because they lose control over the message.
commented 2017-05-08 12:06:40 -0400
You brought up the point that the barriers are useless. I’ll tell you what would be more useful: reminding us of the old “British stiff upper lip” motto. These barriers show surrender to the enemy, not defending England from them.
Solution: Crack down on Islamist values and hate. Allow all radicals to leave UK on their own or suffer arrest for their extreme actions and views. Don’t ban Muslims, but ban their evil tenets and cultural practices. Such as:
FGM is child abuse and parents should be arrested and receive LONG jail terms for it (or emigrate).
Arrest those wearing a burka or niqab (or emigrate)
Ban Halal
Confiscate all Qurans that promote hate. Allow for a new version that promotes tolerance and love.
Follow western values or emigrate…Simple
commented 2017-05-08 11:36:08 -0400
Caolan, thanks for your report. You are right of course, add to that, Britain needs to oust the existing radicalized Islamists and repeal laws permitting Sharia to flourish.
commented 2017-05-08 11:34:30 -0400
Peter Netterville: I was thinking along the same lines as you. I think the real war is over the air waves and we have been getting our ass kicked and paying for the privilege. Don’t misunderstand me. I love the Rebel and grateful for it’s existence and the staff and all those who write in and comment, but if you are like a sizeable portion of the population who get most their news from television you are being bombarded with a very one sided bias that is in all appearances not only deceitfully slandering us all as far right but are doing their best to suppress any reasonable defense to hit the air waves. It is no wonder they want to crack down on “fake news” so they can have a monopoly over the medium and ultimately fashion the news the way they see fit. Until we figure out how to correct this balance my expectations for improvement are limited. Again I don’t mean this as a criticism against the rebel or other similar outlets and am encouraged by growth but I am simultaneously concerned if facebook, youtube and twitter hold the power to block us in the end.
commented 2017-05-08 10:52:17 -0400
Excellent point, Caolin.

However, until the main stream media starts reporting unbiased all sides of any issue or story, the people will not be able to make an informed decision about their political leaders and which ones they should vote for.

I am under the firm belief that if people are informed of the fact, the majority will choose a government that will allow them to remain free.

Most of the blame rests squarely on the solders of the socialist/globalist main stream media. The media has betrayed the principles of proper journalism for their communist agenda.